Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

Improving Retrieval for RAG based Question Answering Models on Financial Documents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.07221 v2 pith:LZGLMVOJ submitted 2024-03-23 cs.IR cs.CLcs.LGq-fin.GN

Improving Retrieval for RAG based Question Answering Models on Financial Documents

classification cs.IR cs.CLcs.LGq-fin.GN
keywords llmsretrievalqualitytextalgorithmschunkmodelsqueries
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The effectiveness of Large Language Models (LLMs) in generating accurate responses relies heavily on the quality of input provided, particularly when employing Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) techniques. RAG enhances LLMs by sourcing the most relevant text chunk(s) to base queries upon. Despite the significant advancements in LLMs' response quality in recent years, users may still encounter inaccuracies or irrelevant answers; these issues often stem from suboptimal text chunk retrieval by RAG rather than the inherent capabilities of LLMs. To augment the efficacy of LLMs, it is crucial to refine the RAG process. This paper explores the existing constraints of RAG pipelines and introduces methodologies for enhancing text retrieval. It delves into strategies such as sophisticated chunking techniques, query expansion, the incorporation of metadata annotations, the application of re-ranking algorithms, and the fine-tuning of embedding algorithms. Implementing these approaches can substantially improve the retrieval quality, thereby elevating the overall performance and reliability of LLMs in processing and responding to queries.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Privacy Without Losing Place: A Paradigm for Private Retrieval in Spatial RAGs

    cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    PAS encodes locations via relative anchors and bins to deliver roughly 370-400m adversarial error in spatial RAG while retaining over half the baseline retrieval performance and keeping generation quality robust.

  2. Enhancing LLM Metacognition via Cognitive Pairwise Training

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CPT is introduced as a pairwise reasoning-trace comparison stage that improves the reasoning-metacognition trade-off over standard SFT+RL pipelines across model scales.

  3. LeakDojo: Decoding the Leakage Threats of RAG Systems

    cs.CR 2026-05 accept novelty 6.0

    LeakDojo benchmarks reveal that RAG leakage is approximated by the product of query generation and adversarial instruction effects, with higher risk tied to LLM instruction-following ability and RAG faithfulness improvements.

  4. Adaptive Query Routing: A Tier-Based Framework for Hybrid Retrieval Across Financial, Legal, and Medical Documents

    cs.IR 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0

    Tree reasoning outperforms vector search on complex document queries but a hybrid approach balances results across tiers, with validation showing an 11.7-point gap on real finance documents.

  5. Hierarchical Reranking for Scalable Financial RAG System

    cs.IR 2026-07 reject novelty 4.0

    A finance-specific RAG pipeline combining table-to-JSON conversion, two-stage reranking, and long-context split-fusion reports NDCG@20=0.7918 and second place in the ICAIF '24 FinanceRAG challenge.

  6. MimirRAG: A Multi-Agent RAG Framework for Financial Data Retrieval with Metadata Integration

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    MimirRAG, a multi-agent RAG framework with metadata integration and table-aware chunking, reaches 89.3% accuracy on FinanceBench and outperforms prior baselines for financial document retrieval.