Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Self-Correcting Self-Consuming Loops for Generative Model Training

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.07087 v3 pith:JZTYOCC4 submitted 2024-02-11 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CVstat.ML

Self-Correcting Self-Consuming Loops for Generative Model Training

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.CVstat.ML
keywords dataself-consumingloopsmodelsynthetictraininggenerativecollapse
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

As synthetic data becomes higher quality and proliferates on the internet, machine learning models are increasingly trained on a mix of human- and machine-generated data. Despite the successful stories of using synthetic data for representation learning, using synthetic data for generative model training creates "self-consuming loops" which may lead to training instability or even collapse, unless certain conditions are met. Our paper aims to stabilize self-consuming generative model training. Our theoretical results demonstrate that by introducing an idealized correction function, which maps a data point to be more likely under the true data distribution, self-consuming loops can be made exponentially more stable. We then propose self-correction functions, which rely on expert knowledge (e.g. the laws of physics programmed in a simulator), and aim to approximate the idealized corrector automatically and at scale. We empirically validate the effectiveness of self-correcting self-consuming loops on the challenging human motion synthesis task, and observe that it successfully avoids model collapse, even when the ratio of synthetic data to real data is as high as 100%.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When AI Reviews Its Own Code: Recursive Self-Training Collapse in Code LLMs

    cs.SE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Experiments across code LLMs show no-review collapses fastest, human-gated filters slow collapse, and AI self-gates lose effect over time, degenerating to ungated self-training under self-confirming acceptance as prov...

  2. A Task-Centric Theory for Iterative Self-Improvement with Easy-to-Hard Curricula

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    Iterative self-improvement provably keeps improving only when initial performance lies in a moderate difficulty interval, and easy-to-hard curricula beat fixed mixtures under moderate difficulty separation and suffici...