Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Watermarking Techniques for Large Language Models: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.00089 v1 pith:TASH4S75 submitted 2024-08-26 cs.CR cs.AI

Watermarking Techniques for Large Language Models: A Survey

classification cs.CR cs.AI
keywords watermarkingllmsresearchreviewtechnologycurrenttechniquesanalyzes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the rapid advancement and extensive application of artificial intelligence technology, large language models (LLMs) are extensively used to enhance production, creativity, learning, and work efficiency across various domains. However, the abuse of LLMs also poses potential harm to human society, such as intellectual property rights issues, academic misconduct, false content, and hallucinations. Relevant research has proposed the use of LLM watermarking to achieve IP protection for LLMs and traceability of multimedia data output by LLMs. To our knowledge, this is the first thorough review that investigates and analyzes LLM watermarking technology in detail. This review begins by recounting the history of traditional watermarking technology, then analyzes the current state of LLM watermarking research, and thoroughly examines the inheritance and relevance of these techniques. By analyzing their inheritance and relevance, this review can provide research with ideas for applying traditional digital watermarking techniques to LLM watermarking, to promote the cross-integration and innovation of watermarking technology. In addition, this review examines the pros and cons of LLM watermarking. Considering the current multimodal development trend of LLMs, it provides a detailed analysis of emerging multimodal LLM watermarking, such as visual and audio data, to offer more reference ideas for relevant research. This review delves into the challenges and future prospects of current watermarking technologies, offering valuable insights for future LLM watermarking research and applications.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Green-Red Watermarking for Recommender Systems

    cs.IR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    GREW uses a secret-key-driven green-red item partition and three ranking-integrated modules to embed verifiable watermarks in recommender systems that resist extraction attacks without data injection.

  2. Copyright Protection for Large Language Models: A Survey of Methods, Challenges, and Trends

    cs.CR 2025-08 accept novelty 7.0

    A survey of LLM copyright protection that unifies text watermarking, model watermarking, and model fingerprinting while presenting new coverage of fingerprint transfer and removal.

  3. PeerCheck: Enhancing LLM-Generated Academic Reviews Towards Human-Level Quality

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    PeerCheck finds that chain-of-thought prompting improves LLM academic reviews while retrieval-augmented generation sometimes lowers quality, and that LLMs and humans emphasize different aspects of papers.