Pith. sign in

REVIEW 14 cited by

Quantifying Uncertainty in Answers from any Language Model and Enhancing their Trustworthiness

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.16175 v2 pith:RQIUB36D submitted 2023-08-30 cs.CL cs.AI

Quantifying Uncertainty in Answers from any Language Model and Enhancing their Trustworthiness

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords confidenceresponsesuncertaintyanswersbsdetectorevaluationextralanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We introduce BSDetector, a method for detecting bad and speculative answers from a pretrained Large Language Model by estimating a numeric confidence score for any output it generated. Our uncertainty quantification technique works for any LLM accessible only via a black-box API, whose training data remains unknown. By expending a bit of extra computation, users of any LLM API can now get the same response as they would ordinarily, as well as a confidence estimate that cautions when not to trust this response. Experiments on both closed and open-form Question-Answer benchmarks reveal that BSDetector more accurately identifies incorrect LLM responses than alternative uncertainty estimation procedures (for both GPT-3 and ChatGPT). By sampling multiple responses from the LLM and considering the one with the highest confidence score, we can additionally obtain more accurate responses from the same LLM, without any extra training steps. In applications involving automated evaluation with LLMs, accounting for our confidence scores leads to more reliable evaluation in both human-in-the-loop and fully-automated settings (across both GPT 3.5 and 4).

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 14 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Fin-Bias: Comprehensive Evaluation for LLM Decision-Making under human bias in Finance Domain

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    LLMs copy biased analyst ratings in investment decisions but a new detection method encourages independent reasoning and can improve stock return predictions beyond human levels.

  2. Optimality of Sub-network Laplace Approximations: New Results and Methods

    stat.ML 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    Sub-network Laplace approximations always underestimate full-model predictive variance, and two new gradient-based and greedy selection rules provide theoretically grounded improvements.

  3. When Calibration Rankings Reverse: Accuracy-Controlled Evaluation for Fair Comparison of LLMs

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Global calibration metrics like ECE are confounded by accuracy; the proposed ACE framework with three accuracy-controlled views shows many prior calibration advantages weaken or reverse.

  4. Beyond Logprobs: A Multi-Signal Confidence Engine for LLM-Based Document Field Extraction

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ExtractConf fuses Hunter-Mapper disagreement with LLM uncertainty, OCR, image quality and layout into a classifier that reaches 0.928 ROC AUC on DocILE invoices and 0.858 on CORD receipts, cutting selective prediction...

  5. Functional Entropy: Predicting Functional Correctness in LLM-Generated Code with Uncertainty Quantification

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Introduces functional equivalence methods and functional entropy to predict functional correctness of LLM-generated code via uncertainty quantification, outperforming NLI-based baselines in most tested settings.

  6. Optimality of Sub-network Laplace Approximations: New Results and Methods

    stat.ML 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    Sub-network Laplace approximations always underestimate an idealized predictive variance, and the proposed gradient- and greedy-based parameter selection rules provably close that gap better than existing heuristics.

  7. Sanity Checks for Long-Form Hallucination Detection

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Hallucination detectors on LLM reasoning traces often rely on final-answer artifacts rather than reasoning validity; once controlled, lightweight lexical trajectory features suffice for robust detection.

  8. HalluField: Detecting LLM Hallucinations via Field-Theoretic Modeling

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    HalluField flags LLM hallucinations using a hand-weighted temperature-perturbation of token-level 'free energy' (negative log-likelihood) and Shannon entropy.

  9. Semantic Entropy Probes: Robust and Cheap Hallucination Detection in LLMs

    cs.CL 2024-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SEPs approximate semantic entropy from single-generation hidden states to enable cheap and robust hallucination detection in LLMs.

  10. Qiskit Code Migration with LLMs

    cs.SE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A taxonomy-guided RAG system with LLMs reduces hallucinations and improves migration suggestions for Qiskit code compared to unconstrained retrieval.

  11. Calibrating Model-Based Evaluation Metrics for Summarization

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A reference-free proxy scoring framework combined with GIRB calibration produces better-aligned evaluation metrics for summarization and outperforms baselines across seven datasets.

  12. Entropy Sentinel: Probing Entropy Traces for LLM Monitoring

    cs.CL 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0

    Top-k decoding-entropy profiles can estimate and rank held-out domain accuracy for most tested LLMs, with difficulty-diverse training data the main success factor.

  13. Entropy Sentinel: Probing Entropy Traces for LLM Monitoring

    cs.CL 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0

    Entropy traces from top-k logprobs, run through a simple classifier, can rank and estimate LLM accuracy on unseen STEM benchmarks—but reliability varies by model.

  14. Towards Trustworthy Report Generation: A Deep Research Agent with Progressive Confidence Estimation and Calibration

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A deep research agent incorporates progressive confidence estimation and calibration to produce trustworthy reports with transparent confidence scores on claims.