REVIEW 7 cited by
Artificial Leviathan: Exploring Social Evolution of LLM Agents Through the Lens of Hobbesian Social Contract Theory
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Artificial Leviathan: Exploring Social Evolution of LLM Agents Through the Lens of Hobbesian Social Contract Theory
read the original abstract
The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) and advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) offer an opportunity for computational social science research at scale. Building upon prior explorations of LLM agent design, our work introduces a simulated agent society where complex social relationships dynamically form and evolve over time. Agents are imbued with psychological drives and placed in a sandbox survival environment. We conduct an evaluation of the agent society through the lens of Thomas Hobbes's seminal Social Contract Theory (SCT). We analyze whether, as the theory postulates, agents seek to escape a brutish "state of nature" by surrendering rights to an absolute sovereign in exchange for order and security. Our experiments unveil an alignment: Initially, agents engage in unrestrained conflict, mirroring Hobbes's depiction of the state of nature. However, as the simulation progresses, social contracts emerge, leading to the authorization of an absolute sovereign and the establishment of a peaceful commonwealth founded on mutual cooperation. This congruence between our LLM agent society's evolutionary trajectory and Hobbes's theoretical account indicates LLMs' capability to model intricate social dynamics and potentially replicate forces that shape human societies. By enabling such insights into group behavior and emergent societal phenomena, LLM-driven multi-agent simulations, while unable to simulate all the nuances of human behavior, may hold potential for advancing our understanding of social structures, group dynamics, and complex human systems.
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
Every Act Has Its Price: Compressed Moral Composition in Frontier LLMs
Moral Trolley Arena shows frontier LLMs produce composite moral preferences that are compressed rather than additive functions of calibrated component act strengths across Moral Foundations Theory.
-
Agentic World Modeling: Foundations, Capabilities, Laws, and Beyond
Proposes a levels x laws taxonomy for world models in AI agents, defining L1-L3 capabilities across physical, digital, social, and scientific regimes while reviewing over 400 works to outline a roadmap for advanced ag...
-
The Energy Society: A Simulation Environment for Studying Agent Cooperation under Survival Pressure
A new multi-agent simulation ties token-generation cost to survival, showing larger models are less efficient, shared objectives induce donations, and recommendation and memory mechanisms shape coordination.
-
AgentCity: Constitutional Governance for Autonomous Agent Economies via Separation of Power
AgentCity introduces a Separation of Power constitutional architecture on blockchain for governing autonomous agent economies through agent legislation, automated execution, and human accountability.
-
Emergent Relational Order in LLM Agent Societies: From Collective Affect to Authority Stratification
LLM agents in the CAREB-MAS framework spontaneously reproduce five core Differential Order phenomena including labor specialization, guanxi ethics, relational cooperation decay, emergent authority, and clan stratifica...
-
Agentic World Modeling: Foundations, Capabilities, Laws, and Beyond
A survey proposing a three-level capability taxonomy (L1 Predictor, L2 Simulator, L3 Evolver) for world models across physical, digital, social, and scientific domains.
-
Multi-Agent Collaboration Mechanisms: A Survey of LLMs
The survey organizes LLM-based multi-agent collaboration mechanisms into a framework with dimensions of actors, types, structures, strategies, and coordination protocols, reviews applications across domains, and ident...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.