Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Calibrating Bayesian Generative Machine Learning for Bayesiamplification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.00838 v2 pith:NKZ7C4H3 submitted 2024-08-01 cs.LG cs.AIhep-ph

Calibrating Bayesian Generative Machine Learning for Bayesiamplification

classification cs.LG cs.AIhep-ph
keywords bayesiandistributiongenerativelearningmachinecalibrationgenerateduncertainties
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently, combinations of generative and Bayesian machine learning have been introduced in particle physics for both fast detector simulation and inference tasks. These neural networks aim to quantify the uncertainty on the generated distribution originating from limited training statistics. The interpretation of a distribution-wide uncertainty however remains ill-defined. We show a clear scheme for quantifying the calibration of Bayesian generative machine learning models. For a Continuous Normalizing Flow applied to a low-dimensional toy example, we evaluate the calibration of Bayesian uncertainties from either a mean-field Gaussian weight posterior, or Monte Carlo sampling network weights, to gauge their behaviour on unsteady distribution edges. Well calibrated uncertainties can then be used to roughly estimate the number of uncorrelated truth samples that are equivalent to the generated sample and clearly indicate data amplification for smooth features of the distribution.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Amplitude Uncertainties Everywhere All at Once

    hep-ph 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Compares ensemble, Bayesian, and evidential regression approaches for uncertainty quantification in amplitude surrogates and shows they detect localized training data issues.