Pith. sign in

REVIEW 10 cited by

On the Planning Abilities of Large Language Models (A Critical Investigation with a Proposed Benchmark)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.06706 v1 pith:T42XOERU submitted 2023-02-13 cs.AI cs.CLcs.LG

On the Planning Abilities of Large Language Models (A Critical Investigation with a Proposed Benchmark)

classification cs.AI cs.CLcs.LG
keywords planningbenchmarkllmsgoodheuristiccapabilitiesevaluatehuman-in-the-loop
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Intrigued by the claims of emergent reasoning capabilities in LLMs trained on general web corpora, in this paper, we set out to investigate their planning capabilities. We aim to evaluate (1) how good LLMs are by themselves in generating and validating simple plans in commonsense planning tasks (of the type that humans are generally quite good at) and (2) how good LLMs are in being a source of heuristic guidance for other agents--either AI planners or human planners--in their planning tasks. To investigate these questions in a systematic rather than anecdotal manner, we start by developing a benchmark suite based on the kinds of domains employed in the International Planning Competition. On this benchmark, we evaluate LLMs in three modes: autonomous, heuristic and human-in-the-loop. Our results show that LLM's ability to autonomously generate executable plans is quite meager, averaging only about 3% success rate. The heuristic and human-in-the-loop modes show slightly more promise. In addition to these results, we also make our benchmark and evaluation tools available to support investigations by research community.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 10 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. LLM+P: Empowering Large Language Models with Optimal Planning Proficiency

    cs.AI 2023-04 accept novelty 7.0

    LLM+P lets LLMs solve planning problems optimally by converting them to PDDL for classical planners and back to natural language.

  2. HANSEL: Extracting Breadcrumbs from Web Agent Trajectories for Interactive Verification

    cs.HC 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    HANSEL extracts navigable evidence from agent trajectories with 83.7% precision and 88.8% recall on 45 tasks, reduces volume by 61.6%, and improves verification metrics in a 14-participant study.

  3. Deterministic vs. LLM-Controlled Orchestration for COBOL-to-Python Modernization

    cs.SE 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    Deterministic orchestration matches LLM-controlled methods in COBOL-to-Python translation accuracy but improves worst-case robustness, reduces run-to-run variability, and cuts token consumption by up to 3.5 times.

  4. HERAKLES: Hierarchical Skill Compilation for Open-ended LLM Agents

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0

    HERAKLES couples a language-model planner to a small, continually retrained skill executor and outperforms three baselines on the 17-goal Crafter benchmark, scaling better to reworded and repeated goals.

  5. Reasoning with Language Model is Planning with World Model

    cs.CL 2023-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    RAP turns LLMs into dual world-model and planning agents via MCTS to generate better reasoning paths, outperforming CoT baselines and achieving 33% relative gains over GPT-4 CoT using LLaMA-33B on plan generation.

  6. Toward Secure and Reliable PDDL Formalization of Large Language Models with Planner-in-the-Loop Feedback

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Presents NL-PDDL-Bench and a planner-in-the-loop framework combining LoRA fine-tuning, DPO on planner-derived pairs, and inference-time repair to improve LLM PDDL generation.

  7. Iterative Formalization and Planning in Partially Observable Environments

    cs.AI 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    PDDLego iteratively formalizes and refines PDDL representations of partially observable environments to improve planning success without finetuning or in-context examples.

  8. SimRPD: Optimizing Recruitment Proactive Dialogue Agents through Simulator-Based Data Evaluation and Selection

    cs.AI 2026-01 conditional novelty 4.0

    SimRPD trains a recruiting dialogue agent on simulator-generated conversations filtered to match real intent-transition patterns, lifting contact-acquisition rate from 3.8% to 4.4% in a live A/B test.

  9. Embodied Spatial Intelligence: from Implicit Scene Modeling to Spatial Reasoning

    cs.RO 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0

    The thesis demonstrates that combining implicit 3D scene representations with LLM-based reasoning, using text as an interface, yields strong performance on robotic perception and spatial language tasks.

  10. The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey

    cs.AI 2023-09 accept novelty 4.0

    The paper surveys the origins, frameworks, applications, and open challenges of AI agents built on large language models.