Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 2 cited by

Timelike entanglement entropy is defined by continuing replica twist correlators to time-ordered timelike insertions, with the operator ordering fixing the imaginary part.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 03:00 UTC pith:KRUQCOBF

load-bearing objection Strong boundary definition of TEE with a concrete Vaidya prediction, but the excited-state sector rests on an unproven identity-block assumption after timelike continuation. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.14012 v1 pith:KRUQCOBF submitted 2026-07-15 hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechgr-qcquant-ph

Temporal Entanglement from Twist Correlators in 2d Conformal Field Theory and Holography

Alice Bernamonti , Federico Galli , Michal P. Heller , Fabio Ori , Alexandre Serantes This is my paper
classification hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechgr-qcquant-ph
keywords timelike entanglement entropyreplica twist correlators2d conformal field theoryAdS3/CFT2complex geodesicscomplex cosmic braneRényi entropyAdS-Vaidya
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper proposes a field-theoretic definition of timelike entanglement entropy in two-dimensional conformal field theory: analytically continue the replica twist correlator, which computes ordinary Rényi entropies for spatial intervals, to a time-ordered correlator whose insertions are timelike separated. The continuation removes the ambiguity in the imaginary part of the complex-valued entropy: operator ordering fixes its sign, and its magnitude is quantized in units of cπ/6, counting causal-diamond crossings between the endpoints. Holographically, the same boundary correlator is evaluated by complex geodesics in AdS3, and the dominant saddle is the one with the smallest real part of the length, giving a boundary derivation of the complex extremal surface rule. For Rényi index n>1 the construction yields a complex cosmic brane geometry. In the AdS-Vaidya setting the result matches the CFT answer and differs from earlier piecewise geodesic constructions, indicating that complex geodesics are the gravitational carriers of TEE.

Core claim

The central claim is that timelike entanglement entropy and timelike Rényi entropies are not defined by analytically continuing the final entropy formula, but by continuing the full replica twist correlator to a Lorentzian, time-ordered correlator with timelike-separated twist operators. This fixes the imaginary part unambiguously through operator ordering: time ordering and anti-time ordering select complex-conjugate branches, giving imaginary parts ±cπ/6 per causal-diamond crossing. In the holographic large-c limit the correlator is dominated by complex geodesics in AdS3 (or complex cosmic branes for n>1), and the boundary computation selects the saddle with the smallest real part of the l

What carries the argument

The central object is the replica twist two-point function ⟨T{σ_n(t1,x1) σ̃_n(t2,x2)}⟩ρ, the time-ordered Lorentzian continuation of the Euclidean twist correlator whose spacelike version gives the standard Rényi entropy. The analytic continuation is implemented by an iε prescription that fixes the operator ordering; in the large-c holographic limit the correlator is evaluated by a geodesic approximation in which complexified geodesics (and, for n>1, complex cosmic branes constructed via standard conformal maps of three-dimensional gravity) connect the timelike boundary points. This object carries the argument because selecting the saddle with the smallest real part of the length, and tracki

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the heavy-heavy-light-light four-point function of twist operators is dominated by the Virasoro identity block and that, for purely timelike intervals, a unique identity channel is selected by continuity from small spatial separation; if non-identity blocks contribute or the degenerate ±|m| channels interfere, the derived phases and saddle-selection rule would change.

What would settle it

Compute exactly the replica twist four-point function for timelike-separated insertions in a solvable 2d CFT such as the free fermion or a minimal model, where Virasoro blocks beyond the identity can be summed; if the imaginary part deviates from the quantized cπ/6 counting or the real part is not given by the smallest-real-part channel, the proposal would fail. A more targeted check is to evaluate the correlator at purely timelike separation and resolve the degenerate ±|m| channel limit: if the channels interfere rather than one dominating, the selection rule breaks.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Timelike entanglement is a boundary-defined observable in 2d CFT, not an ad hoc continuation of the entropy formula, so its imaginary part has a controlled origin in operator ordering.
  • The imaginary part of TEE is quantized in units of cπ/6 and counts effective causal-diamond crossings; it is sensitive to causal structure, not dynamics.
  • Holographic TEE is computed by complex geodesics (and complex cosmic branes) selected by smallest real part of the length, providing a boundary derivation of the complex extremal surface prescription.
  • In AdS-Vaidya, the complex-geodesic answer reproduces the known CFT correlator and differs from earlier piecewise constructions, ruling out piecewise curves as the gravitational carriers of TEE.
  • For purely timelike intervals on a cylinder, TEE extends beyond a single causal diamond, overcoming a limitation of earlier geometric continuation prescriptions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the identity-block dominance holds beyond large c, the same time-ordered twist correlator prescription could be tested against exact correlators in minimal models or free fermions, where the imaginary part should still be fixed by ordering.
  • The smallest-real-part selection rule suggests that for multiple timelike intervals, distinct operator orderings may define inequivalent complex entropies, possibly connected to entanglement negativity or entanglement in time.
  • The constancy of the imaginary part in both local and global quenches hints that the imaginary part is a topological/causal quantity in 2d, whereas in higher dimensions the paper's own discussion suggests it may acquire nontrivial subregion-size dependence.
  • A tensor-network realization of temporal entanglement should reproduce the complex domain-wall saddle in the replica limit, providing a discrete analog of the complex cosmic brane; this would connect the CFT construction to numerical simulations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a replica twist-correlator definition of timelike entanglement entropy (TEE) and timelike Rényi entropies in 2d CFTs: the Euclidean replica twist two-point function is analytically continued to a time-ordered Lorentzian correlator with timelike-separated insertions, eqs. (2.5)–(2.7). This defines complex-valued entropies whose imaginary part is claimed to be fixed by the operator ordering. The construction is worked out for the vacuum on the line and on the cylinder, where the imaginary part is quantized in units of cπ/6 and counts causal-diamond crossings; for heavy local-operator states using Virasoro identity-block dominance of HHLL correlators; for local and global operator quenches; and holographically in terms of complex geodesics in AdS3, complex cosmic branes for Rényi index n>1, and complex geodesics in planar AdS3-Vaidya. The paper reports exact agreement between CFT and bulk computations in all these settings and argues that earlier piecewise geodesic constructions do not reproduce the CFT result in Vaidya.

Significance. If the assumptions hold, this is a substantial contribution: it gives a boundary-defined origin for the complex-extremal-surface prescription, removes the continuation ambiguity in the imaginary part, extends the construction to Rényi index n>1, and provides a sharp holographic test in a time-dependent geometry. The paper's strengths include explicit analytic CFT and bulk computations in several nontrivial settings, a careful treatment of lightcone sheet structure and operator ordering, and an independent numerical check for thick-shell Vaidya spacetimes. The main caveat is that the excited-state results rest on an unproven identity-block dominance after the timelike continuation, so the central claim is conditional on a gap that needs to be closed.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.1, eqs. (4.3)–(4.4) and (4.14), (4.16)] The excited-state TEE results relies on approximating the HHLL four-point function by the Virasoro identity block, G_n(z, z̄) ≈ F0(z) F̄0(z̄), and then analytically continuing to timelike-separated twist insertions. Euclidean large-c identity-block dominance is standard, but the Lorentzian continuation moves z and z̄ onto different sheets, and the paper does not prove that non-identity Virasoro blocks remain subdominant. Stokes phenomena could make a non-identity block the leading saddle in the timelike regime, which would invalidate the smallest-real-part selection rule and the phase formulas (4.14), (4.16). The statement in §4.3 that subleading channels 'give subleading contributions at all times' is not demonstrated for the TEE continuation; the check is described only for the spacelike local-quench discussion. Please provide a concrete test, e.g., compute the subleading block on the
  2. [§4.1, after eq. (4.16); §4.2] For purely timelike intervals (Δϕ=0), the channels with m and −|m| are degenerate in real part. The paper asserts that continuing from a small spatial separation selects a unique dominant channel, but no computation of the correlator in that degenerate limit is provided. If both channels contribute coherently, the imaginary part need not be the single value displayed in (4.14) or (4.16). This is a load-bearing point for the claim that the imaginary part is uniquely determined; it should be resolved by an explicit calculation near Δϕ=0 or by an argument that the channels cannot interfere in the replica limit.
  3. [§5.4, eqs. (5.26)–(5.31)] The selection of the junction point v_s=0 in the thin-shell Vaidya computation is made by minimizing the real part of the length along the purely imaginary v_s direction. A minimum on a one-dimensional slice is not sufficient to identify a saddle point in the complex v_s plane; other complex saddles could contribute with smaller real part. Since the agreement with the CFT result (5.31) is a central test of the holographic dictionary, please either provide a full complex saddle-point analysis or verify explicitly that the relevant steepest-descent contour passes through v_s=0 and that no other saddle dominates.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§2.1, eqs. (2.11) and (2.14)] The displayed phases e^{iπ(Δt²−Δx²)} and e^{−iπ(Δt²−Δx²)} are dimensionally inconsistent; the intended expression is e^{iπ}(Δt²−Δx²) (with the appropriate iε branch). This is likely a typo, but it appears in the central definition and should be corrected.
  2. [Abstract and §3] The phrase 'imaginary part is quantized in units of cπ/6' is accurate for the cylinder and conical-defect cases, but in the BTZ case (4.16) the imaginary part takes only the values 0 or cπ/6. A brief qualification would avoid overstating the universality.
  3. [§4.3] The sentence 'one can check explicitly that in all time regimes the other channels ... give subleading contributions at all times' should be substantiated or accompanied by a reference; as written it is an unverified assertion in a section that already relies on the identity-block approximation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the paper's CFT definition and holographic saddle computations are self-contained; cited prior work is contextual rather than load-bearing, and the flagged gaps are correctness risks rather than circular reductions.

full rationale

The paper defines TEE as the analytic continuation of the replica twist correlator to a time-ordered Lorentzian correlator (eqs. (2.5)-(2.7)). The cπ/6 quantization of the imaginary part follows directly from the conformal weight h_n = c/24(n−1/n) and the iε branch choice; it is a derived property of the definition, not an independent assumption used to construct the observable, so it does not constitute circularity. The holographic results are obtained through the standard geodesic approximation and cosmic-brane saddle-point computations, and their agreement with the CFT expressions is a genuine consistency check rather than a rewrite of the input. In the AdS-Vaidya comparison, the CFT answer is taken from [62] and the complex geodesic length is computed independently in the paper, with the match being nontrivial. The identity-block dominance in section 4 is quoted from established literature ([45,47,62,73,77,78]) and is not defined in terms of the paper's target conclusions; even though [47] shares authors, the assumption is independently established, and the excited-state results would be falsified if a non-identity block dominated after analytic continuation. The unresolved question of Stokes phenomena or the ±|m| degeneracy is an unproven correctness gap, not a circular step. Self-citations to [16,42] are contextual: the selection rule is re-derived from the CFT minimization over monodromy channels rather than assumed from those papers. No fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. Therefore no specific circular reduction can be exhibited.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data; UV cutoffs (δ, ε) and the quench regulator µ are renormalization/regularization scales, and the heavy-operator weight hψ (equivalently α) is an input state parameter. No new physical entities are postulated: complex geodesics were introduced earlier ([63,68-70]) and the complex cosmic brane is an analytic continuation of the standard brane [57,58]. The principal postulates are the time-ordered continuation definition and the identity-block dominance.

axioms (6)
  • domain assumption TEE is defined by the time-ordered analytic continuation of the replica twist correlator (eqs. (2.5)-(2.7))
    This is the paper's central proposal, not a theorem: the iε prescription and sheet choice fix the imaginary part. Other continuation prescriptions would give different phases.
  • domain assumption Virasoro identity-block dominance for heavy-heavy-light-light correlators at large c
    Assumed in §4 (eq. (4.3)) following [47,73,78]; load-bearing for locally and globally excited states; not re-derived for the timelike regime.
  • standard math Geodesic approximation for heavy twist two-point functions in holographic CFTs
    Standard holographic dictionary used throughout (eq. (2.16)): correlator ~ exp(-2 h_n δL).
  • standard math Bañados–Roberts uniformization and the wall/beyond-wall coordinate extension
    Used in §2.3 to construct the complex cosmic brane; cited from [59,60,74,75].
  • domain assumption Junction at v_s=0 in thin-shell Vaidya after minimizing Re L along the imaginary v_s direction
    Section 5.4: the minimization is performed only along the purely imaginary v_s axis; global complex-saddle selection for v_s is assumed rather than proven.
  • domain assumption No homology constraint for pure microstates
    Section 4.2: 'we do not impose the usual homology condition' for pure states; follows [47,81].

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 46914 in / 15407 out tokens · 136841 ms · 2026-08-02T03:00:52.409474+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We formulate timelike entanglement entropy and its R\'enyi extension in two-dimensional conformal field theory through the analytic continuation of replica twist correlators to time-ordered, timelike-separated insertions. This field-theoretic construction grounds and generalizes recent developments, and applies to temporal subregions of arbitrary extent. Within three-dimensional holography, the semiclassical boundary correlator identifies boundary-anchored complex geodesics as the relevant bulk saddles and selects the one with the smallest real part of the length. This provides a direct boundary derivation of the proposed complex extremal surface prescription and extends to R\'enyi index $n>1$, for which we explicitly construct the corresponding complex cosmic brane geometry in the vacuum. We develop these ideas in several representative settings, including locally and globally excited states and quantum operator quenches, making manifest the precise agreement between boundary twist correlator and bulk complex geodesic calculations. For AdS-Vaidya, our approach predicts a different result from earlier piecewise geodesic constructions, while reproducing the field theory answer. Across these examples, the operator ordering uniquely determines the imaginary part of the complex-valued entropy, which is quantized in units of $c\pi/6$ and sensitive to the effective causal structure but not to the underlying dynamics.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Selecting Complex Extremal Surfaces with the Kontsevich--Segal--Witten Criterion

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    In AdS3, dS3, and AdS4 hyperbolic examples, the Kontsevich-Segal-Witten criterion uniquely selects a three-piece complex contour for timelike extremal surfaces, while timelike strips in AdS4 violate the criterion near...

  2. Analytic HTEE in Moving Plasmas and Its Transition

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Analytic holographic timelike entanglement entropy for a boosted BTZ black hole, with a critical boost separating complex and real extremal-geodesic branches.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

123 extracted references · 107 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Orus,A Practical Introduction to Tensor Networks: Matrix Product States and Projected Entangled Pair States,Annals Phys.349(2014) 117–158, [1306.2164]

    R. Orus,A Practical Introduction to Tensor Networks: Matrix Product States and Projected Entangled Pair States,Annals Phys.349(2014) 117–158, [1306.2164]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  2. [2]

    J. I. Cirac, D. Perez-Garcia, N. Schuch and F. Verstraete,Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states: Concepts, symmetries, theorems,Rev. Mod. Phys.93(2021) 045003, [2011.12127]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    M. C. Bañuls, M. B. Hastings, F. Verstraete and J. I. Cirac,Matrix Product States for Dynamical Simulation of Infinite Chains,Phys. Rev. Lett.102(2009) 240603, [0904.1926]. – 57 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  4. [4]

    M. B. Hastings and R. Mahajan,Connecting Entanglement in Time and Space: Improving the Folding Algorithm,Phys. Rev. A91(2015) 032306, [1411.7950]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  5. [5]

    Giudice, G

    G. Giudice, G. Giudici, M. Sonner, J. Thoenniss, A. Lerose, D. A. Abanin et al.,Temporal Entanglement, Quasiparticles, and the Role of Interactions,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 220401, [2112.14264]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    Lerose, M

    A. Lerose, M. Sonner and D. A. Abanin,Influence Matrix Approach to Many-Body Floquet Dynamics,Phys. Rev. X11(2021) 021040, [2009.10105]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Foligno, T

    A. Foligno, T. Zhou and B. Bertini,Temporal Entanglement in Chaotic Quantum Circuits, Phys. Rev. X13(2023) 041008, [2302.08502]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Carignano, C

    S. Carignano, C. R. Marimón and L. Tagliacozzo,Temporal entropy and the complexity of computing the expectation value of local operators after a quench,Phys. Rev. Res.6(2024) 033021, [2307.11649]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Carignano and L

    S. Carignano and L. Tagliacozzo,Loschmidt echo, emerging dual unitarity and scaling of generalized temporal entropies after quenches to the critical point,Quantum9(2025) 1859, [2405.14706]

    arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Bou-Comas, C

    A. Bou-Comas, C. R. Marimón, J. T. Schneider, S. Carignano and L. Tagliacozzo, Measuring temporal entropies in experiments,2409.05517

    arXiv

  11. [11]

    Cerezo-Roquebrún, J

    S. Cerezo-Roquebrún, J. T. Schneider, S. Carignano, A. Bou-Comas, M. C. Bañuls, E. López et al.,Mesoscopic Regimes of Temporal Entanglement in Ergodic Quantum Systems,2605.08356

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    Nakata, T

    Y. Nakata, T. Takayanagi, Y. Taki, K. Tamaoka and Z. Wei,New holographic generalization of entanglement entropy,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 026005, [2005.13801]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    K. Doi, J. Harper, A. Mollabashi, T. Takayanagi and Y. Taki,Pseudoentropy in dS/CFT and Timelike Entanglement Entropy,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 031601, [2210.09457]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    K. Doi, J. Harper, A. Mollabashi, T. Takayanagi and Y. Taki,Timelike entanglement entropy,JHEP05(2023) 052, [2302.11695]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Rangamani and T

    M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi,Holographic Entanglement Entropy, vol. 931. Springer, 2017, 10.1007/978-3-319-52573-0

    doi:10.1007/978-3-319-52573-0 2017

  16. [16]

    M. P. Heller, F. Ori and A. Serantes,Geometric Interpretation of Timelike Entanglement Entropy,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 131601, [2408.15752]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Nunez and D

    C. Nunez and D. Roychowdhury,Timelike entanglement entropy: A top-down approach, Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 026030, [2505.20388]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Nunez and D

    C. Nunez and D. Roychowdhury,Interpolating between spacelike and timelike entanglement via holography,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) L081902, [2507.17805]

    arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Nunez and D

    C. Nunez and D. Roychowdhury,Holographic timelike entanglement across dimensions, JHEP11(2025) 100, [2508.13266]

    arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Z.-X. Zhao, L. Zhao and S. He,Timelike entanglement entropy in higher curvature gravity, JHEP12(2025) 156, [2509.04181]

    arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Li, Z.-Q

    Z. Li, Z.-Q. Xiao and R.-Q. Yang,On holographic time-like entanglement entropy,JHEP04 (2023) 004, [2211.14883]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Bohra and A

    H. Bohra and A. Sivaramakrishnan,Composite AdS geodesics for CFT correlators and timelike entanglement entropy,2511.22168. – 58 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    Jiang, P

    X. Jiang, P. Wang, H. Wu and H. Yang,Timelike entanglement entropy and TT¯ deformation,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 046004, [2302.13872]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    Basu and V

    D. Basu and V. Raj,Reflected entropy and timelike entanglement in TT¯-deformed CFT2s, Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 046009, [2402.07253]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Chang, S

    J.-C. Chang, S. He, Y.-X. Liu and L. Zhao,Holographic TT¯deformation of the entanglement entropy in (A)dS3/CFT2,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 026013, [2409.08198]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Chu and H

    C.-S. Chu and H. Parihar,Time-like entanglement entropy in AdS/BCFT,JHEP06(2023) 173, [2304.10907]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    A. Das, S. Sachdeva and D. Sarkar,Bulk reconstruction using timelike entanglement in (A)dS,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 066007, [2312.16056]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    He and H.-Q

    P.-Z. He and H.-Q. Zhang,Holographic timelike entanglement entropy from Rindler method*,Chin. Phys. C48(2024) 115113, [2307.09803]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    J. K. Basak, A. Chakraborty, C.-S. Chu, D. Giataganas and H. Parihar,Massless Lifshitz field theory for arbitrary z,JHEP05(2024) 284, [2312.16284]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Afrasiar, J

    M. Afrasiar, J. K. Basak and D. Giataganas,Timelike entanglement entropy and phase transitions in non-conformal theories,JHEP07(2024) 243, [2404.01393]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    S. S. Jena and S. Mahapatra,A note on the holographic time-like entanglement entropy in Lifshitz theory,JHEP01(2025) 055, [2410.00384]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Afrasiar, J

    M. Afrasiar, J. K. Basak and D. Giataganas,Holographic timelike entanglement entropy in non-relativistic theories,JHEP05(2025) 205, [2411.18514]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Anegawa and K

    T. Anegawa and K. Tamaoka,Black hole singularity and timelike entanglement,JHEP10 (2024) 182, [2406.10968]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Afrasiar, J

    M. Afrasiar, J. K. Basak and K.-Y. Kim,Aspects of holographic timelike entanglement entropy in black hole backgrounds,2512.21327

    arXiv

  35. [35]

    Li and R.-Q

    Z.-H. Li and R.-Q. Yang,Black Hole Interior and Time-like Entanglement Entropy, 2601.18319

    arXiv

  36. [36]

    Katoch, D

    G. Katoch, D. Sarkar and B. Sen,Holographic timelike entanglement in AdS3 Vaidya,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 046026, [2504.14313]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Katoch, D

    G. Katoch, D. Sarkar and B. Sen,Entanglement inequalities for timelike intervals within dynamical holography,2604.11158

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [38]

    Q. Wen, M. Xu and H. Zhong,Timelike and gravitational anomalous entanglement from the inner horizon,SciPost Phys.18(2025) 204, [2412.21058]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Chu and H

    C.-S. Chu and H. Parihar,Timelike entanglement entropy with gravitational anomalies, JHEP08(2025) 038, [2504.19694]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    M. M. D. Goki and M. Ali-Akbari,On Holographic Time-Like Entanglement Entropy, 2601.17810

    arXiv

  41. [41]

    H. L. Prihadi, M. A. R. Al-Faritsi, R. R. Firdaus, F. Khairunnisa, Y. P. Sarwono and F. P. Zen,Holographic timelike entanglement and subregion complexity with scalar hair,JHEP04 (2026) 174, [2601.18310]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  42. [42]

    M. P. Heller, F. Ori and A. Serantes,Temporal Entanglement from Holographic Entanglement Entropy,Phys. Rev. X15(2025) 041022, [2507.17847]. – 59 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy,Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory,J. Phys. A42 (2009) 504005, [0905.4013]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  44. [44]

    Headrick,Entanglement Renyi entropies in holographic theories,Phys

    M. Headrick,Entanglement Renyi entropies in holographic theories,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 126010, [1006.0047]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  45. [45]

    Hartman,Entanglement Entropy at Large Central Charge,1303.6955

    T. Hartman,Entanglement Entropy at Large Central Charge,1303.6955

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [46]

    Faulkner,The Entanglement Renyi Entropies of Disjoint Intervals in AdS/CFT, 1303.7221

    T. Faulkner,The Entanglement Renyi Entropies of Disjoint Intervals in AdS/CFT, 1303.7221

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  47. [47]

    C. T. Asplund, A. Bernamonti, F. Galli and T. Hartman,Holographic Entanglement Entropy from 2d CFT: Heavy States and Local Quenches,JHEP02(2015) 171, [1410.1392]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  48. [48]

    Chen,Complex-valued Holographic Pseudo Entropy via Real-time AdS/CFT Correspondence,2302.14303

    Z. Chen,Complex-valued Holographic Pseudo Entropy via Real-time AdS/CFT Correspondence,2302.14303

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  49. [49]

    Omidi,Pseudo Rényi Entanglement Entropies For an Excited State and Its Time Evolution in a 2D CFT,2309.04112

    F. Omidi,Pseudo Rényi Entanglement Entropies For an Excited State and Its Time Evolution in a 2D CFT,2309.04112

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [50]

    Guo, Y.-z

    W.-z. Guo, Y.-z. Jiang and Y. Jiang,Pseudo entropy and pseudo-Hermiticity in quantum field theories,JHEP05(2024) 071, [2311.01045]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    He, Y.-X

    S. He, Y.-X. Zhang, L. Zhao and Z.-X. Zhao,Entanglement and pseudo entanglement dynamics versus fusion in CFT,JHEP06(2024) 177, [2312.02679]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Shinmyo, T

    K. Shinmyo, T. Takayanagi and K. Tasuki,Pseudo entropy under joining local quenches, JHEP02(2024) 111, [2310.12542]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Gong, W.-z

    X. Gong, W.-z. Guo and J. Xu,Entanglement measures for causally connected subregions and holography,2508.05158

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    W.-z. Guo, S. He and T. Liu,Entanglement of General Subregions in Time-Dependent States,2512.19955

    arXiv

  55. [55]

    Kanda, T

    H. Kanda, T. Takayanagi and Z. Wei,CFT derivation of entanglement phase transition in pseudo entropy,2602.22994

    arXiv

  56. [56]

    O. A. Castro-Alvaredo,Temporal Entanglement in Quantum Field Theory,2603.20765

    arXiv

  57. [57]

    Dong,The Gravity Dual of Renyi Entropy,Nature Commun.7(2016) 12472, [1601.06788]

    X. Dong,The Gravity Dual of Renyi Entropy,Nature Commun.7(2016) 12472, [1601.06788]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  58. [58]

    Dong,Holographic Renyi Entropy at High Energy Density,Phys

    X. Dong,Holographic Renyi Entropy at High Energy Density,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 041602, [1811.04081]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  59. [59]

    Banados,Three-dimensional quantum geometry and black holes,AIP Conf

    M. Banados,Three-dimensional quantum geometry and black holes,AIP Conf. Proc.484 (1999) 147–169, [hep-th/9901148]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  60. [60]

    M. M. Roberts,Time evolution of entanglement entropy from a pulse,JHEP12(2012) 027, [1204.1982]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  61. [61]

    Colin-Ellerin, X

    S. Colin-Ellerin, X. Dong, D. Marolf, M. Rangamani and Z. Wang,Real-time gravitational replicas: low dimensional examples,JHEP08(2021) 171, [2105.07002]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  62. [62]

    Anous, T

    T. Anous, T. Hartman, A. Rovai and J. Sonner,Black Hole Collapse in the 1/c Expansion, JHEP07(2016) 123, [1603.04856]. – 60 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  63. [63]

    Balasubramanian, A

    V. Balasubramanian, A. Bernamonti, B. Craps, V. Keränen, E. Keski-Vakkuri, B. Müller et al.,Thermalization of the spectral function in strongly coupled two dimensional conformal field theories,JHEP04(2013) 069, [1212.6066]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  64. [64]

    Hartman, S

    T. Hartman, S. Jain and S. Kundu,Causality Constraints in Conformal Field Theory, JHEP05(2016) 099, [1509.00014]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  65. [65]

    Kundu, S

    S. Kundu, S. Minwalla and A. Navhal,Monodromies of CFT correlators on the Lorentzian cylinder,SciPost Phys.19(2025) 162, [2505.01507]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    Balasubramanian, A

    V. Balasubramanian, A. Bernamonti, J. de Boer, N. Copland, B. Craps, E. Keski-Vakkuri et al.,Thermalization of Strongly Coupled Field Theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.106(2011) 191601, [1012.4753]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  67. [67]

    Balasubramanian, A

    V. Balasubramanian, A. Bernamonti, J. de Boer, N. Copland, B. Craps, E. Keski-Vakkuri et al.,Holographic Thermalization,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 026010, [1103.2683]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  68. [68]

    Kraus, H

    P. Kraus, H. Ooguri and S. Shenker,Inside the horizon with AdS / CFT,Phys. Rev. D67 (2003) 124022, [hep-th/0212277]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  69. [69]

    Fidkowski, V

    L. Fidkowski, V. Hubeny, M. Kleban and S. Shenker,The Black hole singularity in AdS / CFT,JHEP02(2004) 014, [hep-th/0306170]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  70. [70]

    Festuccia and H

    G. Festuccia and H. Liu,Excursions beyond the horizon: Black hole singularities in Yang-Mills theories. I.,JHEP04(2006) 044, [hep-th/0506202]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  71. [71]

    L.-Y. Hung, R. C. Myers, M. Smolkin and A. Yale,Holographic Calculations of Renyi Entropy,JHEP12(2011) 047, [1110.1084]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  72. [72]

    Lewkowycz and J

    A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena,Generalized gravitational entropy,JHEP08(2013) 090, [1304.4926]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  73. [73]

    A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan and M. T. Walters,Universality of Long-Distance AdS Physics from the CFT Bootstrap,JHEP08(2014) 145, [1403.6829]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  74. [74]

    Abajian, F

    J. Abajian, F. Aprile, R. C. Myers and P. Vieira,Holography and correlation functions of huge operators: spacetime bananas,JHEP12(2023) 058, [2306.15105]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  75. [75]

    Abajian, F

    J. Abajian, F. Aprile, R. C. Myers and P. Vieira,Correlation functions of huge operators in AdS3/CFT2: domes, doors and book pages,JHEP03(2024) 118, [2307.13188]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  76. [76]

    Bernamonti, F

    A. Bernamonti, F. Galli and D. Ge,Boundary-induced transitions in Möbius quenches of holographic BCFT,JHEP06(2024) 184, [2402.16555]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  77. [77]

    Caputa, J

    P. Caputa, J. Simon, A. Stikonas and T. Takayanagi,Quantum entanglement of localized excited states at finite temperature,JHEP01(2015) 102, [1410.2287]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  78. [78]

    A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan and M. T. Walters,Virasoro conformal blocks and thermality from classical background fields,JHEP11(2015) 200, [1501.05315]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  79. [79]

    Holzhey, F

    C. Holzhey, F. Larsen and F. Wilczek,Geometric and renormalized entropy in conformal field theory,Nucl. Phys. B424(1994) 443–467, [hep-th/9403108]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  80. [80]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. L. Cardy,Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory,J. Stat. Mech.0406(2004) P06002, [hep-th/0405152]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

Showing first 80 references.