The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2004.06165 · v5 · pith:RKDIN7TP · submitted 2020-04-13 · cs.CV · cs.CL· cs.IR· cs.LG

Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Tasks

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:RKDIN7TPrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CV cs.CLcs.IRcs.LG
keywords taskslearningoscarpre-trainingvision-languagealignedalignmentsdetected
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Large-scale pre-training methods of learning cross-modal representations on image-text pairs are becoming popular for vision-language tasks. While existing methods simply concatenate image region features and text features as input to the model to be pre-trained and use self-attention to learn image-text semantic alignments in a brute force manner, in this paper, we propose a new learning method Oscar (Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training), which uses object tags detected in images as anchor points to significantly ease the learning of alignments. Our method is motivated by the observation that the salient objects in an image can be accurately detected, and are often mentioned in the paired text. We pre-train an Oscar model on the public corpus of 6.5 million text-image pairs, and fine-tune it on downstream tasks, creating new state-of-the-arts on six well-established vision-language understanding and generation tasks.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Decoding the Multimodal Maze: A Systematic Review on the Adoption of Explainability in Multimodal Attention-based Models

    cs.LG 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A systematic literature review of explainability in multimodal attention models finds most studies focus on vision-language tasks with attention-based explanations, but evaluation methods lack consistency and modality...