Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 22 references

A prompt-and-fine-tune attack can recover most of the private multimodal knowledge that unlearning methods claim to erase from MLLMs.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-11 00:22 UTC pith:P4NN3W4I

load-bearing objection Solid first closed-loop attack showing current multimodal unlearning is recoverable under gray-box access; the 82% "near-complete" figure is inflated by a compressed multi-choice metric, but the directional vulnerability claim holds. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.06649 v1 pith:P4NN3W4I submitted 2026-07-07 cs.CR cs.LG

POPS: Recovering Unlearned Multi-Modality Knowledge in MLLMs with Prompt-Optimized Parameter Shaking

Zhangheng LI , Jianing Zhu , Junyuan Hong , Sungmin Eum , Shuowen Hu , Suya You , Zhangyang Wang This is my paper
classification cs.CR cs.LG
keywords multimodal large language modelsmachine unlearningprivacy attackprompt optimizationparameter shakingcross-modal memorymodel inversion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Multimodal large language models can be told to forget private image-text facts, yet the paper shows that those facts often remain recoverable. The authors introduce Prompt-Optimized Parameter Shaking (POPS): first an optimized prompt suffix is found using similar but non-forgotten data so the model starts emitting candidate private details; those synthetic outputs are then used to fine-tune the model, reactivating the residual knowledge. Across standard multimodal unlearning benchmarks and several model families, POPS restores roughly four-fifths of the accuracy gap between the unlearned model and the original model, approaching the performance of models that never forgot. The result matters because it shows that today’s multimodal unlearning techniques leave cross-modal associations intact, so releasing an “unlearned” model is not yet a reliable privacy guarantee.

Core claim

Current multimodal machine-unlearning methods leave residual cross-modal associations that an adversary with query and light fine-tuning access can systematically reactivate. By coupling OOD-guided prompt-suffix optimization with synthetic-data fine-tuning, POPS recovers a large fraction (reported ~82 percent) of the supposedly erased sensitive information, bringing test-set accuracy nearly back to the pre-unlearning baseline.

What carries the argument

Prompt-Optimized Parameter Shaking (POPS): an extraction-amplification loop that first optimizes a continuous prompt suffix on retain-set-style OOD data, then uses the resulting synthetic image-question-answer triplets to LoRA-fine-tune the unlearned model so residual visual-textual links reappear.

Load-bearing premise

The attacker must be able to compute gradients (or continuous embeddings) for prompt optimization and to run a short LoRA fine-tune on the released model, while also possessing a retain-set-style corpus that shares the same format and attribute space as the forgotten identities.

What would settle it

If, after POPS is applied under the stated gray-box conditions, the accuracy, ROUGE-L and cloze scores on the forget set remain statistically indistinguishable from the unlearned baseline across the three benchmarks, the central recovery claim would be falsified.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Prompt-Optimized Parameter Shaking (POPS), a closed-loop adversarial attack that recovers multi-modality knowledge supposedly erased by Multi-modality Machine Unlearning (MMU). POPS first optimizes continuous prompt-suffix embeddings on an OOD retain-set corpus (Eq. 1, Algorithm 1) to elicit residual private facts from an unlearned MLLM, then synthesizes image-QA pairs from those outputs and fine-tunes the model with LoRA-based Shake-to-Leak (S2L). Experiments on MLLMU-Bench, CLEAR and UnLoK-VQA across LLaVA-1.5-7B, Qwen-VL-Chat, InternVL3 and Llama-3.2-11B-V, and against both unimodal-adapted (GA, GD, KL-Min, NPO) and multimodal-specific (MANU, MultiDelete) unlearning methods, report recovery rates around 82% (e.g., multi-choice accuracy 40.2%→42.9% approaching the 43.5% pre-unlearning baseline). Ablations isolate PromptSuffix (~70%), S2L (~21%) and the full pipeline, and a text-only control shows the visual pathway is essential.

Significance. If the reported recoveries hold under the stated gray-box threat model, the work supplies the first systematic demonstration that current MMU methods leave exploitable cross-modal residual associations. The multi-architecture, multi-benchmark evaluation, the explicit comparison to GCG and ground-truth fine-tuning upper bounds, the modality-ablation (Table 15), and the privacy-utility dilemma under stronger unlearning (Table 14) are concrete contributions that raise a falsifiable challenge for future unlearning designs. The closed-loop coupling of concept-level OOD suffix optimization with synthetic multimodal fine-tuning is a clear technical advance over open-loop jailbreaks or unimodal S2L.

major comments (2)
  1. The central claim of "near-complete recovery" (abstract, §1, §4.2) rests on the recovery-rate definition that maps multi-choice accuracy 40.2%→42.9% against a 43.5% baseline into an 82% figure. Appendix A itself notes that multi-choice accuracy is the least sensitive metric (random guessing already yields 25%). Generation metrics improve more (ROUGE-L 0.387→0.461, cloze 14.51%→18.2%, factuality 3.83→4.72) yet remain substantially short of the pre-unlearning baselines (0.516 / 25.73% / 5.2). The quantitative strength of "near-complete" is therefore load-bearing on an optimistic metric; the architectural-vulnerability conclusion still holds directionally, but the paper should either re-center the claim on generation metrics or qualify the recovery-rate language throughout.
  2. Threat-model realism (§2.2 and §4.1 OOD construction): the attacker is assumed to possess continuous-embedding gradients for suffix optimization and a retain-set-style OOD corpus that shares the exact format and attribute space of the forgotten identities. While this is plausible for open-source releases, the manuscript does not quantify how recovery degrades when the OOD corpus is only distributionally similar (different attribute schema, different image style) or when only black-box API access is available. A short sensitivity experiment would make the claimed practicality more robust.
minor comments (4)
  1. Table 3 / Table 4: report absolute deltas and 95% CIs alongside the recovery percentages so readers can judge effect size without recomputing.
  2. Eq. (1) and Algorithm 1: the Clip / Proj_V operations and the precise token-decode step are described only in prose; a short pseudocode line or reference to the embedding-space projection would improve reproducibility.
  3. Figure 1 caption is dense; a clearer separation of the three stages (suffix optimization, synthetic generation, S2L fine-tuning) would help first-time readers.
  4. A few typographical inconsistencies appear ("Multimodal Large Language Models(MLLMs)", missing spaces after citations). A light copy-edit pass is sufficient.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: recovery claims are empirical attack results measured against independent external baselines, not quantities forced by construction or self-citation.

full rationale

POPS is an empirical adversarial attack (OOD-guided continuous-embedding PromptSuffix + synthetic-data S2L fine-tuning) evaluated on public MMU benchmarks (MLLMU-Bench, CLEAR, UnLoK-VQA) and multiple MLLM architectures. The central quantitative claim—an 82% recovery rate computed from multi-choice accuracy moving 40.2% (GA-unlearned) → 42.9% (POPS) against a 43.52% pre-unlearning baseline—is a post-hoc ratio of observed deltas; it is not the output of any equation that re-uses a fitted free parameter as a “prediction.” The OOD retain-set corpus used for suffix optimization is explicitly disjoint from the forget identities (Section 4.1). Ground-truth fine-tuning is reported only as an independent upper bound, not as an input that forces the attack result. Ablations (Tables 5–7, 15) and cross-architecture/cross-benchmark tables further isolate components against the same external baselines. No self-definitional loop, no fitted-input-called-prediction, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorem imported from the authors appear. Metric-sensitivity concerns (Appendix A) affect the rhetorical strength of “near-complete” but do not constitute circularity under the stated criteria. Score 0 is therefore the correct outcome.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 3 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on a realistic gray-box attacker who can optimize continuous embeddings and run LoRA fine-tuning, plus the modeling assumption that residual cross-modal associations survive unlearning and can be reactivated by OOD-guided suffixes. No new physical entities are postulated; free parameters are ordinary optimization hyper-parameters.

free parameters (4)
  • perplexity weight γ
    Balances concept-recovery loss against suffix naturalness in Eq. (1); chosen by the authors.
  • ℓ∞ clip bound ε
    Constrains continuous suffix embeddings during gradient descent (Algorithm 1).
  • LoRA rank r=8, α=16, KL penalty weight 0.2
    Control the capacity and regularization of the S2L fine-tuning stage; selected by the authors.
  • number of random base prompts (30) and top-k suffixes (10)
    Determine the diversity of the PromptSuffix search; hand-chosen.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption An attacker with query, gradient/embedding, and LoRA fine-tuning access to a released unlearned MLLM can mount the described attack without the original forget set.
    Stated in Section 2.2 Threat Model; underpins the entire evaluation.
  • domain assumption Retain-set profiles that share format and attribute space but different identities constitute a usable OOD corpus for suffix optimization.
    Section 4.1 OOD Dataset Construction; the attack never sees forget-set labels.
  • domain assumption Cross-modal associations that enable useful multimodal reasoning also leave recoverable residual traces after current unlearning procedures.
    Core modeling premise articulated in the introduction and methodology; empirically tested rather than proved.
invented entities (1)
  • POPS (Prompt-Optimized Parameter Shaking) closed-loop pipeline independent evidence
    purpose: Name the two-stage attack that couples OOD-guided PromptSuffix optimization with synthetic-data S2L fine-tuning.
    The pipeline is a methodological construct, not a physical entity; independent evidence is the empirical recovery tables.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 25476 in / 2644 out tokens · 24557 ms · 2026-07-11T00:22:46.954853+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance on cross-modal tasks by jointly training on large-scale textual and visual data, where privacy-sensitive examples could be unintentionally encoded, raising concerns about privacy or copyright violation. To this end, Multi-modality Machine Unlearning (MMU) was proposed as a mitigation that can effectively force MLLMs to forget private information. However, the robustness of such unlearning methods is not fully exploited when the model is published and accessible to malicious users. In this paper, we propose a novel adversarial strategy, namely Prompt-Optimized Parameter Shaking (POPS), aiming to recover the supposedly unlearned multi-modality knowledge from the MLLMs. Our method elicits the victim MLLMs to generate potential private examples via prompt-suffix optimization, and then exploits these synthesized outputs to fine-tune the models so they disclose the true private information. The experiments on the different MMU benchmarks reveal substantial weaknesses in the existing MMU algorithms. Our POPS can even achieve a near-complete recovery of supposedly erased sensitive information on the unlearned MLLMs, exposing fundamental vulnerabilities that challenge the foundational robustness of representative MMU-based privacy protections.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.06649 by Jianing Zhu, Junyuan Hong, Shuowen Hu, Sungmin Eum, Suya You, Zhangheng Li, Zhangyang Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of the workflow about model inversion attack for multimodal unlearning. The model is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

22 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · 20 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Soft Prompting for Unlearning in Large Language Models

    Karuna Bhaila et al. Soft prompting for unlearning in large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.12038,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    CLEAR: Character Unlearning in Textual and Visual Modalities

    Alexey Dontsov, Dmitrii Korzh, Alexey Zhavoronkin, Boris Mikheev, Denis Bobkov, Aibek Alanov, Oleg Y Rogov, Ivan Oseledets, and Elena Tutubalina. Clear: Character unlearning in textual and visual modalities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.18057,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    SalUn: Empowering Machine Unlearning via Gradient-based Weight Saliency in Both Image Classification and Generation

    Chongyu Fan, Jiancheng Liu, Yihua Zhang, Eric Wong, Dennis Wei, and Sijia Liu. Salun: Empowering machine unlearning via gradient-based weight saliency in both image classification and generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.12508,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    Fine-grained pluggable gradient ascent for knowledge unlearning in language models

    XiaoHua Feng, Chaochao Chen, Yuyuan Li, and Zibin Lin. Fine-grained pluggable gradient ascent for knowledge unlearning in language models. InProceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 10141–10155, 2024a. Zijian Feng, Hanzhang Zhou, Zixiao Zhu, and Kezhi Mao. Promptexplainer: Explaining language models throu...

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    MMUnlearner: Reformulating Multimodal Machine Unlearning in the Era of Multimodal Large Language Models

    Jiahao Huo, Yibo Yan, Xu Zheng, Yuanhuiyi Lyu, Xin Zou, Zhihua Wei, and Xuming Hu. Mmunlearner: Reformulating multimodal machine unlearning in the era of multimodal large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.11051,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    GPT-4o System Card

    Aaron Hurst, Adam Lerer, Adam P Goucher, Adam Perelman, Aditya Ramesh, Aidan Clark, AJ Ostrow, Akila Welihinda, Alan Hayes, Alec Radford, et al. Gpt-4o system card.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.21276,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    Survey of Adversarial Robustness in Multimodal Large Language Models

    Chengze Jiang, Zhuangzhuang Wang, Minjing Dong, and Jie Gui. Survey of adversarial robustness in multimodal large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.13962,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    Single Image Unlearning: Efficient Machine Unlearning in Multimodal Large Language Models

    Jiaqi Li, Qianshan Wei, Chuanyi Zhang, Guilin Qi, Miaozeng Du, Yongrui Chen, Sheng Bi, and Fan Liu. Single image unlearning: Efficient machine unlearning in multimodal large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.12523, 2024a. Zhangheng Li, Junyuan Hong, Bo Li, and Zhangyang Wang. Shake to leak: Fine-tuning diffusion models can amplify the generative p...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    Protecting Privacy in Multimodal Large Language Models with MLLMU-Bench

    14 Yunze Liu, Changxi Chen, Zifan Wang, and Li Yi. Crossvideo: Self-supervised cross-modal contrastive learning for point cloud video understanding. In2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 12436–12442. IEEE, 2024a. Zheyuan Liu, Guangyao Dou, Mengzhao Jia, Zhaoxuan Tan, Qingkai Zeng, Yongle Yuan, and Meng Jiang. Protecti...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    Situated and Interactive Multimodal Conversations

    Seungwhan Moon, Satwik Kottur, Paul A Crook, Ankita De, Shivani Poddar, Theodore Levin, David Whitney, Daniel Difranco, Ahmad Beirami, Eunjoon Cho, et al. Situated and interactive multimodal conversations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.01460,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  11. [11]

    A Survey of Machine Unlearning

    Thanh Tam Nguyen, Thanh Trung Huynh, Zhao Ren, Phi Le Nguyen, Alan Wee-Chung Liew, Hongzhi Yin, and Quoc Viet Hung Nguyen. A survey of machine unlearning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.02299,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    Unlearning Sensitive Information in Multimodal LLMs: Benchmark and Attack-Defense Evaluation

    Vaidehi Patil, Yi-Lin Sung, Peter Hase, Jie Peng, Tianlong Chen, and Mohit Bansal. Unlearning sensitive information in multimodal llms: Benchmark and attack-defense evaluation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.01456,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!

    Xiangyu Qi, Yi Zeng, Tinghao Xie, Pin-Yu Chen, Ruoxi Jia, Prateek Mittal, and Peter Henderson. Fine- tuning aligned language models compromises safety, even when users do not intend to!arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.03693,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    Multimodal Conversational AI: A Survey of Datasets and Approaches

    Anirudh Sundar and Larry Heck. Multimodal conversational ai: A survey of datasets and approaches.arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.06907,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    MultiModalQA: Complex Question Answering over Text, Tables and Images

    Alon Talmor, Ori Yoran, Amnon Catav, Dan Lahav, Yizhong Wang, Akari Asai, Gabriel Ilharco, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, and Jonathan Berant. Multimodalqa: Complex question answering over text, tables and images. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.06039,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    Machine Unlearning of Pre-trained Large Language Models

    Jin Yao, Eli Chien, Minxin Du, Xinyao Niu, Tianhao Wang, Zezhou Cheng, and Xiang Yue. Machine unlearning of pre-trained large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.15159,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    Towards Robust Knowledge Unlearning: An Adversarial Framework for Assessing and Improving Unlearning Robustness in Large Language Models

    Hongbang Yuan, Zhuoran Jin, Pengfei Cao, Yubo Chen, Kang Liu, and Jun Zhao. Towards robust knowledge unlearning: An adversarial framework for assessing and improving unlearning robustness in large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.10682,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    AnyGPT: Unified Multimodal LLM with Discrete Sequence Modeling

    Jun Zhan, Junqi Dai, Jiasheng Ye, Yunhua Zhou, Dong Zhang, Zhigeng Liu, Xin Zhang, Ruibin Yuan, Ge Zhang, Linyang Li, et al. Anygpt: Unified multimodal llm with discrete sequence modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.12226,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [19]

    State-of-the-Art Approaches to Enhancing Privacy Preservation of Machine Learning Datasets: A Survey

    Chaoyu Zhang and Shaoyu Li. State-of-the-art approaches to enhancing privacy preservation of machine learning datasets: A survey.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.16847,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    Multi-modal Semantic Understanding with Contrastive Cross-modal Feature Alignment

    Ming Zhang, Ke Chang, and Yunfang Wu. Multi-modal semantic understanding with contrastive cross-modal feature alignment.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.06355, 2024a. Ruiqi Zhang, Licong Lin, Yu Bai, and Song Mei. Negative preference optimization: From catastrophic collapse to effective unlearning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.05868, 2024b. Zhanke Zhou, Jianing Zhu,...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models

    Andy Zou, Zifan Wang, Nicholas Carlini, Milad Nasr, J Zico Kolter, and Matt Fredrikson. Universal and transferable adversarial attacks on aligned language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.15043,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    no free lunch

    Epochs 3 KL penalty weight 0.2 KL penalty scope Retain-set samples F Defense Analysis Potential Defense regarding POPS.We evaluate POPS against two representative defense mechanisms; Table 8 (main text) reports the quantitative results. Head Projection applies orthogonal projection to model representations, attempting to remove directions associated with ...

    work page 2025