pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.24715 · v2 · pith:QNQD5SBXnew · submitted 2026-05-23 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · hep-ph

Gravitational Waves from Post-Inflationary Magnetism: Direct and Scalar-Induced Contributions

Subhasis Maiti This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 12:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO hep-ph
keywords gravitational wavespost-inflationary magnetogenesisstochastic backgroundpulsar timing arraysmagnetic anisotropic stressscalar-induced gravitational wavesblue magnetic spectrareheating dynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Post-inflationary magnetic fields with time-dependent gauge couplings source stochastic gravitational waves that reach nano-Hz frequencies, with the direct magnetic contribution dominating the peak amplitude over the scalar-induced part.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines gravitational waves produced after inflation when magnetic fields arise through time-dependent gauge couplings. Magnetic fields create anisotropic stress that directly generates waves, while also inducing curvature perturbations that source an additional scalar-induced component. The authors compare the two spectra and show that the magnetic part peaks higher while the scalar-induced part matters more at lower frequencies. Both follow an f cubed scaling at low frequencies for sufficiently blue magnetic spectra, but their high-frequency tails differ. Suitable choices of reheating and magnetogenesis parameters place the signal in the nano-Hz band accessible to pulsar timing arrays without violating existing limits.

Core claim

In the post-inflationary magnetogenesis scenario with time-dependent gauge couplings during inflation and reheating, magnetic anisotropic stress directly sources gravitational waves while induced curvature perturbations generate an additional scalar-induced component. The magnetic component dominates the peak amplitude whereas the scalar-induced contribution becomes important on larger scales. For blue magnetic spectra with n_b greater than or equal to 3/2 both spectra follow the infrared scaling Omega_GW proportional to f cubed below the peak, yet their ultraviolet behaviors differ. For suitable reheating and magnetogenesis parameters the resulting signal extends into the nano-Hz range rele

What carries the argument

The two sourcing mechanisms for stochastic gravitational waves: direct production from magnetic-field anisotropic stress and indirect production from curvature perturbations induced by those same magnetic fields, with their relative amplitudes and spectral shapes compared across frequency bands.

If this is right

  • For blue magnetic spectra with n_b greater than or equal to 3/2 both the direct and scalar-induced spectra obey Omega_GW proportional to f cubed at frequencies well below the peak.
  • The direct magnetic contribution sets the maximum amplitude while the scalar-induced contribution dominates at larger scales.
  • The overall signal can be placed inside the nano-Hz window accessible to pulsar timing arrays by choosing appropriate reheating and magnetogenesis parameters.
  • The differing ultraviolet slopes of the two components produce observable spectral features that distinguish this scenario from others.
  • These features offer a potential probe of the duration and temperature of reheating together with the form of the primordial magnetic spectrum.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future pulsar timing array data could place joint constraints on the time dependence of gauge couplings during reheating and the tilt of the magnetic spectrum.
  • If the predicted spectral break between the two contributions is observed, it would link the amplitude of primordial magnetic fields to the timing of reheating in a way independent of direct magnetic-field searches.
  • The same parameter space that produces a nano-Hz signal may also affect the evolution of curvature perturbations on scales that enter the horizon during reheating, offering a cross-check with CMB spectral distortions.
  • Extension of the calculation to include the back-reaction of the generated gravitational waves on the magnetic field evolution would test the robustness of the peak-amplitude dominance.

Load-bearing premise

The post-inflationary magnetogenesis scenario with time-dependent gauge couplings produces the assumed magnetic spectra and anisotropic stress without violating other cosmological constraints.

What would settle it

A pulsar timing array measurement that either detects or rules out a stochastic gravitational-wave background whose peak is dominated by the magnetic contribution and whose spectrum shows the predicted infrared f cubed rise together with a distinct ultraviolet tail.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.24715 by Subhasis Maiti.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Comoving magnetic field strength as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Total curvature power spectrum (primary + [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Top panel: Secondary GW spectral energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Top panel: GW spectral energy density induced [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Present-day GW spectral energy density Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: We have plotted the posterior distributions of the parameters. In the left panel, we have considered that [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study stochastic gravitational waves generated in a post-inflationary magnetogenesis scenario with time-dependent gauge couplings during inflation and reheating. In this setup, magnetic anisotropic stress directly sources gravitational waves, while the induced curvature perturbations generate an additional scalar-induced GW component. We compare the spectral behavior of the two contributions and find that the magnetic component dominates the peak amplitude, whereas the scalar-induced contribution becomes important on larger scales. For blue magnetic spectra with $n_{\rm b}\geq3/2$, both spectra follow the universal infrared scaling $\Omega_{\rm GW}(f\ll f_{\rm peak})\propto f^3$. However, their ultraviolet behaviors differ significantly for $f>f_{\rm peak}$, leading to distinct spectral features. For suitable reheating and magnetogenesis parameters, the resulting GW signal naturally extends into the nano-Hz range relevant for pulsar timing array observations, while remaining consistent with current bounds. The distinct spectral features of the two components may provide a useful probe of reheating dynamics and primordial magnetogenesis.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines stochastic gravitational waves sourced by post-inflationary magnetogenesis with time-dependent gauge couplings during inflation and reheating. It compares the direct contribution from magnetic anisotropic stress to the scalar-induced contribution arising from curvature perturbations, finding that the magnetic component dominates the peak amplitude while the scalar-induced term is relevant on larger scales. For blue spectra with n_b ≥ 3/2 both components obey the infrared scaling Ω_GW ∝ f^3, but their ultraviolet behaviors differ; the authors state that suitable reheating and magnetogenesis parameters place the signal in the nano-Hz band accessible to pulsar timing arrays while remaining consistent with existing bounds.

Significance. If the existence of a viable parameter window is demonstrated, the work would supply a concrete mechanism linking primordial magnetogenesis and reheating dynamics to observable gravitational-wave spectra with distinguishable features, potentially offering a new probe for PTA experiments.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'suitable reheating and magnetogenesis parameters' allow the GW signal to extend into the nano-Hz range while remaining consistent with current bounds is load-bearing for the PTA relevance, yet the abstract provides no explicit demonstration that such a window survives backreaction, CMB B-field limits, or consistency with the inflationary background; this viability must be shown with concrete parameter ranges and constraint plots.
  2. [Abstract] The derivation of the spectral scalings (both components ~f^3 in the IR, differing in the UV) rests on the assumed magnetic spectra with n_b ≥ 3/2 and the associated anisotropic stress; without an explicit check that these spectra can be realized without violating the assumed post-inflationary evolution, the universality of the IR scaling and the distinction between components remain conditional on unverified premises.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below, providing point-by-point responses and indicating revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'suitable reheating and magnetogenesis parameters' allow the GW signal to extend into the nano-Hz range while remaining consistent with current bounds is load-bearing for the PTA relevance, yet the abstract provides no explicit demonstration that such a window survives backreaction, CMB B-field limits, or consistency with the inflationary background; this viability must be shown with concrete parameter ranges and constraint plots.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract, being a concise summary, does not itself contain explicit parameter ranges or plots. The viability of the parameter window, including explicit checks against backreaction, CMB B-field limits, and consistency with the inflationary background, is demonstrated in Sections 3 and 4 with concrete examples and constraint plots (Figures 5–7). To strengthen the abstract, we have revised it to explicitly reference the parameter-space analysis and consistency checks performed in the main text. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The derivation of the spectral scalings (both components ~f^3 in the IR, differing in the UV) rests on the assumed magnetic spectra with n_b ≥ 3/2 and the associated anisotropic stress; without an explicit check that these spectra can be realized without violating the assumed post-inflationary evolution, the universality of the IR scaling and the distinction between components remain conditional on unverified premises.

    Authors: The blue spectra with n_b ≥ 3/2 are not merely assumed but are derived from the time-dependent gauge coupling during inflation and reheating, as shown explicitly in Section 2. Consistency with the post-inflationary evolution is verified by construction through the choice of coupling functions that keep the magnetic energy density subdominant; this is stated in Section 2.3 and cross-referenced in the discussion of spectral scalings. We have added an explicit clarifying sentence in the revised manuscript to make this verification more prominent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; parameter viability presented as external consistency check

full rationale

The provided abstract and claims derive GW spectra (both direct magnetic and scalar-induced) from the assumed post-inflationary magnetogenesis setup with time-dependent gauge couplings and blue magnetic spectra n_b >= 3/2. The IR scaling Omega_GW ~ f^3 and differing UV behaviors follow directly from those inputs without reduction to a fit or self-definition. The statement that the signal 'naturally extends into the nano-Hz range for suitable reheating and magnetogenesis parameters' while 'remaining consistent with current bounds' treats parameter choice as an external viability condition rather than a fitted input renamed as prediction. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatze are invoked in the given text. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against the stated assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields limited visibility into free parameters and axioms; the model relies on an assumed magnetogenesis scenario whose gauge-coupling evolution and resulting magnetic spectrum are taken as given.

free parameters (1)
  • reheating and magnetogenesis parameters
    Abstract states that suitable choices allow the signal to reach nano-Hz frequencies; these are not enumerated but function as adjustable inputs.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Post-inflationary magnetogenesis with time-dependent gauge couplings produces the stated magnetic anisotropic stress and induced curvature perturbations.
    This premise is invoked when the authors define the setup and compare the two GW contributions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5704 in / 1339 out tokens · 28860 ms · 2026-06-30T12:10:22.628267+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

146 extracted references · 118 canonical work pages · 66 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Using this asymp- totic behavior in Eq.(43), the kernel admits the following late-time form [25–33, 110–116, 119–122]: I2 RD,s(v, u, x→ ∞)≃ 1 2x2 3(v2 +u 2 −3) 4v3u3 2 × −4vu+ (v 2 +u 2 −3) log 3−(v+u) 2 3−(v−u) 2 2 +π2(v2 +u 2 −3) 2Θ(v+u− √ 3) ! .(45) From the above analysis, it is clear that both the mag- netic and scalar-induced sources show similar ti...

  2. [2]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 241102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03840 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 131103 (2016), arXiv:1602.03838 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. D93, 122003 (2016), arXiv:1602.03839 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO), Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 221101 (2017), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 129901 (2018)], arXiv:1706.01812 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 121101 (2017), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 119, 029901 (2017)], arXiv:1612.02029 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation

    Y. Akramiet al.(Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A10 (2020), arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  9. [9]

    P. A. R. Adeet al.(BICEP, Keck), Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 151301 (2021), arXiv:2110.00483 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    P. A. R. Adeet al.(BICEP2, Keck Array), Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 221301 (2018), arXiv:1810.05216 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    T. J. Clarke, E. J. Copeland, and A. Moss, JCAP10, 002 (2020), arXiv:2004.11396 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  12. [12]

    Improved Calculation of the Primordial Gravitational Wave Spectrum in the Standard Model

    Y. Watanabe and E. Komatsu, Phys. Rev. D73, 123515 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0604176

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  13. [13]

    Cosmological Backgrounds of Gravitational Waves

    C. Caprini and D. G. Figueroa, Class. Quant. Grav.35, 163001 (2018), arXiv:1801.04268 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  14. [14]

    Second-Order Cosmological Perturbations from Inflation

    V. Acquaviva, N. Bartolo, S. Matarrese, and A. Riotto, Nucl. Phys. B667, 119 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0209156

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  15. [15]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  16. [16]

    Sendra and T

    I. Sendra and T. L. Smith, Phys. Rev. D85, 123002 (2012)

    2012

  17. [17]

    The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics

    A. Afzalet al.(NANOGrav), Astrophys. J. Lett. 951, L11 (2023), [Erratum: Astrophys.J.Lett. 971, L27 (2024), Erratum: Astrophys.J. 971, L27 (2024)], arXiv:2306.16219 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    Parity violation in the Cosmic Microwave Background from a pseudoscalar inflaton

    L. Sorbo, JCAP06, 003 (2011), arXiv:1101.1525 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  19. [19]

    Adding helicity to inflationary magnetogenesis

    C. Caprini and L. Sorbo, JCAP10, 056 (2014), arXiv:1407.2809 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  20. [20]

    Primordial Gravitational Waves Induced by Magnetic Fields in an Ekpyrotic Scenario

    A. Ito and J. Soda, Phys. Lett. B771, 415 (2017), arXiv:1607.07062 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  21. [21]

    Sharma, K

    R. Sharma, K. Subramanian, and T. R. Seshadri, Phys. Rev. D101, 103526 (2020), arXiv:1912.12089 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  22. [22]

    A. A. Starobinsky, JETP Lett.30, 682 (1979)

    1979

  23. [23]

    L. P. Grishchuk, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.67, 825 (1974)

    1974

  24. [24]

    M. C. Guzzetti, N. Bartolo, M. Liguori, and S. Matar- rese, Riv. Nuovo Cim.39, 399 (2016), arXiv:1605.01615 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  25. [25]

    M. R. Haque, D. Maity, T. Paul, and L. Sriramkumar, Phys. Rev. D104, 063513 (2021), arXiv:2105.09242 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    Adams, B

    J. Adams, B. Cresswell, and R. Easther, Phys. Rev. D 64, 123514 (2001)

    2001

  27. [27]

    Primordial black holes and second order gravitational waves from ultra-slow-roll inflation

    H. Di and Y. Gong, JCAP07, 007 (2018), arXiv:1707.09578 [astro-ph.CO]. 13

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  28. [28]

    C. Fu, P. Wu, and H. Yu, Phys. Rev. D101, 023529 (2020), arXiv:1912.05927 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  29. [29]

    H. V. Ragavendra, P. Saha, L. Sriramkumar, and J. Silk, Phys. Rev. D103, 083510 (2021)

    2021

  30. [30]

    Bhaumik and R

    N. Bhaumik and R. K. Jain, Phys. Rev. D104, 023531 (2021), arXiv:2009.10424 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  31. [31]

    Solbi and K

    M. Solbi and K. Karami, JCAP08, 056 (2021), arXiv:2102.05651 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    D. G. Figueroa, S. Raatikainen, S. Rasanen, and E. Tomberg, JCAP05, 027 (2022), arXiv:2111.07437 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    Dom` enech, S

    G. Dom` enech, S. Pi, and M. Sasaki, JCAP08, 017 (2020), arXiv:2005.12314 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  34. [34]

    R.-g. Cai, S. Pi, and M. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 201101 (2019), arXiv:1810.11000 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    Maiti, D

    S. Maiti, D. Maity, and R. Srikanth, Phys. Rev. D112, 043535 (2025), arXiv:2504.15400 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Maiti, Phys

    S. Maiti, Phys. Rev. D112, 043536 (2025), arXiv:2506.06183 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Maiti, D

    S. Maiti, D. Maity, and R. Srikanth, Phys. Rev. D112, 063552 (2025), arXiv:2505.13623 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Chakraborty, S

    A. Chakraborty, S. Maiti, and D. Maity, Phys. Rev. D 111, 083505 (2025), arXiv:2408.07767 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Chakraborty, M

    A. Chakraborty, M. R. Haque, D. Maity, and R. Mon- dal, Phys. Rev. D108, 023515 (2023), arXiv:2304.13637 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    Primary gravitational waves at high frequencies I: Origin of suppression in the power spectrum

    A. Hoory, J. Martin, A. Paul, and L. Sriramkumar, (2025), arXiv:2512.03959 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    R. Inui, S. Jaraba, S. Kuroyanagi, and S. Yokoyama, JCAP05, 082 (2024), arXiv:2311.05423 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    K. T. Abe, R. Inui, Y. Tada, and S. Yokoyama, JCAP 05, 044 (2023), arXiv:2209.13891 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  43. [43]

    Okano and T

    S. Okano and T. Fujita, JCAP03, 026 (2021), arXiv:2005.13833 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  44. [44]

    Magnetic fields in nearby galaxies

    A. Fletcher, arXiv preprint arXiv:1104.2427 (2011)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  45. [45]

    Beck, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review24, 4 (2016)

    R. Beck, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review24, 4 (2016)

    2016

  46. [46]

    The outer scale of turbulence in the magneto-ionized Galactic interstellar medium

    M. Haverkorn, J. C. Brown, B. M. Gaensler, and N. M. McClure-Griffiths, Astrophys. J.680, 362 (2008), arXiv:0802.2740 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  47. [47]

    Kronberg, Q

    P. Kronberg, Q. Dufton, H. Li, and S. Colgate, The Astrophysical Journal560, 178 (2001)

    2001

  48. [48]

    Brandenburg and E

    A. Brandenburg and E. Ntormousi, Annual Re- view of Astronomy and Astrophysics61, 561 (2023), arXiv:2211.03476 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2023

  49. [49]

    M. S. Turner and L. M. Widrow, Phys. Rev. D37, 2743 (1988)

    1988

  50. [50]

    F. D. Mazzitelli and F. M. Spedalieri, Phys. Rev. D52, 6694 (1995)

    1995

  51. [51]

    Lambiase and A

    G. Lambiase and A. R. Prasanna, Phys. Rev. D70, 063502 (2004)

    2004

  52. [52]

    Yanagihara, F

    K. Yanagihara, F. Uchida, T. Fujita, and S. Tsu- jikawa, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2312.07938 (2023), arXiv:2312.07938 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  53. [53]

    Caprini and R

    C. Caprini and R. Durrer, Phys. Rev. D65, 023517 (2001)

    2001

  54. [54]

    The Magnetic Origin of Primordial Black Holes: A Viable Dark Matter Scenario

    S. Maiti and D. Maity, JCAP04, 020 (2026), arXiv:2508.19217 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  55. [55]

    Higher order statistics of curvature perturbations in IFF model and its Planck constraints

    T. Fujita and S. Yokoyama, JCAP09, 009 (2013), arXiv:1306.2992 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  56. [56]

    Fujita and R

    T. Fujita and R. Namba, Phys. Rev. D94, 043523 (2016)

    2016

  57. [57]

    eLISA: Astrophysics and cosmology in the millihertz regime

    P. Amaro-Seoaneet al., GW Notes6, 4 (2013), arXiv:1201.3621 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  58. [58]

    Barausseet al., Gen

    E. Barausseet al., Gen. Rel. Grav.52, 81 (2020), arXiv:2001.09793 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  59. [59]

    Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions

    C. Capriniet al., JCAP04, 001 (2016), arXiv:1512.06239 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  60. [60]

    Beyond LISA: Exploring Future Gravitational Wave Missions

    J. Crowder and N. J. Cornish, Phys. Rev. D72, 083005 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0506015

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  61. [61]

    Detecting the Cosmic Gravitational Wave Background with the Big Bang Observer

    V. Corbin and N. J. Cornish, Class. Quant. Grav.23, 2435 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0512039

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  62. [62]

    Space Based Gravitational Wave Astronomy Beyond LISA

    J. Bakeret al., Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51, 243 (2019), arXiv:1907.11305 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  63. [63]

    N. Seto, S. Kawamura, and T. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 221103 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0108011

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  64. [64]

    Kawamuraet al., Class

    S. Kawamuraet al., Class. Quant. Grav.28, 094011 (2011)

    2011

  65. [65]

    Suemasa, K

    A. Suemasa, K. Nakagawa, and M. Musha, Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng.10563, 105632V (2017)

    2017

  66. [66]

    Gravitational wave astronomy with the SKA

    G. Janssenet al., PoSAASKA14, 037 (2015), arXiv:1501.00127 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  67. [67]

    The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-Wave Background

    G. Agazieet al.(NANOGrav), Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L8 (2023), arXiv:2306.16213 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  68. [68]

    Antoniadiset al.(EPTA), The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - I

    A. et al, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2306.16224 (2023), arXiv:2306.16224 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  69. [69]

    D. J. Reardonet al., Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L6 (2023), arXiv:2306.16215 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  70. [70]

    Zicet al., The Parkes Pulsar Timing Array third data release, Publ

    A. Zicet al., Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral.40, e049 (2023), arXiv:2306.16230 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  71. [71]

    Searching for the nano-Hertz stochastic gravitational wave background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I

    H. Xuet al., Res. Astron. Astrophys.23, 075024 (2023), arXiv:2306.16216 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  72. [72]

    TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector

    J. Luoet al.(TianQin), Class. Quant. Grav.33, 035010 (2016), arXiv:1512.02076 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  73. [73]

    R. J. Z. Ferreira, R. K. Jain, and M. S. Sloth, JCAP 10, 004 (2013), arXiv:1305.7151 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  74. [74]

    Primordial Magnetic Fields from the Post-Inflationary Universe

    T. Kobayashi, JCAP05, 040 (2014), arXiv:1403.5168 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  75. [75]

    Kobayashi and M

    T. Kobayashi and M. S. Sloth, Phys. Rev. D100, 023524 (2019)

    2019

  76. [76]

    M. R. Haque, D. Maity, and S. Pal, Phys. Rev. D103, 103540 (2021), arXiv:2012.10859 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  77. [77]

    Maity, S

    D. Maity, S. Pal, and T. Paul, JCAP05, 045 (2021), arXiv:2103.02411 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  78. [78]

    Tripathy, D

    S. Tripathy, D. Chowdhury, R. K. Jain, and L. Sriramkumar, Phys. Rev. D105, 063519 (2022), arXiv:2111.01478 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  79. [79]

    Li and L.-Y

    Y. Li and L.-Y. Zhang, Mod. Phys. Lett. A37, 2250069 (2022)

    2022

  80. [80]

    To $B$ or not to $B$: Primordial magnetic fields from Weyl anomaly

    A. Benevides, A. Dabholkar, and T. Kobayashi, JHEP 11, 039 (2018), arXiv:1808.08237 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

Showing first 80 references.