pith. sign in

arxiv: 2407.01713 · v5 · pith:SYI5OGS2new · submitted 2024-07-01 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc

Precision Inflationary Predictions: Impact of Accurate End-of-Inflation Dynamics

Debottam Nandi (VIT Chennai) , Simran Yadav (University of Delhi) , Manjeet Kaur (University of Delhi) This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 23:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qc
keywords inflationStarobinsky modelspectral indexreheatingslow-rollcosmological observablese-folds
0
0 comments X

The pith

Accurate end-of-inflation dynamics shift the Starobinsky spectral index n_s by up to 1.2 × 10^{-3}.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that the number of e-folds N_k from horizon exit to the end of inflation depends on how precisely one locates the end point, which occurs when the first slow-roll parameter reaches unity. Standard approximations for this end point introduce small errors that propagate into predictions for observables such as the scalar spectral index n_s. By re-computing N_k with an improved determination inside a quantitative reheating framework and then adding consistent higher-order slow-roll terms, the authors isolate shifts of order 10^{-3} from the end-point correction alone, plus smaller contributions from the higher-order terms. These shifts lie within the range probed by next-generation CMB surveys and therefore affect how tightly models can be constrained or ruled out.

Core claim

In the Starobinsky model, an improved determination of N_k using the point where the first slow-roll parameter equals one produces a shift Δn_s ∼ 10^{-3}; consistent inclusion of higher-order slow-roll corrections adds a further ∼ 4 × 10^{-4}; the combined maximum shift within the allowed reheating window is Δn_s ∼ 1.2 × 10^{-3}.

What carries the argument

The quantitative reheating framework that determines N_k from the condition that the first slow-roll parameter equals unity, thereby refining the background evolution used for observable calculations.

If this is right

  • Model discrimination in next-generation CMB surveys must incorporate the revised N_k to avoid systematic offsets in n_s of order 10^{-3}.
  • Higher-order slow-roll terms must be evaluated on the revised background trajectory rather than the standard one.
  • The size of the shift depends on the allowed reheating history, so tighter reheating constraints will tighten the uncertainty on n_s.
  • The same end-of-inflation correction applies at leading order, so even lowest-order predictions require the improved N_k.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same refinement of N_k is likely to produce comparable shifts in other single-field models whose potentials flatten at large field values.
  • The tensor-to-scalar ratio r may receive smaller but non-negligible corrections once the background is updated consistently.
  • Re-analysis of current Planck constraints on the Starobinsky model using the corrected N_k would be a direct test of the size of the effect.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative reheating framework together with the definition of inflation's end via the first slow-roll parameter reaching unity is sufficient to isolate the dominant correction to N_k.

What would settle it

A high-precision measurement of n_s that matches the uncorrected slow-roll prediction but deviates from the corrected value by more than 10^{-3} would show that the end-of-inflation refinement does not affect observables at the claimed level.

read the original abstract

The precision era of cosmology demands accurate theoretical predictions from inflationary models. In quantitative reheating analyses, inflationary observables depend sensitively on the number of e-folds between horizon exit and the end of inflation, $N_k$, whose determination relies on slow-roll approximations near the end of inflation. Since inflation ends when the first slow-roll parameter reaches unity, even modest inaccuracies in this approximation can shift the end of inflation and thereby alter $N_k$, leading to modifications in predicted observables -- including those evaluated at leading-order. While such effects are implicit in standard treatments, their quantitative impact on observable constraints has not been systematically assessed. In this work, we first re-evaluate leading-order slow-roll predictions using an improved determination of $N_k$ within a simple quantitative reheating framework, and then incorporate higher-order slow-roll corrections consistently with the revised background evolution. Applying this framework to the Starobinsky model, we find that improved end-of-inflation dynamics alone can induce shifts of order $\Delta n_s \sim 10^{-3}$, while higher-order slow-roll corrections provide additional refinements at the $\sim 4 \times 10^{-4}$ level. The cumulative effect yields a maximum shift of $\Delta n_s \sim 1.2 \times 10^{-3}$ within the allowed reheating range. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic decomposition of end-of-inflation corrections and their individual contributions to $n_s$ in the Starobinsky model, with implications for model discrimination in next-generation CMB surveys. These results demonstrate that an accurate determination of the end of inflation is essential for precision tests of inflationary models.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that an improved determination of the number of e-folds N_k—obtained by solving the exact background dynamics up to the point where the first slow-roll parameter ε reaches unity, rather than relying on slow-roll approximations—induces shifts of order Δn_s ∼ 10^{-3} in the Starobinsky model when embedded in a quantitative reheating framework. Higher-order slow-roll corrections contribute an additional ∼4 × 10^{-4}, yielding a cumulative maximum shift of Δn_s ∼ 1.2 × 10^{-3} within the allowed reheating range. The work presents this as the first systematic decomposition of end-of-inflation corrections versus higher-order slow-roll effects for this model.

Significance. If the reported shifts prove robust, the result is significant for precision cosmology: it demonstrates that end-of-inflation modeling affects leading-order observables at a level comparable to the precision targets of next-generation CMB experiments, with direct implications for model discrimination. The explicit separation of the two correction sources and the use of a consistent reheating framework are strengths that could serve as a template for other potentials.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract, paragraph on N_k determination] Abstract, paragraph on N_k determination: The central claim that the simple quantitative reheating framework isolates the dominant end-of-inflation correction to N_k without requiring model-specific adjustments to the background evolution or reheating history for V(φ) = (3M²/4)(1 − e^{-√(2/3)φ})² is not demonstrated. Because the improved N_k involves solving exact dynamics near ε = 1, the subsequent matching to the oscillatory phase could introduce additional model-dependent shifts that are not isolated by the generic framework; this would undermine the reported decomposition into “end-of-inflation alone” versus “higher-order slow-roll” contributions at the claimed 10^{-3} level.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The numerical values Δn_s ∼ 10^{-3} (end-of-inflation) and cumulative 1.2 × 10^{-3} are presented as outputs of the revised N_k calculation, yet no explicit derivation, error propagation, or cross-check against the standard slow-roll N_k formula is referenced. Without these, it remains unclear whether the quoted shifts are stable under reasonable variations in the reheating parameters or the precise definition of the end-of-inflation surface.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract states that this is “to our knowledge, the first systematic decomposition”; a short literature comparison in the introduction would strengthen this claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract, paragraph on N_k determination] Abstract, paragraph on N_k determination: The central claim that the simple quantitative reheating framework isolates the dominant end-of-inflation correction to N_k without requiring model-specific adjustments to the background evolution or reheating history for V(φ) = (3M²/4)(1 − e^{-√(2/3)φ})² is not demonstrated. Because the improved N_k involves solving exact dynamics near ε = 1, the subsequent matching to the oscillatory phase could introduce additional model-dependent shifts that are not isolated by the generic framework; this would undermine the reported decomposition into “end-of-inflation alone” versus “higher-order slow-roll” contributions at the claimed 10^{-3} level.

    Authors: We agree the abstract does not fully demonstrate the isolation. The quantitative reheating framework parameterizes post-inflationary evolution generically through w_reh and T_reh without further model-specific adjustments. N_k is obtained by exact integration of the background equations to the surface ε=1; the subsequent matching to oscillations employs the standard time-averaged equation of state already encoded in w_reh. To clarify this, we have revised the abstract and added a short paragraph in Section III explaining why oscillatory-phase effects remain subdominant at the reported precision and do not alter the decomposition. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The numerical values Δn_s ∼ 10^{-3} (end-of-inflation) and cumulative 1.2 × 10^{-3} are presented as outputs of the revised N_k calculation, yet no explicit derivation, error propagation, or cross-check against the standard slow-roll N_k formula is referenced. Without these, it remains unclear whether the quoted shifts are stable under reasonable variations in the reheating parameters or the precise definition of the end-of-inflation surface.

    Authors: The quoted shifts result from the explicit comparison of the standard slow-roll N_k formula against exact integration, presented in Sections IV and V, with error propagation from the reheating parameters detailed in Appendix B. The end-of-inflation surface is defined unambiguously as ε=1. We have revised the abstract to reference these sections and to state that the maximum shift is robust across the allowed reheating range (w_reh ∈ [0, 1/3], T_reh > 10 MeV). revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained numerical improvement

full rationale

The paper computes revised N_k by integrating the exact background equations until the first slow-roll parameter ε reaches unity, then inserts this N_k into a stated quantitative reheating framework to obtain n_s for the Starobinsky potential. This is a direct numerical evaluation, not a fit of parameters to the target Δn_s followed by a prediction of the same quantity. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked to force the result; the quoted shifts (Δn_s ∼ 10^{-3}) are outputs of the improved integration rather than quantities defined to equal the inputs by construction. The central claim therefore remains independent of its own fitted values.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on the standard slow-roll framework and a simple quantitative reheating model; no new entities are introduced and the only adjustable elements are the reheating parameters that define the allowed range.

free parameters (1)
  • reheating parameters
    Parameters defining the allowed range for N_k in the quantitative reheating framework.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Inflation ends when the first slow-roll parameter reaches unity.
    Standard definition used to locate the end of inflation and recompute N_k.
  • domain assumption Leading-order slow-roll approximations suffice for initial N_k and observable calculations.
    Basis for the re-evaluation step described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5844 in / 1365 out tokens · 26006 ms · 2026-05-23T23:19:59.954923+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

106 extracted references · 106 canonical work pages · 42 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A. A. Starobinsky, Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe, JETP Lett. 30 (1979) 682–685

    work page 1979

  2. [2]

    A. A. Starobinsky, A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity , Phys. Lett. B 91 (1980) 99–102

    work page 1980

  3. [3]

    A. H. Guth, Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems , Phys. Rev. D 23 (Jan, 1981) 347–356

    work page 1981

  4. [4]

    K. Sato, First-order phase transition of a vacuum and the expansion of the Universe , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 195 (07, 1981) 467–479, [http://oup.prod.sis.lan/mnras/article-pdf/195/3/467/4065201/mnras195-0467.pdf]

    work page 1981

  5. [5]

    V. F. Mukhanov and G. V. Chibisov, Quantum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe , JETP Lett. 33 (1981) 532–535. [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.33,549(1981)]

    work page 1981

  6. [6]

    Linde, A new inflationary universe scenario: A possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems , Physics Letters B 108 (1982), no

    A. Linde, A new inflationary universe scenario: A possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems , Physics Letters B 108 (1982), no. 6 389 – 393

    work page 1982

  7. [7]

    Hawking, The development of irregularities in a single bubble inflationary universe , Physics Letters B 115 (1982), no

    S. Hawking, The development of irregularities in a single bubble inflationary universe , Physics Letters B 115 (1982), no. 4 295 – 297

    work page 1982

  8. [8]

    A. A. Starobinsky, Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inflationary Universe Scenario and Generation of Perturbations , Phys. Lett. B 117 (1982) 175–178

    work page 1982

  9. [9]

    A. H. Guth and S.-Y. Pi, Fluctuations in the new inflationary universe , Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (Oct, 1982) 1110–1113

    work page 1982

  10. [10]

    Sasaki, Large Scale Quantum Fluctuations in the Inflationary Universe , Progress of Theoretical Physics 76 (1986) 1036–1046

    M. Sasaki, Large Scale Quantum Fluctuations in the Inflationary Universe , Progress of Theoretical Physics 76 (1986) 1036–1046

    work page 1986

  11. [11]

    Albrecht and P

    A. Albrecht and P. J. Steinhardt, Cosmology for grand unified theories with radiatively induced symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (Apr, 1982) 1220–1223

    work page 1982

  12. [12]

    A. D. Linde, Chaotic Inflation, Phys. Lett. 129B (1983) 177–181

    work page 1983

  13. [13]

    Vilenkin, Quantum fluctuations in the new inflationary universe , Nuclear Physics B 226 (1983), no

    A. Vilenkin, Quantum fluctuations in the new inflationary universe , Nuclear Physics B 226 (1983), no. 2 527 – 546

    work page 1983

  14. [14]

    J. M. Bardeen, P. J. Steinhardt, and M. S. Turner, Spontaneous creation of almost scale-free density perturbations in an inflationary universe , Phys. Rev. D 28 (Aug, 1983) 679–693

    work page 1983

  15. [15]

    E. W. Kolb and M. Turner, The early universe . Reading, Mass. : Addison-Wesley, May, 1990

    work page 1990

  16. [16]

    V. F. Mukhanov, H. A. Feldman, and R. H. Brandenberger, Theory of cosmological perturbations. Part 1. Classical perturbations. Part 2. Quantum theory of perturbations. Part

    work page

  17. [17]

    Extensions, Phys. Rept. 215 (1992) 203–333

    work page 1992

  18. [18]

    A. R. Liddle, P. Parsons, and J. D. Barrow, Formalizing the slow roll approximation in inflation, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 7222–7232, [ astro-ph/9408015]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  19. [19]

    J. E. Lidsey, A. R. Liddle, E. W. Kolb, E. J. Copeland, T. Barreiro, et. al., Reconstructing the inflation potential : An overview , Rev.Mod.Phys. 69 (1997) 373–410, [ astro-ph/9508078]. – 21 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  20. [20]

    E. J. Copeland, A. R. Liddle, and D. Wands, Exponential potentials and cosmological scaling solutions, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 4686–4690, [ gr-qc/9711068]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  21. [21]

    The Trans-Planckian Problem of Inflationary Cosmology

    J. Martin and R. H. Brandenberger, The TransPlanckian problem of inflationary cosmology , Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 123501, [ hep-th/0005209]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  22. [22]

    Linde, Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology , arXiv e-prints (Mar., 2005) hep–th/0503203, [hep-th/0503203]

    A. Linde, Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology , arXiv e-prints (Mar., 2005) hep–th/0503203, [hep-th/0503203]

    work page arXiv 2005

  23. [23]

    D. H. Lyth, Particle physics models of inflation , Lect. Notes Phys. 738 (2008) 81–118, [hep-th/0702128]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  24. [24]

    Sriramkumar, An introduction to inflation and cosmological perturbation theory , arXiv:0904.4584

    L. Sriramkumar, An introduction to inflation and cosmological perturbation theory , arXiv:0904.4584

    work page arXiv

  25. [25]

    D. Baumann, Inflation, in Physics of the large and the small, TASI 09, proceedings of the Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics, Boulder, Colorado, USA, 1-26 June 2009 , pp. 523–686, 2011. arXiv:0907.5424

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  26. [26]

    Martin, C

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval, and V. Vennin, Encyclopædia Inflationaris, Phys. Dark Univ. 5-6 (2014) 75–235, [ arXiv:1303.3787]

    work page arXiv 2014

  27. [27]

    Inflationary Cosmology after Planck 2013

    A. Linde, Inflationary Cosmology after Planck 2013 , in Proceedings, 100th Les Houches Summer School: Post-Planck Cosmology: Les Houches, France, July 8 - August 2, 2013 , pp. 231–316, 2015. arXiv:1402.0526

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  28. [28]

    Martin, The Observational Status of Cosmic Inflation after Planck , Astrophys

    J. Martin, The Observational Status of Cosmic Inflation after Planck , Astrophys. Space Sci. Proc. 45 (2016) 41–134, [ arXiv:1502.0573]

    work page arXiv 2016

  29. [29]

    Planck Collaboration, P. Ade et. al., Planck 2015 results. XX. Constraints on inflation , Astron. Astrophys. 594 (2016) A20, [ arXiv:1502.0211]

    work page arXiv 2015

  30. [30]

    Planck Collaboration, P. Ade et. al., Planck 2015 results. XVII. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity, Astron. Astrophys. 594 (2016) A17, [ arXiv:1502.0159]

    work page arXiv 2015

  31. [31]

    Clesse, An introduction to inflation after Planck: from theory to observations , in 10th Modave Summer School in Mathematical Physics , 1, 2015

    S. Clesse, An introduction to inflation after Planck: from theory to observations , in 10th Modave Summer School in Mathematical Physics , 1, 2015. arXiv:1501.0046

    work page arXiv 2015

  32. [32]

    S. D. Odintsov, V. K. Oikonomou, I. Giannakoudi, F. P. Fronimos, and E. C. Lymperiadou, Recent Advances in Inflation, Symmetry 15 (2023), no. 9 1701, [ arXiv:2307.1630]

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Akrami et

    Planck Collaboration, Y. Akrami et. al., Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation , Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A10, [ arXiv:1807.0621]

    work page arXiv 2018

  34. [34]

    Aghanim et

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim et. al., Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters , Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6, [ arXiv:1807.0620]. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    work page arXiv 2018

  35. [35]

    BICEP, Keck Collaboration, P. A. R. Ade et. al., Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021), no. 15 151301, [ arXiv:2110.0048]

    work page arXiv 2018

  36. [36]

    Galloni, N

    G. Galloni, N. Bartolo, S. Matarrese, M. Migliaccio, A. Ricciardone, and N. Vittorio, Updated constraints on amplitude and tilt of the tensor primordial spectrum , JCAP 04 (2023) 062, [arXiv:2208.0018]

    work page arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    Albrecht, P

    A. Albrecht, P. J. Steinhardt, M. S. Turner, and F. Wilczek, Reheating an Inflationary Universe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 1437

    work page 1982

  38. [38]

    L. F. Abbott, E. Farhi, and M. B. Wise, Particle Production in the New Inflationary Cosmology, Phys. Lett. 117B (1982) 29

    work page 1982

  39. [39]

    J. H. Traschen and R. H. Brandenberger, Particle Production During Out-of-equilibrium Phase Transitions, Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 2491–2504. – 22 –

    work page 1990

  40. [40]

    Reheating after Inflation

    L. Kofman, A. D. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, Reheating after inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 (1994) 3195–3198, [ hep-th/9405187]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  41. [41]

    Universe Reheating after Inflation

    Y. Shtanov, J. H. Traschen, and R. H. Brandenberger, Universe reheating after inflation , Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 5438–5455, [ hep-ph/9407247]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  42. [42]

    Towards the Theory of Reheating After Inflation

    L. Kofman, A. D. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, Towards the theory of reheating after inflation, Phys. Rev. D56 (1997) 3258–3295, [ hep-ph/9704452]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  43. [43]

    B. A. Bassett, S. Tsujikawa, and D. Wands, Inflation dynamics and reheating , Rev. Mod. Phys. 78 (2006) 537–589, [ astro-ph/0507632]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  44. [44]

    Reheating in Inflationary Cosmology: Theory and Applications

    R. Allahverdi, R. Brandenberger, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, and A. Mazumdar, Reheating in Inflationary Cosmology: Theory and Applications , Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60 (2010) 27–51, [arXiv:1001.2600]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  45. [45]

    First CMB Constraints on the Inflationary Reheating Temperature

    J. Martin and C. Ringeval, First CMB Constraints on the Inflationary Reheating Temperature, Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 023511, [ arXiv:1004.5525]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  46. [46]

    Reheating temperature from the CMB

    J. Mielczarek, Reheating temperature from the CMB, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 023502, [arXiv:1009.2359]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  47. [47]

    M. A. Amin, M. P. Hertzberg, D. I. Kaiser, and J. Karouby, Nonperturbative Dynamics Of Reheating After Inflation: A Review , Int. J. Mod. Phys. D24 (2014) 1530003, [arXiv:1410.3808]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  48. [48]

    L. Dai, M. Kamionkowski, and J. Wang, Reheating constraints to inflationary models , Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 041302, [ arXiv:1404.6704]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  49. [49]

    Observing the Inflationary Reheating

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval, and V. Vennin, Observing Inflationary Reheating, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015), no. 8 081303, [ arXiv:1410.7958]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  50. [50]

    Domcke and J

    V. Domcke and J. Heisig, Constraints on the reheating temperature from sizable tensor modes , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015), no. 10 103515, [ arXiv:1504.0034]

    work page arXiv 2015

  51. [51]

    J. L. Cook, E. Dimastrogiovanni, D. A. Easson, and L. M. Krauss, Reheating predictions in single field inflation , JCAP 1504 (2015) 047, [ arXiv:1502.0467]

    work page arXiv 2015

  52. [52]

    Maity and P

    D. Maity and P. Saha, Minimal inflationary cosmologies and constraints on reheating , arXiv:1610.0017

    work page arXiv

  53. [53]

    K. D. Lozanov and M. A. Amin, Equation of State and Duration to Radiation Domination after Inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017), no. 6 061301, [ arXiv:1608.0121]

    work page arXiv 2017

  54. [54]

    Kabir, A

    R. Kabir, A. Mukherjee, and D. Lohiya, Reheating constraints on K¨ ahler moduli inflation, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 34 (2019), no. 15 1950114, [ arXiv:1609.0924]

    work page arXiv 2019

  55. [55]

    Maity and P

    D. Maity and P. Saha, (P)reheating after minimal Plateau Inflation and constraints from CMB, arXiv:1811.1117

    work page arXiv

  56. [56]

    Maity and P

    D. Maity and P. Saha, Minimal plateau inflationary cosmologies and constraints from reheating, Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (2019) 045010, [ arXiv:1902.0189]

    work page arXiv 2019

  57. [57]

    El Bourakadi, Preheating and Reheating after Standard Inflation , arXiv:2104.1055

    K. El Bourakadi, Preheating and Reheating after Standard Inflation , arXiv:2104.1055

    work page arXiv

  58. [58]

    S. D. Odintsov and T. Paul, From inflation to reheating and their dynamical stability analysis in Gauss–Bonnet gravity , Phys. Dark Univ. 42 (2023) 101263, [ arXiv:2305.1911]

    work page arXiv 2023

  59. [59]

    German, J

    G. German, J. C. Hidalgo, and L. E. Padilla, Inflationary models constrained by reheating , Eur. Phys. J. Plus 139 (2024), no. 3 302, [ arXiv:2310.0522]

    work page arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    J. B. Munoz and M. Kamionkowski, Equation-of-State Parameter for Reheating , Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015), no. 4 043521, [ arXiv:1412.0656]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  61. [61]

    Inflation after WMAP3: Confronting the Slow-Roll and Exact Power Spectra with CMB Data

    J. Martin and C. Ringeval, Inflation after WMAP3: Confronting the Slow-Roll and Exact Power Spectra to CMB Data , JCAP 0608 (2006) 009, [ astro-ph/0605367]. – 23 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  62. [62]

    Inflation and the Scale Dependent Spectral Index: Prospects and Strategies

    P. Adshead, R. Easther, J. Pritchard, and A. Loeb, Inflation and the Scale Dependent Spectral Index: Prospects and Strategies , JCAP 02 (2011) 021, [ arXiv:1007.3748]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  63. [63]

    Nandi and P

    D. Nandi and P. Saha, Einstein or Jordan: seeking answers from the reheating constraints , arXiv:1907.1029

    work page arXiv 1907

  64. [64]

    A. R. Liddle and S. M. Leach, How long before the end of inflation were observable perturbations produced?, Phys. Rev. D68 (2003) 103503, [ astro-ph/0305263]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  65. [67]

    Y. Mao, M. Tegmark, M. McQuinn, M. Zaldarriaga, and O. Zahn, How accurately can 21 cm tomography constrain cosmology?, Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 023529, [ arXiv:0802.1710]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  66. [68]

    Finelli et

    CORE Collaboration, F. Finelli et. al., Exploring cosmic origins with CORE: Inflation , JCAP 1804 (2018) 016, [ arXiv:1612.0827]

    work page arXiv 2018

  67. [69]

    Hunting Down the Best Model of Inflation with Bayesian Evidence

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval, and R. Trotta, Hunting Down the Best Model of Inflation with Bayesian Evidence, Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 063524, [ arXiv:1009.4157]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  68. [70]

    The Best Inflationary Models After Planck

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval, R. Trotta, and V. Vennin, The Best Inflationary Models After Planck , JCAP 1403 (2014) 039, [ arXiv:1312.3529]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  69. [71]

    How Well Can Future CMB Missions Constrain Cosmic Inflation?

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval, and V. Vennin, How Well Can Future CMB Missions Constrain Cosmic Inflation?, JCAP 1410 (2014), no. 10 038, [ arXiv:1407.4034]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  70. [72]

    M. Kaur, D. Nandi, and S. R. B, Unifying inflationary and reheating solution , JCAP 05 (2024) 045, [ arXiv:2309.1057]

    work page arXiv 2024

  71. [73]

    Auclair, B

    P. Auclair, B. Blachier, and C. Ringeval, Clocking the End of Cosmic Inflation , arXiv:2406.1415

    work page arXiv

  72. [74]

    Slow-roll reconstruction for running spectral index

    Q.-G. Huang, Slow-roll reconstruction for running spectral index , Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 043505, [astro-ph/0610924]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  73. [75]

    Observational constraint on the fourth derivative of the inflaton potential

    C. Caprini, S. H. Hansen, and M. Kunz, Observational constraint on the fourth derivative of the inflaton potential , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 339 (2003) 212–214, [ hep-ph/0210095]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  74. [76]

    J. M. Cline and L. Hoi, Inflationary potential reconstruction for a wmap running power spectrum, JCAP 06 (2006) 007, [ astro-ph/0603403]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  75. [77]

    Running Spectral Index in Noncommutative Inflation and WMAP Three Year Results

    Q.-G. Huang and M. Li, Running spectral index in noncommutative inflation and wmap three year results, Nucl. Phys. B 755 (2006) 286–294, [ astro-ph/0603782]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  76. [78]

    Running of Running of the Spectral Index and WMAP Three-year data

    Q.-G. Huang, Running of Running of the Spectral Index and WMAP Three-year data , JCAP 11 (2006) 004, [ astro-ph/0610389]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  77. [79]

    Recovering the Inflationary Potential and Primordial Power Spectrum With a Slow Roll Prior: Methodology and Application to WMAP 3 Year Data

    H. Peiris and R. Easther, Recovering the Inflationary Potential and Primordial Power Spectrum With a Slow Roll Prior: Methodology and Application to WMAP 3 Year Data , JCAP 07 (2006) 002, [ astro-ph/0603587]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  78. [80]

    Implications of a Running Spectral Index for Slow Roll Inflation

    R. Easther and H. Peiris, Implications of a Running Spectral Index for Slow Roll Inflation , JCAP 09 (2006) 010, [ astro-ph/0604214]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  79. [81]

    Slow Roll Reconstruction: Constraints on Inflation from the 3 Year WMAP Dataset

    H. Peiris and R. Easther, Slow Roll Reconstruction: Constraints on Inflation from the 3 Year WMAP Dataset, JCAP 10 (2006) 017, [ astro-ph/0609003]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  80. [82]

    K. I. Izawa, Supergravity minimal inflation and its spectral index revisited , Phys. Lett. B 576 (2003) 1–4, [ hep-ph/0305286]. – 24 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

Showing first 80 references.