REVIEW 5 cited by
PlotQA: Reasoning over Scientific Plots
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
PlotQA: Reasoning over Scientific Plots
read the original abstract
Existing synthetic datasets (FigureQA, DVQA) for reasoning over plots do not contain variability in data labels, real-valued data, or complex reasoning questions. Consequently, proposed models for these datasets do not fully address the challenge of reasoning over plots. In particular, they assume that the answer comes either from a small fixed size vocabulary or from a bounding box within the image. However, in practice, this is an unrealistic assumption because many questions require reasoning and thus have real-valued answers which appear neither in a small fixed size vocabulary nor in the image. In this work, we aim to bridge this gap between existing datasets and real-world plots. Specifically, we propose PlotQA with 28.9 million question-answer pairs over 224,377 plots on data from real-world sources and questions based on crowd-sourced question templates. Further, 80.76% of the out-of-vocabulary (OOV) questions in PlotQA have answers that are not in a fixed vocabulary. Analysis of existing models on PlotQA reveals that they cannot deal with OOV questions: their overall accuracy on our dataset is in single digits. This is not surprising given that these models were not designed for such questions. As a step towards a more holistic model which can address fixed vocabulary as well as OOV questions, we propose a hybrid approach: Specific questions are answered by choosing the answer from a fixed vocabulary or by extracting it from a predicted bounding box in the plot, while other questions are answered with a table question-answering engine which is fed with a structured table generated by detecting visual elements from the image. On the existing DVQA dataset, our model has an accuracy of 58%, significantly improving on the highest reported accuracy of 46%. On PlotQA, our model has an accuracy of 22.52%, which is significantly better than state of the art models.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
S1-MMAlign: A Large-Scale, Multi-Disciplinary Dataset for Scientific Figure-Text Understanding
S1-MMAlign is a new large-scale dataset of 15.5 million semantically enhanced scientific image-text pairs created via an AI recaptioning pipeline to improve multimodal understanding.
-
EpiCurveBench: Evaluating VLMs on Epidemic Curve Digitization
EpiCurveBench supplies 1,000 epidemic curve images and ECS metric shows top VLMs reach only 52.3% while correlating 1.5-3.6 times more strongly than DTW with downstream epidemiological statistics.
-
Chart-RL: Policy Optimization Reinforcement Learning for Enhanced Visual Reasoning in Chart Question Answering with Vision Language Models
Chart-RL uses RL policy optimization and LoRA to boost VLM chart reasoning, enabling a 4B model to reach 0.634 accuracy versus 0.580 for an 8B model with lower latency.
-
ChartVerse: Scaling Chart Reasoning via Reliable Programmatic Synthesis from Scratch
ChartVerse uses Rollout Posterior Entropy and truth-anchored inverse QA synthesis to produce 640K high-quality chart reasoning samples, training an 8B model that surpasses its 30B teacher.
-
ABot-OCR Technical Report
ABot-OCR is a new end-to-end VLM for direct image-to-Markdown transcription using a custom data engine and structure-constrained RL optimization, reporting SOTA scores of 92.81/93.30 on OmniDocBench v1.5/v1.6.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.