pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.30419 · v1 · pith:RKHDAWBAnew · submitted 2026-05-28 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· hep-th· quant-ph

New quantum information perspectives in the axion--photon and neutrino systems

Aaditya Datar , Arun M. Thalapillil , Palak Thareja This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 06:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exhep-thquant-ph
keywords axion-photon mixingbipartite entanglementconcurrencenegativityquantum speed limitsneutrino oscillationsquantum discordentanglement entropy
0
0 comments X

The pith

Axion-photon mixing in the two-level sector generates bipartite mode entanglement with maxima at resonance.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies quantum information concepts to axion-photon oscillations. In the two-level single-excitation sector the mixing dynamics produce entanglement between the axion and photon modes. Entanglement entropy, concurrence, negativity, mutual information, discord and entanglement capacity all reach extremal values at resonant or strong mixing. Quantum speed limits are examined for both axion-photon and neutrino systems, with the two bounds coinciding only at resonance or maximal mixing. An additional entanglement speed limit is derived that saturates temporarily before weakening.

Core claim

In the two-level single-excitation sector of the axion-photon system, the coupled dynamics naturally generate bipartite axion-photon mode entanglement. The analysis details how entanglement entropy, concurrence, negativity, quantum mutual information, discord and capacity of entanglement attain their extremal values, with maximal entanglement tied to resonant or strong-mixing conversion and distinct thresholds separating the regimes. Parallel results hold for neutrino oscillations. Orthogonalisation occurs only at resonance or maximal mixing, where the Mandelstam-Tamm and Margolus-Levitin bounds coincide; away from resonance the Margolus-Levitin bound saturates at maximal conversion while th

What carries the argument

the two-level single-excitation sector of the axion-photon mixing dynamics that induces bipartite mode entanglement

If this is right

  • Maximal axion-photon entanglement occurs precisely at resonant or strong-mixing conversion.
  • The Mandelstam-Tamm and Margolus-Levitin bounds coincide only at resonance or at maximal neutrino mixing.
  • Away from resonance the Margolus-Levitin bound saturates at the point of maximal conversion.
  • The Mandelstam-Tamm bound stays weaker than the Margolus-Levitin bound outside those special points.
  • The entanglement quantum speed limit for axion-photon conversion saturates temporarily before becoming weak in either detuning- or mixing-dominated regimes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Entanglement measures could function as additional observables in axion haloscope or helioscope searches.
  • The identified thresholds might guide parameter choices in quantum-enhanced axion detection proposals.
  • Analogous quantum-information analysis could be applied to other two-state oscillation systems such as neutral-meson mixing.
  • The separation into detuning- and mixing-dominated regimes suggests distinct experimental regimes for testing speed-limit saturation.

Load-bearing premise

The system remains confined to the two-level single-excitation sector where the entanglement and speed-limit calculations apply.

What would settle it

An experiment that measures axion-photon conversion at resonance and finds that concurrence or negativity fails to reach its predicted maximum would falsify the claimed connection between maximal entanglement and resonance.

read the original abstract

In this work, we broach a quantum information-theoretic treatment of axion--photon mixing. Motivated by an emerging class of quantum-enhanced axion searches, we analyse the two-level single-excitation sector of axion--photon oscillations, demonstrating how the coupled dynamics naturally generate bipartite axion--photon mode entanglement. We study in detail the ensuing aspects of entanglement entropy, concurrence, negativity, quantum mutual information and discord, and capacity of entanglement, and the corresponding neutrino analogues wherever novel and previously unaddressed. In particular, we highlight the characteristic features that connect maximal axion--photon entanglement to resonant or strong-mixing conversion, and the distinct thresholds for the extremal values attained by the quantum information measures. We study aspects of the Mandelstam--Tamm and Margolus--Levitin quantum speed limits for both the axion--photon and neutrino systems. While orthogonalisation occurs only at axion--photon resonance, or at maximal neutrino mixing, where the two bounds coincide, away from these limits, the Margolus--Levitin bound is saturated at maximal conversion, while the Mandelstam--Tamm bound is generally weaker. We also study an entanglement quantum speed limit for axion--photon conversion, that separates into detuning-dominated and magnetic-mixing-dominated regimes, and find that it is saturated for a period and then the bound becomes weak. The results in this work identify the quantum resources and limiting timescales intrinsic to axion--photon conversion, and connect axion phenomenology, neutrino oscillations and quantum information theory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies standard two-level quantum mechanics to the single-excitation sector of the axion-photon mixing Hamiltonian (and its neutrino analogue), deriving bipartite entanglement measures (concurrence, negativity, mutual information, discord, entanglement capacity) and quantum speed limits (Mandelstam-Tamm, Margolus-Levitin, and an entanglement QSL) directly from the time-evolution operator. It reports that maximal entanglement occurs at resonance or strong mixing, that the two QSL bounds coincide only at resonance/maximal mixing, that the Margolus-Levitin bound saturates at maximal conversion away from resonance, and that the entanglement QSL separates into detuning- versus mixing-dominated regimes.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work supplies a consistent quantum-information framing of axion-photon conversion and neutrino oscillations inside the stated sector, identifying concrete thresholds (resonance for maximal entanglement, regime-dependent saturation of the QSLs) that are falsifiable within that model. The explicit restriction to the single-excitation sector and the absence of circularity in the reported measures are strengths; the results could inform quantum-resource considerations in future axion searches, though direct experimental mapping remains outside the manuscript's scope.

major comments (1)
  1. [Hamiltonian and sector definition (early sections)] The two-level single-excitation restriction is load-bearing for every quantitative claim (entanglement measures, QSL saturation thresholds). The manuscript states the restriction but does not supply an error estimate or validity criterion for typical axion haloscope parameters (e.g., photon occupation number or magnetic-field strength); without this, the regime of applicability cannot be assessed from the text alone.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the mixing angle, detuning, and magnetic coupling should be unified across the axion-photon and neutrino sections to avoid reader confusion.
  2. A short paragraph comparing the obtained concurrence and negativity values to the well-known two-level oscillation probability would make the connection to standard phenomenology more immediate.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading, positive assessment, and constructive comment. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Hamiltonian and sector definition (early sections)] The two-level single-excitation restriction is load-bearing for every quantitative claim (entanglement measures, QSL saturation thresholds). The manuscript states the restriction but does not supply an error estimate or validity criterion for typical axion haloscope parameters (e.g., photon occupation number or magnetic-field strength); without this, the regime of applicability cannot be assessed from the text alone.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit validity criterion or error estimate for the single-excitation sector would strengthen the manuscript. In the revised version we will insert a short paragraph (likely in Section II) that supplies a quantitative estimate of the approximation's accuracy for representative haloscope parameters, including typical photon occupation numbers and magnetic-field strengths, together with the resulting error bound on the reported entanglement and QSL quantities. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper restricts analysis to the two-level single-excitation sector and derives all entanglement measures (concurrence, negativity, mutual information, discord, capacity of entanglement) and quantum speed limits (Mandelstam-Tamm, Margolus-Levitin, entanglement QSL) directly from the time-evolution operator of the axion-photon and neutrino Hamiltonians. Maximal entanglement at resonance, distinct saturation thresholds, and regime separations follow from explicit computation on the resulting two-dimensional dynamics. No parameters are fitted to data and then called predictions; no load-bearing steps invoke self-citations that reduce to unverified inputs; the sector restriction is stated upfront and all results are obtained within it without external renormalization or ansatz smuggling. The central claims are independent computations on the mixing Hamiltonian.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the standard two-level mixing Hamiltonian for axions and neutrinos plus the single-excitation restriction; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond those already standard in the axion and neutrino literature.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The axion-photon system is accurately described by a two-level single-excitation sector Hamiltonian.
    Explicitly stated as the sector analyzed in the abstract.
  • standard math Standard quantum mechanics and the definitions of entanglement measures and quantum speed limits apply directly to the mixing dynamics.
    Implicit throughout the use of concurrence, negativity, Mandelstam-Tamm, Margolus-Levitin, and entanglement QSL.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5831 in / 1389 out tokens · 29328 ms · 2026-06-29T06:16:22.813899+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · 33 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    CP Conservation in the Presence of Pseudoparticles

    R. D. Peccei and Helen R. Quinn. “CP Conservation in the Presence of Pseudoparticles”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett.38 (1977), pp. 1440–1443.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.38.1440

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.38.1440 1977

  2. [2]

    A New Light Boson?

    Steven Weinberg. “A New Light Boson?” In:Phys. Rev. Lett.40 (1978), pp. 223–226.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.223

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.40.223 1978

  3. [3]

    Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons

    Frank Wilczek. “Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.40 (1978), pp. 279–282.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.279

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.40.279 1978

  4. [4]

    Photo-Production of Neutral Mesons in Nuclear Electric Fields and the Mean Life of the Neutral Meson

    H. Primakoff. “Photo-Production of Neutral Mesons in Nuclear Electric Fields and the Mean Life of the Neutral Meson”. In:Phys. Rev.81 (1951), p. 899.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.81.899. – 35 –

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.81.899 1951

  5. [5]

    Mixing of the photon with low-mass particles

    Georg Raffelt and Leo Stodolsky. “Mixing of the photon with low-mass particles”. In:Phys. Rev. D37 (5 Mar. 1988), pp. 1237–1249.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.37.1237

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.37.1237 1988

  6. [6]

    First results from the CERN Axion Solar Telescope (CAST)

    K. Zioutas et al. “First results from the CERN Axion Solar Telescope (CAST)”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.94 (2005), p. 121301.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.121301. arXiv:hep-ex/0411033

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.121301 2005

  7. [7]

    An improved limit on the axion-photon coupling from the CAST experiment

    S. Andriamonje et al. “An Improved limit on the axion-photon coupling from the CAST ex- periment”. In:JCAP04 (2007), p. 010.doi:10 . 1088 / 1475 - 7516 / 2007 / 04 / 010. arXiv: hep-ex/0702006

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  8. [8]

    New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles

    Igor G. Irastorza and Javier Redondo. “New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles”. In:Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.102 (2018), pp. 89–159.doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2018.05

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2018.05 2018

  9. [9]

    arXiv:1801.08127 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    The landscape of QCD axion models

    Luca Di Luzio, Maurizio Giannotti, Enrico Nardi, and Luca Visinelli. “The landscape of QCD axion models”. In:Phys. Rept.870 (2020), pp. 1–117.doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.06.002. arXiv:2003.01100 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.06.002 2020

  11. [11]

    Astrophysical Axion Bounds: The 2024 Edition

    Andrea Caputo and Georg Raffelt. “Astrophysical Axion Bounds: The 2024 Edition”. In:PoS COSMICWISPers (2024), p. 041.doi:10.22323/1.454.0041. arXiv:2401.13728 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.22323/1.454.0041 2024

  12. [12]

    Quantum Sensing

    Christian L. Degen, Friedemann Reinhard, and Paola Cappellaro. “Quantum Sensing”. In:Re- views of Modern Physics89.3 (2017), p. 035002.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035002.url: https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035002

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.89.035002.url: 2017

  13. [13]

    Searching for Dark Matter with a Superconducting Qubit

    Akash V. Dixit, Srivatsan Chakram, Kevin He, Ankur Agrawal, Ravi K. Naik, David I. Schuster, and Aaron Chou. “Searching for Dark Matter with a Superconducting Qubit”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.126.14 (2021), p. 141302.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.141302. arXiv:2008.12231 [hep-ex]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.141302 2021

  14. [14]

    Quantum dual-path interferometry scheme for axion dark matter searches

    Qiaoli Yang, Yu Gao, and Zhihui Peng. “Quantum dual-path interferometry scheme for axion dark matter searches”. In:Commun. Phys.7.1 (2024), p. 277.doi:10 . 1038 / s42005 - 024 - 01770-y. arXiv:2201.08291 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Photon counting for axion interferometry

    Haocun Yu, Ohkyung Kwon, Devendra K. Namburi, Robert H. Hadfield, Hartmut Grote, and Denis Martynov. “Photon counting for axion interferometry”. In:Phys. Rev. D109.9 (2024), p. 095042.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.095042. arXiv:2309.03394 [physics.ins-det]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.095042 2024

  16. [16]

    Quantum-Enhanced Sensing of Axion Dark Matter with a Transmon-Based Single Microwave Photon Counter

    C. Braggio et al. “Quantum-Enhanced Sensing of Axion Dark Matter with a Transmon-Based Single Microwave Photon Counter”. In:Phys. Rev. X15.2 (2025), p. 021031.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevX.15.021031. arXiv:2403.02321 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Exploring Quantum Aspects of Dark Matter Axions and Dark Photons Transitioning to Photons in a Resonant Cavity

    Ruifeng Zheng, Puxian Wei, and Qiaoli Yang. “Exploring Quantum Aspects of Dark Matter Axions and Dark Photons Transitioning to Photons in a Resonant Cavity”. In: (Oct. 2024). arXiv:2410.12634 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    A Penning trap single-photon counter for axion detection

    Jack A. Devlin, Marko L. Wojtkowiak, Shreyak R. Banhatti, He Zhang, Jiacheng Shi, Toren S. Dofher, Jonathan M. H. Gosling, Michael R. Tarbutt, and Richard C. Thompson. “A Penning trap single-photon counter for axion detection”. In: (Jan. 2026). arXiv:2601.05472 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  19. [19]

    Nonlocality of a single photon

    S. M. Tan, D. F. Walls, and M. J. Collett. “Nonlocality of a single photon”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett. 66.3 (1991), p. 252.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.252

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.66.252 1991

  20. [20]

    Bell’s-inequality experiments using independent-particle sources

    Bernard Yurke and David Stoler. “Bell’s-inequality experiments using independent-particle sources”. In:Phys. Rev. A46.5 (1992), p. 2229.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.46.2229. – 36 –

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.46.2229 1992

  21. [22]

    Single-particle entanglement

    S. J. van Enk. “Single-particle entanglement”. In:Phys. Rev. A72 (6 Dec. 2005), p. 064306. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.72.064306.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA. 72.064306

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.72.064306.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/physreva 2005

  22. [23]

    Virtual Quantum Subsystems

    Paolo Zanardi. “Virtual quantum subsystems”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.87 (2001), p. 077901.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.077901. arXiv:quant-ph/0103030

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.077901 2001

  23. [24]

    Quantum Entanglement in Fermionic Lattices

    Paolo Zanardi. “Quantum entanglement in fermionic lattices”. In:Phys. Rev. A65.4 (2002), p. 042101.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.65.042101. arXiv:quant-ph/0104114

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physreva.65.042101 2002

  24. [25]

    Experimental Demon- stration of Single Photon Nonlocality

    Bj¨ orn Hessmo, Pavel Usachev, Hoshang Heydari, and Gunnar Bj¨ ork. “Experimental Demon- stration of Single Photon Nonlocality”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.92 (18 May 2004), p. 180401.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.180401.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 92.180401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.180401.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/physrevlett 2004

  25. [26]

    Experimental Proof of Nonlocal Wavefunction Collapse for a Single Particle Using Homodyne Measurement

    Maria Fuwa, Shuntaro Takeda, Marcin Zwierz, Howard M. Wiseman, and Akira Furusawa. “Ex- perimental Proof of Nonlocal Wavefunction Collapse for a Single Particle Using Homodyne Mea- surement”. In:Nature Commun.6 (2015), p. 6665.doi:10.1038/ncomms7665. arXiv:1412.7790 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/ncomms7665 2015

  26. [27]

    Demonstration of EPR steering using single-photon path entanglement and displacement-based detection

    T. Guerreiro et al. “Demonstration of EPR steering using single-photon path entanglement and displacement-based detection”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.117 (2016), p. 070404.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.117.070404. arXiv:1603.03589 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  27. [28]

    Multipartite entangled states in particle mixing

    M. Blasone, F. Dell’Anno, S. De Siena, M. Di Mauro, and F. Illuminati. “Multipartite entangled states in particle mixing”. In:Phys. Rev. D77 (2008), p. 096002.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77. 096002. arXiv:0711.2268 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.77 2008

  28. [29]

    Entanglement in neutrino oscillations

    Massimo Blasone, Fabio Dell’Anno, Silvio De Siena, and Fabrizio Illuminati. “Entanglement in neutrino oscillations”. In:EPL85 (2009), p. 50002.doi:10.1209/0295-5075/85/50002. arXiv: 0707.4476 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1209/0295-5075/85/50002 2009

  29. [30]

    Entanglement monotones

    Guifre Vidal. “On the characterization of entanglement”. In:J. Mod. Opt.47 (2000), p. 355. doi:10.1080/09500340008244048. arXiv:quant-ph/9807077

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1080/09500340008244048 2000

  30. [31]

    Introducing Quantum Discord

    Harold Ollivier and Wojciech H. Zurek. “Introducing Quantum Discord”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett. 88.1 (2001), p. 017901.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.017901. arXiv:quant-ph/0105072

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.017901 2001

  31. [32]

    Why should we care about quantum discord?

    Aharon Brodutch and Daniel R. Terno. “Why should we care about quantum discord?” In: Aug. 2016.doi:10.1007/978-3-319-53412-1_8. arXiv:1608.01920 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/978-3-319-53412-1_8 2016

  32. [33]

    The classical-quantum boundary for correlations: discord and related measures

    Kavan Modi, Aharon Brodutch, Hugo Cable, Tomasz Paterek, and Vlatko Vedral. “The classical- quantum boundary for correlations: Discord and related measures”. In:Rev. Mod. Phys.84.4 (2012), p. 1655.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.84.1655. arXiv:1112.6238 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.1655 2012

  33. [34]

    Entanglement entropy and entanglement spectrum of the Kitaev model

    Hong Yao and Xiao-Liang Qi. “Entanglement entropy and entanglement spectrum of the Kitaev model”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.105.8 (2010), p. 080501.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.080501. arXiv:1001.1165 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.080501 2010

  34. [35]

    Entanglement Spectrum and Entanglement Thermodynamics of Quantum Hall Bilayers at nu=1

    John Schliemann. “Entanglement Spectrum and Entanglement Thermodynamics of Quantum Hall Bilayers at nu=1”. In:Phys. Rev. B83 (2011), p. 115322.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.83. 115322. arXiv:1008.5289 [cond-mat.mes-hall]. – 37 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevb.83 2011

  35. [36]

    The Uncertainty Principle

    H. P. Robertson. “The Uncertainty Principle”. In:Physical Review34.1 (1929), pp. 163–164. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.34.163

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.34.163 1929

  36. [37]

    Capacity of entanglement for a nonlocal Hamiltonian

    Divyansh Shrimali, Swapnil Bhowmick, Vivek Pandey, and Arun Kumar Pati. “Capacity of entanglement for a nonlocal Hamiltonian”. In:Phys. Rev. A106.4 (2022), p. 042419.doi:10. 1103/PhysRevA.106.042419. arXiv:2207.11459 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  37. [38]

    Gener- alised quantum speed limit for arbitrary time-continuous evolution

    Dimpi Thakuria, Abhay Srivastav, Brij Mohan, Asmita Kumari, and Arun Kumar Pati. “Gener- alised quantum speed limit for arbitrary time-continuous evolution”. In:J. Phys. A57.2 (2024), p. 025302.doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ad15ad. arXiv:2207.04124 [quant-ph]

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ad15ad 2024

  38. [39]

    Quantum speed limits for observables

    Brij Mohan and Arun Kumar Pati. “Quantum speed limits for observables”. In:Phys. Rev. A 106.4 (2022), p. 042436.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.106.042436. arXiv:2112.13789 [quant-ph]

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.106.042436 2022

  39. [40]

    The Uncertainty Relation Between Energy and Time in Non- relativistic Quantum Mechanics

    L. Mandelstam and Ig. Tamm. “The Uncertainty Relation Between Energy and Time in Non- relativistic Quantum Mechanics”. In:Selected Papers. Ed. by Boris M. Bolotovskii, Victor Ya. Frenkel, and Rudolf Peierls. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1991, pp. 115–123. isbn: 978-3-642-74626-0.doi:10.1007/978-3-642-74626-0_8

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-74626-0_8 1991

  40. [41]

    The maximum speed of dynamical evolution

    Norman Margolus and Lev B. Levitin. “The Maximum speed of dynamical evolution”. In:Physica D120 (1998), pp. 188–195.doi:10.1016/S0167-2789(98)00054-2. arXiv:quant-ph/9710043

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0167-2789(98)00054-2 1998

  41. [42]

    Fundamental limit on the rate of quantum dynamics: The unified bound is tight

    Lev B. Levitin and Tommaso Toffoli. “Fundamental limit on the rate of quantum dynamics: The unified bound is tight”. In:Physical Review Letters103.16 (2009), p. 160502.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.103.160502

    2009

  42. [43]

    Quantum speed limits: from Heisenberg's uncertainty principle to optimal quantum control

    Sebastian Deffner and Steve Campbell. “Quantum speed limits: from Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle to optimal quantum control”. In:J. Phys. A50.45 (2017), p. 453001.doi:10.1088/ 1751-8121/aa86c6. arXiv:1705.08023 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  43. [44]

    Enhancing photon-axion conversion probability with squeezed coherent states

    Taiki Ikeda, Sugumi Kanno, and Jiro Soda. “Enhancing photon-axion conversion probability with squeezed coherent states”. In:Phys. Rev. D113.2 (2026), p. 023539.doi:10.1103/c741-bwvs. arXiv:2506.14354 [quant-ph]

    work page doi:10.1103/c741-bwvs 2026

  44. [45]

    Quantum Field Theory of Meson Mixing

    Michael Binger and Chueng-Ryong Ji. “Quantum field theory of meson mixing”. In:Phys. Rev. D60 (1999), p. 056005.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.056005. arXiv:hep-ph/9901407

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.60.056005 1999

  45. [46]

    Quantum Field Theory of boson mixing

    Massimo Blasone, Antonio Capolupo, Oreste Romei, and Giuseppe Vitiello. “Quantum field theory of boson mixing”. In:Phys. Rev. D63 (2001), p. 125015.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.63. 125015. arXiv:hep-ph/0102048

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.63 2001

  46. [47]

    Axion-photon mixing in quantum field theory and vacuum energy

    A. Capolupo, I. De Martino, G. Lambiase, and An. Stabile. “Axion–photon mixing in quantum field theory and vacuum energy”. In:Phys. Lett. B790 (2019), pp. 427–435.doi:10.1016/j. physletb.2019.01.056. arXiv:1901.10473 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j 2019

  47. [48]

    Charles R

    Roy J. Glauber. “Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field”. In:Phys. Rev.131 (1963), pp. 2766–2788.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.131.2766

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.131.2766 1963

  48. [49]

    On single-photon and classical interference

    Stephen M. Barnett. “On single-photon and classical interference”. In:Phys. Scripta97.11 (2022), p. 114004.doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ac971a. arXiv:2207.14632 [quant-ph]

    work page doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ac971a 2022

  49. [50]

    Invited Review Article: Single-photon sources and detectors

    M. D. Eisaman, J. Fan, A. Migdall, and S. V. Polyakov. “Invited Review Article: Single-photon sources and detectors”. In:Review of Scientific Instruments82 (2011), p. 071101.doi:10.1063/ 1.3610677. – 38 –

    2011

  50. [51]

    Applications of single photons to quantum communication and computing

    Christophe Couteau, Stefanie Barz, Thomas Durt, Thomas Gerrits, Jan Huwer, Robert Prevedel, John Rarity, and Gregor Weihs. “Applications of single photons to quantum communication and computing”. In:Nature Reviews Physics5 (2023), pp. 326–338.doi:10.1038/s42254- 023- 00583-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s42254- 2023

  51. [52]

    Nonclassical properties of states generated by the excitations on a coherent state

    G. S. Agarwal and K. Tara. “Nonclassical properties of states generated by the excitations on a coherent state”. In:Physical Review A43.1 (1991), pp. 492–497.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.43. 492

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.43 1991

  52. [53]

    Quantum-to-classical transition with single-photon- added coherent states of light

    Alessandro Zavatta, Silvia Viciani, and Marco Bellini. “Quantum-to-classical transition with single-photon-added coherent states of light”. In:Science306.5696 (2004), pp. 660–662.doi: 10.1126/science.1103190

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1103190 2004

  53. [54]

    Nielsen and Isaac L

    Michael A. Nielsen and Isaac L. Chuang.Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, June 2012.isbn: 978-0-521-63503-5.doi:10.1017/cbo9780511976667

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511976667 2012

  54. [55]

    Quantum entanglement

    Ryszard Horodecki, Pawel Horodecki, Michal Horodecki, and Karol Horodecki. “Quantum en- tanglement”. In:Rev. Mod. Phys.81 (2009), pp. 865–942.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865. arXiv:quant-ph/0702225

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.865 2009

  55. [56]

    An introduction to entanglement measures

    Martin B. Plenio and Shashank S. Virmani. “An Introduction to Entanglement Theory”. In: Quant. Inf. Comput.7.1-2 (2007), pp. 001–051.doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04063-9_8. arXiv: quant-ph/0504163

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04063-9_8 2007

  56. [57]

    Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model

    Reinhard F. Werner. “Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model”. In:Phys. Rev. A40 (8 Oct. 1989), pp. 4277–4281.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevA.40.4277.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.40.4277

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.40.4277 1989

  57. [58]

    Entangled coherent states

    Barry C. Sanders. “Entangled coherent states”. In:Physical Review A45.9 (May 1992), pp. 6811– 6815.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.45.6811.url:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.45.6811

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.45.6811.url:https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.45.6811 1992

  58. [59]

    John von Neumann.Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Trans. by Robert T. Beyer. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1955.isbn: 9780691178561.url:https : //press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691178578/mathematical- foundations- of-quantum-mechanics

    work page arXiv 1955

  59. [60]

    Concentrating Partial Entanglement by Local Operations

    Charles H. Bennett, Herbert J. Bernstein, Sandu Popescu, and Benjamin Schumacher. “Concen- trating partial entanglement by local operations”. In:Phys. Rev. A53 (1996), pp. 2046–2052. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.53.2046. arXiv:quant-ph/9511030

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physreva.53.2046 1996

  60. [61]

    Mixed State Entanglement and Quantum Error Correction

    Charles H. Bennett, David P. DiVincenzo, John A. Smolin, and William K. Wootters. “Mixed state entanglement and quantum error correction”. In:Phys. Rev. A54 (1996), pp. 3824–3851. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.54.3824. arXiv:quant-ph/9604024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physreva.54.3824 1996

  61. [62]

    Intrinsically Quantum Effects of Axion Dark Matter Are Undetectable

    Yunjia Bao, Dhong Yeon Cheong, Nicholas L. Rodd, Joey Takach, Lian-Tao Wang, and Kevin Zhou. “Intrinsically Quantum Effects of Axion Dark Matter Are Undetectable”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.136.17 (2026), p. 171601.doi:10.1103/9mff-p5k6. arXiv:2510.05198 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1103/9mff-p5k6 2026

  62. [63]

    Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits

    William K. Wootters. “Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.80 (1998), pp. 2245–2248.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevLett . 80 . 2245. arXiv:quant - ph/9709029

    work page arXiv 1998

  63. [64]

    The fate of hints: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations

    Ivan Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Michele Maltoni, Thomas Schwetz, and Albert Zhou. “The fate of hints: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations”. In:JHEP09 (2020), p. 178.doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2020)178. arXiv:2007.14792 [hep-ph]. – 39 –

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2020)178 2020

  64. [65]

    Measuring the scalar induced gravitational waves from observation

    K. Abe et al. “Measurements of neutrino oscillation parameters from the T2K experiment using 3.6×10 21 protons on target”. In:Eur. Phys. J. C83.9 (2023), p. 782.doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-023-11819-x. arXiv:2303.03222 [hep-ex]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/ 2023

  65. [66]

    Improved measurement of neutrino oscillation parameters by the NOvA experiment

    M. A. Acero et al. “Improved measurement of neutrino oscillation parameters by the NOvA experiment”. In:Phys. Rev. D106.3 (2022), p. 032004.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.032004. arXiv:2108.08219 [hep-ex]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.032004 2022

  66. [67]

    Maximal Entanglement in High Energy Physics

    Alba Cervera-Lierta, Jos´ e I. Latorre, Juan Rojo, and Luca Rottoli. “Maximal Entanglement in High Energy Physics”. In:SciPost Phys.3 (2017), p. 036.doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.3.5.036. arXiv:1703.02989 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.21468/scipostphys.3.5.036 2017

  67. [68]

    Flavor patterns of fundamental particles from quantum entanglement?

    Jesse Thaler and Sokratis Trifinopoulos. “Flavor patterns of fundamental particles from quantum entanglement?” In:Phys. Rev. D111.5 (2025), p. 056021.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.056021. arXiv:2410.23343 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.056021 2025

  68. [69]

    Separability Criterion for Density Matrices

    Asher Peres. “Separability criterion for density matrices”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.77 (1996), pp. 1413– 1415.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1413. arXiv:quant-ph/9604005

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.1413 1996

  69. [70]

    Separability of Mixed States: Necessary and Sufficient Conditions

    Michal Horodecki, Pawel Horodecki, and Ryszard Horodecki. “On the necessary and sufficient conditions for separability of mixed quantum states”. In:Phys. Lett. A223 (1996), p. 1.doi: 10.1016/S0375-9601(96)00706-2. arXiv:quant-ph/9605038

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(96)00706-2 1996

  70. [71]

    On the volume of the set of mixed entangled states

    Karol Zyczkowski, Pawel Horodecki, Anna Sanpera, and Maciej Lewenstein. “On the volume of the set of mixed entangled states”. In:Phys. Rev. A58 (1998), p. 883.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA. 58.883. arXiv:quant-ph/9804024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physreva 1998

  71. [72]

    A computable measure of entanglement

    G. Vidal and R. F. Werner. “Computable measure of entanglement”. In:Phys. Rev. A65 (2002), p. 032314.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.65.032314. arXiv:quant-ph/0102117

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physreva.65.032314 2002

  72. [73]

    The logarithmic negativity: A full entanglement monotone that is not convex

    M. B. Plenio. “Logarithmic Negativity: A Full Entanglement Monotone That is not Convex”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.95 (2005), p. 090503.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevLett . 95 . 090503. arXiv: quant-ph/0505071

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  73. [74]

    Classical, quantum and total correlations

    L. Henderson and V. Vedral. “Classical, quantum and total correlations”. In:J. Phys. A34.35 (2001), p. 6899.doi:10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/315. arXiv:quant-ph/0105028

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/315 2001

  74. [75]

    Negative Entropy and Information in Quantum Mechanics

    N. J. Cerf and C. Adami. “Negative Entropy and Information in Quantum Mechanics”. In: Physical Review Letters79 (1997), pp. 5194–5197.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.5194

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.79.5194 1997

  75. [76]

    Aspects of capacity of entanglement

    Jan De Boer, Jarkko J¨ arvel¨ a, and Esko Keski-Vakkuri. “Aspects of capacity of entanglement”. In: Phys. Rev. D99.6 (2019), p. 066012.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.066012. arXiv:1807.07357 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.066012 2019

  76. [77]

    Quantum speed limit time for bipartite entanglement in neutrino oscillations in matter with non-standard interactions

    Abhishek Kumar Jha, Lekhashri Konwar, and Rukmani Mohanta. “Quantum speed limit time for bipartite entanglement in neutrino oscillations in matter with non-standard interactions”. In: (Feb. 2026). arXiv:2602.03748 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  77. [78]

    Sulle metriche definite da una forma Hermitiana

    Guido Fubini. “Sulle metriche definite da una forma Hermitiana”. In:Atti del Reale Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti63 (1904), pp. 502–513

    1904

  78. [79]

    K¨ urzeste Wege im komplexen Gebiet

    Eduard Study. “K¨ urzeste Wege im komplexen Gebiet”. In:Mathematische Annalen60 (1905), pp. 321–378. – 40 –

    1905