Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 2 minor 5 cited by

TransitionListener v2.0 -- Robust gravitational wave predictions for cosmological phase transitions

T0 review · 1 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-19 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read TransitionListener v2.0 tracks the true-vacuum fraction and mean bubble separation to produce consistent gravitational wave predictions from phase transitions.

desk verdict The v2 update adds self-consistent dynamics and bubble separation but still relies on unverified GW templates in the supercooled regimes it targets. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.15259 v1 pith:KMBOA2OJ submitted 2026-05-14 hep-ph astro-ph.CO

Jonas Matuszak , Carlo Tasillo This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.CO
keywords cosmologicalphasetransitionsgravitationalwavesbubbledynamicsreheatingmeanseparationLISApulsartimingarraysscalarpotential
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper presents an updated software framework that calculates gravitational wave signals from first-order cosmological phase transitions by following the full dynamics of the transition rather than relying on simplified approximations. It follows how the fraction of space in the true vacuum grows over time, how that growth slows the overall expansion of the universe, and how energy is released as heat when bubbles fill the space. A direct calculation of the typical distance between bubbles then feeds into established templates for the three main sources of gravitational waves: bubble collisions, sound waves, and turbulence. This approach matters because the strongest signals are expected from very slow or supercooled transitions where older methods lose accuracy.

What carries the argument

self-consistent evolution of the true-vacuum fraction together with direct computation of mean bubble separation

What would settle it

A direct numerical simulation of bubble nucleation and expansion in a strongly supercooled model whose gravitational wave spectrum is then compared to the spectrum predicted by TransitionListener v2.0 using the same input potential.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Version 2 introduces a self-consistent treatment of the transition dynamics, including the evolution of the true-vacuum fraction and its backreaction on the Hubble expansion, as well as a consistent description of reheating during percolation, and computes the mean bubble separation directly to map onto gravitational wave templates from bubble collisions, sound waves, and turbulence.

Load-bearing premise

The templates derived from existing simulations of bubble collisions, sound waves, and turbulence remain accurate when applied to the strongly supercooled and ultraslow regimes targeted by the new code.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Numerical stability improves for transitions that are strongly supercooled or ultraslow.
  • Large parameter scans can now be performed with consistent physical modeling of the expansion history and reheating.
  • Signal-to-noise ratios for detectors such as LISA and pulsar timing arrays become more reliable across a wider range of models.
  • Built-in interfaces support Bayesian inference on the underlying scalar potential parameters.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the new predictions differ noticeably from older codes in the supercooled regime, existing upper limits from pulsar timing arrays may need re-evaluation.
  • The reheating description could be tested by checking whether the predicted peak frequency and amplitude line up with future LISA data for a given model.
  • Users could extend the framework to include additional sources such as magnetohydrodynamic turbulence once the core dynamics are validated.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents TransitionListener v2.0, a Python framework providing an end-to-end pipeline from a user-defined scalar potential to gravitational wave (GW) spectra and signal-to-noise ratios for cosmological phase transitions. Version 2 introduces self-consistent treatment of transition dynamics, including evolution of the true-vacuum fraction with backreaction on Hubble expansion, consistent reheating during percolation, and direct computation of mean bubble separation to map onto spectral templates for bubble collisions, sound waves, and turbulence. The code includes built-in sensitivity curves for LISA, Einstein Telescope, and PTAs, interfaces to PTA likelihoods, and wrappers for Bayesian inference and parameter scans, with emphasis on the strongly supercooled and ultraslow regime.

Significance. If the self-consistent dynamics and mapping procedure hold under scrutiny, the package would offer a useful advance for precision GW forecasts in models predicting strong first-order transitions. The focus on regimes where conventional approximations break down aligns with the parameter space expected to yield the most detectable signals at LISA and PTAs. Explicit support for reproducible scans and likelihood interfaces strengthens its potential community impact.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and GW spectrum section] Abstract (final paragraph) and the description of the GW mapping procedure: the central claim of 'robust' and 'faithful' predictions rests on applying state-of-the-art simulation templates for bubble collisions, sound waves, and turbulence to the strongly supercooled and ultraslow regimes targeted by the new dynamics. The manuscript does not provide validation, error budgets, or tests demonstrating that the template functional forms and normalizations remain accurate when the altered expansion history modifies wall velocities, sound-wave lifetimes, and turbulence injection scales. This assumption is load-bearing for the robustness claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the mean bubble separation and its mapping to the template parameters could be clarified with an explicit equation relating the computed quantity to the peak frequency and amplitude in each channel.
  2. The manuscript would benefit from a dedicated validation subsection comparing v2.0 outputs to known analytic limits or previous codes in the weakly supercooled regime before presenting results in the ultraslow limit.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for recognizing the potential utility of TransitionListener v2.0 for precision GW forecasts in challenging regimes. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and GW spectrum section] Abstract (final paragraph) and the description of the GW mapping procedure: the central claim of 'robust' and 'faithful' predictions rests on applying state-of-the-art simulation templates for bubble collisions, sound waves, and turbulence to the strongly supercooled and ultraslow regimes targeted by the new dynamics. The manuscript does not provide validation, error budgets, or tests demonstrating that the template functional forms and normalizations remain accurate when the altered expansion history modifies wall velocities, sound-wave lifetimes, and turbulence injection scales. This assumption is load-bearing for the robustness claim.

    Authors: We agree that the robustness claim is load-bearing and that the manuscript does not contain dedicated validation or quantitative error budgets for the application of existing simulation templates under the modified expansion histories that arise in strongly supercooled transitions. The new dynamics module computes a self-consistent mean bubble separation and reheating history that serve as improved inputs to the templates, but the functional forms and normalizations themselves originate from simulations performed in standard cosmologies. We will revise the manuscript by adding a dedicated paragraph in the GW spectrum section (and a corresponding note in the abstract) that explicitly states the assumptions inherited from the templates, discusses how altered wall velocities and sound-wave lifetimes could affect the spectra, and provides a qualitative error estimate drawn from the existing literature on non-standard expansion. This will qualify the language of 'robust' and 'faithful' predictions accordingly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained from user potential

full rationale

The framework computes transition quantities (true-vacuum fraction evolution, Hubble backreaction, reheating, mean bubble separation) directly from a user-defined scalar potential using self-consistent dynamics. These feed into a mapping onto pre-existing GW templates from external state-of-the-art simulations. No self-definitional loops, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain. The pipeline remains independent of the target GW spectra themselves and is externally falsifiable via the input potential and simulation templates.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is necessarily incomplete. The framework relies on standard cosmological assumptions plus external simulation templates whose validity in the target regime is taken as given.

assumptions (2)
  • standard math Standard Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker cosmology and general relativity govern the background expansion during the transition.
    Invoked implicitly when backreaction on the Hubble rate is discussed.
  • domain assumption Gravitational-wave spectral templates from existing bubble-collision, sound-wave, and turbulence simulations remain applicable in the strongly supercooled and ultraslow regimes.
    Stated in the final paragraph of the abstract as the justification for the direct mean-bubble-separation mapping.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of TransitionListener v2.0 -- Robust gravitational wave predictions for cosmological phase transitions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KMBOA2OJ

@misc{pith2026260515259,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: TransitionListener v2.0 -- Robust gravitational wave predictions for cosmological phase transitions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KMBOA2OJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.15259}
}
read the original abstract

Gravitational wave backgrounds from strong first-order cosmological phase transitions are key observational targets predicted by many SM extensions and might be observed by current and future observatories like LISA, the Einstein Telescope or pulsar timing arrays (PTAs). Still, their precise forecast given a specific model remains a challenge. In this article, we present TransitionListener v2.0, a Python framework for precision studies of cosmological phase transitions and their associated gravitational wave (GW) signals. The code provides an end-to-end pipeline from a user-defined scalar potential to GW spectra and signal-to-noise ratios, enabling both benchmark studies and large-scale parameter scans. Version 2 introduces a self-consistent treatment of the transition dynamics, including the evolution of the true-vacuum fraction and its backreaction on the Hubble expansion, as well as a consistent description of reheating during percolation. A direct computation of the mean bubble separation allows to faithfully map to the GW spectral templates from bubble collisions, sound waves, and turbulence stemming from state-of-the-art simulations. TransitionListener includes built-in sensitivity curves for space- and ground-based detectors and PTAs, interfaces to PTA likelihoods, and wrappers for Bayesian model inference and high-dimensional parameter scans. Compared to existing public tools, TransitionListener v2.0 improves the physical consistency and numerical stability of GW predictions across a wide range of models, with particular emphasis on the strongly supercooled and ultraslow transition regime where conventional approximations break down and the most promising GW signals are expected.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.15259 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Workflow of the TransitionListener pipeline. Given a user-defined tree-level po￾tential and mass spectrum of a theory, the 1-loop effective potential is constructed, the phase structure is traced and possible first-order transitions are identified. For each possible transition, the nucleation history and the evolution of the true-vacuum fraction is computed. Using this, the percolation and reheating temperatures are… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Evolution of the energy densities in the false and true vacuum around the phase [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Numerical validation of the f 1/3 perc correction relating RH with β/H, based on a line scan over the quartic coupling λ in the dark Abelian Higgs model (g = 1, v = 100 MeV), defined in appendix A. Left: Three different definitions of β/H. The factor f 1/3 perc is needed to achieve consistency, see also appendix C for a derivation. Middle: For ultraslow transitions, the conventional definition of (β/H)S3 , based on … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: Reheating temperature and its approximation T approx perc = Tperc (1 + α) 1/4 as a function of the gauge coupling g in the conformal U(1)′ model (y = 0.01, v = 140 MeV). Right: Comparison of the self-consistent and approximate (¯ρ = ρf) solution of the percolatio…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Gravitational wave spectra for the four benchmark points listed in table [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Module dependencies inside TransitionListener. evolution described by the effective degrees of freedom g ext eff and h ext eff , cf. eq. (2.11). Helper functions (visualised in green in fig. 6) for the bookkeeping of different types of particles are implemented in part…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Flowchart showing the structure of the percolation algorithm. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Compilation of the output plots using the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Output of the action plot option for the dark flipflop benchmark point 2 from table 1. Upper panel: Bounce action S3/T in dependence of temperature. Lower panel: Corresponding bubble nucleation rate Γ in units of H4 . 100 101 102 Bubble radius / GeV−1 0 2 4 φi / GeV φ0…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Bubble profile at nucleation for the dark flipflop benchmark point 2 from table [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: True-vacuum fraction evolution of the conformal dark [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Overview plot of the example line scan based on the conformal model near the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Overview plot of the example grid scan for the Abelian dark Higgs model from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Posterior distributions in the α–(β/H)RH plane for the three dark sector models described in appendix A. Left: Generic model predictions generated based on flat and log priors using TransitionListener’s random scan method. Right: Parameter regions favoured by the indi…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Comparison of a 2HDM benchmark scan between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Relative differences between the BSMPT and TL curves shown in fig. 15. Dotted vertical lines indicate points which we manually identified as unflagged BSMPT errors, which we excluded from this comparison. Note that BSMPT does not automatically flag these points as inv…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can the universe be matter-dominated after a supercooled first-order phase transition?

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    After a supercooled first-order phase transition, the scalar field's equation of state is set by the bubble-wall Lorentz factor γ*, and matter domination is delayed until a/a* ≃ γ* in the free-streaming limit.

  2. Polyakov Loops Tame Phase Transitions

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Polyakov loop contributions to the thermal effective potential soften electroweak phase transitions, disfavoring first-order transitions and suppressing gravitational-wave signals.

  3. A critical look at low-scale cosmological phase transitions in the PTA era

    hep-ph 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Precision study of dark sector phase transitions finds PTA-favored parameters near EFT breakdown with disfavored GW signals after higher-order corrections.

  4. HydroGrav: Precise hydrodynamics and gravitational waves for cosmological phase transitions

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    HydroGrav code computes self-similar fluid profiles and GW spectra using exact EOS from effective potentials for EWPT models, identifying parameter regions in a Z2 SM extension where simplified EOS differ in amplitude...

  5. Natural Supercooling and Reheating along Supersymmetric Flat Directions and Observable Gravitational Waves at the Einstein Telescope and the Cosmic Explorer

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Radiative barriers in SUSY flat directions enable supercooled PTs yielding Ω_GW h² up to ~3e-10 for M_λ̃/v_X in 0.05-0.23, with the hidden sector also reproducing Ω_CDM h²=0.12 for m_q ~30-800 keV.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

147 extracted references · 147 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanim et al. “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters”. In:Astron. As- trophys.641 (2020), A6.doi:10 . 1051 / 0004 - 6361 / 201833910. arXiv:1807 . 06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Cosmological Backgrounds of Gravitational Waves

    Chiara Caprini and Daniel G. Figueroa. “Cosmological Backgrounds of Gravitational Waves”. In:Class. Quant. Grav.35.16 (2018), p. 163001.doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aac

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aac 2018

  3. [3]

    arXiv:1801.04268 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  4. [4]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    Pau Amaro-Seoane et al. “Laser Interferometer Space Antenna”. In: (Feb. 2017). arXiv: 1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    Science Case for the Einstein Telescope

    Michele Maggiore et al. “Science Case for the Einstein Telescope”. In:JCAP03 (2020), p. 050.doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03/050. arXiv:1912.02622 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03/050 2020

  6. [6]

    The International Pulsar Timing Array second data release: Search for an isotropic gravitational wave background

    J. Antoniadis et al. “The International Pulsar Timing Array second data release: Search for an isotropic gravitational wave background”. In:Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 510.4 (2022), pp. 4873–4887.doi:10 . 1093 / mnras / stab3418. arXiv:2201 . 03980 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-Wave Background

    Gabriella Agazie et al. “The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational- Wave Background”. In:Astrophys. J. Lett.951.1 (2023).doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acd ac6. arXiv:2306.16213 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acd 2023

  8. [8]

    The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array III. Search for gravitational wave signals

    J. Antoniadis et al. “The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array III. Search for gravitational wave signals”. In:Astron. Astrophys.678 (2023), A50.doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346844. arXiv:2306.16214 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346844 2023

Show all 147 references
  1. [9]

    Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Back- ground with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I

    Heng Xu et al. “Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Back- ground with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I”. In:Res. Astron. As- trophys.23.7 (2023), p. 075024.doi:10.1088/1674-4527/acdfa5. arXiv:2306.16216 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 doi arXiv

  2. [10]

    Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array

    Daniel J. Reardon et al. “Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array”. In:Astrophys. J. Lett.951.1 (2023), p. L6.doi:10.3 847/2041-8213/acdd02. arXiv:2306.16215 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  3. [11]

    The MeerKAT Pulsar Timing Array: The first search for grav- itational waves with the MeerKAT radio telescope

    Matthew T. Miles et al. “The MeerKAT Pulsar Timing Array: The first search for grav- itational waves with the MeerKAT radio telescope”. In: (Dec. 2024).doi:10.1093/mnr as/stae2571. arXiv:2412.01153 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 doi

  4. [12]

    Weinberg model in the hot universe

    D. A. Kirzhnits. “Weinberg model in the hot universe”. In:JETP Lett.15 (1972), pp. 529– 531

    1972

  5. [13]

    Symmetry Behavior at Finite Temperature

    L. Dolan and R. Jackiw. “Symmetry Behavior at Finite Temperature”. In:Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974), pp. 3320–3341.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.9.3320

    1974 doi

  6. [14]

    Gauge and Global Symmetries at High Temperature

    Steven Weinberg. “Gauge and Global Symmetries at High Temperature”. In:Phys. Rev. D9 (1974), pp. 3357–3378.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.9.3357

    1974 doi

  7. [15]

    Symmetry Behavior in Gauge Theories

    D. A. Kirzhnits and Andrei D. Linde. “Symmetry Behavior in Gauge Theories”. In: Annals Phys.101 (1976), pp. 195–238.doi:10.1016/0003-4916(76)90279-7

    1976 doi

  8. [16]

    Is there a hot electroweak phase transition atm H ≳m W ?

    K. Kajantie et al. “Is there a hot electroweak phase transition atm H ≳m W ?” In: Phys. Rev. Lett.77 (1996), pp. 2887–2890.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2887. arXiv: hep-ph/9605288. 59

    1996 doi arXiv

  9. [17]

    The QCD transition temperature: results with physical masses in the continuum limit II

    Y. Aoki et al. “The QCD transition temperature: results with physical masses in the continuum limit II.” In:JHEP06 (2009), p. 088.doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/06/08

    2009 doi

  10. [18]

    arXiv:0903.4155 [hep-lat]

    arXiv

  11. [19]

    Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe

    A. D. Sakharov. “Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe”. In:Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.5 (1967), pp. 32–35.doi:10.1070/PU1991 v034n05ABEH002497

    1967 doi

  12. [20]

    Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln

    F. Zwicky. “Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln”. In:Helv. Phys. Acta6 (1933), pp. 110–127.doi:10.1007/s10714-008-0707-4

    1933 doi

  13. [21]

    Rotation of the Andromeda Nebula from a Spec- troscopic Survey of Emission Regions

    Vera C. Rubin and W. Kent Ford Jr. “Rotation of the Andromeda Nebula from a Spec- troscopic Survey of Emission Regions”. In:Astrophys. J.159 (1970), pp. 379–403.doi: 10.1086/150317

    1970 doi

  14. [22]

    Implications of Dynamical Symmetry Breaking

    Steven Weinberg. “Implications of Dynamical Symmetry Breaking”. In:Phys. Rev. D13 (1976), pp. 974–996.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.19.1277

    1976 doi

  15. [23]

    Dynamics of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in the Weinberg- Salam Theory

    Leonard Susskind. “Dynamics of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in the Weinberg- Salam Theory”. In:Phys. Rev. D20 (1979), pp. 2619–2625.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevD .20.2619

    1979

  16. [24]

    µ→eγat a Rate of One Out of 10 9 Muon Decays?

    Peter Minkowski. “µ→eγat a Rate of One Out of 10 9 Muon Decays?” In:Phys. Lett. B67 (1977), pp. 421–428.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(77)90435-X

    1977 doi

  17. [25]

    Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos

    Tsutomu Yanagida. “Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos”. In:Conf. Proc. C7902131 (1979). Ed. by Osamu Sawada and Akio Sugamoto, pp. 95–99

    1979

  18. [26]

    A Theory of Spontaneous T Violation

    T. D. Lee. “A Theory of Spontaneous T Violation”. In:Phys. Rev. D8 (1973). Ed. by G. Feinberg, pp. 1226–1239.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.8.1226

    1973 doi

  19. [27]

    Lepton Number as the Fourth Color

    Jogesh C. Pati and Abdus Salam. “Lepton Number as the Fourth Color”. In:Phys. Rev. D10 (1974), pp. 275–289.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.275

    1974 doi

  20. [28]

    Supersymmetry, Supergravity and Particle Physics

    Hans Peter Nilles. “Supersymmetry, Supergravity and Particle Physics”. In:Phys. Rept. 110 (1984), pp. 1–162.doi:10.1016/0370-1573(84)90008-5

    1984 doi

  21. [29]

    Unity of All Elementary Particle Forces

    H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow. “Unity of All Elementary Particle Forces”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.32 (1974), pp. 438–441.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.32.438

    1974 doi

  22. [30]

    Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts

    Bob Holdom. “Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts”. In:Phys. Lett. B166 (1986), pp. 196–198.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)91377-8

    1986 doi

  23. [31]

    Gravitational Waves from a Dark Phase Transition

    Pedro Schwaller. “Gravitational Waves from a Dark Phase Transition”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.115.18 (2015), p. 181101.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.181101. arXiv:1504.0 7263 [hep-ph]

    2015 doi

  24. [32]

    On the Anomalous Electroweak Baryon Number Nonconservation in the Early Universe

    V. A. Kuzmin, V. A. Rubakov, and M. E. Shaposhnikov. “On the Anomalous Electroweak Baryon Number Nonconservation in the Early Universe”. In:Phys. Lett. B155 (1985), p. 36.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)91028-7

    1985 doi

  25. [33]

    Baryogenesis via relativistic bubble expansion

    Iason Baldes et al. “Baryogenesis via relativistic bubble expansion”. In:Phys. Rev. D 104.11 (2021), p. 115029.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevD . 104 . 115029. arXiv:2106 . 15602 [hep-ph]

    2021

  26. [34]

    Leptogenesis via bubble collisions

    Martina Cataldi and Bibhushan Shakya. “Leptogenesis via bubble collisions”. In:JCAP 11 (2024), p. 047.doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/11/047. arXiv:2407.16747 [hep-ph]

    2024 doi

  27. [35]

    Standard Model Baryon Number Violation at Zero Temperature from Higgs Bubble Collisions

    Nabeen Bhusal et al. “Standard Model Baryon Number Violation at Zero Temperature from Higgs Bubble Collisions”. In: (Aug. 2025). arXiv:2508.21825 [hep-ph]. 60

    2025 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Filtered Dark Matter at a First Order Phase Transition

    Michael J. Baker, Joachim Kopp, and Andrew J. Long. “Filtered Dark Matter at a First Order Phase Transition”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.125.15 (2020), p. 151102.doi:10.1103/P hysRevLett.125.151102. arXiv:1912.02830 [hep-ph]

    2020 doi

  29. [37]

    Dark Matter production from relativistic bubble walls

    Aleksandr Azatov, Miguel Vanvlasselaer, and Wen Yin. “Dark Matter production from relativistic bubble walls”. In:JHEP03 (2021), p. 288.doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2021)288. arXiv:2101.05721 [hep-ph]

    2021 doi

  30. [38]

    Hunting WIMPs with LISA: correlating dark matter and gravitational wave signals

    Torsten Bringmann et al. “Hunting WIMPs with LISA: correlating dark matter and gravitational wave signals”. In:JCAP05 (2024), p. 065.doi:10.1088/1475-7516/202 4/05/065. arXiv:2311.06346 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 doi

  31. [39]

    Sub-GeV Dark Matter and Nano-Hertz Gravitational Waves from a Classically Conformal Dark Sector

    Sowmiya Balan et al. “Sub-GeV Dark Matter and Nano-Hertz Gravitational Waves from a Classically Conformal Dark Sector”. In:Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2025.08 (Aug. 2025), p. 062.issn: 1475-7516.doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/08/062. arXiv:2502.19478 [hep-ph]. (...

    2025 doi

  32. [40]

    Cosmic Separation of Phases

    Edward Witten. “Cosmic Separation of Phases”. In:Phys. Rev. D30 (1984), pp. 272–285. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.30.272

    1984 doi

  33. [41]

    Gravitational radiation from cosmological phase transitions

    C. J. Hogan. “Gravitational radiation from cosmological phase transitions”. In:Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.218.4 (1986), pp. 629–636.doi:10.1093/mnras/218.4.629

    1986 doi

  34. [42]

    The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics

    Adeela Afzal et al. “The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics”. In:Astrophys. J. Lett.951.1 (2023).doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acdc91. arXiv: 2306.16219 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 doi arXiv

  35. [43]

    Challenges and opportunities of gravitational-wave searches above 10 kHz

    Nancy Aggarwal et al. “Challenges and opportunities of gravitational-wave searches above 10 kHz”. In:Living Rev. Rel.28.1 (2025), p. 10.doi:10.1007/s41114-025-00060-5. arXiv:2501.11723 [gr-qc]

    2025 doi

  36. [44]

    Cosmological phase transitions: From perturbative particle physics to gravitational waves

    Peter Athron et al. “Cosmological phase transitions: From perturbative particle physics to gravitational waves”. In:Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.135 (2024), p. 104094.doi:10.1016 /j.ppnp.2023.104094. arXiv:2305.02357 [hep-ph]

    2024

  37. [45]

    Fate of the false vacuum: Semiclassical theory

    Sidney Coleman. “Fate of the false vacuum: Semiclassical theory”. In:Phys. Rev. D15 (10 May 1977), pp. 2929–2936.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2929.url:https://link .aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2929

    1977 doi

  38. [46]

    Decay of the False Vacuum at Finite Temperature

    A.D. Linde. “Decay of the False Vacuum at Finite Temperature”. In:Nuclear Physics B 216.2 (May 1983), pp. 421–445.issn: 05503213.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(83)90293-6. (Visited on 01/09/2023)

    1983 doi

  39. [47]

    Cosmological Consequences of a First Order Phase Transition in the SU(5) Grand Unified Model

    Alan H. Guth and Erick J. Weinberg. “Cosmological Consequences of a First Order Phase Transition in the SU(5) Grand Unified Model”. In:Phys. Rev. D23 (1981), p. 876.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.23.876

    1981 doi

  40. [48]

    Bubble nucleation in first order inflation and other cosmological phase transitions

    Michael S. Turner, Erick J. Weinberg, and Lawrence M. Widrow. “Bubble nucleation in first order inflation and other cosmological phase transitions”. In:Phys. Rev. D46 (1992), pp. 2384–2403.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.46.2384

    1992 doi

  41. [49]

    Gravitational radiation from first order phase transitions

    Marc Kamionkowski, Arthur Kosowsky, and Michael S. Turner. “Gravitational radiation from first order phase transitions”. In:Phys. Rev. D49 (1994), pp. 2837–2851.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.2837. arXiv:astro-ph/9310044

    1994 doi arXiv

  42. [50]

    Energy Budget of Cosmological First-order Phase Transitions

    Jose R. Espinosa et al. “Energy Budget of Cosmological First-order Phase Transitions”. In:JCAP06 (2010), p. 028.doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/06/028. arXiv:1004.4187 [hep-ph]. 61

    2010 doi arXiv

  43. [51]

    Andreas Ekstedt et al.How Fast Does the WallGo? A Package for Computing Wall Ve- locities in First-Order Phase Transitions. Nov. 2024.doi:10.48550/arXiv.2411.04970. eprint:2411.04970(hep-ph). (Visited on 01/07/2025)

    2024 doi

  44. [53]

    General Properties of the Gravitational Wave Spectrum from Phase Transitions

    Chiara Caprini et al. “General Properties of the Gravitational Wave Spectrum from Phase Transitions”. In:Phys. Rev. D79 (2009), p. 083519.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.083519. arXiv:0901.1661 [astro-ph.CO]

    2009 doi arXiv

  45. [54]

    Gravitational waves from the sound of a first order phase tran- sition

    Mark Hindmarsh et al. “Gravitational waves from the sound of a first order phase tran- sition”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014), p. 041301.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.04

    2014 doi

  46. [55]

    arXiv:1304.2433 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  47. [56]

    Numerical simulations of acoustically generated gravitational waves at a first order phase transition

    Mark Hindmarsh et al. “Numerical simulations of acoustically generated gravitational waves at a first order phase transition”. In:Phys. Rev. D92.12 (2015), p. 123009.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.92.123009. arXiv:1504.03291 [astro-ph.CO]

    2015 doi arXiv

  48. [57]

    Gravitational waves from bubble collisions: An analytic derivation

    Ryusuke Jinno and Masahiro Takimoto. “Gravitational waves from bubble collisions: An analytic derivation”. In:Phys. Rev. D95.2 (2017), p. 024009.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD .95.024009. arXiv:1605.01403 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 doi arXiv

  49. [58]

    Shape of the acoustic gravitational wave power spectrum from a first order phase transition

    Mark Hindmarsh et al. “Shape of the acoustic gravitational wave power spectrum from a first order phase transition”. In:Phys. Rev. D96.10 (2017), p. 103520.doi:10.1103 /PhysRevD.96.103520. arXiv:1704.05871 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017

  50. [59]

    Vorticity, kinetic energy, and suppressed gravitational wave production in strong first order phase transitions

    Daniel Cutting, Mark Hindmarsh, and David J. Weir. “Vorticity, kinetic energy, and suppressed gravitational wave production in strong first order phase transitions”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett.125.2 (2020), p. 021302.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevLett . 125 . 021302. arXiv:1906.00480 [hep-ph]

    2020

  51. [61]

    Higgsless simulations of cosmological phase transitions and gravi- tational waves

    Ryusuke Jinno et al. “Higgsless simulations of cosmological phase transitions and gravi- tational waves”. In:JCAP02 (2023), p. 011.doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/02/011. arXiv:2209.04369 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 doi

  52. [62]

    Gravitational waves from decaying sources in strong phase transi- tions

    Chiara Caprini et al. “Gravitational waves from decaying sources in strong phase transi- tions”. In: (Sept. 2024). arXiv:2409.03651 [gr-qc]

    2024

  53. [64]

    On the Maximal Strength of a First- Order Electroweak Phase Transition and its Gravitational Wave Signal

    John Ellis, Marek Lewicki, and Jos´ e Miguel No. “On the Maximal Strength of a First- Order Electroweak Phase Transition and its Gravitational Wave Signal”. In:JCAP04 (2019), p. 003.doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/04/003. arXiv:1809.08242 [hep-ph]

    2019 doi

  54. [66]

    Tuning the Violins: Dark Sector Phase Transition Models for the PTA Signal

    Torsten Bringmann et al. “Tuning the Violins: Dark Sector Phase Transition Models for the PTA Signal”. In: arXiv:2602.09092 (Feb. 2026).doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.09092. arXiv:2602.09092 [hep-ph]. (Visited on 03/31/2026)

    2026 doi

  55. [67]

    BSMPT (Beyond the Standard Model Phase Transitions): A tool for the electroweak phase transition in extended Higgs sectors

    Philipp Basler and Margarete M¨ uhlleitner. “BSMPT (Beyond the Standard Model Phase Transitions): A tool for the electroweak phase transition in extended Higgs sectors”. In: Comput. Phys. Commun.237 (2019), pp. 62–85.doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2018.11.006. arXiv:1803.02846 [hep-ph]

    2019 doi arXiv

  56. [68]

    BSMPT v2 a tool for the electroweak phase transition and the baryon asymmetry of the universe in extended Higgs Sectors

    Philipp Basler, Margarete M¨ uhlleitner, and Jonas M¨ uller. “BSMPT v2 a tool for the electroweak phase transition and the baryon asymmetry of the universe in extended Higgs Sectors”. In:Comput. Phys. Commun.269 (2021), p. 108124.doi:10.1016/j.cp c.2021.108124. arXiv:2007.0172...

    2021 doi

  57. [69]

    BSMPT v3 a tool for phase transitions and primordial gravitational waves in extended Higgs sectors

    Philipp Basler et al. “BSMPT v3 a tool for phase transitions and primordial gravitational waves in extended Higgs sectors”. In:Comput. Phys. Commun.316 (2025), p. 109766. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2025.109766. arXiv:2404.19037 [hep-ph]

    2025 doi

  58. [70]

    PhaseTracer: tracing cosmological phases and calculating transition properties

    Peter Athron et al. “PhaseTracer: tracing cosmological phases and calculating transition properties”. In:Eur. Phys. J. C80.6 (2020), p. 567.doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8 035-2. arXiv:2003.02859 [hep-ph]

    2020 doi

  59. [72]

    ELENA: a software for fast and precise computation of first order phase transitions and gravitational waves production in particle physics models

    Francesco Costa et al. “ELENA: a software for fast and precise computation of first order phase transitions and gravitational waves production in particle physics models”. In: (Sept. 2025). arXiv:2510.00289 [hep-ph]

    2025

  60. [73]

    PT2GWFinder : A package for cosmological first-order phase transi- tions and gravitational waves

    Vedran Brdar et al. “PT2GWFinder : A package for cosmological first-order phase transi- tions and gravitational waves”. In:Comput. Phys. Commun.323 (2026), p. 110119.doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2026.110119. arXiv:2505.04744 [hep-ph]

    2026 doi

  61. [74]

    Turn up the volume: listening to phase transitions in hot dark sectors

    Fatih Ertas, Felix Kahlhoefer, and Carlo Tasillo. “Turn up the volume: listening to phase transitions in hot dark sectors”. In:JCAP02.02 (2022), p. 014.doi:10.1088/1475-75 16/2022/02/014. arXiv:2109.06208 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 doi

  62. [75]

    Does NANOGrav observe a dark sector phase transition?

    Torsten Bringmann et al. “Does NANOGrav observe a dark sector phase transition?” In: JCAP11 (2023), p. 053.doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/11/053. arXiv:2306.09411 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 doi

  63. [76]

    DRalgo: A package for effective field theory approach for thermal phase transitions

    Andreas Ekstedt, Philipp Schicho, and Tuomas V. I. Tenkanen. “DRalgo: A package for effective field theory approach for thermal phase transitions”. In:Comput. Phys. Commun.288 (2023), p. 108725.doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2023.108725. arXiv:2205.08815 [hep-ph]

    2023 doi

  64. [77]

    FindBounce: Package for multi-field bounce actions

    Victor Guada, Miha Nemevˇ sek, and Matevˇ z Pintar. “FindBounce: Package for multi-field bounce actions”. In:Comput. Phys. Commun.256 (2020), p. 107480.doi:10.1016/j.c pc.2020.107480. arXiv:2002.00881 [hep-ph]

    2020 doi

  65. [78]

    SimpleBounce : a simple package for the false vacuum decay

    Ryosuke Sato. “SimpleBounce : a simple package for the false vacuum decay”. In:Comput. Phys. Commun.258 (2021), p. 107566.doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107566. arXiv:1908 .10868 [hep-ph]. 63

    2021 doi

  66. [79]

    BubbleDet: a Python package to compute functional determinants for bubble nucleation

    Andreas Ekstedt, Oliver Gould, and Joonas Hirvonen. “BubbleDet: a Python package to compute functional determinants for bubble nucleation”. In:JHEP12 (2023), p. 056. doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2023)056. arXiv:2308.15652 [hep-ph]

    2023 doi

  67. [80]

    Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update

    Chiara Caprini et al. “Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update”. In:JCAP03 (2020), p. 024.doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03 /024. arXiv:1910.13125 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 doi

  68. [81]

    SpecBit, DecayBit and PrecisionBit: GAMBIT modules for com- puting mass spectra, particle decay rates and precision observables

    Peter Athron et al. “SpecBit, DecayBit and PrecisionBit: GAMBIT modules for com- puting mass spectra, particle decay rates and precision observables”. In:Eur. Phys. J. C78.1 (2018), p. 22.doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 017- 5390- 8. arXiv:1705.07936 [hep-ph]

    2018 doi

  69. [82]

    CosmoBit: A GAMBIT module for computing cosmological ob- servables and likelihoods

    Janina J. Renk et al. “CosmoBit: A GAMBIT module for computing cosmological ob- servables and likelihoods”. In:JCAP02 (2021), p. 022.doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021 /02/022. arXiv:2009.03286 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 doi

  70. [83]

    Wen-Yuan Ai, Benoit Laurent, and Jorinde van de Vis.Bounds on the Bubble Wall Velocity. Nov. 2024.doi:10.48550/arXiv.2411.13641. arXiv:2411.13641 [hep-ph]. (Visited on 01/13/2025)

    2024 doi

  71. [84]

    Model-independent bubble wall velocities in local thermal equilibrium

    Wen-Yuan Ai, Benoit Laurent, and Jorinde van de Vis. “Model-independent bubble wall velocities in local thermal equilibrium”. In:JCAP07 (2023), p. 002.doi:10.1088/147 5-7516/2023/07/002. arXiv:2303.10171 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 doi

  72. [85]

    PTArcade

    Andrea Mitridate et al. “PTArcade”. In: (June 2023). arXiv:2306.16377 [hep-ph]

    2023

  73. [86]

    UltraNest – a robust, general purpose Bayesian inference engine

    Johannes Buchner. “UltraNest – a robust, general purpose Bayesian inference engine”. In: (Jan. 2021). arXiv:2101.09604 [stat.CO]

    2021

  74. [87]

    Compact Gauge Fields and the Infrared Catastrophe

    Alexander M. Polyakov. “Compact Gauge Fields and the Infrared Catastrophe”. In:Phys. Lett. B59 (1975). Ed. by J. C. Taylor, pp. 82–84.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(75)90162-8

    1975 doi

  75. [88]

    Chiral effective model with the Polyakov loop

    Kenji Fukushima. “Chiral effective model with the Polyakov loop”. In:Phys. Lett. B591 (2004), pp. 277–284.doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.04.027. arXiv:hep-ph/0310121

    2004 doi arXiv

  76. [89]

    Polyakov loop modeling for hot QCD

    Kenji Fukushima and Vladimir Skokov. “Polyakov loop modeling for hot QCD”. In:Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.96 (2017), pp. 154–199.doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2017.05.002. arXiv: 1705.00718 [hep-ph]

    2017 doi arXiv

  77. [90]

    Supercool exit: Gravitational waves from QCD-triggered conformal symmetry breaking

    Laura Sagunski, Philipp Schicho, and Daniel Schmitt. “Supercool exit: Gravitational waves from QCD-triggered conformal symmetry breaking”. In:Phys. Rev. D107.12 (2023), p. 123512.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.123512. arXiv:2303.02450 [hep-ph]

    2023 doi

  78. [91]

    Phase Transitions in Particle Physics: Results and Perspectives from Lattice Quantum Chromo-Dynamics

    Gert Aarts et al. “Phase Transitions in Particle Physics: Results and Perspectives from Lattice Quantum Chromo-Dynamics”. In:Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.133 (2023), p. 104070. doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104070. arXiv:2301.04382 [hep-lat]

    2023 doi

  79. [92]

    Radiative Corrections as the Origin of Spon- taneous Symmetry Breaking

    Sidney R. Coleman and Erick J. Weinberg. “Radiative Corrections as the Origin of Spon- taneous Symmetry Breaking”. In:Phys. Rev. D7 (1973), pp. 1888–1910.doi:10.1103 /PhysRevD.7.1888

    1973

  80. [93]

    The Effective potential and first order phase transitions: Beyond leading-order

    Peter Brockway Arnold and Olivier Espinosa. “The Effective potential and first order phase transitions: Beyond leading-order”. In:Phys. Rev. D47 (1993), p. 3546.doi:10 .1103/PhysRevD.47.3546. arXiv:hep-ph/9212235

    1993 arXiv

  81. [94]

    Resummation in a hot scalar field theory

    Rajesh R. Parwani. “Resummation in a hot scalar field theory”. In:Phys. Rev. D45 (1992), p. 4695.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.45.4695. arXiv:hep-ph/9204216. 64

    1992 doi arXiv

  82. [96]

    Impact of theoretical uncertainties on model parameter reconstruc- tion from GW signals sourced by cosmological phase transitions

    Marek Lewicki et al. “Impact of theoretical uncertainties on model parameter reconstruc- tion from GW signals sourced by cosmological phase transitions”. In:Phys. Rev. D110.2 (2024), p. 023538.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.023538. arXiv:2403.03769 [hep-ph]

    2024 doi

  83. [97]

    Theoretical uncertainties for cosmological first-order phase transi- tions

    Djuna Croon et al. “Theoretical uncertainties for cosmological first-order phase transi- tions”. In:JHEP04 (2021), p. 055.doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2021)055. arXiv:2009.10080 [hep-ph]

    2021 doi

  84. [98]

    Gravitational waves from supercooled phase transitions: dimen- sional transmutation meets dimensional reduction

    Maciej Kierkla et al. “Gravitational waves from supercooled phase transitions: dimen- sional transmutation meets dimensional reduction”. In:JHEP02 (2024), p. 234.doi: 10.1007/JHEP02(2024)234. arXiv:2312.12413 [hep-ph]

    2024 doi

  85. [99]

    Model-independent energy budget for LISA

    Felix Giese et al. “Model-independent energy budget for LISA”. In:JCAP01 (2021), p. 072.doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/01/072. arXiv:2010.09744 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 doi

  86. [100]

    The Dynamics of False Vacuum Bubbles

    Steven K. Blau, E. I. Guendelman, and Alan H. Guth. “The Dynamics of False Vacuum Bubbles”. In:Phys. Rev. D35 (1987), p. 1747.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.35.1747

    1987 doi

  87. [101]

    Dark Matter from Eternity

    G. Franciolini, M. Peloso, and A. Riotto. “Dark Matter from Eternity”. In: (Feb. 2026). arXiv:2602.08338 [astro-ph.CO]

    2026

  88. [102]

    Precise determination of the critical percolation threshold for the three-dimensional “Swiss cheese

    Christian D. Lorenz and Robert M. Ziff. “Precise determination of the critical percolation threshold for the three-dimensional “Swiss cheese” model using a growth algorithm”. In: The Journal of Chemical Physics114.8 (Feb. 2001), pp. 3659–3661.issn: 0021-9606.doi: 10.1063/1.133...

    2001 doi

  89. [103]

    Supercool subtleties of cosmological phase transitions

    Peter Athron, Csaba Bal´ azs, and Lachlan Morris. “Supercool subtleties of cosmological phase transitions”. In:JCAP03 (2023), p. 006.doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/03/006. arXiv:2212.07559 [hep-ph]

    2023 doi

  90. [104]

    Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravita- tional waves from cosmological phase transitions

    Chiara Caprini et al. “Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravita- tional waves from cosmological phase transitions”. In:JCAP04 (2016), p. 001.doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2016/04/001. arXiv:1512.06239 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 doi arXiv

  91. [105]

    Bubble nucleation and growth in very strong cosmological phase transitions

    Ariel Megevand and Santiago Ramirez. “Bubble nucleation and growth in very strong cosmological phase transitions”. In:Nucl. Phys. B919 (2017), pp. 74–109.doi:10.101 6/j.nuclphysb.2017.03.009. arXiv:1611.05853 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  92. [107]

    Can electroweak bubble walls run away?

    Dietrich Bodeker and Guy D. Moore. “Can electroweak bubble walls run away?” In: JCAP05 (2009), p. 009.doi:10.1088/1475- 7516/2009/05/009. arXiv:0903.4099 [hep-ph]

    2009 doi arXiv

  93. [108]

    Gravitational radiation from colliding vacuum bubbles: envelope approximation to many bubble collisions

    Arthur Kosowsky and Michael S. Turner. “Gravitational radiation from colliding vacuum bubbles: envelope approximation to many bubble collisions”. In:Phys. Rev. D47 (1993), pp. 4372–4391.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.47.4372. arXiv:astro-ph/9211004. 65

    1993 doi arXiv

  94. [109]

    Gravitational radiation from colliding vacuum bubbles

    Arthur Kosowsky, Michael S. Turner, and Richard Watkins. “Gravitational radiation from colliding vacuum bubbles”. In:Phys. Rev. D45 (1992), pp. 4514–4535.doi:10.11 03/PhysRevD.45.4514

    1992

  95. [110]

    Gravitional radiation from first-order phase transitions in the presence of a fluid

    John T. Giblin and James B. Mertens. “Gravitional radiation from first-order phase transitions in the presence of a fluid”. In:Phys. Rev. D90.2 (2014), p. 023532.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.023532. arXiv:1405.4005 [astro-ph.CO]

    2014 doi arXiv

  96. [111]

    Sound shell model for acoustic gravitational wave production at a first- order phase transition in the early Universe

    Mark Hindmarsh. “Sound shell model for acoustic gravitational wave production at a first- order phase transition in the early Universe”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.120.7 (2018), p. 071301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.071301. arXiv:1608.04735 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 doi arXiv

  97. [112]

    Gravitational waves from bubble dynamics: Beyond the Envelope

    Ryusuke Jinno and Masahiro Takimoto. “Gravitational waves from bubble dynamics: Beyond the Envelope”. In:JCAP01 (2019), p. 060.doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/01 /060. arXiv:1707.03111 [hep-ph]

    2019 doi

  98. [113]

    Gravitational radiation from a bulk flow model

    Thomas Konstandin. “Gravitational radiation from a bulk flow model”. In:JCAP 03 (2018), p. 047.doi:10 . 1088 / 1475 - 7516 / 2018 / 03 / 047. arXiv:1712 . 06869 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018

  99. [114]

    Gravitational waves from vac- uum first-order phase transitions: from the envelope to the lattice

    Daniel Cutting, Mark Hindmarsh, and David J. Weir. “Gravitational waves from vac- uum first-order phase transitions: from the envelope to the lattice”. In:Phys. Rev. D 97.12 (2018), p. 123513.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevD . 97 . 123513. arXiv:1802 . 05712 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018

  100. [115]

    Gravitational waves from first order cosmological phase transitions in the Sound Shell Model

    Mark Hindmarsh and Mulham Hijazi. “Gravitational waves from first order cosmological phase transitions in the Sound Shell Model”. In:JCAP12 (2019), p. 062.doi:10.1088 /1475-7516/2019/12/062. arXiv:1909.10040 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019

  101. [116]

    Phase transitions in the early universe

    Mark B. Hindmarsh et al. “Phase transitions in the early universe”. In:SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes24 (2021), p. 1.doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.24. arXiv:2008.09 136 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 doi

  102. [117]

    Gravitational waves from vacuum first order phase transitions II: from thin to thick walls

    Daniel Cutting et al. “Gravitational waves from vacuum first order phase transitions II: from thin to thick walls”. In:Phys. Rev. D103.2 (2021), p. 023531.doi:10.1103/Phys RevD.103.023531. arXiv:2005.13537 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 doi

  103. [118]

    Characterization of the grav- itational wave spectrum from sound waves within the sound shell model

    Alberto Roper Pol, Simona Procacci, and Chiara Caprini. “Characterization of the grav- itational wave spectrum from sound waves within the sound shell model”. In:Phys. Rev. D109.6 (2024), p. 063531.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.063531. arXiv:2308.12943 [gr-qc]

    2024 doi

  104. [119]

    Fluid perturbations from expanding bubbles in first-order phase transitions

    Chiara Caprini et al. “Fluid perturbations from expanding bubbles in first-order phase transitions”. In: (Apr. 2026). arXiv:2604.02240 [gr-qc]

    2026

  105. [120]

    Causal gravitational waves as a probe of free streaming particles and the expansion of the Universe

    Anson Hook, Gustavo Marques-Tavares, and Davide Racco. “Causal gravitational waves as a probe of free streaming particles and the expansion of the Universe”. In:JHEP02 (2021), p. 117.doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2021)117. arXiv:2010.03568 [hep-ph]

    2021 doi

  106. [121]

    Footprints of the QCD Crossover on Cosmological Gravitational Waves at Pulsar Timing Arrays

    Gabriele Franciolini, Davide Racco, and Fabrizio Rompineve. “Footprints of the QCD Crossover on Cosmological Gravitational Waves at Pulsar Timing Arrays”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.132.8 (2024), p. 081001.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevLett . 132 . 081001. arXiv: 2306.17136 [astro-ph.CO]. 66

    2024

  107. [122]

    Oneµto rule them all: CMB spectral distortions can probe domain walls, cosmic strings and low scale phase transitions

    Nicklas Ramberg, Wolfram Ratzinger, and Pedro Schwaller. “Oneµto rule them all: CMB spectral distortions can probe domain walls, cosmic strings and low scale phase transitions”. In:JCAP02 (2023), p. 039.doi:10 . 1088 / 1475 - 7516 / 2023 / 02 / 039. arXiv:2209.14313 [hep-ph]

    2023

  108. [123]

    Constraining First-Order Phase Transitions with Curvature Perturba- tions

    Jing Liu et al. “Constraining First-Order Phase Transitions with Curvature Perturba- tions”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.130.5 (2023), p. 051001.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.0 51001. arXiv:2208.14086 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 doi

  109. [124]

    The bearable inhomo- geneity of the baryon asymmetry

    Hengameh Bagherian, Majid Ekhterachian, and Stefan Stelzl. “The bearable inhomo- geneity of the baryon asymmetry”. In:JHEP01 (2026), p. 068.doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2 026)068. arXiv:2505.15904 [hep-ph]

    2026 doi

  110. [125]

    Dark, Cold, and Noisy: Constraining Secluded Hidden Sectors with Gravitational Waves

    Moritz Breitbach et al. “Dark, Cold, and Noisy: Constraining Secluded Hidden Sectors with Gravitational Waves”. In:JCAP07 (2019), p. 007.doi:10.1088/1475-7516/201 9/07/007. arXiv:1811.11175 [hep-ph]

    2019 doi arXiv

  111. [126]

    Gravitational wave astronomy with the SKA

    Gemma Janssen et al. “Gravitational wave astronomy with the SKA”. In:PoSAASKA14 (2015). Ed. by Tyler L. Bourke et al., p. 037.doi:10.22323/1.215.0037. arXiv:1501 .00127 [astro-ph.IM]

    2015 doi

  112. [127]

    Fundamental physics with the Square Kilometre Array

    A. Weltman et al. “Fundamental physics with the Square Kilometre Array”. In:Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral.37 (2020), e002.doi:10.1017/pasa.2019.42. arXiv:1810.02680 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 doi

  113. [128]

    European Pulsar Timing Array Limits On An Isotropic Stochas- tic Gravitational-Wave Background

    L. Lentati et al. “European Pulsar Timing Array Limits On An Isotropic Stochas- tic Gravitational-Wave Background”. In:Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.453.3 (2015), pp. 2576–2598.doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1538. arXiv:1504.03692 [astro-ph.CO]

    2015 doi arXiv

  114. [129]

    High-precision timing of 42 millisecond pulsars with the European Pulsar Timing Array

    G. Desvignes et al. “High-precision timing of 42 millisecond pulsars with the European Pulsar Timing Array”. In:Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.458.3 (2016), pp. 3341–3380.doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw483. arXiv:1602.08511 [astro-ph.HE]

    2016 doi arXiv

  115. [130]

    The NANOGrav 11-year Data Set: Pulsar-timing Constraints On The Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background

    Z. Arzoumanian et al. “The NANOGrav 11-year Data Set: Pulsar-timing Constraints On The Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background”. In:Astrophys. J.859.1 (2018), p. 47. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aabd3b. arXiv:1801.02617 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 doi arXiv

  116. [131]

    Unveiling the gravitational universe atµ-Hz frequencies

    Alberto Sesana et al. “Unveiling the gravitational universe atµ-Hz frequencies”. In: Exper. Astron.51.3 (2021), pp. 1333–1383.doi:10.1007/s10686-021-09709-9. arXiv: 1908.11391 [astro-ph.IM]

    2021 doi arXiv

  117. [132]

    Possibility of direct measurement of the acceleration of the universe using 0.1-Hz band laser interferometer gravitational wave antenna in space

    Naoki Seto, Seiji Kawamura, and Takashi Nakamura. “Possibility of direct measurement of the acceleration of the universe using 0.1-Hz band laser interferometer gravitational wave antenna in space”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.87 (2001), p. 221103.doi:10.1103/PhysR evLett.87.221103. arX...

    2001 doi arXiv

  118. [133]

    The status of DECIGO

    Shuichi Sato et al. “The status of DECIGO”. In:J. Phys. Conf. Ser.840.1 (2017). Ed. by Domencio Giardini and Philippe Jetzer, p. 012010.doi:10.1088/1742-6596/840/1/01 2010

    2017 doi

  119. [134]

    Beyond LISA: Exploring future gravitational wave missions

    Jeff Crowder and Neil J. Cornish. “Beyond LISA: Exploring future gravitational wave missions”. In:Phys. Rev. D72 (2005), p. 083005.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.083005. arXiv:gr-qc/0506015

    2005 doi arXiv

  120. [135]

    Scientific Objectives of Einstein Telescope

    B. Sathyaprakash et al. “Scientific Objectives of Einstein Telescope”. In:Class. Quant. Grav.29 (2012). Ed. by Mark Hannam et al., p. 124013.doi:10.1088/0264-9381/29/1 2/124013. arXiv:1206.0331 [gr-qc]. 67

    2012 doi arXiv

  121. [136]

    Advanced LIGO

    J. Aasi et al. “Advanced LIGO”. In:Class. Quant. Grav.32 (2015), p. 074001.doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/32/7/074001. arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

    2015 doi arXiv

  122. [137]

    Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector

    F. Acernese et al. “Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector”. In:Class. Quant. Grav.32.2 (2015), p. 024001.doi:10.1088/0264-938 1/32/2/024001. arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc]

    2015 doi arXiv

  123. [138]

    KAGRA, the underground and cryogenic laser interferometer for grav- itational wave detection

    Keiko Kokeyama. “KAGRA, the underground and cryogenic laser interferometer for grav- itational wave detection”. In:14th Pacific Rim Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics. Aug. 2020.doi:10.1364/CLEOPR.2020.C5G_1

    2020 doi

  124. [139]

    Rapid refitting tech- niques for Bayesian spectral characterization of the gravitational wave background using pulsar timing arrays

    William G. Lamb, Stephen R. Taylor, and Rutger van Haasteren. “Rapid refitting tech- niques for Bayesian spectral characterization of the gravitational wave background using pulsar timing arrays”. In:Phys. Rev. D108.10 (2023), p. 103019.doi:10.1103/PhysRe vD.108.103019. arXiv:...

    2023 doi

  125. [140]

    The NANOGrav 12.5 yr Data Set: Search for an Isotropic Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background

    Zaven Arzoumanian et al. “The NANOGrav 12.5 yr Data Set: Search for an Isotropic Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background”. In:Astrophys. J. Lett.905.2 (2020), p. L34. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abd401. arXiv:2009.04496 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 doi

  126. [141]

    Michele Maggiore.Gravitational Waves. Vol. 2: Astrophysics and Cosmology. Oxford University Press, Mar. 2018.isbn: 978-0-19-857089-9

    2018

  127. [142]

    Probing physics beyond the standard model: limits from BBN and the CMB independently and combined

    Tsung-Han Yeh et al. “Probing physics beyond the standard model: limits from BBN and the CMB independently and combined”. In:JCAP10 (2022), p. 046.doi:10.1088 /1475-7516/2022/10/046. arXiv:2207.13133 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022

  128. [143]

    CosmoTransitions: Computing Cosmological Phase Transition Temperatures and Bubble Profiles with Multiple Fields

    Carroll L. Wainwright. “CosmoTransitions: Computing Cosmological Phase Transition Temperatures and Bubble Profiles with Multiple Fields”. In:Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 (2012), pp. 2006–2013.doi:10 . 1016 / j . cpc . 2012 . 04 . 004. arXiv:1109 . 4189 [hep-ph]

    2012

  129. [144]

    Was the electroweak phase transition preceded by a color broken phase?

    James M. Cline, Guy D. Moore, and Geraldine Servant. “Was the electroweak phase transition preceded by a color broken phase?” In:Phys. Rev. D60 (1999), p. 105035. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.105035. arXiv:hep-ph/9902220

    1999 doi arXiv

  130. [145]

    On Effective Degrees of Freedom in the Early Universe

    Lars Husdal. “On Effective Degrees of Freedom in the Early Universe”. In:Galaxies4.4 (2016), p. 78.doi:10.3390/galaxies4040078. arXiv:1609.04979 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 doi arXiv

  131. [146]

    Primordial gravitational waves, precisely: The role of thermodynamics in the Standard Model

    Ken’ichi Saikawa and Satoshi Shirai. “Primordial gravitational waves, precisely: The role of thermodynamics in the Standard Model”. In:JCAP05 (2018), p. 035.doi:10.1088 /1475-7516/2018/05/035. arXiv:1803.01038 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  132. [147]

    Vevacious: A Tool For Finding The Global Minima Of One-Loop Effective Potentials With Many Scalars

    J. E. Camargo-Molina et al. “Vevacious: A Tool For Finding The Global Minima Of One-Loop Effective Potentials With Many Scalars”. In:Eur. Phys. J. C73.10 (2013), p. 2588.doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2588-2. arXiv:1307.1477 [hep-ph]

    2013 doi arXiv

  133. [148]

    Efficient numerical solution to vac- uum decay with many fields

    Ali Masoumi, Ken D. Olum, and Benjamin Shlaer. “Efficient numerical solution to vac- uum decay with many fields”. In:JCAP01 (2017), p. 051.doi:10.1088/1475-7516/20 17/01/051. arXiv:1610.06594 [gr-qc]

    2017 doi arXiv

  134. [149]

    BubbleProfiler: finding the field profile and action for cosmological phase transitions

    Peter Athron et al. “BubbleProfiler: finding the field profile and action for cosmological phase transitions”. In:Comput. Phys. Commun.244 (2019), pp. 448–468.doi:10.1016 /j.cpc.2019.05.017. arXiv:1901.03714 [hep-ph]

    2019

  135. [150]

    An optimisation based algorithm for finding the nucleation tem- perature of cosmological phase transitions

    Michael Bardsley. “An optimisation based algorithm for finding the nucleation tem- perature of cosmological phase transitions”. In:Comput. Phys. Commun.273 (2022), p. 108252.doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108252. arXiv:2103.01985 [astro-ph.CO]. 68

    2022 doi

  136. [151]

    PT2GWFinder: A Package for Cosmological First-Order Phase Transitions and Gravitational Waves

    Vedran Brdar et al. “PT2GWFinder: A Package for Cosmological First-Order Phase Transitions and Gravitational Waves”. In: (May 2025). arXiv:2505.04744 [hep-ph]

    2025

  137. [152]

    May 2018.doi: ESA-L3-EST-SCI-RS-001.url:https://www.cosmos.esa.int/documents/678316/17 00384/SciRD.pdf

    European Space Agency (ESA).LISA Science Requirements Document. May 2018.doi: ESA-L3-EST-SCI-RS-001.url:https://www.cosmos.esa.int/documents/678316/17 00384/SciRD.pdf

    2018

  138. [153]

    Theory and Phenomenology of Two-Higgs-doublet Models

    G.C. Branco et al. “Theory and Phenomenology of Two-Higgs-doublet Models”. In: Physics Reports516.1-2 (July 2012), pp. 1–102.issn: 03701573.doi:10 . 1016 / j . ph ysrep.2012.02.002. (Visited on 04/13/2026)

    2012

  139. [154]

    Baryon Washout, Electroweak Phase Transition, and Perturbation Theory

    Hiren H. Patel and Michael J. Ramsey-Musolf. “Baryon Washout, Electroweak Phase Transition, and Perturbation Theory”. In:JHEP07 (2011), p. 029.doi:10.1007/JHEP 07(2011)029. arXiv:1101.4665 [hep-ph]. 69

    2011 doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed May 19, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.