Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Visual Programming for Text-to-Image Generation and Evaluation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.15328 v2 pith:PFJFKA2F submitted 2023-05-24 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords generationevaluationvisualmodelsinterpretableexplainableframeworkobject
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

As large language models have demonstrated impressive performance in many domains, recent works have adopted language models (LMs) as controllers of visual modules for vision-and-language tasks. While existing work focuses on equipping LMs with visual understanding, we propose two novel interpretable/explainable visual programming frameworks for text-to-image (T2I) generation and evaluation. First, we introduce VPGen, an interpretable step-by-step T2I generation framework that decomposes T2I generation into three steps: object/count generation, layout generation, and image generation. We employ an LM to handle the first two steps (object/count generation and layout generation), by finetuning it on text-layout pairs. Our step-by-step T2I generation framework provides stronger spatial control than end-to-end models, the dominant approach for this task. Furthermore, we leverage the world knowledge of pretrained LMs, overcoming the limitation of previous layout-guided T2I works that can only handle predefined object classes. We demonstrate that our VPGen has improved control in counts/spatial relations/scales of objects than state-of-the-art T2I generation models. Second, we introduce VPEval, an interpretable and explainable evaluation framework for T2I generation based on visual programming. Unlike previous T2I evaluations with a single scoring model that is accurate in some skills but unreliable in others, VPEval produces evaluation programs that invoke a set of visual modules that are experts in different skills, and also provides visual+textual explanations of the evaluation results. Our analysis shows that VPEval provides a more human-correlated evaluation for skill-specific and open-ended prompts than widely used single model-based evaluation. We hope that our work encourages future progress on interpretable/explainable generation and evaluation for T2I models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LLM Code Customization with Visual Results: A Benchmark on TikZ

    cs.SE 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    vTikZ, a 100-task benchmark for visual code customization, shows LLMs solve at most 28 percent of TikZ editing scenarios even with best-of-five sampling.

  2. Multi-Modal Language Models as Text-to-Image Model Evaluators

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MT2IE uses a single open-source multimodal LLM to generate 20 progressively harder prompts and score image-text consistency, reproducing the 1,600-prompt GenAIBench ranking of 8 text-to-image models.

  3. Think, Plan, Paint: Layout-Aware Reasoning for Controllable Image Generation in Unified Models

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ATLAS adds a Think–Plan–Paint loop with shared positional tokens to unified MLLMs, plus RL-based layout alignment, achieving large reported gains over prior layout-based unified models on compositional image generatio...

Pith tools