Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

OpinionGPT: Modelling Explicit Biases in Instruction-Tuned LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.03876 v1 pith:OJ3KKTHQ submitted 2023-09-07 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CYcs.LG

OpinionGPT: Modelling Explicit Biases in Instruction-Tuned LLMs

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.CYcs.LG
keywords biasesopiniongptmodelmodelsansweranswersbiasdemo
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Instruction-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently showcased remarkable ability to generate fitting responses to natural language instructions. However, an open research question concerns the inherent biases of trained models and their responses. For instance, if the data used to tune an LLM is dominantly written by persons with a specific political bias, we might expect generated answers to share this bias. Current research work seeks to de-bias such models, or suppress potentially biased answers. With this demonstration, we take a different view on biases in instruction-tuning: Rather than aiming to suppress them, we aim to make them explicit and transparent. To this end, we present OpinionGPT, a web demo in which users can ask questions and select all biases they wish to investigate. The demo will answer this question using a model fine-tuned on text representing each of the selected biases, allowing side-by-side comparison. To train the underlying model, we identified 11 different biases (political, geographic, gender, age) and derived an instruction-tuning corpus in which each answer was written by members of one of these demographics. This paper presents OpinionGPT, illustrates how we trained the bias-aware model and showcases the web application (available at https://opiniongpt.informatik.hu-berlin.de).

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Explainability of Large Language Models: Opportunities and Challenges toward Generating Trustworthy Explanations

    cs.CL 2025-10 conditional novelty 4.0

    LLM explanations split into local and mechanistic tracks; the paper argues they are trustworthy only if they pass causal and contrastive stress tests, adapt to the explainee, and satisfy eight trust principles.