Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Explaining Patterns in Data with Language Models via Interpretable Autoprompting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.01848 v2 pith:NV5JNCKR submitted 2022-10-04 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CLq-bio.NCstat.ML

Explaining Patterns in Data with Language Models via Interpretable Autoprompting

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.CLq-bio.NCstat.ML
keywords ipromptdatalanguagepromptsabilityautopromptingdatasetdatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have displayed an impressive ability to harness natural language to perform complex tasks. In this work, we explore whether we can leverage this learned ability to find and explain patterns in data. Specifically, given a pre-trained LLM and data examples, we introduce interpretable autoprompting (iPrompt), an algorithm that generates a natural-language string explaining the data. iPrompt iteratively alternates between generating explanations with an LLM and reranking them based on their performance when used as a prompt. Experiments on a wide range of datasets, from synthetic mathematics to natural-language understanding, show that iPrompt can yield meaningful insights by accurately finding groundtruth dataset descriptions. Moreover, the prompts produced by iPrompt are simultaneously human-interpretable and highly effective for generalization: on real-world sentiment classification datasets, iPrompt produces prompts that match or even improve upon human-written prompts for GPT-3. Finally, experiments with an fMRI dataset show the potential for iPrompt to aid in scientific discovery. All code for using the methods and data here is made available on Github.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Human-AI Co-design for Clinical Prediction Models

    cs.AI 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0

    HACHI, an iterative human-AI loop that turns clinical notes into small interpretable yes/no-concept risk scores, outperforms standard instruments in two retrospective UCSF case studies.

  2. RLIE: Rule Generation with Logistic Regression, Iterative Refinement, and Evaluation for Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0

    Logistic regression over LLM-generated natural-language rules outperformed letting the LLM reason with those rules on six binary text tasks.