Mind the Gesture: Evaluating AI Sensitivity to Culturally Offensive Non-Verbal Gestures
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:SQ6DJYRBrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Gestures are an integral part of non-verbal communication, with meanings that vary across cultures, and misinterpretations that can have serious social and diplomatic consequences. As AI systems become more integrated into global applications, ensuring they do not inadvertently perpetuate cultural offenses is critical. To this end, we introduce Multi-Cultural Set of Inappropriate Gestures and Nonverbal Signs (MC-SIGNS), a dataset of 288 gesture-country pairs annotated for offensiveness, cultural significance, and contextual factors across 25 gestures and 85 countries. Through systematic evaluation using MC-SIGNS, we uncover critical limitations: text-to-image (T2I) systems exhibit strong US-centric biases, performing better at detecting offensive gestures in US contexts than in non-US ones; large language models (LLMs) tend to over-flag gestures as offensive; and vision-language models (VLMs) default to US-based interpretations when responding to universal concepts like wishing someone luck, frequently suggesting culturally inappropriate gestures. These findings highlight the urgent need for culturally-aware AI safety mechanisms to ensure equitable global deployment of AI technologies.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The Algorithmic Gaze of Image Quality Assessment: An Audit and Trace Ethnography of the LAION-Aesthetics Predictor
LAION-Aesthetics Predictor reinforces Western and male biases by preferentially selecting images associated with women and realistic Western/Japanese art while excluding men, LGBTQ+ references, and other styles.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.