Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 8 cited by

This paper claims that circularly polarized phonons directly generate a nonzero, time-averaged electronic orbital angular momentum in two-dimensional materials through an adiabatic Berry phase, with the sign controlled by phonon chirality a

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 22:39 UTC pith:HOXDHFVJ

load-bearing objection Chiral phonons as a SOC-free handle on electronic OAM is a genuinely new idea with a plausible microscopic model; the TMD numbers rest on a missing Supplement, so peer review should insist on the derivation. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2511.09271 v3 pith:HOXDHFVJ submitted 2025-11-12 cond-mat.mes-hall

Dynamical Orbital Angular Momentum Induced by Circularly Polarized Phonons

Dapeng Yao , Dongwook Go , Yuriy Mokrousov , Shuichi Murakami This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords chiral phononsorbital angular momentumBerry phaseorbitronicstransition metal dichalcogenidesintervalley scatteringphonon pseudoangular momentumadiabatic response
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tries to establish that chiral phonons—atomic rotations with a handedness—transfer angular momentum directly to electrons' orbital motion, without requiring spin-orbit coupling. It derives a formula for the induced OAM from an adiabatic Berry phase accumulated as the electron wavefunction follows the rotating lattice, and shows that the sign follows the phonon chirality. A toy model with p orbitals on a honeycomb lattice gives the microscopic picture, and an effective model for d-orbital electrons yields a closed expression for the OAM in monolayer TMDs near the K point. If correct, this offers a lattice-based route to generating orbital currents in weak-spin-orbit materials, useful for orbitronics.

Core claim

The central claim is that a steady-state electronic OAM appears when chiral phonons are present, arising not from equilibrium band structure but from the dynamically acquired Berry phase of the adiabatically following electronic states. For monolayer TMDs the paper derives Eq. (8), an explicit momentum-resolved expression L_z(q) = −λ̃_u^4 ħ^2 ω / ((ṽ^2 q^2 + Δ^2 + λ̃_u^2)^{3/2}(ṽ^2 q^2 + λ̃_u^2)), which is negative, proportional to phonon frequency, and inversely dependent on the gap; the sign reverses when the phonon chirality is changed. This yields a predicted induced OAM density of order 10^7–10^9 ħ/cm^2 in monolayer MoS2, MoSe2, WS2, and WSe2.

What carries the argument

The key object is the phonon-induced Berry connection A_mn = i⟨ψ_m|∂_t ψ_n⟩ evaluated over one phonon cycle, combined with the instantaneous OAM matrix elements L̂_nm; the OAM formula Eq. (3) is the adiabatic response. The phonon pseudoangular momentum (PAM), defined by the C3 rotation eigenvalue of the phonon polarization, dictates which intervalley scattering channels open, and the effective Hamiltonians Eqs. (4)–(6) encode the selection rule. Carrying that structure to d orbitals yields the TMD Hamiltonian Eq. (7) and the closed-form OAM Eq. (8).

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that electrons adiabatically follow the rotating lattice—phonon frequency much smaller than the electronic gap and no degeneracies along the cycle—so Eq. (3), whose derivation is deferred to the Supplemental Material, applies.

What would settle it

Compute the time-averaged OAM for monolayer MoS2 from a direct time-dependent Schrödinger solver with a K-point chiral phonon of increasing amplitude and frequency; if the sign does not reverse when the phonon chirality is flipped, or the magnitude deviates strongly from the ω-linear law as the gap is approached, the adiabatic Berry-phase mechanism is not the whole story.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Chirality control: reversing phonon handedness reverses the induced OAM, giving a direct dial for orbital polarization.
  • No spin-orbit needed: the OAM mechanism works in weak-SOC materials like titanium, unlike spin-based phonon coupling.
  • Steady-state response: unlike a transient switching effect, the OAM persists while chiral phonons are driven, connecting to phonon-pumping experiments.
  • Estimable in TMDs: with measured K-point phonon energies (≈19–23 meV), the predicted density is 10^7–10^9 ħ/cm^2, within reach of inverse orbital Hall detection.
  • Selection rules: the PAM classification determines whether intervalley scattering is active, predicting which phonon modes generate OAM at K/K′.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same adiabatic mechanism likely applies to acoustic chiral phonons and to three-dimensional chiral lattices, where the OAM might couple to phonon thermal currents; the paper does not work these out.
  • Because Eq. (8) scales as ω and inverse cubic in the gap, the OAM should be strongly enhanced by reducing the gap or increasing phonon frequency; this suggests tunable materials or strain engineering as a testable extension.
  • If the adiabatic approximation is pushed beyond linear response, higher-order corrections in ω could cause the OAM to deviate from Eq. (8); a direct time-dependent simulation at finite ω would test the range of validity.
  • A measurement could distinguish this mechanism from spin-related effects by comparing OAM in light metals or TMDs with and without chiral phonon pumping using inverse orbital Hall signals.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that circularly polarized phonons adiabatically induce a nonzero, time-averaged electronic orbital angular momentum (OAM) through a dynamically acquired Berry phase. It first develops a microscopic p-orbital tight-binding model on a honeycomb lattice and shows numerically that chiral Γ-point phonons generate OAM whose sign is reversed for opposite phonon chirality. It then constructs effective valley-phonon Hamiltonians classified by phonon pseudoangular momentum (PAM), identifies intervalley-scattering selection rules, and extends the formalism to d orbitals in monolayer TMDs, where Eq. (8) yields an induced OAM density estimated at 10^7–10^9 ℏ/cm². The authors emphasize that the mechanism requires no spin-orbit coupling and is therefore relevant for orbitronics in weakly spin-orbit-coupled materials.

Significance. If the deferred derivations are correct, this is a timely and potentially significant contribution. It offers a general microscopic route from chiral phonons to electronic OAM, supported by TRS-based sign checks (Figs. 1c–d), a transparent selection-rule picture for valley phonons, and material estimates using externally fitted TMD parameters (Refs. [69–71]). The predicted linear-in-ω scaling and chirality-controlled sign are falsifiable. However, the central formula Eq. (3) and the key closed-form result Eq. (8) are deferred to a Supplemental Material that is not present in v1, so the quantitative core of the paper is currently unverified.

major comments (3)
  1. [Dynamical OAM with a geometric nature (Eq. 3)] Equation (3) is the central identity from which all numerical results are computed, yet it is stated without derivation and deferred to Supplemental Material [62]. In v1, [62] is only a placeholder (“URL_will_be_inserted_by_publisher”). The stated conditions (ω_phonon much smaller than the electronic gap/ℏ, no degeneracies along the phonon cycle) are not sufficient to control the result: the derivation must show why intraband Berry-phase terms A_nn, second-order wavefunction corrections, and population/Bose factors do not contribute to the time-averaged OAM. Without this, even the sign of the time average and the linear-in-ω scaling in Eq. (8) are not checkable.
  2. [Application to 2D monolayer TMDs (Eq. 8)] Equation (8) is the closed-form result underlying the claimed OAM density of 10^7–10^9 ℏ/cm², but it is simply asserted after Eq. (7). The evaluation of Eq. (3) for the four-band model—including the treatment of the q=0 degeneracy between the K and K′ blocks, the time average over one phonon period, and the q-integration leading to Fig. 4(c)—is not shown in the Letter or in an available Supplemental Material. The prefactor, the λ̃_u^4 dependence, and the linear-in-ω scaling all follow from this derivation. These steps must be supplied before the quantitative claim can be assessed.
  3. [End Matter and Table I] The absolute scale of the TMD prediction is set by the assumed phonon displacements u_M = 0.05 a0 and u_X/u_M = m_M/m_X. Because Eq. (8) scales as λ̃_u^4, the estimate is extremely sensitive to this assumption: a factor of 2 in u_M changes L_z by a factor of 16. The manuscript should state whether these amplitudes correspond to a particular experimental pumping condition (e.g., Refs. [70,71]) and provide a sensitivity range or an estimate of u_M from phonon occupation. As it stands, the quantitative claim is an input-dependent illustration rather than a robust, parameter-derived prediction.
minor comments (5)
  1. [General] The text contains several typos: “classfied” → “classified”, “writen” → “written”, “identity” → “identify” (abstract and text), “spin-orbital coupling” → “spin-orbit coupling”, and “via the the inverse spin Hall effect” → “via the inverse spin Hall effect”.
  2. [Fig. 2 vs Fig. 3] In the section on valley phonons, the text says “in Fig. 2(d)” for the time-averaged OAM with different PAM, but the surrounding discussion and figure captions indicate this should be Fig. 3(d).
  3. [Reference [62]] Reference [62] should contain the actual URL or ancillary-file link for the Supplemental Material, not the placeholder “URL_will_be_inserted_by_publisher.”
  4. [End Matter Table I] The table caption says “The upper three lines,” but the three quantities a0, f0, and f1 are better described as upper three rows; consider rewording for clarity.
  5. [Terminology] The abstract uses “dynamically induced OAM” while the main text sometimes refers to “orbital magnetization in a steady state.” These are distinct observables; the relation between the computed OAM and any orbital magnetization should be stated explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular derivation: OAM output is not used to set any parameter; the placeholder Supplemental Material is a verifiability gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

I walked the derivation chain from Eq. (3) through Eq. (8) and the TMD estimate. No step reduces to its own output. Eq. (3) is an explicit adiabatic first-order expression in the instantaneous eigenstates, energies, OAM matrix elements, and Berry connection; it contains no fitted parameter and is not chosen to reproduce the claimed OAM. Eq. (8) is presented as the evaluation of Eq. (3) on the effective MX2 Hamiltonian Eq. (7), with Δ, ṽ, and λ̃_u fixed by comparing Eq. (7) to the external two-band parameters f0, f1, a0 of Ref. [69] and by the stated assumption 'u_M is 5% of the bond length a0' (End Matter/Table I). Phonon energies are external [70,71], and no OAM data are used to tune any coefficient. The CCW/CW sign reversal is a time-reversal symmetry statement, not a fit. Although the paper contains many self-citations, the load-bearing parameterization is external or explicitly assumed; no 'uniqueness theorem' from the authors forbids alternatives, and no known empirical pattern is merely renamed. The real gap is verifiability, not circularity: the central formulas are deferred to '[62] URL_will_be_inserted_by_publisher, see Supplemental Materials for detailed discussions and calculations', so Eq. (3) and Eq. (8) cannot be checked in v1. That is an omitted proof/correctness risk, not a circular reduction. Score 2 reflects the minor self-reference to the unpublished supplement; the derivation itself is not circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

9 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, fields, or conserved quantities; the dynamical OAM is the response of existing p/d-orbital electrons to the phonon drive. The free-parameter cost is concentrated in assumed displacement amplitudes (5% of the bond length, mass-weighted ratio) that set the numerical scale, toy-model parameters in Figs. 1–2, and the two-band truncation imported from Ref [69].

free parameters (9)
  • Δ = 0.2 t_σ (p-orbital model staggered potential) = 0.2 t_σ
    Hand-set model parameter; controls the gap whose inverse-cube scaling appears in Eq. (8) and in the comparison to Ref [60].
  • u_r = 0.05 a_0 (relative phonon amplitude, p-orbital model) = 0.05 a_0
    Hand-set amplitude for the Γ-point chiral phonon used in Figs. 1(c)–(d); the OAM magnitude scales with the displacement.
  • t'_σ = 0.1 t_σ (NNN hopping, p-orbital valley model) = 0.1 t_σ
    Hand-set ratio for the NNN hopping that mediates intervalley scattering in Eqs. (5)–(6).
  • m_B = 0.8 m_A (phonon mass ratio, Fig. 2) = 0.8 m_A
    Hand-set to make the K-point phonon modes circularly polarized in the toy phonon dispersion; affects the PAM classification of modes in Fig. 2.
  • K_T = K_L/4 (phonon spring constants, Fig. 2) = K_L/4
    Hand-set ratio for the phonon toy model; shapes the phonon dispersions shown in Fig. 2(a).
  • u_M = 0.05 a_0 (M-atom displacement, TMDs) = 5% of bond length
    Assumed displacement magnitude; enters λ̃_u linearly and the headline OAM density as u^4 via Eq. (8). The 10^7–10^9 ħ/cm^2 range depends directly on this choice.
  • u_X/u_M = m_M/m_X (displacement ratio, TMDs) = mass-weighted
    Assumed eigenvector composition of the K-point phonon; combined with u_M = 0.05 a_0 gives λ̃_u = 0.1 f_1(m_M/m_X − 1) (End Matter).
  • Δ, ṽ, λ̃_u (TMD two-band parameters, Table I) = see Table I
    Matched to the external two-band model of Ref [69] (Eq. (9)); disclosed fitting, not fit to the OAM itself, but these values set the prediction's scale and gap dependence.
  • ħω (phonon energy, TMD estimate) = 23 meV (WSe2), 19 meV (MoSe2)
    Experimental inputs from Refs [70,71]; the OAM is linear in ω (Eq. (8)).
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Adiabatic following: phonon frequency much smaller than the electronic band gap
    Stated in the text before Eq. (3); justifies using instantaneous eigenstates. Not quantitatively checked for the p-orbital flat-band model with Δ = 0.2 t_σ versus an unspecified phonon frequency.
  • domain assumption Slater-Koster two-center approximation for σ-type hoppings
    Hopping integrals t^αβ_ij ∝ cos²Θ/d² etc. assume the two-center SK form (Ref [61]); standard for tight-binding but a modeling choice that excludes π-type and multi-center terms.
  • domain assumption OAM formula Eq. (3): L = ∫_k Σ_{m≠n} [ħ L̂_nm A_mn/(E_n−E_m) + c.c.]
    Borrowed from the geometric-adiabatic framework (Refs [59,66]); full derivation deferred to SM [62], which is unavailable in v1.
  • domain assumption Pseudoangular momentum conservation / C3 classification of phonon modes
    Standard chiral-phonon theory (Refs [2,3]); used to construct the effective Hamiltonians Eqs. (4)–(6) and the selection rule l_v(c)(K′) − l_v(c)(K) = l_ph(K) (mod 3).
  • domain assumption Two-band truncation for TMDs (only d_0 and d_±2 orbitals near E_F)
    Justified by the three-band TB analysis of Ref [69]; neglects X-p orbitals and remote M-d orbitals in the OAM calculation, which could alter the OAM matrix elements.
  • domain assumption TRS relation between K and K′ phonon modes (PAM at K′ is opposite)
    Standard time-reversal argument (Ref [2]); used to extend the K-point result to K′ with opposite OAM sign, giving the chirality-dependent response.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 12950 in / 18701 out tokens · 182593 ms · 2026-08-03T22:39:22.853269+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We show that the orbital angular momentum (OAM) of electrons is dynamically induced by circularly polarized phonons. The induced OAM originates from the adiabatic evolution in which electrons acquire Berry phase formulated in terms of the Berry curvature encoded in phonon displacement space. By introducing a tight-binding model with $p$ orbitals on a honeycomb lattice, we show a microscopic picture that ionic rotations modulate orbital overlaps of electrons, and calculate the generated OAM, whose sign depends on phonon chirality. We then construct an effective model for valley phonons with different phonon pseudoangular momenta (PAM) and identity their distinct intervalley-scattering channels. Our model obeys the selection rule between phonons and electrons with the orbital degree of freedom. Extending this framework to $d$-orbital electrons, our model is applied to describe the induced OAM in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides. Our results reveal a direct orbital generation mechanism that emerges even in materials with weak spin-orbital coupling, opening a new promising way for orbitronics applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.09271 by Dapeng Yao, Dongwook Go, Shuichi Murakami, Yuriy Mokrousov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Electronic states with phonon dynamics on 2D honey [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Valley chiral phonons and selection rule. (a) Phonon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Band structure and OAM calculated from the effec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Electronic OAM induced by the phonon at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Antiferro-Chiral Phonons in $\mathcal{P}\mathcal{T}$-Symmetric Antiferromagnets

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    PT-symmetric antiferromagnets support antiferro-chiral phonons whose sublattice-staggered angular momentum couples to the Neel vector via molecular Berry curvature.

  2. Antiferro-Chiral Phonons in $\mathcal{P}\mathcal{T}$-Symmetric Antiferromagnets

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    PT-symmetric antiferromagnets support antiferro-chiral phonons with sublattice-staggered angular momentum that acts as a conjugate field to the Néel vector via Néel-locked Raman-infrared hybridization.

  3. First-principles prediction of chiral-phonon-induced orbital accumulation

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    First-principles calculations predict that chiral lattice vibrations induce orbital accumulation in metals, controlled mainly by orbital character, near-degeneracies, and electron-phonon coupling.

  4. Angular momentum splitter effect of $d$-wave axial phonons in orbital altermagnets

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    d-wave axial phonons with an angular-momentum texture arise in orbital altermagnets via molecular Berry curvature, without spin-orbit coupling, enabling angular-momentum Seebeck and splitter effects.

  5. Magnetism and Topology from Circularly Polarized Phonon Floquet Engineering

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Circularly polarized phonons on honeycomb lattice produce Haldane-type mass term via effective NNN hopping, driving transition to Chern insulator with emergent magnetizations.

  6. Effective electron coupling to phonon mechanical angular momentum in helical systems

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Phonon mechanical angular momentum converts to electronic degrees of freedom via a derived second-order Hamiltonian in helical systems.

  7. Boundary condition for phonon distribution functions at a smooth crystal interface and interfacial angular momentum transfer

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0

    At a smooth crystal interface, total phonon angular momentum conservation forces circularly polarized phonons to shift sideways and generate orbital angular momentum, quantified here by new boundary conditions.

  8. Orbital Accumulation Induced by Chiral Phonons

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0

    In a p-orbital square-lattice model, chiral phonons induce a static orbital moment at second order in the lattice displacement via coupling to orbital quadrupoles.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith · cited by 7 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Zhang and Q

    L. Zhang and Q. Niu, Angular momentum of phonons and the Einstein–de Haas effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 085503 (2014)

    2014

  2. [2]

    Zhang and Q

    L. Zhang and Q. Niu, Chiral phonons at high-symmetry points in monolayer hexagonal lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 115502 (2015)

    2015

  3. [3]

    Zhang and S

    T. Zhang and S. Murakami, Chiral phonons and pseu- doangular momentum in nonsymmorphic systems, Phys. Rev. Res.4, L012024 (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    Tsunetsugu and H

    H. Tsunetsugu and H. Kusunose, Theory of energy dis- persion of chiral phonons, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.92, 023601 (2023)

    2023

  5. [5]

    Zhang, Z

    T. Zhang, Z. Huang, Z. Pan, L. Du, G. Zhang, and S. Mu- rakami, Weyl phonons in chiral crystals, Nano Letters23, 7561 (2023)

    2023

  6. [6]

    Zhang, Z

    S. Zhang, Z. Huang, M. Du, T. Ying, L. Du, and T. Zhang, The chirality of phonons: Definitions, sym- metry constraints, and experimental observation (2025), arXiv:2503.22794

    arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Zhang, Y

    T. Zhang, Y. Liu, H. Miao, and S. Murakami, New ad- vances in phonons: From band topology to quasiparticle chirality (2025), arXiv:2505.06179. 6

    arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    H. Zhu, J. Yi, M.-Y. Li, J. Xiao, L. Zhang, C.-W. Yang, R. A. Kaindl, L.-J. Li, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, Obser- vation of chiral phonons, Science359, 579 (2018)

    2018

  9. [9]

    X. Chen, X. Lu, S. Dubey, Q. Yao, S. Liu, X. Wang, Q. Xiong, L. Zhang, and A. Srivastava, Entanglement of single-photons and chiral phonons in atomically thin WSe2, Nature Physics15, 221 (2019)

    2019

  10. [10]

    Grissonnanche, S

    G. Grissonnanche, S. Th´ eriault, A. Gourgout, M.-E. Boulanger, E. Lefran¸ cois, A. Ataei, F. Lalibert´ e, M. Dion, J.-S. Zhou, S. Pyon, T. Takayama, H. Takagi, N. Doiron- Leyraud, and L. Taillefer, Chiral phonons in the pseudo- gap phase of cuprates, Nature Physics16, 1108 (2020)

    2020

  11. [11]

    S. R. Tauchert, M. Volkov, D. Ehberger, D. Kazenwadel, M. Evers, H. Lange, A. Donges, A. Book, W. Kreuz- paintner, U. Nowak, and P. Baum, Polarized phonons carry angular momentum in ultrafast demagnetization, Nature602, 73 (2022)

    2022

  12. [12]

    H. Ueda, M. Garc ´ ıa-Fern´ andez, S. Agrestini, C. P. Ro- mao, J. van den Brink, N. A. Spaldin, K.-J. Zhou, and U. Staub, Chiral phonons in quartz probed by X-rays, Nature618, 946 (2023)

    2023

  13. [13]

    Ishito, H

    K. Ishito, H. Mao, Y. Kousaka, Y. Togawa, S. Iwasaki, T. Zhang, S. Murakami, J.-i. Kishine, and T. Satoh, Truly chiral phonons inα-hgs, Nature Physics19, 35 (2023)

    2023

  14. [14]

    K. Ohe, H. Shishido, M. Kato, S. Utsumi, H. Matsuura, and Y. Togawa, Chirality-induced selectivity of phonon angular momenta in chiral quartz crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 056302 (2024)

    2024

  15. [15]

    Zhang, S

    T. Zhang, S. Murakami, and H. Miao, Weyl phonons: the connection of topology and chirality, Nature Communi- cations16, 3560 (2025)

    2025

  16. [16]

    Suzuki and S

    Y. Suzuki and S. Murakami, Disorder-induced slow re- laxation of phonon polarization, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 046301 (2025)

    2025

  17. [17]

    Fransson, Chiral phonon induced spin polarization, Phys

    J. Fransson, Chiral phonon induced spin polarization, Phys. Rev. Res.5, L022039 (2023)

    2023

  18. [18]

    Hamada and S

    M. Hamada and S. Murakami, Conversion between elec- tron spin and microscopic atomic rotation, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 023275 (2020)

    2020

  19. [19]

    K. Kim, E. Vetter, L. Yan, C. Yang, Z. Wang, R. Sun, Y. Yang, A. H. Comstock, X. Li, J. Zhou, L. Zhang, W. You, D. Sun, and J. Liu, Chiral-phonon-activated spin Seebeck effect, Nature Materials22, 322 (2023)

    2023

  20. [20]

    D. Yao, M. Matsuo, and T. Yokoyama, Electric field- induced nonreciprocal spin current due to chiral phonons in chiral-structure superconductors, Applied Physics Let- ters124, 162603 (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    Funato, M

    T. Funato, M. Matsuo, and T. Kato, Chirality-induced phonon-spin conversion at an interface, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 236201 (2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    Yao and S

    D. Yao and S. Murakami, Theory of spin magnetiza- tion driven by chiral phonons, Phys. Rev. B111, 134414 (2025)

    2025

  23. [23]

    Nishimura, T

    N. Nishimura, T. Funato, M. Matsuo, and T. Kato, The- ory of spin Seebeck effect activated by acoustic chiral phonons, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.630, 173386 (2025)

    2025

  24. [24]

    C. Xiao, Y. Ren, and B. Xiong, Adiabatically induced orbital magnetization, Phys. Rev. B103, 115432 (2021)

    2021

  25. [25]

    Y. Ren, C. Xiao, D. Saparov, and Q. Niu, Phonon mag- netic moment from electronic topological magnetization, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 186403 (2021)

    2021

  26. [26]

    Zhang, Y

    X.-W. Zhang, Y. Ren, C. Wang, T. Cao, and D. Xiao, Gate-tunable phonon magnetic moment in bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 226302 (2023)

    2023

  27. [27]

    Thingstad, A

    E. Thingstad, A. Kamra, A. Brataas, and A. Sudbø, Chi- ral phonon transport induced by topological magnons, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 107201 (2019)

    2019

  28. [28]

    Yao and S

    D. Yao and S. Murakami, Conversion of chiral phonons into magnons in ferromagnets and antiferromagnets, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.93, 034708 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    Yokoyama, Spin-spin interaction mediated by chiral phonons, J

    T. Yokoyama, Spin-spin interaction mediated by chiral phonons, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.93, 123705 (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    M. Che, J. Liang, Y. Cui, H. Li, B. Lu, W. Sang, X. Li, X. Dong, L. Zhao, S. Zhang, T. Sun, W. Jiang, E. Liu, F. Jin, T. Zhang, and L. Yang, Magnetic order induced chiral phonons in a ferromagnetic Weyl semimetal, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 196906 (2025)

    2025

  31. [31]

    Yang, Y.-Y

    R. Yang, Y.-Y. Zhu, M. Steigleder, Y.-C. Liu, C.-C. Liu, X.-G. Qiu, T. Zhang, and M. Dressel, Inherent circu- lar dichroism of phonons in magnetic Weyl semimetal co3sn2s2, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 196905 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    G. Go, S. K. Kim, and K.-J. Lee, Topological magnon- phonon hybrid excitations in two-dimensional ferromag- nets with tunable Chern numbers, Physical Review Let- ters123, 237207 (2019)

    2019

  33. [33]

    Godejohann, A

    F. Godejohann, A. V. Scherbakov, S. M. Kukhtaruk, A. N. Poddubny, D. D. Yaremkevich, M. Wang, A. Nadzeyka, D. R. Yakovlev, A. W. Rushforth, A. V. Akimov, and M. Bayer, Magnon polaron formed by selec- tively coupled coherent magnon and phonon modes of a surface patterned ferromagnet, Physical Review B102, 144438 (2020)

    2020

  34. [34]

    Vaclavkova, M

    D. Vaclavkova, M. Palit, J. Wyzula, M. Veis, V. Martiˇ sovits, M. Orlita, P. Mal´ y, M. Potemski, J. ˇSebek, J. Fabian, M. M. Glazov, M. O. Goerbig, and M. Potemski, Magnon polarons in the van der Waals antiferromagnet FePS3, Physical Review B104, 134437 (2021)

    2021

  35. [35]

    Bao, Z.-L

    S. Bao, Z.-L. Gu, Y. Shangguan, Z. Huang, J. Liao, X. Zhao, B. Zhang, Z.-Y. Dong, W. Wang, R. Kajimoto, M. Nakamura, T. Fennell, S.-L. Yu, J.-X. Li, and J. Wen, Direct observation of topological magnon polarons in a multiferroic material, Nature Communications14, 2208 (2023)

    2023

  36. [36]

    Hamada and S

    M. Hamada and S. Murakami, Phonon rotoelectric effect, Phys. Rev. B101, 144306 (2020)

    2020

  37. [37]

    Yao and S

    D. Yao and S. Murakami, Chiral-phonon-induced current in helical crystals, Phys. Rev. B105, 184412 (2022)

    2022

  38. [38]

    Yokoyama, Phonon Edelstein effect in chiral metals, Phys

    T. Yokoyama, Phonon Edelstein effect in chiral metals, Phys. Rev. B112, L020406 (2025)

    2025

  39. [39]

    Hamada, E

    M. Hamada, E. Minamitani, M. Hirayama, and S. Mu- rakami, Phonon angular momentum induced by the tem- perature gradient, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 175301 (2018)

    2018

  40. [40]

    Park and B.-J

    S. Park and B.-J. Yang, Phonon angular momentum Hall effect, Nano Letters20, 7694 (2020)

    2020

  41. [41]

    Ishizuka and M

    H. Ishizuka and M. Sato, Nonlinear optical response of truly chiral phonons: Light-induced phonon angular momentum, Peltier effect, and orbital current (2025), arXiv:2505.05313

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Orbi- tronics: The intrinsic orbital current inp-doped silicon, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 066601 (2005)

    2005

  43. [43]

    Tanaka, H

    T. Tanaka, H. Kontani, M. Naito, T. Naito, D. S. Hi- rashima, K. Yamada, and J. Inoue, Intrinsic spin Hall effect and orbital Hall effect in 4dand 5dtransition met- als, Phys. Rev. B77, 165117 (2008)

    2008

  44. [44]

    D. Go, D. Jo, C. Kim, and H.-W. Lee, Intrinsic spin and 7 orbital Hall effects from orbital texture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086602 (2018)

    2018

  45. [45]

    D. Jo, D. Go, and H.-W. Lee, Gigantic intrinsic orbital Hall effects in weakly spin-orbit coupled metals, Phys. Rev. B98, 214405 (2018)

    2018

  46. [46]

    Y.-G. Choi, D. Jo, K.-H. Ko, D. Go, K.-H. Kim, H. G. Park, C. Kim, B.-C. Min, G.-M. Choi, and H.-W. Lee, Observation of the orbital Hall effect in a light metal Ti, Nature619, 52 (2023)

    2023

  47. [47]

    Lyalin, S

    I. Lyalin, S. Alikhah, M. Berritta, P. M. Oppeneer, and R. K. Kawakami, Magneto-optical detection of the orbital Hall effect in chromium, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 156702 (2023)

    2023

  48. [48]

    Go and H.-W

    D. Go and H.-W. Lee, Orbital torque: Torque generation by orbital current injection, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 013177 (2020)

    2020

  49. [49]

    H. Xu, Y. Yang, Z. Jin, P. Wang, Z. Feng, T. Wang, W. Yue, C. Chen, F. Chen, Y. Zhu, Y. Peng, D. Zhang, Y. Jiang, and S. Zhuang, Generation and manipulation of light-induced orbital transport in Co/Zr/Al 2O3 het- erostructure probed with ultrafast terahertz emission, Communications Physics8, 115 (2025)

    2025

  50. [50]

    R. S. Fishman, J. S. Gardner, and S. Okamoto, Or- bital angular momentum of magnons in collinear mag- nets, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 167202 (2022)

    2022

  51. [51]

    G. Go, D. An, H.-W. Lee, and S. K. Kim, Magnon or- bital Nernst effect in honeycomb antiferromagnets with- out spin–orbit coupling, Nano Letters24, 5968 (2024)

    2024

  52. [52]

    An and S

    D. An and S. K. Kim, Intrinsic Nernst effect of the magnon orbital moment in a honeycomb ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B111, 104436 (2025)

    2025

  53. [53]

    Yao and T

    D. Yao and T. Yokoyama, Chiral magnon in ferromag- netic chiral crystals, Phys. Rev. B111, L060404 (2025)

    2025

  54. [54]

    Han, H.-W

    S. Han, H.-W. Lee, and K.-W. Kim, Orbital dynamics in centrosymmetric systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 176601 (2022)

    2022

  55. [55]

    Hayashi, D

    H. Hayashi, D. Go, S. Haku, Y. Mokrousov, and K. Ando, Observation of orbital pumping, Nature Electronics7, 646 (2024)

    2024

  56. [56]

    D. Go, K. Ando, A. Pezo, S. Bl¨ ugel, A. Manchon, and Y. Mokrousov, Orbital pumping by magnetization dy- namics in ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B111, L140409 (2025)

    2025

  57. [57]

    A. Pezo, D. Go, Y. Mokrousov, H. Jaffr` es, and A. Man- chon, Adiabatic spin and orbital pumping in metallic het- erostructures, Phys. Rev. B111, 134424 (2025)

    2025

  58. [58]

    D. Go, F. Freimuth, J.-P. Hanke, F. Xue, O. Gomonay, K.-J. Lee, S. Bl¨ ugel, P. M. Haney, H.-W. Lee, and Y. Mokrousov, Theory of current-induced angular mo- mentum transfer dynamics in spin-orbit coupled systems, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033401 (2020)

    2020

  59. [59]

    M. V. Berry, Quantal phase factors accompanying adia- batic changes, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A392, 45 (1984)

    1984

  60. [60]

    Urazhdin, Atomic and interatomic orbital magnetiza- tion induced in SrTiO 3 by chiral phonons, Phys

    S. Urazhdin, Atomic and interatomic orbital magnetiza- tion induced in SrTiO 3 by chiral phonons, Phys. Rev. B 111, 214435 (2025)

    2025

  61. [61]

    W. A. Harrison, Tight-binding methods, Surface Science 299-300, 298 (1994). [62]URL_will_be_inserted_by_publisher, see Supplemen- tal Materials for detailed discussions and calculations

    1994

  62. [63]

    C. Wu, D. Bergman, L. Balents, and S. Das Sarma, Flat bands and Wigner crystallization in the honeycomb op- tical lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 070401 (2007)

    2007

  63. [64]

    Wu and S

    C. Wu and S. Das Sarma,p x,y-orbital counterpart of graphene: Cold atoms in the honeycomb optical lattice, Phys. Rev. B77, 235107 (2008)

    2008

  64. [65]

    Z. Liu, F. Liu, and Y.-S. Wu, Exotic electronic states in the world of flat bands: From theory to material, Chinese Physics B23, 077308 (2014)

    2014

  65. [66]

    Trifunovic, S

    L. Trifunovic, S. Ono, and H. Watanabe, Geometric or- bital magnetization in adiabatic processes, Phys. Rev. B 100, 054408 (2019)

    2019

  66. [67]

    Y. Ren, X. Deng, Z. Qiao, C. Li, J. Jung, C. Zeng, Z. Zhang, and Q. Niu, Single-valley engineering in graphene superlattices, Phys. Rev. B91, 245415 (2015)

    2015

  67. [68]

    Liu, W.-Y

    G.-B. Liu, W.-Y. Shan, Y. Yao, W. Yao, and D. Xiao, Three-band tight-binding model for monolayers of group- VIB transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B88, 085433 (2013)

    2013

  68. [69]

    S. Fang, R. Kuate Defo, S. N. Shirodkar, S. Lieu, G. A. Tritsaris, and E. Kaxiras, Ab initio tight-binding hamil- tonian for transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B 92, 205108 (2015)

    2015

  69. [70]

    Z. Li, T. Wang, C. Jin, Z. Lu, Z. Lian, Y. Meng, M. Blei, M. Gao, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, T. Ren, T. Cao, S. Tongay, D. Smirnov, L. Zhang, and S.-F. Shi, Momentum-dark intervalley exciton in monolayer tung- sten diselenide brightened via chiral phonon, ACS Nano 13, 14107 (2019)

    2019

  70. [71]

    S. Bae, K. Matsumoto, H. Raebiger, K.-i. Shudo, Y.-H. Kim, Ø. S. Handeg ˚ ard, T. Nagao, M. Kitajima, Y. Sakai, X. Zhang, R. Vajtai, P. Ajayan, J. Kono, J. Takeda, and I. Katayama, K-point longitudinal acoustic phonons are responsible for ultrafast intervalley scattering in mono- layer MoSe2, Nature Communications13, 4279 (2022)

    2022

  71. [72]

    T. F. Nova, A. Cartella, A. Cantaluppi, M. F¨ orst, D. Bossini, R. V. Mikhaylovskiy, A. V. Kimel, R. Merlin, and A. Cavalleri, An effective magnetic field from opti- cally driven phonons, Nature Physics13, 132 (2017)

    2017

  72. [73]

    P. Wang, Z. Feng, Y. Yang, D. Zhang, Q. Liu, Z. Xu, Z. Jia, Y. Wu, G. Yu, X. Xu, and Y. Jiang, Inverse orbital Hall effect and orbitronic terahertz emission observed in the materials with weak spin-orbit coupling, npj Quan- tum Materials8, 28 (2023). End Matter Parameters in effective model of TMDs.—The energy bands atK/K ′ are composed of various orbital...

    2023