Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

Gravitational EFT for dissipative open systems

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A dissipative open system cannot be coupled to dynamical gravity without an environment energy-momentum tensor; the Stückelberg fields that restore the doubled diffeomorphism symmetry otherwise become constraints that forbid dissipation.

desk verdict The core structural result—dynamical gravity forces an environment sector because the Stückelberg field is auxiliary—is real, clearly shown for the concrete model, and new; the generality claim is overstated but the paper deserves a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.21136 v1 pith:KEQGJILH submitted 2024-12-30 hep-th astro-ph.COcond-mat.stat-mechgr-qchep-ph

Pak Hang Chris Lau , Kanji Nishii , Toshifumi Noumi This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thastro-ph.COcond-mat.stat-mechgr-qchep-ph
keywords Schwinger-KeldyshformalismdissipativeopensystemsdynamicalgravityeffectivefieldtheoryHydroEFTfluctuation-dissipationrelationgravitationalwavesblackholethermodynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a dissipative open system cannot be coupled to dynamical gravity unless the EFT includes the energy-momentum tensor of the environment sector to which energy flows. The reason is symmetry: the Schwinger-Keldysh formalism doubles every field, so gravity has two diffeomorphism symmetries, and any term that mixes the two copies breaks the off-diagonal 'noise' diffeomorphism. Restoring that symmetry with Stückelberg fields makes them auxiliary degrees of freedom whose equation of motion forces the dissipated energy to vanish, unless the environment is included. The authors complete the construction by modeling the environment with the effective field theory of dissipative fluids (HydroEFT), and apply it to a dissipative scalar, dissipative gravitational waves, and black hole thermodynamics. If correct, this restricts which dissipative gravity EFTs are self-consistent and provides a concrete recipe for building them.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the Schwinger-Keldysh closed-time-path formalism with doubled variables in the r-a basis, the decomposition of doubled diffeomorphisms into physical and noise diffeomorphisms, and the Stückelberg fields X a μ that non-linearly realize the noise symmetry. In the completed construction these Stückelberg fields become dynamical through their partner fields in HydroEFT, the fluid coordinates σ A, so that the environment's energy-momentum tensor T (hydro) μν sources gravity and absorbs the dissipated energy. The dynamical KMS symmetry then ties noise terms to dissipation coefficients, giving the fluctuation-dissipation relations used for the scalar and for gravitational waves.

What would settle it

Search for a local, diffeomorphism-invariant Schwinger-Keldysh effective action built only from the metric pair and scalar pair that satisfies the consistency conditions (2.32)-(2.34) and yields dissipative equations with nonzero on-shell energy loss; if such an action exists, the claimed necessity of an environment sector fails. Concretely, one can take the naive action (4.13), add arbitrarily many local higher-derivative terms consistent with unitarity, and check whether the X a μ equation of motion can be made non-constraining without introducing T (env) μν.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the Schwinger-Keldysh formalism for dynamical gravity, the microscopic action has doubled diffeomorphism symmetries, diffs1 × diffs2, which decompose into physical and noise diffeomorphisms. Dissipation breaks the noise symmetry, so a consistent EFT must restore it via Stückelberg fields X a μ. In a naive model with only a dissipative scalar and Einstein gravity, the X a equation of motion, γ u μ ∂ μ φ ∂ ν φ = 0 (Eq. 4.19), forces the would-be dissipated energy (Eq. 4.10) to zero; X a acts as an auxiliary field and dissipation is forbidden. The paper therefore claims that the energy-momentum tensor T (env) μν of an environment sector must appear in the Einstein equation, and proposes HydroEFT as a natural model. With HydroEFT the constraint is replaced by the conservation law ∇ μ T (hydro) μν = −γ u μ ∂ μ φ ∂ ν φ, which describes energy transfer out of the scalar. The same logic is applied to dissipative gravity, where an extrinsic-curvature term gives dissipative gravitational waves with γ = 2η/M Pl 2 and a fluctuation-dissipation relation, and to black holes surrounded by fluids, where the generalized second law is driven by a temperature gradient.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that after integrating out the environment, the bulk Schwinger-Keldysh effective action still possesses the full doubled diffeomorphism symmetry diffs1 × diffs2, so every 1-2 mixing operator must be Stückelberg-completed; if coarse graining broke the off-diagonal symmetry, the constraint (4.19) that kills dissipation would not follow in the claimed way.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any consistent Schwinger-Keldysh EFT of a dissipative open system with dynamical gravity must contain an environment energy-momentum tensor, so the space of such EFTs is smaller than fixed-background constructions suggest.
  • For a dissipative scalar, e.g. for dissipative inflation, the construction yields explicit couplings between scalar, metric, and fluid fluctuations and identifies the decoupling regime by the condition E 4 ≪ ρ 0 + p 0, under which environment fluctuations can be ignored.
  • Dissipative gravitational waves acquire a dissipation coefficient γ = 2η/M Pl 2 from fluid shear viscosity and a noise term fixed by the same viscosity through the dynamical KMS symmetry.
  • In black hole spacetimes surrounded by fluids, the model shows that generalized entropy production is controlled by the temperature difference between the black hole, defined through Kodama/dynamical surface gravity, and the fluid, defined with a blue-shift effective temperature, covering both ordinary accretion and Hawking-radiation outflow.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the necessity claim is right, existing open-system EFTs of inflation computed on fixed backgrounds must be re-examined when gravity is dynamical, since their dissipation and noise terms may violate the noise diffeomorphism constraint once the metric is integrated out.
  • The argument suggests a general principle: any locally conserved quantity coupled to a dynamical gauge symmetry requires an explicit sink sector, so analogous environment terms should appear in EFTs with dynamical gauge fields and dissipation.
  • Because HydroEFT is only one possible environment, the framework predicts environment-model dependence: replacing the fluid by a solid or superfluid phase would change noise spectra and the decoupling condition, possibly allowing observations of dissipative gravitational waves to identify the environment's phase.
  • A sharper microscopic test is available: in a simple UV model of a scalar field interacting with a thermal bath and coupled to gravity, one can compute the one-loop Schwinger-Keldysh effective action and check whether the X a μ equation becomes the claimed constraint when the bath is absent.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops a Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theory (SKEFT) for dissipative open systems coupled to dynamical gravity. The central claim is that, because gravity couples universally to all degrees of freedom, a dissipative system coupled to dynamical gravity must be supplemented by an environment sector whose energy-momentum tensor absorbs the dissipated energy. The argument proceeds by first reviewing the SK formalism and the doubled diffeomorphism symmetries diffs1 × diffs2, then decomposing them into physical and noise diffeomorphisms. For a dissipative scalar, the paper shows that a naive model with only the scalar and metric, after Stückelberg completion of the noise diffeomorphism, yields the constraint equation γ u·∂φ ∂_ν φ = 0 (Eq. 4.19), which forces dissipation to vanish. The paper then proposes to model the environment with HydroEFT, introducing dynamical Stückelberg fields for the physical diffeomorphism as fluid variables, and derives the energy transfer equation (4.29). It also includes noise terms via dynamical KMS symmetry and identifies a decoupling regime (Eq. 4.43). The same framework is applied to dissipative gravitational waves and to a generalized second law for dynamical black holes surrounded by a fluid.

Significance. If the central necessity claim is correct, the paper establishes a nontrivial restriction on the space of consistent gravitational EFTs for dissipative systems: any such EFT must include the energy-momentum tensor of an environment sector. The paper is clearly written and provides a self-contained review of the SK formalism and HydroEFT, with explicit actions at the classical and noise levels. Its strengths include concrete constructions: Eq. (4.36) gives a complete SK action for a dissipative scalar coupled to gravity and a first-order fluid, Eq. (5.13) gives the analogous action for dissipative gravitational waves, and Eq. (4.43) gives a quantitative condition for the decoupling regime. The generalized second law discussion in Sec. 5.2 is also explicit and connects the sign of entropy production to a temperature gradient between the fluid and the black hole.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4.1, after Eq. (4.9)] The sentence 'one can explicitly show that the noise diffeomorphism symmetry cannot be recovered by any modification of the energy-momentum tensor T^(φ)_μν' is a load-bearing assertion, but no proof is supplied. The generality claim of Sec. 4.2 — that the naive model fails for any dissipative operator and that an environment sector is necessary — depends on this statement. A local, covariant completion S^μν(φ,u,g) satisfying ∇_μ(T^(φ) μν + S^μν) = γ u·∂φ ∂^ν φ on the dissipative scalar EOM would make the naive model consistent without an explicit environment sector. To make the necessity claim rigorous, the authors should provide a Noether/Ward-identity argument or a concrete classification of covariant modifications showing that no such S^μν exists.
  2. [Secs. 3.2 and 4.2] The argument that the Stückelberg fields are required, and hence that Eq. (4.19) is a general obstruction, relies on the premise that the SKEFT after integrating out the environment retains the full doubled diffeomorphism symmetries diffs1 × diffs2. This premise is stated in Sec. 3.2 but not proved for the coarse-grained effective action. Because the SK boundary conditions at t_i and t_f break the off-diagonal symmetries, and because open-system EFTs in fixed backgrounds typically contain 1-2 mixing terms that explicitly break such symmetries, the authors should justify that the bulk doubled symmetry survives integration over the environment. If coarse graining instead produces an effective action with only the diagonal physical diffeomorphism, the constraint (4.19) would not follow in the claimed way and the necessity of the environment sector would need separate support.
  3. [Sec. 5.1.1, after Eq. (5.8)] The statement that 'by explicitly calculating the energy-momentum tensor of linear gravitational waves, one can show that this constraint equation prohibits energy loss' is asserted without showing the calculation. This is a supporting step for the dissipative gravitational wave application and for the claim that Eq. (5.8) is a constraint that prevents dissipation. The authors should either present the calculation or clearly state it as an assumption; as written, the reader cannot verify that the constraint indeed prohibits energy loss for general metric perturbations.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 2.2] Typo: 'corse-grained' should be 'coarse-grained' in the paragraph before Eq. (2.9).
  2. [Sec. 4.2, after Eq. (4.17)] Typo: 'preformed' should be 'performed' in the sentence 'where we just preformed integration by parts'.
  3. [Eq. (4.15) and Sec. 3.3] The transformation rule for X_a^μ is given as X_a^μ → X_a^μ + ξ_a^μ, but the noise diffeomorphism transformations in the classical limit (3.23b) and (3.23d) act on φ_a and g_aμν with a relative sign; please check the sign conventions and state them consistently.
  4. [Footnote 6] The claim that Eq. (4.12) gives 'the general SK action of gμν and gaμν that is invariant under both physical and noise diffeomorphism symmetries' is too strong unless the order in a-variables and the derivative order are specified; please clarify the statement.
  5. [Sec. 4.5, Eq. (4.43)] The derivation of the decoupling condition E^4 ≪ ρ0 + p0 is schematic and depends on several simplifying assumptions (e.g., weak β-dependence of γ, δu ~ ∂π, δβ ~ β̄ ∂π). Please state more explicitly which assumptions are required and whether the condition is meant as an order-of-magnitude estimate.
  6. [Eq. (5.36)] In the second line of Eq. (5.36), the quantities T_{μν}k^μk^ν and T^{(1)}_{μν}k^μk^ν appear but the Kodama vector k^μ is not explicitly defined there; the definition appears later in the text, so please add a pointer or define it locally.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the naive-model obstruction is an explicit EOM calculation, and the environment-sector necessity claim rests on an unproven but not circular generality assertion.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is not circular. In Sec. 4.2 the naive model is completed by Stückelberg fields and the X_a equation (4.19), γ u·∂φ ∂_ν φ = 0, is obtained by direct variation of the completed action (4.16)/(4.17); this is an honest derivation for the model considered, not an input renamed as a conclusion. The necessity of an environment sector for the specific dissipative operator follows from that constraint together with the Bianchi identity. The step to a fully general obstruction does rest on the unproven assertion in Sec. 4.1 that 'the noise diffeomorphism symmetry cannot be recovered by any modification of the energy-momentum tensor T^(φ)_μν'; this is a missing proof/completeness gap (a Noether/Ward argument would be needed), but it is not a circular reduction: no equation is identified with another by construction, and the assertion is not the same as the conclusion. The assumed preservation of diffs1 × diffs2 under coarse graining (Sec. 3.2) is likewise an assumption, not a circularity. The fluctuation-dissipation forms W and A = 2γ/β are imported from the dynamical KMS condition of prior HydroEFT literature and are presented as inputs, not as predictions. Self-citations by Noumi ([10,12]) appear only as background/future directions and are not load-bearing. Hence no circularity; score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No constants are fitted to data. The EFT coefficients (gamma, eta, zeta, beta0) are inputs from prior literature or from the model. The central claim rests on the symmetry and HydroEFT assumptions listed above. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • Dissipation coefficient gamma(beta) for the scalar and gravitational sectors
    Introduced by hand in Eq. (4.6) and later promoted to gamma(beta) in Eq. (4.36); not fitted to data. Positivity gamma > 0 is required by unitarity.
  • Shear viscosity eta(beta) and bulk viscosity zeta(beta) of the environment fluid
    Transport coefficients inherited from HydroEFT in Eqs. (4.33) and (5.12); set the gravitational wave damping gamma = 2 eta / M_Pl^2 in Sec. 5.1.2.
  • Reference inverse temperature beta0 of the initial thermal state
    Sets the initial state and the KMS periodicity in Appendix A; assumed, not measured.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Microscopic unitarity and self-adjoint initial density matrix imply SK consistency conditions (2.32).
    Invoked throughout to justify gamma > 0, eta >= 0, zeta >= 0 and the entropy production inequality.
  • domain assumption The bulk SK action after integrating out the environment retains diffs1 x diffs2; local mixing operators need Stückelberg fields.
    Central premise of Sec. 3.2 and Sec. 4.2; if false the naive model would not be inconsistent in the claimed way.
  • domain assumption The environment can be modeled by HydroEFT with a valid derivative expansion and local thermal equilibrium.
    Explicit in Sec. 4.3 and Appendix A; needed for the decoupling condition, GW damping coefficient, and GSL inequality.
  • domain assumption Apparent horizon area and Kodama surface gravity define dynamical black hole entropy and temperature.
    Used in Sec. 5.2; flagged in the paper as an ongoing issue.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gravitational EFT for dissipative open systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KEQGJILH

@misc{pith2026241221136,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gravitational EFT for dissipative open systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KEQGJILH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.21136}
}
read the original abstract

We elaborate on the effective field theory (EFT) construction for dissipative open systems coupled to dynamical gravity, in light of recent developments on the EFT of dissipative hydrodynamics (HydroEFT). Our construction is based on the Schwinger-Keldysh formalism and its symmetries as well as microscopic unitarity. A key aspect of dynamical gravity is that gravity couples to all degrees of freedom universally, hence the EFT has to take into account the energy-momentum tensor of the environment to which the energy escapes from the dissipative system of interest. We incorporate this effect by modeling the environment based on HydroEFT, assuming validity of the derivative expansion of the environment sector. For illustration, we apply our EFT recipe to a dissipative scalar field coupled to dynamical gravity that can be used, e.g., for dissipative inflation. In particular we quantify impacts of fluctuations in the environment sector on the scalar dynamics. We also apply the same framework to dissipative gravity, discussing dissipative gravitational waves and the generalized second law of black hole thermodynamics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Emergent structures in open EFTs

    hep-th 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Breaking the advanced (r minus a) symmetry in Schwinger-Keldysh open EFTs forces deformed identities among the equations of motion, and the paper gives an explicit deformed diffeomorphism identity for open gravity.

  2. Lectures on Open Systems and Cosmology

    hep-th 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 1.0 of 10

    A pedagogical review that presents the density-matrix/master-equation formalism and the Schwinger–Keldysh path integral in one notation and applies them to inflation; it claims no new result.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Crossley, P

    M. Crossley, P. Glorioso and H. Liu, Effective field theory of dissipative fluids , JHEP 09 (2017) 095 [ 1511.03646]

    arXiv 2017

  2. [2]

    Glorioso and H

    P. Glorioso and H. Liu, The second law of thermodynamics from symmetry and unitarity , 1612.07705

    arXiv

  3. [3]

    Glorioso, M

    P. Glorioso, M. Crossley and H. Liu, Effective field theory of dissipative fluids (II): classical limit, dynamical KMS symmetry and entropy current , JHEP 09 (2017) 096 [ 1701.07817]. – 38 –

    arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    Liu and P

    H. Liu and P. Glorioso, Lectures on non-equilibrium effective field theories and fluctuating hydrodynamics, PoS T ASI2017(2018) 008 [ 1805.09331]

    arXiv 2018

  5. [5]

    Sieberer, A

    L.M. Sieberer, A. Chiocchetta, A. Gambassi, U.C. T¨ auber and S. Diehl, Thermodynamic Equilibrium as a Symmetry of the Schwinger-Keldysh Action , Phys. Rev. B 92 (2015) 134307 [1505.00912]

    arXiv 2015

  6. [6]

    Haehl, R

    F.M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam and M. Rangamani, Adiabatic hydrodynamics: The eightfold way to dissipation , JHEP 05 (2015) 060 [ 1502.00636]

    arXiv 2015

  7. [7]

    Jensen, N

    K. Jensen, N. Pinzani-Fokeeva and A. Yarom, Dissipative hydrodynamics in superspace, JHEP 09 (2018) 127 [ 1701.07436]

    arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    Jensen, R

    K. Jensen, R. Marjieh, N. Pinzani-Fokeeva and A. Yarom, An entropy current in superspace , JHEP 01 (2019) 061 [ 1803.07070]

    arXiv 2019

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Minami and Y

    Y. Minami and Y. Hidaka, Spontaneous symmetry breaking and Nambu-Goldstone modes in dissipative systems, Phys. Rev. E 97 (2018) 012130 [ 1509.05042]

    2018 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Hongo, S

    M. Hongo, S. Kim, T. Noumi and A. Ota, Effective field theory of time-translational symmetry breaking in nonequilibrium open system , JHEP 02 (2019) 131 [ 1805.06240]

    2019 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Hayata and Y

    T. Hayata and Y. Hidaka, Diffusive Nambu-Goldstone modes in quantum time-crystals , 1808.07636

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    Hongo, S

    M. Hongo, S. Kim, T. Noumi and A. Ota, Effective Lagrangian for Nambu-Goldstone modes in nonequilibrium open systems , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 056020 [ 1907.08609]

    2021 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Landry, The coset construction for non-equilibrium systems , JHEP 07 (2020) 200 [1912.12301]

    M.J. Landry, The coset construction for non-equilibrium systems , JHEP 07 (2020) 200 [1912.12301]

    2020 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Landry, Non-equilibrium effective field theory and second sound , JHEP 04 (2021) 213 [2008.11725]

    M.J. Landry, Non-equilibrium effective field theory and second sound , JHEP 04 (2021) 213 [2008.11725]

    2021 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Landry, Dynamical chemistry: non-equilibrium effective actions for reactive fluids , J

    M.J. Landry, Dynamical chemistry: non-equilibrium effective actions for reactive fluids , J. Stat. Mech. 2207 (2022) 073205 [ 2006.13220]

    2022 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Landry, Higher-form and (non-)St¨ uckelberg symmetries in non-equilibrium systems, 2101.02210

    M.J. Landry, Higher-form and (non-)St¨ uckelberg symmetries in non-equilibrium systems, 2101.02210

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    Fujii and M

    K. Fujii and M. Hongo, Effective field theory of fluctuating wall in open systems: from a kink in Josephson junction to general domain wall , SciPost Phys. 12 (2022) 160 [ 2109.10335]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Polonyi, Equilibrium properties and decoherence of an open harmonic oscillator , J

    J. Polonyi, Equilibrium properties and decoherence of an open harmonic oscillator , J. Phys. A 53 (2020) 235301 [ 1904.08706]

    2020 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Ota, Fluctuation-dissipation relation in cosmic microwave background , JCAP 05 (2024) 062 [2402.07623]

    A. Ota, Fluctuation-dissipation relation in cosmic microwave background , JCAP 05 (2024) 062 [2402.07623]

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Salcedo, T

    S.A. Salcedo, T. Colas and E. Pajer, The open effective field theory of inflation , JHEP 10 (2024) 248 [ 2404.15416]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Hongo, N

    M. Hongo, N. Sogabe, M.A. Stephanov and H.-U. Yee, Schwinger-Keldysh effective action for hydrodynamics with approximate symmetries , 2411.08016

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    Salcedo, T

    S.A. Salcedo, T. Colas and E. Pajer, An Open Effective Field Theory for light in a medium , 2412.12299

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    Akyuz, G

    C.O. Akyuz, G. Goon and R. Penco, The Schwinger-Keldysh coset construction , JHEP 06 (2024) 004 [ 2306.17232]. – 39 –

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Sieberer, M

    L.M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold and S. Diehl, Keldysh Field Theory for Driven Open Quantum Systems, Rept. Prog. Phys. 79 (2016) 096001 [ 1512.00637]

    2016 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Chen-Lin, L.V

    X. Chen-Lin, L.V. Delacr´ etaz and S.A. Hartnoll, Theory of diffusive fluctuations , Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 091602 [ 1811.12540]

    2019 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Chao and T

    J. Chao and T. Schaefer, Multiplicative noise and the diffusion of conserved densities , JHEP 01 (2021) 071 [ 2008.01269]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Cheung, P

    C. Cheung, P. Creminelli, A.L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan and L. Senatore, The Effective Field Theory of Inflation , JHEP 03 (2008) 014 [ 0709.0293]

    2008 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Lopez Nacir, R.A

    D. Lopez Nacir, R.A. Porto, L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga, Dissipative effects in the Effective Field Theory of Inflation , JHEP 01 (2012) 075 [ 1109.4192]

    2012 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Kamenev, Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems , Cambridge University Press (2011)

    A. Kamenev, Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems , Cambridge University Press (2011)

    2011

  22. [30]

    BenTov, Schwinger-Keldysh path integral for the quantum harmonic oscillator , 2102.05029

    Y. BenTov, Schwinger-Keldysh path integral for the quantum harmonic oscillator , 2102.05029

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    Weinberg, Effective Field Theory for Inflation , Phys

    S. Weinberg, Effective Field Theory for Inflation , Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 123541 [0804.4291]

    2008 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Bellac, Thermal Field Theory , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (3, 2011), 10.1017/CBO9780511721700

    M.L. Bellac, Thermal Field Theory , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (3, 2011), 10.1017/CBO9780511721700

    2011 doi

  25. [33]

    Bekenstein, Black holes and the second law , Lett

    J.D. Bekenstein, Black holes and the second law , Lett. Nuovo Cim. 4 (1972) 737

    1972

  26. [34]

    Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy , Phys

    J.D. Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy , Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 2333

    1973

  27. [35]

    Bekenstein, Generalized second law of thermodynamics in black hole physics , Phys

    J.D. Bekenstein, Generalized second law of thermodynamics in black hole physics , Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 3292

    1974

  28. [36]

    Hayward, General laws of black hole dynamics , Phys

    S.A. Hayward, General laws of black hole dynamics , Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 6467

    1994

  29. [37]

    Hayward, Unified first law of black hole dynamics and relativistic thermodynamics , Class

    S.A. Hayward, Unified first law of black hole dynamics and relativistic thermodynamics , Class. Quant. Grav. 15 (1998) 3147 [ gr-qc/9710089]

    1998 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Ashtekar and B

    A. Ashtekar and B. Krishnan, Dynamical horizons: Energy, angular momentum, fluxes and balance laws, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 261101 [ gr-qc/0207080]

    2002 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Nielsen and M

    A.B. Nielsen and M. Visser, Production and decay of evolving horizons , Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) 4637 [ gr-qc/0510083]

    2006 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Nielsen, Black holes and black hole thermodynamics without event horizons , Gen

    A.B. Nielsen, Black holes and black hole thermodynamics without event horizons , Gen. Rel. Grav. 41 (2009) 1539 [ 0809.3850]

    2009 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Debnath, M

    U. Debnath, M. Jamil, R. Myrzakulov and M. Akbar, Thermodynamics of Evolving Lorentzian Wormhole at Apparent and Event Horizons , Int. J. Theor. Phys. 53 (2014) 4083 [1202.1706]

    2014 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Hollands, R.M

    S. Hollands, R.M. Wald and V.G. Zhang, Entropy of dynamical black holes , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 024070 [ 2402.00818]

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Visser and Z

    M.R. Visser and Z. Yan, Properties of dynamical black hole entropy , JHEP 10 (2024) 029 [2403.07140]

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Takeda, Coarse-graining black holes out of equilibrium with boundary observables on time slice, JHEP 05 (2024) 319 [ 2403.07275]

    D. Takeda, Coarse-graining black holes out of equilibrium with boundary observables on time slice, JHEP 05 (2024) 319 [ 2403.07275]. – 40 –

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    D. Kong, Y. Tian, H. Zhang and J. Zhao, Dynamical black hole entropy beyond general relativity from the Einstein frame , 2412.00647

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    Nielsen and J.H

    A.B. Nielsen and J.H. Yoon, Dynamical surface gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 25 (2008) 085010 [0711.1445]

    2008 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Hayward, R

    S.A. Hayward, R. Di Criscienzo, L. Vanzo, M. Nadalini and S. Zerbini, Local Hawking temperature for dynamical black holes , Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009) 062001 [ 0806.0014]

    2009 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Misner and D.H

    C.W. Misner and D.H. Sharp, Relativistic equations for adiabatic, spherically symmetric gravitational collapse, Phys. Rev. 136 (1964) B571

    1964

  41. [49]

    Kodama, Conserved Energy Flux for the Spherically Symmetric System and the Back Reaction Problem in the Black Hole Evaporation , Prog

    H. Kodama, Conserved Energy Flux for the Spherically Symmetric System and the Back Reaction Problem in the Black Hole Evaporation , Prog. Theor. Phys. 63 (1980) 1217

    1980

  42. [50]

    Murk and D.R

    S. Murk and D.R. Terno, Universal properties of the near-horizon geometry , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 064082 [ 2010.03784]

    2021 arXiv

  43. [51]

    R.B. Mann, S. Murk and D.R. Terno, Surface gravity and the information loss problem , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 124032 [ 2109.13939]

    2022 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Murk and D.R

    S. Murk and D.R. Terno, Physical black holes in semiclassical gravity , in 16th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity, Astrophysics and Relativistic Field Theories , 10, 2021, DOI [ 2110.12761]

    2021 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Kurpicz, N

    F. Kurpicz, N. Pinamonti and R. Verch, Temperature and entropy–area relation of quantum matter near spherically symmetric outer trapping horizons , Lett. Math. Phys. 111 (2021) 110 [2102.11547]

    2021 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Murk and I

    S. Murk and I. Soranidis, Kinematic and energy properties of dynamical regular black holes , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 124007 [ 2309.06002]

    2023 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Visser, Dirty black holes: Thermodynamics and horizon structure , Phys

    M. Visser, Dirty black holes: Thermodynamics and horizon structure , Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 2445 [ hep-th/9203057]

    1992 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Abreu and M

    G. Abreu and M. Visser, Kodama time: Geometrically preferred foliations of spherically symmetric spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 044027 [ 1004.1456]

    2010 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Pielahn, G

    M. Pielahn, G. Kunstatter and A.B. Nielsen, Dynamical Surface Gravity in Spherically Symmetric Black Hole Formation , Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 104008 [ 1103.0750]

    2011 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Cropp, S

    B. Cropp, S. Liberati and M. Visser, Surface gravities for non-Killing horizons , Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 125001 [ 1302.2383]

    2013 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Hawking, Particle Creation by Black Holes , Commun

    S.W. Hawking, Particle Creation by Black Holes , Commun. Math. Phys. 43 (1975) 199

    1975

  52. [60]

    Baggioli and M

    M. Baggioli and M. Landry, Effective Field Theory for Quasicrystals and Phasons Dynamics , SciPost Phys. 9 (2020) 062 [ 2008.05339]. – 41 –

    2020 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.