Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 2 minor 78 references

New quantum information perspectives in the axion--photon and neutrino systems

T0 review · 1 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-29 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Axion-photon mixing in the two-level sector generates bipartite mode entanglement with maxima at resonance.

desk verdict The paper computes standard QI measures on axion-photon mixing in the single-excitation sector and ties maximal entanglement to resonance, with no major internal problems. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.30419 v1 pith:RKHDAWBA submitted 2026-05-28 hep-ph hep-exhep-thquant-ph

Aaditya Datar , Arun M. Thalapillil , Palak Thareja This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-exhep-thquant-ph
keywords axion-photonmixingbipartiteentanglementconcurrencenegativityquantumspeedlimitsneutrinooscillationsdiscordentropy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper applies quantum information concepts to axion-photon oscillations. In the two-level single-excitation sector the mixing dynamics produce entanglement between the axion and photon modes. Entanglement entropy, concurrence, negativity, mutual information, discord and entanglement capacity all reach extremal values at resonant or strong mixing. Quantum speed limits are examined for both axion-photon and neutrino systems, with the two bounds coinciding only at resonance or maximal mixing. An additional entanglement speed limit is derived that saturates temporarily before weakening.

What carries the argument

the two-level single-excitation sector of the axion-photon mixing dynamics that induces bipartite mode entanglement

What would settle it

An experiment that measures axion-photon conversion at resonance and finds that concurrence or negativity fails to reach its predicted maximum would falsify the claimed connection between maximal entanglement and resonance.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the two-level single-excitation sector of the axion-photon system, the coupled dynamics naturally generate bipartite axion-photon mode entanglement. The analysis details how entanglement entropy, concurrence, negativity, quantum mutual information, discord and capacity of entanglement attain their extremal values, with maximal entanglement tied to resonant or strong-mixing conversion and distinct thresholds separating the regimes. Parallel results hold for neutrino oscillations. Orthogonalisation occurs only at resonance or maximal mixing, where the Mandelstam-Tamm and Margolus-Levitin bounds coincide; away from resonance the Margolus-Levitin bound saturates at maximal conversion while th

Load-bearing premise

The system remains confined to the two-level single-excitation sector where the entanglement and speed-limit calculations apply.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Maximal axion-photon entanglement occurs precisely at resonant or strong-mixing conversion.
  • The Mandelstam-Tamm and Margolus-Levitin bounds coincide only at resonance or at maximal neutrino mixing.
  • Away from resonance the Margolus-Levitin bound saturates at the point of maximal conversion.
  • The Mandelstam-Tamm bound stays weaker than the Margolus-Levitin bound outside those special points.
  • The entanglement quantum speed limit for axion-photon conversion saturates temporarily before becoming weak in either detuning- or mixing-dominated regimes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Entanglement measures could function as additional observables in axion haloscope or helioscope searches.
  • The identified thresholds might guide parameter choices in quantum-enhanced axion detection proposals.
  • Analogous quantum-information analysis could be applied to other two-state oscillation systems such as neutral-meson mixing.
  • The separation into detuning- and mixing-dominated regimes suggests distinct experimental regimes for testing speed-limit saturation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies standard two-level quantum mechanics to the single-excitation sector of the axion-photon mixing Hamiltonian (and its neutrino analogue), deriving bipartite entanglement measures (concurrence, negativity, mutual information, discord, entanglement capacity) and quantum speed limits (Mandelstam-Tamm, Margolus-Levitin, and an entanglement QSL) directly from the time-evolution operator. It reports that maximal entanglement occurs at resonance or strong mixing, that the two QSL bounds coincide only at resonance/maximal mixing, that the Margolus-Levitin bound saturates at maximal conversion away from resonance, and that the entanglement QSL separates into detuning- versus mixing-dominated regimes.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work supplies a consistent quantum-information framing of axion-photon conversion and neutrino oscillations inside the stated sector, identifying concrete thresholds (resonance for maximal entanglement, regime-dependent saturation of the QSLs) that are falsifiable within that model. The explicit restriction to the single-excitation sector and the absence of circularity in the reported measures are strengths; the results could inform quantum-resource considerations in future axion searches, though direct experimental mapping remains outside the manuscript's scope.

major comments (1)
  1. [Hamiltonian and sector definition (early sections)] The two-level single-excitation restriction is load-bearing for every quantitative claim (entanglement measures, QSL saturation thresholds). The manuscript states the restriction but does not supply an error estimate or validity criterion for typical axion haloscope parameters (e.g., photon occupation number or magnetic-field strength); without this, the regime of applicability cannot be assessed from the text alone.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the mixing angle, detuning, and magnetic coupling should be unified across the axion-photon and neutrino sections to avoid reader confusion.
  2. A short paragraph comparing the obtained concurrence and negativity values to the well-known two-level oscillation probability would make the connection to standard phenomenology more immediate.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading, positive assessment, and constructive comment. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Hamiltonian and sector definition (early sections)] The two-level single-excitation restriction is load-bearing for every quantitative claim (entanglement measures, QSL saturation thresholds). The manuscript states the restriction but does not supply an error estimate or validity criterion for typical axion haloscope parameters (e.g., photon occupation number or magnetic-field strength); without this, the regime of applicability cannot be assessed from the text alone.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit validity criterion or error estimate for the single-excitation sector would strengthen the manuscript. In the revised version we will insert a short paragraph (likely in Section II) that supplies a quantitative estimate of the approximation's accuracy for representative haloscope parameters, including typical photon occupation numbers and magnetic-field strengths, together with the resulting error bound on the reported entanglement and QSL quantities. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper restricts analysis to the two-level single-excitation sector and derives all entanglement measures (concurrence, negativity, mutual information, discord, capacity of entanglement) and quantum speed limits (Mandelstam-Tamm, Margolus-Levitin, entanglement QSL) directly from the time-evolution operator of the axion-photon and neutrino Hamiltonians. Maximal entanglement at resonance, distinct saturation thresholds, and regime separations follow from explicit computation on the resulting two-dimensional dynamics. No parameters are fitted to data and then called predictions; no load-bearing steps invoke self-citations that reduce to unverified inputs; the sector restriction is stated upfront and all results are obtained within it without external renormalization or ansatz smuggling. The central claims are independent computations on the mixing Hamiltonian.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the standard two-level mixing Hamiltonian for axions and neutrinos plus the single-excitation restriction; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond those already standard in the axion and neutrino literature.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The axion-photon system is accurately described by a two-level single-excitation sector Hamiltonian.
    Explicitly stated as the sector analyzed in the abstract.
  • standard math Standard quantum mechanics and the definitions of entanglement measures and quantum speed limits apply directly to the mixing dynamics.
    Implicit throughout the use of concurrence, negativity, Mandelstam-Tamm, Margolus-Levitin, and entanglement QSL.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of New quantum information perspectives in the axion--photon and neutrino systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RKHDAWBA

@misc{pith2026260530419,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: New quantum information perspectives in the axion--photon and neutrino systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RKHDAWBA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.30419}
}
read the original abstract

In this work, we broach a quantum information-theoretic treatment of axion--photon mixing. Motivated by an emerging class of quantum-enhanced axion searches, we analyse the two-level single-excitation sector of axion--photon oscillations, demonstrating how the coupled dynamics naturally generate bipartite axion--photon mode entanglement. We study in detail the ensuing aspects of entanglement entropy, concurrence, negativity, quantum mutual information and discord, and capacity of entanglement, and the corresponding neutrino analogues wherever novel and previously unaddressed. In particular, we highlight the characteristic features that connect maximal axion--photon entanglement to resonant or strong-mixing conversion, and the distinct thresholds for the extremal values attained by the quantum information measures. We study aspects of the Mandelstam--Tamm and Margolus--Levitin quantum speed limits for both the axion--photon and neutrino systems. While orthogonalisation occurs only at axion--photon resonance, or at maximal neutrino mixing, where the two bounds coincide, away from these limits, the Margolus--Levitin bound is saturated at maximal conversion, while the Mandelstam--Tamm bound is generally weaker. We also study an entanglement quantum speed limit for axion--photon conversion, that separates into detuning-dominated and magnetic-mixing-dominated regimes, and find that it is saturated for a period and then the bound becomes weak. The results in this work identify the quantum resources and limiting timescales intrinsic to axion--photon conversion, and connect axion phenomenology, neutrino oscillations and quantum information theory.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons

    R. D. Peccei and Helen R. Quinn. “CP Conservation in the Presence of Pseudoparticles”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett.38 (1977), pp. 1440–1443.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.38.1440

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.38.1440 1977

  2. [2]

    A New Light Boson?

    Steven Weinberg. “A New Light Boson?” In:Phys. Rev. Lett.40 (1978), pp. 223–226.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.223

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.40.223 1978

  3. [3]

    Wilczek, Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys

    Frank Wilczek. “Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.40 (1978), pp. 279–282.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.279

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.40.279 1978

  4. [4]

    Photo-Production of Neutral Mesons in Nuclear Electric Fields and the Mean Life of the Neutral Meson

    H. Primakoff. “Photo-Production of Neutral Mesons in Nuclear Electric Fields and the Mean Life of the Neutral Meson”. In:Phys. Rev.81 (1951), p. 899.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.81.899. – 35 –

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.81.899 1951

  5. [5]

    Mixing of the photon with low-mass particles

    Georg Raffelt and Leo Stodolsky. “Mixing of the photon with low-mass particles”. In:Phys. Rev. D37 (5 Mar. 1988), pp. 1237–1249.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.37.1237

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.37.1237 1988

  6. [6]

    First results from the CERN Axion Solar Telescope (CAST)

    K. Zioutas et al. “First results from the CERN Axion Solar Telescope (CAST)”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.94 (2005), p. 121301.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.121301. arXiv:hep-ex/0411033

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.121301 2005

  7. [7]

    An improved limit on the axion-photon coupling from the CAST experiment

    S. Andriamonje et al. “An Improved limit on the axion-photon coupling from the CAST ex- periment”. In:JCAP04 (2007), p. 010.doi:10 . 1088 / 1475 - 7516 / 2007 / 04 / 010. arXiv: hep-ex/0702006

    work page Pith review arXiv 2007

  8. [8]

    New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles

    Igor G. Irastorza and Javier Redondo. “New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles”. In:Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.102 (2018), pp. 89–159.doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2018.05

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2018.05 2018

Show all 78 references
  1. [9]

    arXiv:1801.08127 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    The landscape of QCD axion models

    Luca Di Luzio, Maurizio Giannotti, Enrico Nardi, and Luca Visinelli. “The landscape of QCD axion models”. In:Phys. Rept.870 (2020), pp. 1–117.doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.06.002. arXiv:2003.01100 [hep-ph]

    2020 doi arXiv

  3. [11]

    Astrophysical Axion Bounds: The 2024 Edition

    Andrea Caputo and Georg Raffelt. “Astrophysical Axion Bounds: The 2024 Edition”. In:PoS COSMICWISPers (2024), p. 041.doi:10.22323/1.454.0041. arXiv:2401.13728 [hep-ph]

    2024 doi

  4. [12]

    Quantum Sensing

    Christian L. Degen, Friedemann Reinhard, and Paola Cappellaro. “Quantum Sensing”. In:Re- views of Modern Physics89.3 (2017), p. 035002.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035002.url: https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035002

    2017 doi

  5. [13]

    Searching for Dark Matter with a Superconducting Qubit

    Akash V. Dixit, Srivatsan Chakram, Kevin He, Ankur Agrawal, Ravi K. Naik, David I. Schuster, and Aaron Chou. “Searching for Dark Matter with a Superconducting Qubit”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.126.14 (2021), p. 141302.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.141302. arXiv:2008.12231 [hep-ex]

    2021 doi

  6. [14]

    Quantum dual-path interferometry scheme for axion dark matter searches

    Qiaoli Yang, Yu Gao, and Zhihui Peng. “Quantum dual-path interferometry scheme for axion dark matter searches”. In:Commun. Phys.7.1 (2024), p. 277.doi:10 . 1038 / s42005 - 024 - 01770-y. arXiv:2201.08291 [hep-ph]

    2024

  7. [15]

    Photon counting for axion interferometry

    Haocun Yu, Ohkyung Kwon, Devendra K. Namburi, Robert H. Hadfield, Hartmut Grote, and Denis Martynov. “Photon counting for axion interferometry”. In:Phys. Rev. D109.9 (2024), p. 095042.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.095042. arXiv:2309.03394 [physics.ins-det]

    2024 doi

  8. [16]

    Quantum-Enhanced Sensing of Axion Dark Matter with a Transmon-Based Single Microwave Photon Counter

    C. Braggio et al. “Quantum-Enhanced Sensing of Axion Dark Matter with a Transmon-Based Single Microwave Photon Counter”. In:Phys. Rev. X15.2 (2025), p. 021031.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevX.15.021031. arXiv:2403.02321 [quant-ph]

    2025

  9. [17]

    Exploring Quantum Aspects of Dark Matter Axions and Dark Photons Transitioning to Photons in a Resonant Cavity

    Ruifeng Zheng, Puxian Wei, and Qiaoli Yang. “Exploring Quantum Aspects of Dark Matter Axions and Dark Photons Transitioning to Photons in a Resonant Cavity”. In: (Oct. 2024). arXiv:2410.12634 [hep-ph]

    2024

  10. [18]

    A Penning trap single-photon counter for axion detection

    Jack A. Devlin, Marko L. Wojtkowiak, Shreyak R. Banhatti, He Zhang, Jiacheng Shi, Toren S. Dofher, Jonathan M. H. Gosling, Michael R. Tarbutt, and Richard C. Thompson. “A Penning trap single-photon counter for axion detection”. In: (Jan. 2026). arXiv:2601.05472 [hep-ph]

    2026

  11. [19]

    Nonlocality of a single photon

    S. M. Tan, D. F. Walls, and M. J. Collett. “Nonlocality of a single photon”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett. 66.3 (1991), p. 252.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.252

    1991 doi

  12. [20]

    Bell’s-inequality experiments using independent-particle sources

    Bernard Yurke and David Stoler. “Bell’s-inequality experiments using independent-particle sources”. In:Phys. Rev. A46.5 (1992), p. 2229.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.46.2229. – 36 –

    1992 doi

  13. [22]

    Single-particle entanglement

    S. J. van Enk. “Single-particle entanglement”. In:Phys. Rev. A72 (6 Dec. 2005), p. 064306. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.72.064306.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA. 72.064306

    2005 doi

  14. [23]

    Virtual quantum subsystems

    Paolo Zanardi. “Virtual quantum subsystems”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.87 (2001), p. 077901.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.077901. arXiv:quant-ph/0103030

    2001 doi arXiv

  15. [24]

    Quantum entanglement in fermionic lattices

    Paolo Zanardi. “Quantum entanglement in fermionic lattices”. In:Phys. Rev. A65.4 (2002), p. 042101.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.65.042101. arXiv:quant-ph/0104114

    2002 doi arXiv

  16. [25]

    Experimental Demon- stration of Single Photon Nonlocality

    Bj¨ orn Hessmo, Pavel Usachev, Hoshang Heydari, and Gunnar Bj¨ ork. “Experimental Demon- stration of Single Photon Nonlocality”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.92 (18 May 2004), p. 180401.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.180401.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 92.180401

    2004 doi

  17. [26]

    Ex- perimental Proof of Nonlocal Wavefunction Collapse for a Single Particle Using Homodyne Mea- surement

    Maria Fuwa, Shuntaro Takeda, Marcin Zwierz, Howard M. Wiseman, and Akira Furusawa. “Ex- perimental Proof of Nonlocal Wavefunction Collapse for a Single Particle Using Homodyne Mea- surement”. In:Nature Commun.6 (2015), p. 6665.doi:10.1038/ncomms7665. arXiv:1412.7790 [quant-ph]

    2015 doi arXiv

  18. [27]

    Demonstration of EPR steering using single-photon path entanglement and displacement-based detection

    T. Guerreiro et al. “Demonstration of EPR steering using single-photon path entanglement and displacement-based detection”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.117 (2016), p. 070404.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.117.070404. arXiv:1603.03589 [quant-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  19. [28]

    Multipartite entangled states in particle mixing

    M. Blasone, F. Dell’Anno, S. De Siena, M. Di Mauro, and F. Illuminati. “Multipartite entangled states in particle mixing”. In:Phys. Rev. D77 (2008), p. 096002.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77. 096002. arXiv:0711.2268 [quant-ph]

    2008 doi arXiv

  20. [29]

    Entanglement in neutrino oscillations

    Massimo Blasone, Fabio Dell’Anno, Silvio De Siena, and Fabrizio Illuminati. “Entanglement in neutrino oscillations”. In:EPL85 (2009), p. 50002.doi:10.1209/0295-5075/85/50002. arXiv: 0707.4476 [hep-ph]

    2009 doi arXiv

  21. [30]

    On the characterization of entanglement

    Guifre Vidal. “On the characterization of entanglement”. In:J. Mod. Opt.47 (2000), p. 355. doi:10.1080/09500340008244048. arXiv:quant-ph/9807077

    2000 doi arXiv

  22. [31]

    Introducing Quantum Discord

    Harold Ollivier and Wojciech H. Zurek. “Introducing Quantum Discord”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett. 88.1 (2001), p. 017901.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.017901. arXiv:quant-ph/0105072

    2001 doi arXiv

  23. [32]

    Why should we care about quantum discord?

    Aharon Brodutch and Daniel R. Terno. “Why should we care about quantum discord?” In: Aug. 2016.doi:10.1007/978-3-319-53412-1_8. arXiv:1608.01920 [quant-ph]

    2016 doi arXiv

  24. [33]

    The classical- quantum boundary for correlations: Discord and related measures

    Kavan Modi, Aharon Brodutch, Hugo Cable, Tomasz Paterek, and Vlatko Vedral. “The classical- quantum boundary for correlations: Discord and related measures”. In:Rev. Mod. Phys.84.4 (2012), p. 1655.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.84.1655. arXiv:1112.6238 [quant-ph]

    2012 doi arXiv

  25. [34]

    Entanglement entropy and entanglement spectrum of the Kitaev model

    Hong Yao and Xiao-Liang Qi. “Entanglement entropy and entanglement spectrum of the Kitaev model”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.105.8 (2010), p. 080501.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.080501. arXiv:1001.1165 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2010 doi arXiv

  26. [35]

    Entanglement Spectrum and Entanglement Thermodynamics of Quantum Hall Bilayers at nu=1

    John Schliemann. “Entanglement Spectrum and Entanglement Thermodynamics of Quantum Hall Bilayers at nu=1”. In:Phys. Rev. B83 (2011), p. 115322.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.83. 115322. arXiv:1008.5289 [cond-mat.mes-hall]. – 37 –

    2011 doi arXiv

  27. [36]

    The Uncertainty Principle

    H. P. Robertson. “The Uncertainty Principle”. In:Physical Review34.1 (1929), pp. 163–164. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.34.163

    1929 doi

  28. [37]

    Capacity of entanglement for a nonlocal Hamiltonian

    Divyansh Shrimali, Swapnil Bhowmick, Vivek Pandey, and Arun Kumar Pati. “Capacity of entanglement for a nonlocal Hamiltonian”. In:Phys. Rev. A106.4 (2022), p. 042419.doi:10. 1103/PhysRevA.106.042419. arXiv:2207.11459 [quant-ph]

    2022

  29. [38]

    Gener- alised quantum speed limit for arbitrary time-continuous evolution

    Dimpi Thakuria, Abhay Srivastav, Brij Mohan, Asmita Kumari, and Arun Kumar Pati. “Gener- alised quantum speed limit for arbitrary time-continuous evolution”. In:J. Phys. A57.2 (2024), p. 025302.doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ad15ad. arXiv:2207.04124 [quant-ph]

    2024 doi

  30. [39]

    Quantum speed limits for observables

    Brij Mohan and Arun Kumar Pati. “Quantum speed limits for observables”. In:Phys. Rev. A 106.4 (2022), p. 042436.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.106.042436. arXiv:2112.13789 [quant-ph]

    2022 doi

  31. [40]

    The Uncertainty Relation Between Energy and Time in Non- relativistic Quantum Mechanics

    L. Mandelstam and Ig. Tamm. “The Uncertainty Relation Between Energy and Time in Non- relativistic Quantum Mechanics”. In:Selected Papers. Ed. by Boris M. Bolotovskii, Victor Ya. Frenkel, and Rudolf Peierls. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1991, pp. 115–123. is...

    1991 doi

  32. [41]

    The Maximum speed of dynamical evolution

    Norman Margolus and Lev B. Levitin. “The Maximum speed of dynamical evolution”. In:Physica D120 (1998), pp. 188–195.doi:10.1016/S0167-2789(98)00054-2. arXiv:quant-ph/9710043

    1998 doi arXiv

  33. [42]

    Fundamental limit on the rate of quantum dynamics: The unified bound is tight

    Lev B. Levitin and Tommaso Toffoli. “Fundamental limit on the rate of quantum dynamics: The unified bound is tight”. In:Physical Review Letters103.16 (2009), p. 160502.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.103.160502

    2009

  34. [43]

    Quantum speed limits: from Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle to optimal quantum control

    Sebastian Deffner and Steve Campbell. “Quantum speed limits: from Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle to optimal quantum control”. In:J. Phys. A50.45 (2017), p. 453001.doi:10.1088/ 1751-8121/aa86c6. arXiv:1705.08023 [quant-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  35. [44]

    Enhancing photon-axion conversion probability with squeezed coherent states

    Taiki Ikeda, Sugumi Kanno, and Jiro Soda. “Enhancing photon-axion conversion probability with squeezed coherent states”. In:Phys. Rev. D113.2 (2026), p. 023539.doi:10.1103/c741-bwvs. arXiv:2506.14354 [quant-ph]

    2026 doi

  36. [45]

    Quantum field theory of meson mixing

    Michael Binger and Chueng-Ryong Ji. “Quantum field theory of meson mixing”. In:Phys. Rev. D60 (1999), p. 056005.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.056005. arXiv:hep-ph/9901407

    1999 doi arXiv

  37. [46]

    Quantum field theory of boson mixing

    Massimo Blasone, Antonio Capolupo, Oreste Romei, and Giuseppe Vitiello. “Quantum field theory of boson mixing”. In:Phys. Rev. D63 (2001), p. 125015.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.63. 125015. arXiv:hep-ph/0102048

    2001 doi arXiv

  38. [47]

    Axion–photon mixing in quantum field theory and vacuum energy

    A. Capolupo, I. De Martino, G. Lambiase, and An. Stabile. “Axion–photon mixing in quantum field theory and vacuum energy”. In:Phys. Lett. B790 (2019), pp. 427–435.doi:10.1016/j. physletb.2019.01.056. arXiv:1901.10473 [hep-ph]

    2019 doi arXiv

  39. [48]

    Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field

    Roy J. Glauber. “Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field”. In:Phys. Rev.131 (1963), pp. 2766–2788.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.131.2766

    1963 doi

  40. [49]

    On single-photon and classical interference

    Stephen M. Barnett. “On single-photon and classical interference”. In:Phys. Scripta97.11 (2022), p. 114004.doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ac971a. arXiv:2207.14632 [quant-ph]

    2022 doi

  41. [50]

    Invited Review Article: Single-photon sources and detectors

    M. D. Eisaman, J. Fan, A. Migdall, and S. V. Polyakov. “Invited Review Article: Single-photon sources and detectors”. In:Review of Scientific Instruments82 (2011), p. 071101.doi:10.1063/ 1.3610677. – 38 –

    2011

  42. [51]

    Applications of single photons to quantum communication and computing

    Christophe Couteau, Stefanie Barz, Thomas Durt, Thomas Gerrits, Jan Huwer, Robert Prevedel, John Rarity, and Gregor Weihs. “Applications of single photons to quantum communication and computing”. In:Nature Reviews Physics5 (2023), pp. 326–338.doi:10.1038/s42254- 023- 00583-2

    2023 doi

  43. [52]

    Nonclassical properties of states generated by the excitations on a coherent state

    G. S. Agarwal and K. Tara. “Nonclassical properties of states generated by the excitations on a coherent state”. In:Physical Review A43.1 (1991), pp. 492–497.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.43. 492

    1991 doi

  44. [53]

    Quantum-to-classical transition with single-photon-added coherent states of light

    Alessandro Zavatta, Silvia Viciani, and Marco Bellini. “Quantum-to-classical transition with single-photon-added coherent states of light”. In:Science306.5696 (2004), pp. 660–662.doi: 10.1126/science.1103190

    2004 doi

  45. [54]

    Nielsen and Isaac L

    Michael A. Nielsen and Isaac L. Chuang.Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, June 2012.isbn: 978-0-521-63503-5.doi:10.1017/cbo9780511976667

    2012 doi

  46. [55]

    Quantum en- tanglement

    Ryszard Horodecki, Pawel Horodecki, Michal Horodecki, and Karol Horodecki. “Quantum en- tanglement”. In:Rev. Mod. Phys.81 (2009), pp. 865–942.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865. arXiv:quant-ph/0702225

    2009 doi arXiv

  47. [56]

    An Introduction to Entanglement Theory

    Martin B. Plenio and Shashank S. Virmani. “An Introduction to Entanglement Theory”. In: Quant. Inf. Comput.7.1-2 (2007), pp. 001–051.doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04063-9_8. arXiv: quant-ph/0504163

    2007 doi arXiv

  48. [57]

    Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model

    Reinhard F. Werner. “Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model”. In:Phys. Rev. A40 (8 Oct. 1989), pp. 4277–4281.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevA.40.4277.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.40.4277

    1989 doi

  49. [58]

    Entangled coherent states

    Barry C. Sanders. “Entangled coherent states”. In:Physical Review A45.9 (May 1992), pp. 6811– 6815.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.45.6811.url:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.45.6811

    1992 doi

  50. [59]

    John von Neumann.Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Trans. by Robert T. Beyer. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1955.isbn: 9780691178561.url:https : //press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691178578/mathematical- foundations- of-quantum-mechanics

    1955

  51. [60]

    Concen- trating partial entanglement by local operations

    Charles H. Bennett, Herbert J. Bernstein, Sandu Popescu, and Benjamin Schumacher. “Concen- trating partial entanglement by local operations”. In:Phys. Rev. A53 (1996), pp. 2046–2052. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.53.2046. arXiv:quant-ph/9511030

    1996 doi arXiv

  52. [61]

    Mixed state entanglement and quantum error correction

    Charles H. Bennett, David P. DiVincenzo, John A. Smolin, and William K. Wootters. “Mixed state entanglement and quantum error correction”. In:Phys. Rev. A54 (1996), pp. 3824–3851. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.54.3824. arXiv:quant-ph/9604024

    1996 doi arXiv

  53. [62]

    Intrinsically Quantum Effects of Axion Dark Matter Are Undetectable

    Yunjia Bao, Dhong Yeon Cheong, Nicholas L. Rodd, Joey Takach, Lian-Tao Wang, and Kevin Zhou. “Intrinsically Quantum Effects of Axion Dark Matter Are Undetectable”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.136.17 (2026), p. 171601.doi:10.1103/9mff-p5k6. arXiv:2510.05198 [hep-ph]

    2026 doi

  54. [63]

    Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits

    William K. Wootters. “Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.80 (1998), pp. 2245–2248.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevLett . 80 . 2245. arXiv:quant - ph/9709029

    1998

  55. [64]

    The fate of hints: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations

    Ivan Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Michele Maltoni, Thomas Schwetz, and Albert Zhou. “The fate of hints: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations”. In:JHEP09 (2020), p. 178.doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2020)178. arXiv:2007.14792 [hep-ph]. – 39 –

    2020 doi

  56. [65]

    Measurements of neutrino oscillation parameters from the T2K experiment using 3.6×10 21 protons on target

    K. Abe et al. “Measurements of neutrino oscillation parameters from the T2K experiment using 3.6×10 21 protons on target”. In:Eur. Phys. J. C83.9 (2023), p. 782.doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-023-11819-x. arXiv:2303.03222 [hep-ex]

    2023 doi

  57. [66]

    Improved measurement of neutrino oscillation parameters by the NOvA experiment

    M. A. Acero et al. “Improved measurement of neutrino oscillation parameters by the NOvA experiment”. In:Phys. Rev. D106.3 (2022), p. 032004.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.032004. arXiv:2108.08219 [hep-ex]

    2022 doi

  58. [67]

    Maximal Entanglement in High Energy Physics

    Alba Cervera-Lierta, Jos´ e I. Latorre, Juan Rojo, and Luca Rottoli. “Maximal Entanglement in High Energy Physics”. In:SciPost Phys.3 (2017), p. 036.doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.3.5.036. arXiv:1703.02989 [hep-th]

    2017 doi arXiv

  59. [68]

    Flavor patterns of fundamental particles from quantum entanglement?

    Jesse Thaler and Sokratis Trifinopoulos. “Flavor patterns of fundamental particles from quantum entanglement?” In:Phys. Rev. D111.5 (2025), p. 056021.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.056021. arXiv:2410.23343 [hep-ph]

    2025 doi

  60. [69]

    Separability criterion for density matrices

    Asher Peres. “Separability criterion for density matrices”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.77 (1996), pp. 1413– 1415.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1413. arXiv:quant-ph/9604005

    1996 doi arXiv

  61. [70]

    On the necessary and sufficient conditions for separability of mixed quantum states

    Michal Horodecki, Pawel Horodecki, and Ryszard Horodecki. “On the necessary and sufficient conditions for separability of mixed quantum states”. In:Phys. Lett. A223 (1996), p. 1.doi: 10.1016/S0375-9601(96)00706-2. arXiv:quant-ph/9605038

    1996 doi arXiv

  62. [71]

    On the volume of the set of mixed entangled states

    Karol Zyczkowski, Pawel Horodecki, Anna Sanpera, and Maciej Lewenstein. “On the volume of the set of mixed entangled states”. In:Phys. Rev. A58 (1998), p. 883.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA. 58.883. arXiv:quant-ph/9804024

    1998 doi arXiv

  63. [72]

    Computable measure of entanglement

    G. Vidal and R. F. Werner. “Computable measure of entanglement”. In:Phys. Rev. A65 (2002), p. 032314.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.65.032314. arXiv:quant-ph/0102117

    2002 doi arXiv

  64. [73]

    Logarithmic Negativity: A Full Entanglement Monotone That is not Convex

    M. B. Plenio. “Logarithmic Negativity: A Full Entanglement Monotone That is not Convex”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.95 (2005), p. 090503.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevLett . 95 . 090503. arXiv: quant-ph/0505071

    2005 arXiv

  65. [74]

    Classical, quantum and total correlations

    L. Henderson and V. Vedral. “Classical, quantum and total correlations”. In:J. Phys. A34.35 (2001), p. 6899.doi:10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/315. arXiv:quant-ph/0105028

    2001 doi arXiv

  66. [75]

    Negative Entropy and Information in Quantum Mechanics

    N. J. Cerf and C. Adami. “Negative Entropy and Information in Quantum Mechanics”. In: Physical Review Letters79 (1997), pp. 5194–5197.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.5194

    1997 doi

  67. [76]

    Aspects of capacity of entanglement

    Jan De Boer, Jarkko J¨ arvel¨ a, and Esko Keski-Vakkuri. “Aspects of capacity of entanglement”. In: Phys. Rev. D99.6 (2019), p. 066012.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.066012. arXiv:1807.07357 [hep-th]

    2019 doi arXiv

  68. [77]

    Quantum speed limit time for bipartite entanglement in neutrino oscillations in matter with non-standard interactions

    Abhishek Kumar Jha, Lekhashri Konwar, and Rukmani Mohanta. “Quantum speed limit time for bipartite entanglement in neutrino oscillations in matter with non-standard interactions”. In: (Feb. 2026). arXiv:2602.03748 [hep-ph]

    2026

  69. [78]

    Sulle metriche definite da una forma Hermitiana

    Guido Fubini. “Sulle metriche definite da una forma Hermitiana”. In:Atti del Reale Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti63 (1904), pp. 502–513

    1904

  70. [79]

    K¨ urzeste Wege im komplexen Gebiet

    Eduard Study. “K¨ urzeste Wege im komplexen Gebiet”. In:Mathematische Annalen60 (1905), pp. 321–378. – 40 –

    1905

Pith tools

Reviewed June 29, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.