Pith. sign in

REVIEW 11 cited by

Learning How Hard to Think: Input-Adaptive Allocation of LM Computation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.04707 v1 pith:PMTRRNNA submitted 2024-10-07 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

Learning How Hard to Think: Input-Adaptive Allocation of LM Computation

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL
keywords computationdecodingprocedureinputqualityaccurateapproachbudget
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Computationally intensive decoding procedures--including search, reranking, and self-critique--can improve the quality of language model (LM) outputs in problems spanning code generation, numerical reasoning, and dialog. Existing work typically applies the same decoding procedure for every input to an LM. But not all inputs require the same amount of computation to process. Can we allocate decoding computation adaptively, using more resources to answer questions whose answers will be harder to compute? We present an approach that predicts the distribution of rewards given an input and computation budget, then allocates additional computation to inputs for which it is predicted to be most useful. We apply this approach in two decoding procedures: first, an adaptive best-of-k procedure that dynamically selects the number of samples to generate as input to a reranker; second, a routing procedure that dynamically responds to a query using a decoding procedure that is expensive but accurate, or one that is cheaper but less capable. Across a suite of programming, mathematics, and dialog tasks, we show that accurate computation-allocation procedures can be learned, and reduce computation by up to 50% at no cost to response quality, or improve quality by up to 10% at a fixed computational budget.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 11 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Falsification, Not Exposure: An Internally Preregistered Placebo-Controlled Decomposition of Self-Repair Feedback in Frozen Small Code Models

    cs.SE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Preregistered placebo-controlled decomposition shows external executable counterexamples drive self-repair gains in small code models more than re-exposure or self-critique.

  2. ATLAS: Agentic Test-time Learning-to-Allocate Scaling

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ATLAS introduces an LLM-orchestrated agentic framework for dynamic test-time scaling via extensible 'explore' actions, achieving higher accuracy with fewer API calls than fixed-workflow baselines on four benchmarks.

  3. Small Generalizable Prompt Predictive Models Can Steer Efficient RL Post-Training of Large Reasoning Models

    cs.AI 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    GPS trains a small model on optimization history to predict prompt difficulty and select intermediate-difficulty diverse batches, yielding better training efficiency, final performance, and test-time allocation than b...

  4. Do NOT Think That Much for 2+3=? On the Overthinking of o1-Like LLMs

    cs.CL 2024-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    o1-like models overthink easy tasks; self-training reduces compute use without accuracy loss on GSM8K, MATH500, GPQA, and AIME.

  5. Self-Supervised On-Policy Distillation for Reasoning Language Models

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SSOPD converts intra-group correct-wrong contrast into process supervision by distilling a teacher distribution from the shortest correct completion into prefixes of the longest wrong completion, improving GRPO on AIM...

  6. Differentiable Mixture-of-Agents Incentivizes Swarm Intelligence of Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DMoA is a differentiable multi-agent framework for LLMs that uses recurrent context-aware routing and predictive entropy for test-time adaptation, claiming SOTA results on 9 benchmarks with efficiency and robustness.

  7. GlimpRouter: Efficient Collaborative Inference by Glimpsing One Token of Thoughts

    cs.AI 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GlimpRouter uses the entropy of the first token in each reasoning step to decide whether to invoke a large model, yielding 10.7% higher accuracy and 25.9% lower latency than a standalone large model on AIME25.

  8. Latency and Token-Aware Test-Time Compute

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    A learned per-query router selects both the inference-scaling method and its compute budget to balance accuracy, token use, and latency, outperforming static strategies on math reasoning.

  9. Differentiable Mixture-of-Agents Incentivizes Swarm Intelligence of Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    DMoA is a differentiable multi-agent LLM framework with recurrent context-aware routing and predictive entropy self-supervision that claims SOTA results on 9 benchmarks through elastic agent collaboration.

  10. Calibrate-Then-Act: Cost-Aware Exploration in LLM Agents

    cs.CL 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Calibrate-Then-Act supplies LLM agents with priors on latent environment states to enable explicit cost-uncertainty reasoning, producing more optimal strategies than standard approaches in retrieval QA and file-readin...

  11. From Long to Short: LLMs Excel at Trimming Own Reasoning Chains

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0

    EDIT searches across step-count prompts to find the shortest reasoning path the model consistently answers correctly.