REVIEW 8 cited by
Solving Challenging Math Word Problems Using GPT-4 Code Interpreter with Code-based Self-Verification
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Solving Challenging Math Word Problems Using GPT-4 Code Interpreter with Code-based Self-Verification
read the original abstract
Recent progress in large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4 and PaLM-2 has brought significant advancements in addressing math reasoning problems. In particular, OpenAI's latest version of GPT-4, known as GPT-4 Code Interpreter, shows remarkable performance on challenging math datasets. In this paper, we explore the effect of code on enhancing LLMs' reasoning capability by introducing different constraints on the \textit{Code Usage Frequency} of GPT-4 Code Interpreter. We found that its success can be largely attributed to its powerful skills in generating and executing code, evaluating the output of code execution, and rectifying its solution when receiving unreasonable outputs. Based on this insight, we propose a novel and effective prompting method, explicit \uline{c}ode-based \uline{s}elf-\uline{v}erification~(CSV), to further boost the mathematical reasoning potential of GPT-4 Code Interpreter. This method employs a zero-shot prompt on GPT-4 Code Interpreter to encourage it to use code to self-verify its answers. In instances where the verification state registers as ``False'', the model shall automatically amend its solution, analogous to our approach of rectifying errors during a mathematics examination. Furthermore, we recognize that the states of the verification result indicate the confidence of a solution, which can improve the effectiveness of majority voting. With GPT-4 Code Interpreter and CSV, we achieve an impressive zero-shot accuracy on MATH dataset \textbf{(53.9\% $\to$ 84.3\%)}.
Forward citations
Cited by 8 Pith papers
-
NoisyCausal: A Benchmark for Evaluating Causal Reasoning Under Structured Noise
NoisyCausal benchmark tests LLMs on causal reasoning with structured noise, and a modular LLM-plus-causal-graph framework outperforms baselines while generalizing to Cladder.
-
Polymath: A Challenging Multi-modal Mathematical Reasoning Benchmark
PolyMATH is a new 5,000-image benchmark where top MLLMs reach at most 41 percent accuracy on multi-modal mathematical reasoning, with ablation showing minimal gain from text over images.
-
MathVerse: Does Your Multi-modal LLM Truly See the Diagrams in Visual Math Problems?
MathVerse is a benchmark that tests multi-modal LLMs on visual math by providing each problem in six versions with progressively less diagram and text information to measure true visual understanding.
-
Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yet
LLMs cannot reliably self-correct reasoning mistakes using only their internal capabilities and often degrade in performance without external feedback.
-
ToRA: A Tool-Integrated Reasoning Agent for Mathematical Problem Solving
ToRA trains language models on interactive tool-use trajectories with imitation learning and output shaping to integrate reasoning and external tools, yielding 13-19% gains on math datasets and new highs like 44.6% on...
-
MAmmoTH: Building Math Generalist Models through Hybrid Instruction Tuning
MAmmoTH models trained via hybrid CoT-PoT instruction tuning on MathInstruct outperform prior open-source LLMs by 16-32% average accuracy on nine math datasets, reaching 33% and 44% on MATH for 7B and 34B scales.
-
Spectral Origins of the Self-Correction Blind Spot in Autoregressive Generation
Self-correction blind spots in residual-stream autoregressive models arise iff the product of attention Jacobians has spectral radius ≥1, with a sharp marker threshold and RL coupling condition derived from that radius.
-
SPHINX: The Joint Mixing of Weights, Tasks, and Visual Embeddings for Multi-modal Large Language Models
SPHINX improves multi-modal LLMs through joint mixing of weights, tasks, and visual embeddings from varied sources to achieve stronger alignment and multi-purpose capabilities.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.