pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1912.02622 · v4 · submitted 2019-12-05 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · astro-ph.HE· gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Science Case for the Einstein Telescope

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 00:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.HEgr-qc
keywords gravitational wavesEinstein Telescopecosmologyastrophysicsfundamental physicsblack hole mergersneutron star binariescosmological distances
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Einstein Telescope will explore the universe with gravitational waves up to cosmological distances and open pathways to discoveries in astrophysics, cosmology, and fundamental physics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper presents the scientific objectives for the Einstein Telescope, a proposed third-generation European ground-based gravitational-wave detector. It positions ET as a direct evolution of existing instruments like Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo, and KAGRA, with the potential to begin operations in the mid-2030s. The central argument is that its increased sensitivity will extend observations from nearby events to sources at cosmological distances. A reader would care because this reach could provide direct data on the early universe, the populations of compact objects, and possible deviations from general relativity that current detectors cannot access. The discussion covers concrete targets in each domain without asserting guaranteed outcomes.

Core claim

The Einstein Telescope will explore the universe with gravitational waves up to cosmological distances. As an evolution of second-generation detectors such as Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo, and KAGRA, it could operate in the mid-2030s and deliver new results in astrophysics, cosmology, and fundamental physics.

What carries the argument

The Einstein Telescope, a proposed third-generation ground-based gravitational-wave detector whose improved sensitivity enables access to sources at cosmological distances.

If this is right

  • Detection of gravitational waves from compact-object mergers at high redshifts to study their formation history.
  • Use of standard sirens to measure the expansion rate of the universe independently of electromagnetic methods.
  • Precision tests of general relativity in the strong-field regime through waveform analysis of distant events.
  • Mapping of the population statistics of black holes and neutron stars across cosmic time.
  • Joint observations with electromagnetic telescopes to link gravitational-wave events to their host galaxies and environments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Data from ET could help address current tensions in cosmological parameters by providing an independent distance ladder.
  • The instrument's frequency band would complement planned space-based detectors to cover a wider range of gravitational-wave sources.
  • Long-term operation might reveal whether primordial gravitational waves from the early universe are detectable above astrophysical backgrounds.
  • Engineering requirements for ET could accelerate development of low-noise technologies usable in other precision measurement fields.

Load-bearing premise

The detector will achieve the modeled sensitivity and operational performance needed to detect the assumed populations of sources at cosmological distances.

What would settle it

Once built and operating, the instrument records far fewer high-redshift events than the sensitivity projections predict, or its measured noise curve falls short of the design targets.

read the original abstract

The Einstein Telescope (ET), a proposed European ground-based gravitational-wave detector of third-generation, is an evolution of second-generation detectors such as Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo, and KAGRA which could be operating in the mid 2030s. ET will explore the universe with gravitational waves up to cosmological distances. We discuss its main scientific objectives and its potential for discoveries in astrophysics, cosmology and fundamental physics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents the science case for the proposed Einstein Telescope (ET), a third-generation European ground-based gravitational-wave detector expected to operate in the mid-2030s. It compiles the main scientific objectives and potential discoveries enabled by ET's projected sensitivity, which would allow exploration of gravitational-wave sources at cosmological distances in astrophysics, cosmology, and fundamental physics.

Significance. If the modeled sensitivity and duty cycle are realized, ET would extend gravitational-wave observations to high redshifts, enabling population studies of compact binaries, multi-messenger events, precision cosmology via standard sirens, and tests of general relativity in strong-field regimes. The paper usefully aggregates established projections from the GW community without introducing new derivations.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §1] The abstract and introduction should more explicitly note that all quantitative source-rate and horizon-distance projections are conditional on achieving the assumed noise curves and operational uptime, to avoid any implication of guaranteed performance.
  2. [Figures in §2–§5] Several sensitivity plots (e.g., those comparing ET to second-generation detectors) would benefit from explicit annotation of the frequency bands relevant to each science case discussed in later sections.
  3. [§3] A short paragraph summarizing the dominant systematic uncertainties in the adopted binary population models (e.g., from different supernova or common-envelope prescriptions) would strengthen the robustness statements in the astrophysics section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review of our manuscript and for the positive assessment and recommendation of minor revision. No specific major comments were raised in the report, so we have no point-by-point responses to provide at this stage. We will incorporate any minor suggestions during the revision process.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The document is a prospective science case for the proposed Einstein Telescope that compiles established gravitational-wave physics, detector modeling, and projected discovery potential without introducing new derivations or predictions that reduce to fitted parameters by construction. All quantitative projections are explicitly conditional on the instrument achieving its modeled sensitivity and duty cycle, and the text contains no self-definitional steps, load-bearing self-citations that substitute for independent evidence, or renamings of known results presented as novel unification. The central claims rest on external benchmarks from second-generation detectors and standard astrophysical/cosmological models rather than internal circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is a science case for a proposed instrument and does not introduce new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; it relies on existing knowledge of gravitational wave physics and detector technology.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5435 in / 940 out tokens · 50274 ms · 2026-05-16T00:09:33.500438+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 18 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A New Spin on Dissipative Tides: First-Post-Newtonian Effects in Compact Binary Inspirals

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Spin-induced tidal dissipation in compact binaries enters the gravitational-wave phase at 2.5 post-Newtonian order with a logarithmic frequency dependence.

  2. Gravitational-wave Tomography of the Moon: Constraining Lunar Structure with Calibrated Gravitational Waves

    astro-ph.EP 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A perturbative tomographic framework shows that calibrated gravitational waves can reduce estimation errors on the Moon's elastic parameters by roughly an order of magnitude.

  3. Axial Oscillations of Viscous Neutron Stars

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Viscous neutron stars have new families of axial oscillation modes without perfect-fluid counterparts, featuring mode avoidance and long-lived modes.

  4. Novel ringdown tests of general relativity with black hole greybody factors

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    GreyRing model based on greybody factors reproduces numerical relativity ringdown signals with mismatches of order 10^{-6} and enables a new post-merger consistency test of general relativity applied to GW250114.

  5. Testing Dark Energy with Black Hole Ringdown

    gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Dynamical dark energy imprints O(1) shifts on black hole quasi-normal modes via cosmological hair, enabling constraints at 10^{-2} (LVK) to 10^{-4} (LISA) precision using the cubic Galileon as example.

  6. Primordial Black Hole from Tensor-induced Density Fluctuation: First-order Phase Transitions and Domain Walls

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Tensor perturbations from first-order phase transitions and domain wall annihilation induce curvature fluctuations at second order that form primordial black holes, allowing asteroid-mass PBHs to comprise all dark mat...

  7. N-body next-to-leading order gravitational spin-orbit interaction via effective field theory

    gr-qc 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    The NLO gravitational spin-orbit Hamiltonian for N spinning bodies is computed via PN-EFT, with only three-body diagrams new beyond the binary case, and the result matches the known ADM Hamiltonian up to canonical tra...

  8. A cosmology-to-ringdown EFT consistency map for scalar-tensor gravity

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    An EFT consistency map transports cosmology-conditioned posteriors from scalar-tensor FLRW backgrounds to black-hole quasinormal-mode kernels, showing tensor-speed effects fall below ringdown detectability while other...

  9. Robust parameter inference for Taiji via time-frequency contrastive learning and normalizing flows

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A glitch-robust amortized inference framework combining normalizing flows, time-frequency multimodal fusion, and contrastive learning outperforms MCMC for Taiji massive black hole binary parameter estimation under noi...

  10. Bilinear products and the orthogonality of quasinormal modes on hyperboloidal foliations

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Bilinear products for black hole quasinormal modes on hyperboloidal foliations are divergent due to CPT transformations but can be regularized to define orthogonal modes and excitation coefficients.

  11. Post-Newtonian inspiral waveform model for eccentric precessing binaries with higher-order modes and matter effects

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    pyEFPEHM extends prior PN models to include higher-order quasi-circular phasing, generalized precession solutions, and eccentric corrections up to 1PN in selected multipoles for eccentric precessing binaries with matt...

  12. Anisotropic hybrid stars: Interplay of superconductivity and magnetic field leading to gravitational waves

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    New phenomenological anisotropy profiles in hybrid stars, driven by superconductivity and magnetic fields, lead to enhanced masses and continuous gravitational wave emission.

  13. Hunting Dark Matter with the Einstein Telescope

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Clustered primordial black holes may constitute all dark matter and produce a flat stochastic gravitational wave background detectable by the Einstein Telescope.

  14. Are Black Holes Fuzzballs? Probing Horizon-Scale Structure with LISA

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LISA can constrain non-axisymmetric mass quadrupole deformations at the 10^{-3} level and axisymmetric mass octupole deformations at the 10^{-2} level in EMRI signals to test fuzzball proposals.

  15. Precision Analysis for $\boldsymbol{H_0}$ Using Upcoming Multi-band Gravitational Wave Observations

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Multi-band GW observations of PBHs can reduce H0 uncertainty to ≲2 km/s/Mpc (conservative) or O(0.1) km/s/Mpc (optimistic) via Fisher forecasts on M_PBH and f_PBH.

  16. Machine Learning for Multi-messenger Probes of New Physics and Cosmology: A Review and Perspective

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A review summarizing machine learning methods for multi-messenger probes of dark matter and new physics, with a proposed plan for future integrated analyses.

  17. Cosmology Intertwined: A Review of the Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Associated with the Cosmological Tensions and Anomalies

    astro-ph.CO 2022-03 accept novelty 2.0

    The paper reviews cosmological tensions including the H0 and S8 discrepancies and explores new physics models that could explain them.

  18. The Science of the Einstein Telescope

    gr-qc 2025-03

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

238 extracted references · 238 canonical work pages · cited by 18 Pith papers · 146 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger

    B. P. Abbott et al., “Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 no. 6, (2016) 061102, arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

  2. [2]

    GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral

    B. P. Abbott et al., “GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 no. 16, (2017) 161101, arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

  3. [3]

    An Ordinary Short Gamma-Ray Burst with Extraordinary Implications: Fermi-GBM Detection of GRB 170817A

    A. Goldstein et al., “An Ordinary Short Gamma-Ray Burst with Extraordinary Implications: Fermi-GBM Detection of GRB 170817A,” Astrophys. J. 848 (2017) L14, arXiv:1710.05446 [astro-ph.HE]

  4. [4]

    INTEGRAL Detection of the First Prompt Gamma-Ray Signal Coincident with the Gravitational Wave Event GW170817

    V. Savchenko et al., “INTEGRAL Detection of the First Prompt Gamma-Ray Signal Coincident with the Gravitational-wave Event GW170817,” Astrophys. J. 848 (2017) L15, arXiv:1710.05449 [astro-ph.HE]

  5. [5]

    Gravitational Waves and Gamma-rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A

    B. P. Abbott et al., “Gravitational Waves and Gamma-rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A,” Astrophys. J. 848 (2017) L13, arXiv:1710.05834 [astro-ph.HE]

  6. [6]

    Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger

    B. P. Abbott et al., “Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger,” Astrophys. J. 848 no. 2, (2017) L12, arXiv:1710.05833 [astro-ph.HE]

  7. [7]

    Swope Supernova Survey 2017a (SSS17a), the Optical Counterpart to a Gravitational Wave Source

    D. A. Coulter et al., “Swope Supernova Survey 2017a (SSS17a), the optical counterpart to a gravitational wave source,” Science 358 no. 6370, (Dec, 2017) 1556–1558, arXiv:1710.05452 [astro-ph.HE]

  8. [8]

    The X-ray counterpart to the gravitational wave event GW 170817

    E. Troja et al., “The X-ray counterpart to the gravitational-wave event GW170817,” Nature 551 no. 7678, (Nov, 2017) 71–74, arXiv:1710.05433 [astro-ph.HE] . – 36 –

  9. [9]

    A Radio Counterpart to a Neutron Star Merger

    G. Hallinan et al., “A radio counterpart to a neutron star merger,” Science 358 no. 6370, (Dec, 2017) 1579–1583, arXiv:1710.05435 [astro-ph.HE]

  10. [10]

    Superluminal motion of a relativistic jet in the neutron star merger GW170817

    K. P. Mooley et al., “Superluminal motion of a relativistic jet in the neutron-star merger GW170817,” Nature 561 no. 7723, (Sep, 2018) 355–359, arXiv:1806.09693 [astro-ph.HE]

  11. [11]

    Compact radio emission indicates a structured jet was produced by a binary neutron star merger

    G. Ghirlanda et al., “Compact radio emission indicates a structured jet was produced by a binary neutron star merger,” Science 363 no. 6430, (Mar, 2019) 968–971, arXiv:1808.00469 [astro-ph.HE]

  12. [12]

    Spectroscopic identification of r-process nucleosynthesis in a double neutron star merger

    E. Pian, P. D’Avanzo, et al., “Spectroscopic identification of r-process nucleosynthesis in a double neutron-star merger,” Nature 551 no. 7678, (Nov, 2017) 67–70, arXiv:1710.05858 [astro-ph.HE]

  13. [13]

    A kilonova as the electromagnetic counterpart to a gravitational-wave source

    S. J. Smartt et al., “A kilonova as the electromagnetic counterpart to a gravitational-wave source,” Nature 551 no. 7678, (Nov, 2017) 75–79, arXiv:1710.05841 [astro-ph.HE]

  14. [14]

    Origin of the heavy elements in binary neutron-star mergers from a gravitational wave event

    D. Kasen, B. Metzger, J. Barnes, E. Quataert, and E. Ramirez-Ruiz, “Origin of the heavy elements in binary neutron-star mergers from a gravitational-wave event,” Nature 551 no. 7678, (Nov, 2017) 80–84, arXiv:1710.05463 [astro-ph.HE]

  15. [15]

    Identification of strontium in the merger of two neutron stars,

    D. Watson et al., “Identification of strontium in the merger of two neutron stars,” Nature 574 no. 7779, (Oct, 2019) 497–500

  16. [16]

    GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs

    B. P. Abbott et al., “GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs,” arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE]

  17. [17]

    A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant

    B. P. Abbott et al., “A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant,” Nature 551 no. 7678, (2017) 85–88, arXiv:1710.05835 [astro-ph.CO]

  18. [18]

    Tests of general relativity with GW150914

    B. P. Abbott et al., “Tests of general relativity with GW150914,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 no. 22, (2016) 221101, arXiv:1602.03841 [gr-qc] . [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett.121,no.12,129902(2018)]

  19. [19]

    Tests of General Relativity with GW170817

    B. P. Abbott et al., “Tests of General Relativity with GW170817,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 no. 1, (2019) 011102, arXiv:1811.00364 [gr-qc]

  20. [20]

    Tests of General Relativity with the Binary Black Hole Signals from the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1

    B. P. Abbott et al., “Tests of General Relativity with the Binary Black Hole Signals from the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1,” arXiv:1903.04467 [gr-qc]

  21. [21]

    The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,

    M. Punturo et al., “The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,” Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 194002

  22. [22]

    ET Design Update 2020,

    ET Steering Committee Editorial Team, “ET Design Update 2020,” to appear

  23. [23]

    Exploring the Sensitivity of Next Generation Gravitational Wave Detectors

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., “Exploring the Sensitivity of Next Generation Gravitational Wave Detectors,” Class. Quant. Grav. 34 (2017) 044001, arXiv:1607.08697 [astro-ph.IM]

  24. [24]

    Pushing towards the ET sensitivity using 'conventional' technology

    S. Hild, S. Chelkowski, and A. Freise, “Pushing towards the ET sensitivity using ’conventional’ technology,” arXiv:0810.0604 [gr-qc]

  25. [25]

    Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories

    S. Hild et al., “Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories,” Class. Quant. Grav. 28 (2011) 094013, arXiv:1012.0908 [gr-qc]

  26. [26]

    Cosmology and the Early Universe

    B. S. Sathyaprakash et al., “Cosmology and the Early Universe,” arXiv:1903.09260 [astro-ph.HE]

  27. [27]

    3G Science Book,

    GWIC 3G Committee, the GWIC 3G Science Case Team, and the International 3G Science Team Consortium, “3G Science Book,” in preparation (2020)

  28. [28]

    A Mock Data Challenge for the Einstein Gravitational-Wave Telescope

    T. Regimbau et al., “A Mock Data Challenge for the Einstein Gravitational-Wave Telescope,” Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 122001, arXiv:1201.3563 [gr-qc] . – 37 –

  29. [29]

    Second Einstein Telescope Mock Science Challenge : Detection of the GW Stochastic Background from Compact Binary Coalescences

    T. Regimbau, D. Meacher, and M. Coughlin, “Second Einstein Telescope mock science challenge: Detection of the gravitational-wave stochastic background from compact binary coalescences,” Phys. Rev. D89 (2014) 084046, arXiv:1404.1134 [astro-ph.CO]

  30. [30]

    Cosmology and dark energy from joint gravitational wave-GRB observations,

    E. Belgacem, Y. Dirian, S. Foffa, E. J. Howell, M. Maggiore, and T. Regimbau, “Cosmology and dark energy from joint gravitational wave-GRB observations,” JCAP 2019 (2020) 015, arXiv:1907.01487 [astro-ph.CO]

  31. [31]

    Primordial black holes, dark matter and hot-spot electroweak baryogenesis at the quark-hadron epoch,

    B. Carr, S. Clesse, and J. Garcia-Bellido, “Primordial black holes, dark matter and hot-spot electroweak baryogenesis at the quark-hadron epoch,” arXiv:1904.02129 [astro-ph.CO]

  32. [32]

    A common origin for baryons and dark matter

    J. Garcia-Bellido, B. Carr, and S. Clesse, “A common origin for baryons and dark matter,” arXiv:1904.11482 [astro-ph.CO]

  33. [33]

    The clustering of massive Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: measuring their mass distribution with Advanced LIGO

    S. Clesse and J. Garcia-Bellido, “The clustering of massive Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: measuring their mass distribution with Advanced LIGO,” Phys. Dark Univ. 15 (2017) 142–147, arXiv:1603.05234 [astro-ph.CO]

  34. [34]

    Detecting the gravitational wave background from primordial black hole dark matter

    S. Clesse and J. Garcia-Bellido, “Detecting the gravitational wave background from primordial black hole dark matter,” Phys. Dark Univ. 18 (2017) 105–114, arXiv:1610.08479 [astro-ph.CO]

  35. [35]

    Massive Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter and their detection with Gravitational Waves

    J. Garcia-Bellido, “Massive Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter and their detection with Gravitational Waves,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 840 no. 1, (2017) 012032, arXiv:1702.08275 [astro-ph.CO]

  36. [36]

    From hadrons to quarks in neutron stars: a review

    G. Baym, T. Hatsuda, T. Kojo, P. D. Powell, Y. Song, and T. Takatsuka, “From hadrons to quarks in neutron stars: a review,” Rept. Prog. Phys. 81 no. 5, (2018) 056902, arXiv:1707.04966 [astro-ph.HE]

  37. [37]

    GW170817: Measurements of Neutron Star Radii and Equation of State

    B. P. Abbott et al., “GW170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 no. 16, (2018) 161101, arXiv:1805.11581 [gr-qc]

  38. [38]

    Constraints on neutron star radii based on chiral effective field theory interactions,

    K. Hebeler, J. M. Lattimer, C. J. Pethick, and A. Schwenk, “Constraints on neutron star radii based on chiral effective field theory interactions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 161102

  39. [39]

    The maximum mass and radius of neutron stars and the nuclear symmetry energy,

    S. Gandolfi, J. Carlson, and S. Reddy, “The maximum mass and radius of neutron stars and the nuclear symmetry energy,” Phys. Rev. C85 (2012) 032801

  40. [40]

    Constraining the speed of sound inside neutron stars with chiral effective field theory interactions and observations,

    I. Tews, J. Carlson, S. Gandolfi, and S. Reddy, “Constraining the speed of sound inside neutron stars with chiral effective field theory interactions and observations,” Astrophys. J. 860 no. 2, (2018) 149

  41. [41]

    Impact of high-order tidal terms on binary neutron-star waveforms

    X. Jim´ enez Forteza, T. Abdelsalhin, P. Pani, and L. Gualtieri, “Impact of high-order tidal terms on binary neutron-star waveforms,” Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 124014, arXiv:1807.08016 [gr-qc]

  42. [42]

    Maggiore, Gravitational Waves

    M. Maggiore, Gravitational Waves. Vol. 2. Astrophysics and Cosmology . Oxford University Press, 848 p, 2018

  43. [43]

    Matter effects on binary neutron star waveforms

    J. S. Read, L. Baiotti, J. D. E. Creighton, J. L. Friedman, B. Giacomazzo, K. Kyutoku, C. Markakis, L. Rezzolla, M. Shibata, and K. Taniguchi, “Matter effects on binary neutron star waveforms,” Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 044042, arXiv:1306.4065 [gr-qc]

  44. [44]

    Whispers from the edge of physics

    N. Andersson, “Whispers from the edge of physics,” J. Astrophys. Astron. 38 (2017) 58, arXiv:1709.07215 [astro-ph.HE]

  45. [45]

    Gravitational Waves from Neutron Stars: A Review

    P. D. Lasky, “Gravitational Waves from Neutron Stars: A Review,” Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral. 32 (2015) e034, arXiv:1508.06643 [astro-ph.HE]

  46. [46]

    Searches for Gravitational Waves from Known Pulsars at Two Harmonics in 2015-2017 LIGO Data,

    B. P. Abbott et al., “Searches for Gravitational Waves from Known Pulsars at Two Harmonics in 2015-2017 LIGO Data,” Astrophys. J. 879 no. 1, (2019) 10, arXiv:1902.08507 [astro-ph.HE]. – 38 –

  47. [47]

    Narrow-band search for gravitational waves from known pulsars using the second LIGO observing run

    B. P. Abbott et al., “Narrow-band search for gravitational waves from known pulsars using the second LIGO observing run,” Phys. Rev. D99 no. 12, (2019) 122002, arXiv:1902.08442 [gr-qc]

  48. [48]

    All-sky search for continuous gravitational waves from isolated neutron stars using Advanced LIGO O2 data

    B. P. Abbott et al., “All-sky search for continuous gravitational waves from isolated neutron stars using Advanced LIGO O2 data,” Phys. Rev. D100 no. 2, (2019) 024004, arXiv:1903.01901 [astro-ph.HE]

  49. [49]

    Searches for Continuous Gravitational Waves from 15 Supernova Remnants and Fomalhaut b with Advanced LIGO,

    B. P. Abbott et al., “Searches for Continuous Gravitational Waves from 15 Supernova Remnants and Fomalhaut b with Advanced LIGO,” Astrophys. J. 875 no. 2, (2019) 122, arXiv:1812.11656 [astro-ph.HE]

  50. [50]

    A directed search for continuous gravitational-wave signals from the Galactic Center in Advanced LIGO second observing run,

    O. J. Piccinni, A. P., S. D’Antonio, S. Frasca, G. Intini, I. La Rosa, P. Leaci, S. Mastrogiovanni, A. Miller, and C. Palomba, “A directed search for continuous gravitational-wave signals from the Galactic Center in Advanced LIGO second observing run,” arXiv e-prints (2019) , arXiv:1910.05097 [gr-qc]

  51. [51]

    Search for gravitational waves from Scorpius X-1 in the second Advanced LIGO observing run with an improved hidden Markov model,

    B. P. Abbott et al., “Search for gravitational waves from Scorpius X-1 in the second Advanced LIGO observing run with an improved hidden Markov model,” Phys. Rev. D100 no. 12, (2019) 122002, arXiv:1906.12040 [gr-qc]

  52. [52]

    The Breaking Strain of Neutron Star Crust and Gravitational Waves

    C. J. Horowitz and K. Kadau, “The Breaking Strain of Neutron Star Crust and Gravitational Waves,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 191102, arXiv:0904.1986

  53. [53]

    Maximum elastic deformations of relativistic stars

    N. K. Johnson-McDaniel and B. J. Owen, “Maximum elastic deformations of relativistic stars,” Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 044004, arXiv:1208.5227

  54. [54]

    Evidence for a minimum ellipticity in millisecond pulsars

    G. Woan, M. D. Pitkin, B. Haskell, D. I. Jones, and P. D. Lasky, “Evidence for a Minimum Ellipticity in Millisecond Pulsars,” Astrophys J. 863 (2018) Ls40, arXiv:1806.02822 [astro-ph.HE]

  55. [55]

    Einstein gravitational wave Telescope: Conceptual Design Study,

    M. Abernathy et al., “Einstein gravitational wave Telescope: Conceptual Design Study,” 2011

  56. [56]

    Beating the spin-down limit on gravitational wave emission from the Vela pulsar

    J. Abadie et al., “Beating the spin-down limit on gravitational wave emission from the Vela pulsar,” Astrophys. J. 737 (2011) 93, arXiv:1104.2712 [astro-ph.HE]

  57. [57]

    Neutron star bulk viscosity, "spin-flip" and GW emission of newly born magnetars

    S. Dall’Osso, L. Stella, and C. Palomba, “Neutron star bulk viscosity, spin-flip and GW emission of newly born magnetars,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 480 no. 1, (2018) 1353–1362, arXiv:1806.11164 [astro-ph.HE]

  58. [58]

    Method to search for long duration gravitational wave transients from isolated neutron stars using the generalized frequency-Hough transform,

    A. Miller et al., “Method to search for long duration gravitational wave transients from isolated neutron stars using the generalized frequency-Hough transform,” Phys. Rev. D98 no. 10, (2018) 102004, arXiv:1810.09784 [astro-ph.IM]

  59. [59]

    Method for all-sky searches of continuous gravitational wave signals using the frequency-Hough transform

    P. Astone, A. Colla, S. D’Antonio, S. Frasca, and C. Palomba, “Method for all-sky searches of continuous gravitational wave signals using the frequency-Hough transform,” Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) 042002, arXiv:1407.8333 [astro-ph.IM]

  60. [60]

    Gravitational Radiation and Rotation of Accreting Neutron Stars

    L. Bildsten, “Gravitational radiation and rotation of accreting neutron stars,” Astrophys. J. 501 (1998) L89, arXiv:astro-ph/9804325 [astro-ph]

  61. [61]

    Formation of very strongly magnetized neutron stars - implications for gamma-ray bursts,

    R. C. Duncan and C. Thompson, “Formation of very strongly magnetized neutron stars - implications for gamma-ray bursts,” Astrophys. J. 392 (1992) L9

  62. [62]

    A Gravitational Wave Detector with Cosmological Reach

    S. Dwyer, D. Sigg, S. W. Ballmer, L. Barsotti, N. Mavalvala, and M. Evans, “Gravitational wave detector with cosmological reach,” Phys. Rev. D91 no. 8, (2015) 082001, arXiv:1410.0612 [astro-ph.IM]

  63. [63]

    Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO

    D. Reitze et al., “Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO,” Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51 (2019) 035, arXiv:1907.04833 [astro-ph.IM]

  64. [64]

    Localization accuracy of compact binary coalescences detected by the third-generation gravitational-wave detectors and implication for cosmology

    W. Zhao and L. Wen, “Localization accuracy of compact binary coalescences detected by the – 39 – third-generation gravitational-wave detectors and implication for cosmology,” Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 064031, arXiv:1710.05325 [astro-ph.CO]

  65. [65]

    Binary Neutron Star Mergers and Third Generation Detectors: Localization and Early Warning

    M. L. Chan, C. Messenger, I. S. Heng, and M. Hendry, “Binary neutron star mergers and third generation detectors: Localization and early warning,” Physical Review D 97 no. 12, (Jun, 2018) 123014, arXiv:1803.09680 [astro-ph.HE]

  66. [66]

    Metrics for next-generation gravitational-wave detectors,

    E. D. Hall and M. Evans, “Metrics for next-generation gravitational-wave detectors,” Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (2019) 225002, arXiv:1902.09485 [astro-ph.IM]

  67. [67]

    Progress on the European Extremely Large Telescope,

    J. Spyromilio, F. Comer´ on, S. D’Odorico, M. Kissler-Patig, and R. Gilmozzi, “Progress on the European Extremely Large Telescope,” The Messenger 133 (Sep, 2008) 2–8

  68. [68]

    Multi-Messenger Astronomy with Extremely Large Telescopes

    R. Chornock et al., “Multi-Messenger Astronomy with Extremely Large Telescopes,” arXiv:1903.04629 [astro-ph.HE]

  69. [69]

    ELT-CAM, the E-ELT first light imager,

    Y. Cl´ enet, “ELT-CAM, the E-ELT first light imager,” inSF2A-2013: Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the French Society of Astronomy and Astrophysics , L. Cambresy, F. Martins, E. Nuss, and A. Palacios, eds., pp. 267–272. Nov, 2013

  70. [70]

    Determining the Hubble Constant from Gravitational Wave Observations,

    B. F. Schutz, “Determining the Hubble Constant from Gravitational Wave Observations,” Nature 323 (1986) 310–311

  71. [71]

    Inference of the cosmological parameters from gravitational waves: application to second generation interferometers

    W. Del Pozzo, “Inference of the cosmological parameters from gravitational waves: application to second generation interferometers,” Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 043011, arXiv:1108.1317 [astro-ph.CO]

  72. [72]

    Beyond the classical distance-redshift test: cross-correlating redshift-free standard candles and sirens with redshift surveys

    S. Mukherjee and B. D. Wandelt, “Beyond the classical distance-redshift test: cross-correlating redshift-free standard candles and sirens with redshift surveys,” arXiv:1808.06615 [astro-ph.CO]

  73. [73]

    GW ×LSS: chasing the progenitors of merging binary black holes,

    G. Scelfo, N. Bellomo, A. Raccanelli, S. Matarrese, and L. Verde, “GW ×LSS: chasing the progenitors of merging binary black holes,” JCAP 1809 no. 09, (2018) 039, arXiv:1809.03528 [astro-ph.CO]

  74. [74]

    Prospects for Observing and Localizing Gravitational-Wave Transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA

    LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., “Prospects for Observing and Localizing Gravitational-Wave Transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA,” Living Rev. Rel. 21 (2018) 3, arXiv:1304.0670 [gr-qc]

  75. [75]

    Properties of the binary neutron star merger GW170817

    B. P. Abbott et al., “Properties of the Binary Neutron Star Merger GW170817,” Physical Review X 9 no. 1, (Jan, 2019) 011001, arXiv:1805.11579 [gr-qc]

  76. [76]

    Multimessenger Parameter Estimation of GW170817

    D. Radice and L. Dai, “Multimessenger parameter estimation of GW170817,” European Physical Journal A 55 no. 4, (Apr, 2019) 50, arXiv:1810.12917 [astro-ph.HE]

  77. [77]

    The Origin of r-Process Elements in the Milky Way

    B. Cˆ ot´ e, C. L. Fryer, K. Belczynski, O. Korobkin, M. Chru´ sli´ nska, N. Vassh, M. R. Mumpower, J. Lippuner, T. M. Sprouse, R. Surman, and R. Wollaeger, “The Origin of r-process Elements in the Milky Way,” Astrophysical Journal 855 no. 2, (Mar, 2018) 99, arXiv:1710.05875 [astro-ph.GA]

  78. [78]

    A Hubble constant measurement from superluminal motion of the jet in GW170817,

    K. Hotokezaka, E. Nakar, O. Gottlieb, S. Nissanke, K. Masuda, G. Hallinan, K. P. Mooley, and A. T. Deller, “A Hubble constant measurement from superluminal motion of the jet in GW170817,” Nature Astronomy (Jul, 2019) 385

  79. [79]

    Science with the Square Kilometer Array: Motivation, Key Science Projects, Standards and Assumptions

    C. L. Carilli and S. Rawlings, “Motivation, key science projects, standards and assumptions,” New Astron. Rev. 48 no. 11-12, (Dec, 2004) 979–984, arXiv:astro-ph/0409274 [astro-ph]

  80. [80]

    Large Synoptic Survey Telescope: From Science Drivers To Reference Design,

    Z. Ivezic et al., “Large Synoptic Survey Telescope: From Science Drivers To Reference Design,” Serbian Astronomical Journal 176 (Jun, 2008) 1–13

Showing first 80 references.