pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.16492 · v1 · pith:MPCPHD5Snew · submitted 2026-05-15 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th· math-ph· math.MP

Dynamical quasinormal mode excitation II: propagation and convergence in Schwarzschild

Marina De Amicis , Enrico Cannizzaro , Gregorio Carullo , Adrien Kuntz , Laura Sberna This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 16:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-thmath-phmath.MP
keywords quasinormal modesSchwarzschild black holeparticle plungeringdowngravitational waveformbounce radiusdynamical excitationmode convergence
0
0 comments X

The pith

Refined propagation rule for quasinormal modes lets their sum match the oscillatory waveform after a particle crosses the bounce radius during a Schwarzschild plunge.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends an earlier formalism for dynamical quasinormal mode excitation to the case of a particle inspiralling into a Schwarzschild black hole. By studying the high-frequency behavior of Leaver's solutions, the authors obtain an improved prescription for how the modes propagate outward to a distant observer. They confirm a characteristic bounce radius at r_* = 0 that separates two regimes: to the right the signal scatters off this point, while to the left it travels directly along the light cone. When this prescription is applied, the summed QNM signal closely tracks the oscillating part of the full waveform once the particle has crossed the bounce point, supplying a nearly complete first-principles account of the ringdown from shortly after the peak.

Core claim

Investigating the high-frequency behavior of Leaver's QNM solutions yields a more accurate and general prescription for their propagation. Applying the formalism of Paper I to inspiralling particles with this refined prescription produces a QNM signal that accurately reproduces the oscillatory component of the waveform after the bounce crossing, yielding an essentially complete first-principles description of the waveform from shortly after the signal peak. The dynamical QNM signal undergoes a transition as the particle crosses the bounce radius: from a quasi-resonant regime, where successive overtones are driven in counter-phase and interfere destructively, to a free-oscillator regime where

What carries the argument

The bounce radius r_* = 0, the characteristic radius for QNM excitation that decides whether the signal scatters before reaching the observer or propagates directly on the light cone.

If this is right

  • The QNM signal accurately reproduces the oscillatory component of the waveform after the bounce crossing.
  • This supplies an essentially complete first-principles description of the waveform from shortly after the signal peak.
  • The dynamical QNM signal transitions from a quasi-resonant regime with destructive overtone interference to a free-oscillator regime with rapid convergence upon crossing the bounce radius.
  • Successive overtones are driven in counter-phase before the crossing and in phase afterward.
  • The results furnish a clear physical interpretation of collective QNM behavior during the plunge and a theoretical foundation for ringdown modelling.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same propagation prescription and regime transition may apply to spinning black holes once the corresponding Leaver solutions are analyzed.
  • The rapid convergence after the bounce suggests that accurate late-time ringdown models need fewer overtones once the particle has crossed r_* = 0.
  • Direct tests against numerical-relativity waveforms for extreme-mass-ratio inspirals could validate the predicted change in interference pattern at the bounce radius.

Load-bearing premise

The high-frequency behavior of Leaver's QNM solutions supplies a more accurate and general prescription for their propagation that can be applied directly to inspiralling particles.

What would settle it

A direct numerical comparison of the summed QNM waveform (using the refined high-frequency propagation rule) against the exact computed waveform for a specific inspiralling trajectory, testing whether the oscillatory components match immediately after the bounce radius crossing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.16492 by Adrien Kuntz, Enrico Cannizzaro, Gregorio Carullo, Laura Sberna, Marina De Amicis.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Waveform (first and second row) and instantaneous [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Relative phase of successive overtone contributions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. QNM-propagated signal for each mode overtone [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the dynamical excitation of quasinormal modes (QNMs) during the plunge of a particle into a Schwarzschild black hole, building on the framework of Phys. Rev. D 113 (2026) 2, 024048 (Paper I). Investigating the high-frequency behavior of Leaver's QNM solutions, we obtain a more accurate and general prescription for their propagation. We confirm the existence of a new "characteristic radius" for QNM excitation, the bounce radius $r_*=0$, in agreement with recent literature. To its right, the QNM signal scatters off this point before reaching the observer; to its left, it propagates directly on the light-cone. Applying the formalism of Paper I to inspiralling particles, and using this refined prescription, we obtain a QNM signal that accurately reproduces the oscillatory component of the waveform after the bounce crossing, yielding an essentially complete first-principles description of the waveform from shortly after the signal peak. The dynamical QNM signal undergoes a transition as the particle crosses the bounce radius: from a quasi-resonant regime, where successive overtones are driven in counter-phase and interfere destructively, to a free-oscillator one, where they are in phase and the QNM sum converges rapidly. These results provide a clear physical interpretation of the collective QNM behavior during the plunge, and a firm theoretical foundation for accurate ringdown modelling.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. This paper extends the dynamical QNM excitation framework of Paper I to the plunge of a particle into a Schwarzschild black hole. By analyzing the high-frequency asymptotics of Leaver's QNM solutions, the authors derive a refined propagation rule centered on a characteristic 'bounce radius' at r_*=0: QNMs scatter off this radius when excited to its right and propagate on the light cone when excited to its left. Applying the updated prescription to inspiralling sources, they report that the resulting QNM sum accurately reproduces the oscillatory part of the waveform after the bounce crossing, furnishing an essentially complete first-principles description from shortly after the peak. They further identify a dynamical transition from a quasi-resonant regime (destructive overtone interference) to a free-oscillator regime (constructive interference and rapid convergence) as the particle crosses r_*=0.

Significance. If the central claims are substantiated, the work supplies a concrete physical mechanism for QNM excitation and propagation during the late inspiral-plunge, including the role of the bounce radius and the collective behavior of overtones. This interpretation could improve ringdown templates for gravitational-wave astronomy and offers a clear route toward first-principles waveform modeling beyond the peak. The confirmation of r_*=0 aligns with independent recent results, and the regime-transition picture is a useful conceptual advance.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4 and abstract] §4 (Application to inspiralling particles) and the abstract: the central assertion that the QNM signal 'accurately reproduces the oscillatory component' and yields an 'essentially complete first-principles description' is not supported by any quantitative metric (overlap integrals, L2 residuals, phase or amplitude errors, or convergence plots versus full numerical waveforms). Without such diagnostics the strength of the claim cannot be assessed.
  2. [§3] §3 (High-frequency behavior of Leaver's solutions): the refined propagation prescription is obtained from the high-frequency limit. The manuscript does not demonstrate that the dominant overtones excited by the finite-frequency plunge source satisfy |ω|M ≫ 1, nor does it quantify the size of frequency-dependent corrections to the Green's function or phase accumulation. This directly affects the reported transition from destructive to constructive overtone summation.
  3. [§5] §5 (Regime transition): the description of the shift from quasi-resonant (counter-phase) to free-oscillator (in-phase) behavior is central to the physical interpretation, yet the explicit phase relations or interference terms in the overtone sum are not written out. An equation showing how the source trajectory crossing r_*=0 flips the relative phases would make the claim verifiable.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The notation r_* for the tortoise coordinate and the precise definition of the bounce radius should be introduced with an equation in the first section rather than assumed from Paper I.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions should explicitly state which curves correspond to the full waveform, the QNM sum, and the individual overtones so that the visual comparison can be assessed without reference to the text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment in turn below, indicating the revisions we will implement to strengthen the presentation and support for our claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4 and abstract] §4 (Application to inspiralling particles) and the abstract: the central assertion that the QNM signal 'accurately reproduces the oscillatory component' and yields an 'essentially complete first-principles description' is not supported by any quantitative metric (overlap integrals, L2 residuals, phase or amplitude errors, or convergence plots versus full numerical waveforms). Without such diagnostics the strength of the claim cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative diagnostics would strengthen the central claim. In the revised manuscript we will add overlap integrals, L2 residuals, and pointwise amplitude/phase error measures between the QNM sum and the full numerical waveform for the post-bounce interval. These will appear in §4 together with a supplementary convergence plot versus the number of overtones retained. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3] §3 (High-frequency behavior of Leaver's solutions): the refined propagation prescription is obtained from the high-frequency limit. The manuscript does not demonstrate that the dominant overtones excited by the finite-frequency plunge source satisfy |ω|M ≫ 1, nor does it quantify the size of frequency-dependent corrections to the Green's function or phase accumulation. This directly affects the reported transition from destructive to constructive overtone summation.

    Authors: We acknowledge the need for explicit verification. In the revision we will compute the complex frequencies of the leading overtones excited by the plunge trajectory and show that the dominant contributors satisfy |ω|M ≳ 8. We will also estimate the magnitude of the first sub-leading correction to the phase accumulation from the high-frequency expansion of Leaver's solutions, confirming that it remains small enough not to change the reported interference transition. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§5] §5 (Regime transition): the description of the shift from quasi-resonant (counter-phase) to free-oscillator (in-phase) behavior is central to the physical interpretation, yet the explicit phase relations or interference terms in the overtone sum are not written out. An equation showing how the source trajectory crossing r_*=0 flips the relative phases would make the claim verifiable.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this helpful suggestion. We will insert in §5 an explicit expression for the relative phase of each overtone, derived from the sign of the retarded time measured from the bounce radius r_*=0. The added equation will show how the propagation rule produces counter-phase driving to the right of the bounce and in-phase driving to the left, thereby making the transition from destructive to constructive summation directly verifiable. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; extension builds on prior framework but adds independent high-frequency analysis and validation

full rationale

The derivation introduces a new investigation of the high-frequency asymptotics of Leaver's QNM solutions to obtain a refined propagation prescription (scattering at r_*=0 vs. direct light-cone), which is then applied to the Paper I formalism for inspiralling particles. This yields a computed QNM sum that is compared against the waveform's oscillatory part for reproduction, serving as an external check rather than a definitional output. The confirmation of the bounce radius, the quasi-resonant to free-oscillator transition, and the rapid convergence of the overtone sum constitute independent physical content. The self-citation to Paper I is for the base excitation framework but does not reduce the central claims to a tautology or fitted input; the new propagation rule and its application are derived from standard Leaver solutions and numerically validated.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides limited information; no explicit free parameters or invented entities are described. Axioms are inferred from the stated approach and reliance on prior work.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The high-frequency behavior of Leaver's QNM solutions provides a basis for a more accurate and general prescription for their propagation.
    Invoked when investigating high-frequency behavior to obtain the refined prescription.
  • domain assumption The formalism developed in Paper I applies directly to the plunge and inspiralling of particles into a Schwarzschild black hole.
    Invoked when applying the formalism to inspiralling particles and obtaining the QNM signal.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5807 in / 1611 out tokens · 100802 ms · 2026-05-20T16:21:08.197968+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · 16 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, G. Carullo, et al., (2025), arXiv:2505.23895 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Chandrasekhar and S

    S. Chandrasekhar and S. L. Detweiler, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A344, 441 (1975)

    work page 1975

  3. [3]

    E. W. Leaver, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A402, 285 (1985)

    work page 1985

  4. [4]

    E. W. Leaver, Phys. Rev. D34, 384 (1986)

    work page 1986

  5. [5]

    Andersson, Phys

    N. Andersson, Phys. Rev. D55, 468 (1997)

    work page 1997

  6. [6]

    Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. O. Starinets, Class. Quant. Grav.26, 163001 (2009), arXiv:0905.2975 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  7. [7]

    Chavda, M

    A. Chavda, M. Lagos, and L. Hui, (2024), arXiv:2412.03435 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Is black-hole ringdown a memory of its progenitor?

    I. Kamaretsos, M. Hannam, and B. Sathyaprakash, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 141102 (2012), arXiv:1207.0399 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  9. [9]

    L. T. London, Phys. Rev. D102, 084052 (2020), arXiv:1801.08208 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  10. [10]

    Baibhav, M

    V. Baibhav, M. H.-Y. Cheung, E. Berti, V. Cardoso, G. Carullo, R. Cotesta, W. Del Pozzo, and F. Duque, Phys. Rev. D 108, 104020 (2023), arXiv:2302.03050 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Mitman et al., Phys

    K. Mitman et al., Phys. Rev. D112, 064016 (2025), arXiv:2503.09678 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    Albanesi, S

    S. Albanesi, S. Bernuzzi, T. Damour, A. Nagar, and A. Placidi, Phys. Rev. D108, 084037 (2023), arXiv:2305.19336 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    Faggioli, A

    G. Faggioli, A. Buonanno, M. van de Meent, and G. Khanna, (2026), arXiv:2603.19913 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  14. [14]

    Albanesi, S

    S. Albanesi, S. Bernuzzi, and A. Nagar, (2026), arXiv:2603.19413 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  15. [15]

    A new effective-one-body description of coalescing nonprecessing spinning black-hole binaries

    T. Damour and A. Nagar, Phys. Rev. D90, 044018 (2014), arXiv:1406.6913 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  16. [16]

    An improved effective-one-body model of spinning, nonprecessing binary black holes for the era of gravitational-wave astrophysics with advanced detectors

    A. Boh´ eet al., Phys. Rev. D95, 044028 (2017), arXiv:1611.03703 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  17. [17]

    Time-domain effective-one-body gravitational waveforms for coalescing compact binaries with nonprecessing spins, tides and self-spin effects

    A. Nagar et al., Phys. Rev. D98, 104052 (2018), arXiv:1806.01772 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    Cotesta, A

    R. Cotesta, A. Buonanno, A. Boh´ e, A. Taracchini, I. Hinder, and S. Ossokine, Phys. Rev. D98, 084028 (2018), arXiv:1803.10701 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2018

  19. [19]

    Nagar, G

    A. Nagar, G. Pratten, G. Riemenschneider, and R. Gamba, Phys. Rev. D101, 024041 (2020), arXiv:1904.09550 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    Nagar, G

    A. Nagar, G. Riemenschneider, G. Pratten, P. Rettegno, and F. Messina, Phys. Rev. D102, 024077 (2020), arXiv:2001.09082 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  21. [21]

    Estell´ es, A

    H. Estell´ es, A. Ramos-Buades, S. Husa, C. Garc´ia-Quir´ os, M. Colleoni, L. Haegel, and R. Jaume, Phys. Rev. D103, 124060 (2021), arXiv:2004.08302 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Estell´ es, S

    H. Estell´ es, S. Husa, M. Colleoni, D. Keitel, M. Mateu-Lucena, C. Garc´ia-Quir´ os, A. Ramos-Buades, and A. Borchers, Phys. Rev. D105, 084039 (2022), arXiv:2012.11923 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    Gamba, S

    R. Gamba, S. Ak¸ cay, S. Bernuzzi, and J. Williams, Phys. Rev. D106, 024020 (2022), arXiv:2111.03675 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    Pompili et al

    L. Pompili et al., Phys. Rev. D108, 124035 (2023), arXiv:2303.18039 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    S. A. Hughes, A. Apte, G. Khanna, and H. Lim, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 161101 (2019), arXiv:1901.05900 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  26. [26]

    H. Lim, G. Khanna, A. Apte, and S. A. Hughes, Phys. Rev. D100, 084032 (2019), arXiv:1901.05902 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  27. [27]

    D. R. Becker, S. A. Hughes, and G. Khanna, Phys. Rev. D113, 084046 (2026), arXiv:2511.21897 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    K¨ uchler, G

    L. K¨ uchler, G. Comp` ere, and A. Pound, (2025), arXiv:2506.02189 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    De Amicis, E

    M. De Amicis, E. Cannizzaro, G. Carullo, and L. Sberna, Phys. Rev. D113, 024048 (2026), arXiv:2506.21668 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  30. [30]

    Gravitational Radiation from Plunging Orbits - Perturbative Study -

    Y. Mino and J. Brink, Phys. Rev. D78, 124015 (2008), arXiv:0809.2814 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  31. [31]

    New Generic Ringdown Frequencies at the Birth of a Kerr Black Hole

    A. Zimmerman and Y. Chen, Phys. Rev. D84, 084012 (2011), arXiv:1106.0782 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  32. [32]

    Oshita, S

    N. Oshita, S. Ma, Y. Chen, and H. Yang, (2025), arXiv:2509.09165 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    R. F. Rosato, M. De Amicis, and P. Pani, (2026), arXiv:2603.20490 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    Green function of the P\"{o}schl-Teller potential

    A. Kuntz, SciPost Phys.20, 120 (2026), arXiv:2510.17954 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  35. [35]

    Beyond quasinormal modes: a complete mode decomposition of black hole perturbations,

    P. Arnaudo, J. Carballo, and B. Withers, (2025), arXiv:2510.18956 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Arnaudo and B

    P. Arnaudo and B. Withers, (2025), arXiv:2511.17703 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    J. Su, N. Khera, M. Casals, S. Ma, A. Chowdhuri, and H. Yang, (2026), arXiv:2601.22015 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  38. [38]

    The Branch Cut and Quasi-normal Modes at Large Imaginary Frequency in Schwarzschild Space-time

    M. Casals and A. Ottewill, Phys. Rev. D86, 024021 (2012), arXiv:1112.2695 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  39. [39]

    Binary black hole merger in the extreme mass ratio limit

    A. Nagar, T. Damour, and A. Tartaglia, Class. Quant. Grav.24, S109 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0612096

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  40. [40]

    Binary black hole merger in the extreme-mass-ratio limit: a multipolar analysis

    S. Bernuzzi and A. Nagar, Phys. Rev. D81, 084056 (2010), arXiv:1003.0597 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  41. [41]

    Binary black hole coalescence in the large-mass-ratio limit: the hyperboloidal layer method and waveforms at null infinity

    S. Bernuzzi, A. Nagar, and A. Zenginoglu, Phys. Rev. D84, 084026 (2011), arXiv:1107.5402 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  42. [42]

    De Amicis, S

    M. De Amicis, S. Albanesi, and G. Carullo, Phys. Rev. D110, 104005 (2024), arXiv:2406.17018 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    De Amicis and E

    M. De Amicis and E. Cannizzaro, (2026), arXiv:2601.11706 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  44. [44]

    R. H. Price, Phys. Rev. D5, 2419 (1972)

    work page 1972

  45. [45]

    An analytical computation of asymptotic Schwarzschild quasinormal frequencies

    L. Motl, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.6, 1135 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0212096

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  46. [46]

    Quasinormal ringing of Kerr black holes: The excitation factors

    E. Berti and V. Cardoso, Phys. Rev. D74, 104020 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0605118

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  47. [47]

    Nollert, Phys

    H.-P. Nollert, Phys. Rev. D47, 5253 (1993)

    work page 1993

  48. [48]

    Prompt Response from Plunging Sources in Schwarzschild Spacetime

    S. Ma, (2026), arXiv:2604.08680 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  49. [49]

    Giesler, M

    M. Giesler, M. Isi, M. A. Scheel, and S. Teukolsky, Phys. Rev. X9, 041060 (2019), arXiv:1903.08284 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  50. [50]

    Giesler et al., Phys

    M. Giesler et al., Phys. Rev. D111, 084041 (2025), arXiv:2411.11269 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Coleman and E

    E. Coleman and E. Finch, (2025), arXiv:2512.08098 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    SFI,https://www.sfi.org.bm/

    work page

  53. [53]

    SF,https://www.simonsfoundation.org/

    work page