Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Scaling Optimal LR Across Token Horizons

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.19913 v3 pith:NFZGS7BD submitted 2024-09-30 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
keywords optimalacrossscalingsizetokenhorizonshyperparameterhorizon
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

State-of-the-art LLMs are powered by scaling -- scaling model size, dataset size and cluster size. It is economically infeasible to extensively tune hyperparameter for the largest runs. Instead, approximately optimal hyperparameters must be inferred or \textit{transferred} from smaller experiments. Hyperparameter transfer across model sizes has been studied in Yang et al. However, hyperparameter transfer across dataset size -- or token horizon -- has not been studied yet. To remedy this we conduct a large scale empirical study on how optimal learning rate (LR) depends on token horizon in LLM training. We first demonstrate that the optimal LR changes significantly with token horizon -- longer training necessitates smaller LR. Secondly we demonstrate the the optimal LR follows a scaling law, and that the optimal LR for longer horizons can be accurately estimated from shorter horizons via such scaling laws. We also provide a rule-of-thumb for transferring LR across token horizons with zero overhead over current practices. Lastly we provide evidence that LLama-1 used too high LR, and estimate the performance hit from this. We thus argue that hyperparameter transfer across data size is an important and overlooked component of LLM training.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Scale Weight Decay and Train Better

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Muon with weight decay scaled by η/η_max reaches the same MoE validation loss ~30% faster than constant-decay Muon while preserving asymptotic stationarity of the unregularized objective.

  2. MiniCPM4: Ultra-Efficient LLMs on End Devices

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    MiniCPM4-8B reportedly matches Qwen3-8B on standard benchmarks while using about 22% of the training tokens, and achieves large long-context speedups on edge devices.

Pith tools