REVIEW 3 cited by
Statistically-informed deep learning for gravitational wave parameter estimation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Statistically-informed deep learning for gravitational wave parameter estimation
read the original abstract
We introduce deep learning models to estimate the masses of the binary components of black hole mergers, $(m_1,m_2)$, and three astrophysical properties of the post-merger compact remnant, namely, the final spin, $a_f$, and the frequency and damping time of the ringdown oscillations of the fundamental $\ell=m=2$ bar mode, $(\omega_R, \omega_I)$. Our neural networks combine a modified $\texttt{WaveNet}$ architecture with contrastive learning and normalizing flow. We validate these models against a Gaussian conjugate prior family whose posterior distribution is described by a closed analytical expression. Upon confirming that our models produce statistically consistent results, we used them to estimate the astrophysical parameters $(m_1,m_2, a_f, \omega_R, \omega_I)$ of five binary black holes: $\texttt{GW150914}, \texttt{GW170104}, \texttt{GW170814}, \texttt{GW190521}$ and $\texttt{GW190630}$. We use $\texttt{PyCBC Inference}$ to directly compare traditional Bayesian methodologies for parameter estimation with our deep-learning-based posterior distributions. Our results show that our neural network models predict posterior distributions that encode physical correlations, and that our data-driven median results and 90$\%$ confidence intervals are similar to those produced with gravitational wave Bayesian analyses. This methodology requires a single V100 $\texttt{NVIDIA}$ GPU to produce median values and posterior distributions within two milliseconds for each event. This neural network, and a tutorial for its use, are available at the $\texttt{Data and Learning Hub for Science}$.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Identifying lensed gravitational waves with physics-informed posterior learning
Fusing a simulation-trained common-source mass posterior with waveform features raises lensed-event detection efficiency from 20.8% to 35.2% at 1% false-positive rate and lowers the SNR for 50% efficiency from 45.3 to 33.5.
-
Parameter inference of millilensed gravitational waves using neural spline flows
Neural spline flows perform fast posterior inference on 11-dimensional millilensed GW parameters with accuracy comparable to dynesty for most quantities and a 3-day to 0.8-second speedup.
-
Assessment of normalizing flows for parameter estimation on time-frequency representations of gravitational-wave data
GP15 maps BBH spectrograms to parameter posteriors via residual networks and normalizing flows, producing results consistent with LVK analyses on GWTC-2.1 and GWTC-3 events while running in seconds.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.