pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17522 · v1 · pith:TBUQQRNCnew · submitted 2026-05-17 · 💻 cs.RO

RoboFlow4D: A Lightweight Flow World Model Toward Real-Time Flow-Guided Robotic Manipulation

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 12:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO
keywords robotic manipulation3D flow predictionflow world modelreal-time planningend-to-end frameworkvisual observationstextual instructionsembodied intelligence
0
0 comments X

The pith

RoboFlow4D directly predicts multi-frame 3D flows from visual observations and textual instructions to guide real-time robotic manipulation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces RoboFlow4D as a lightweight flow world model that unifies perception and planning for 3D robotic tasks. It estimates temporal motion by directly predicting multi-frame 3D flows from visual inputs and text instructions. This end-to-end design supplies explicit flow-based planning signals that integrate with action policies. The result forms an observation-planning-execution loop that runs with lower overhead than stacked modular systems. Experiments in simulation and real-world settings report gains in success rates alongside better computational efficiency.

Core claim

As an end-to-end framework, RoboFlow4D directly predicts multi-frame 3D flows from visual observations and textual instructions, providing explicit flow-based planning to guide action generation. This design allows seamless integration with general action policies, forming an efficient observation-planning-execution closed loop that enables real-time and resource-efficient manipulation through slow-fast collaboration between flow prediction and action control.

What carries the argument

The unified lightweight flow world model that estimates temporal 3D motion by predicting multi-frame flows to serve as explicit planning signals for action generation.

If this is right

  • Enables seamless integration with general action policies to form a closed observation-planning-execution loop.
  • Achieves real-time performance through slow-fast collaboration between flow prediction and action control.
  • Consistently improves manipulation success rates in both simulation and real-world settings.
  • Reduces computational overhead for more resource-efficient robotic operation compared to modular pipelines.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The flow outputs could serve as human-interpretable intermediates for debugging why specific actions are selected during manipulation.
  • Extending the model to additional sensory channels such as force or tactile data might improve handling of contact-rich tasks.
  • If the flow predictions generalize across object types, the same model could support planning in more varied dynamic scenes without retraining.

Load-bearing premise

Directly predicting temporal 3D motion flows in a single unified lightweight model will produce better planning signals and lower overhead than prior modular pipelines without introducing new errors in flow estimation or action integration.

What would settle it

A controlled comparison on the same manipulation tasks where a modular pipeline achieves higher success rates or lower latency than RoboFlow4D would falsify the advantage of the unified approach.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.17522 by Brian Sheil, Guangming Wang, Guiliang Liu, Huaiyuan Xu, Junliang Chen, Lap-Pui Chau, Runyi Zhao, Sheng Xu, Sixu Lin, Yixiong Jing, Zhuohao Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Top left: System-level comparison of various flow-based planning. (a) 2D flow-based planning (Vecerik et al., 2024; Xu et al., 2024) predicts pixel-level flow on images using a modular pipeline with stacked modules, but lacks 3D geometry. (b) Point flow-based frameworks (Li et al., 2025a; Dharmarajan et al., 2025) improve pixel flows by typically predicting fixed temporal-length 3D flows from 3D observatio… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overview of robotic manipulation. Top left (Sec. 3.2): Given an RGB image sequence, optional gripper query points, and a task instruction, the proposed RoboFlow4D extracts vision, 2D point, and text tokens using a Vision Encoder, Point Encoder, and Text Encoder, respectively. A diffusion-based FlowDiT predicts future multi-frame flows from the extracted tokens. Top right (Sec. 3.3): Built upon RoboFlow4D, … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Data generation pipeline. Stage one: We track the flows of the grounded gripper from diverse real-world and simulated robot videos. (Khazatsky et al., 2024; Liu et al., 2023; Tao et al., 2024). Stage two: Each video is divided into sequential atomic tasks, and then goal-oriented flows are collected from a specific keyframe to each atomic task completion. 3.4. Closed-Loop Control Open-loop control is ill-su… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Real-world robot platform. consistently improves success rates by a large margin and reduces task completion time across various policies, includ￾ing DP and DiT. For example, DP achieves a 12.5% higher average success rate (SR) while reducing completion time (s) by an average of 1.4 s, as evidenced by Pick-and-Place (+20.0 % SR, −1.0 s) and Assemble (+15.0 % SR, −3.2 s) as well. Similar results from DiT ca… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: LIBERO Visualization. boundaries. In practice, to suppress spurious gripper oscillations, we only accept a boundary if the new state persists for a short temporal window, and we discard segments shorter than ℓmin. If no stable transition is found, we keep the trajectory as a single segment. Goal-Oriented Flow Resampling. For each segment τi = [si , ei ], we construct a compact supervision that emphasizes k… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Maniskill Visualization. D. Training Objective We train our model via conditional denoising (Ho et al., 2020). Let x0 ∈ R K×N×3 be ground-truth flow trajectories. We sample a timestep t ∼ U {1, . . . , T} and corrupt x0 through the forward process: xt = √ α¯t x0 + √ 1 − α¯t ϵ, ϵ ∼ N (0, I), (9) where α¯t is the cumulative product of noise schedule coefficients. We use the stable v-prediction parameterizati… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Real-world Visualization. Diffusion Loss. It computes a visibility-weighted mean-squared error: Ldiff = Et,ϵ " 1 P k,n wk,n X K k=1 X N n=1 wk,n [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Planning and acting in 3D environments is a fundamental capability for robotic manipulation in the real world. Although prior work has explored predictive flow planners to guide 3D manipulation, existing approaches often rely on modular pipelines stacking multiple submodels, resulting in high computational overhead and limited real-time performance. To address these challenges, we introduce RoboFlow4D, a lightweight flow world model that unifies perception and planning by estimating temporal motion in physical 3D space. As an end-to-end framework, RoboFlow4D directly predicts multi-frame 3D flows from visual observations and textual instructions, providing explicit flow-based planning to guide action generation. This design allows seamless integration with general action policies, forming an efficient observation-planning-execution closed loop. Through slow-fast collaboration between flow prediction and action control, RoboFlow4D enables real-time and resource-efficient manipulation. Extensive experiments in both simulation and real-world settings demonstrate that RoboFlow4D consistently improves manipulation success rates and computational efficiency, advancing flow-guided planning for embodied intelligence.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces RoboFlow4D, a lightweight end-to-end flow world model for robotic manipulation. It unifies perception and planning by directly predicting multi-frame 3D flows from visual observations and textual instructions, providing explicit flow-based planning signals that integrate with general action policies to form an observation-planning-execution closed loop. The design emphasizes slow-fast collaboration between flow prediction and action control to achieve real-time, resource-efficient performance, with claims of consistent improvements in manipulation success rates and computational efficiency demonstrated through simulation and real-world experiments.

Significance. If the quantitative results and ablations support the claims, this could represent a meaningful step toward more integrated and efficient flow-guided planning in 3D robotic manipulation, addressing overhead issues in prior modular pipelines while maintaining compatibility with existing action policies.

major comments (1)
  1. [§4 Experiments] §4 Experiments (and associated tables/figures): The central claim of consistent improvements in success rates and efficiency is load-bearing, yet the provided abstract and high-level description contain no quantitative results, specific baselines, number of trials, error bars, or statistical analysis. This prevents verification of whether the unified model actually outperforms modular alternatives without introducing new flow estimation or integration errors.
minor comments (1)
  1. [§3 Method] The description of 'slow-fast collaboration' between flow prediction and action control would benefit from an explicit diagram or pseudocode in the method section to clarify the timing and data flow in the closed loop.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the concern regarding the experimental claims and quantitative details below, and we will incorporate revisions to improve the clarity and verifiability of the results.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§4 Experiments] §4 Experiments (and associated tables/figures): The central claim of consistent improvements in success rates and efficiency is load-bearing, yet the provided abstract and high-level description contain no quantitative results, specific baselines, number of trials, error bars, or statistical analysis. This prevents verification of whether the unified model actually outperforms modular alternatives without introducing new flow estimation or integration errors.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting the importance of explicit quantitative support for our central claims. The full manuscript presents these details in §4, including tables and figures that report specific success rate improvements (e.g., over modular flow-based baselines), computational efficiency metrics, number of trials across simulation and real-world settings, error bars, and statistical analysis where relevant. These experiments directly compare the unified end-to-end model against modular alternatives and show gains without introducing measurable new errors in flow estimation or policy integration, as validated through the closed-loop observation-planning-execution design. To make the key results more immediately accessible and address the concern about the abstract and high-level description, we will revise the abstract to include representative quantitative highlights (such as average success rate gains and latency reductions) while retaining the overall structure and contributions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; model presented as new construction

full rationale

The paper introduces RoboFlow4D as an end-to-end lightweight model that directly predicts multi-frame 3D flows from visual observations and textual instructions. The abstract and high-level description frame this as a novel unified architecture for perception-planning integration, with claims supported by experimental results in simulation and real-world settings rather than by reducing predictions to previously fitted parameters or self-referential equations. No load-bearing steps reduce by construction to inputs via self-definition, fitted-input renaming, or self-citation chains. The central claim remains an independent engineering proposal whose validity rests on external benchmarks and ablations, not internal tautology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so no specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be identified from the text. The core idea of a 'flow world model' is introduced but its internal assumptions and training details are not described.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5749 in / 1229 out tokens · 50189 ms · 2026-05-20T12:30:32.021138+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · 19 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    AgiBot World Colosseo: A Large-scale Manipulation Platform for Scalable and Intelligent Embodied Systems

    URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.06669. Ai, B., Tian, S., Shi, H., Wang, Y ., Pfaff, T., Tan, C., Chris- tensen, H. I., Su, H., Wu, J., and Li, Y . A review of learning-based dynamics models for robotic manipula- tion.Science Robotics, 10(106):eadt1497,

  2. [2]

    GR00T N1: An Open Foundation Model for Generalist Humanoid Robots

    Bjorck, J., Casta˜neda, F., Cherniadev, N., Da, X., Ding, R., Fan, L., Fang, Y ., Fox, D., Hu, F., Huang, S., et al. Gr00t n1: An open foundation model for generalist humanoid robots.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.14734,

  3. [3]

    $\pi_0$: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control

    URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2410.24164. Brohan, A., Brown, N., Carbajal, J., Chebotar, Y ., Dabis, J., Finn, C., Gopalakrishnan, K., Hausman, K., Herzog, A., Hsu, J., et al. Rt-1: Robotics transformer for real-world control at scale.arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.06817,

  4. [4]

    Learning robotic manipulation policies from point clouds with conditional flow matching.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.07343,

    9 RoboFlow4D: A Lightweight Flow World Model Toward Real-Time Flow-Guided Robotic Manipulation Chisari, E., Heppert, N., Argus, M., Welschehold, T., Brox, T., and Valada, A. Learning robotic manipulation policies from point clouds with conditional flow matching.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.07343,

  5. [5]

    Dream2flow: Bridging video generation and open-world manipulation with 3d object flow, 2025

    Dharmarajan, K., Huang, W., Wu, J., Fei-Fei, L., and Zhang, R. Dream2flow: Bridging video generation and open- world manipulation with 3d object flow.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.24766,

  6. [6]

    Diffusion trajectory-guided policy for long-horizon robot manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.10040,

    Fan, S., Yang, Q., Liu, Y ., Wu, K., Che, Z., Liu, Q., and Wan, M. Diffusion trajectory-guided policy for long-horizon robot manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.10040,

  7. [7]

    Flip: Flow-centric generative planning as general-purpose manipulation world model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.08261, 2024

    Gao, C., Zhang, H., Xu, Z., Cai, Z., and Shao, L. Flip: Flow- centric generative planning as general-purpose manipu- lation world model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.08261,

  8. [8]

    Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidance

    Ho, J. and Salimans, T. Classifier-free diffusion guidance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.12598,

  9. [9]

    Diffusion transformer policy.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.15959,

    Hou, Z., Zhang, T., Xiong, Y ., Pu, H., Zhao, C., Tong, R., Qiao, Y ., Dai, J., and Chen, Y . Diffusion transformer policy.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.15959,

  10. [10]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.03782 , year=

    Huang, W., Chao, Y .-W., Mousavian, A., Liu, M.-Y ., Fox, D., Mo, K., and Fei-Fei, L. Pointworld: Scaling 3d world models for in-the-wild robotic manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.03782,

  11. [11]

    Accessed: 2026-01-25

    https://github.com/IDEA-Research/ Grounded-SAM-2. Accessed: 2026-01-25. Ji, Y ., Tan, H., Shi, J., Hao, X., Zhang, Y ., Zhang, H., Wang, P., Zhao, M., Mu, Y ., An, P., et al. Robobrain: A unified brain model for robotic manipulation from abstract to concrete. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pp. 1724–1734,

  12. [12]

    DROID: A Large-Scale In-The-Wild Robot Manipulation Dataset

    Khazatsky, A., Pertsch, K., Nair, S., Balakrishna, A., Dasari, S., Karamcheti, S., Nasiriany, S., Srirama, M. K., Chen, L. Y ., Ellis, K., et al. Droid: A large-scale in-the-wild robot manipulation dataset.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.12945,

  13. [13]

    OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model

    Kim, M. J., Pertsch, K., Karamcheti, S., Xiao, T., Balakr- ishna, A., Nair, S., Rafailov, R., Foster, E., Lam, G., San- keti, P., et al. Openvla: An open-source vision-language- action model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09246,

  14. [14]

    Crafting papers on machine learning

    Langley, P. Crafting papers on machine learning. In Langley, P. (ed.),Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2000), pp. 1207–1216, Stan- ford, CA,

  15. [15]

    LeCun, Y

    Morgan Kaufmann. LeCun, Y . A path towards autonomous machine intelligence version 0.9. 2, 2022-06-27.Open Review, 62(1):1–62,

  16. [16]

    Novaflow: Zero-shot manipulation via ac- tionable flow from generated videos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.08568, 2025a

    Li, H., Sun, L., Hu, Y ., Ta, D., Barry, J., Konidaris, G., and Fu, J. Novaflow: Zero-shot manipulation via ac- tionable flow from generated videos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.08568, 2025a. Li, Q., Liang, Y ., Wang, Z., Luo, L., Chen, X., Liao, M., Wei, F., Deng, Y ., Xu, S., Zhang, Y ., et al. Cogact: A foundational vision-language-action model for synergi...

  17. [17]

    Manip- dreamer3d: Synthesizing plausible robotic manipulation video with occupancy-aware 3d trajectory.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.05314, 2025b

    Li, Y ., Wei, X., Chi, X., Li, Y ., Zhao, Z., Wang, H., Ma, N., Lu, M., Han, S., and Zhang, S. Manip- dreamer3d: Synthesizing plausible robotic manipulation video with occupancy-aware 3d trajectory.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.05314, 2025b. Liu, B., Zhu, Y ., Gao, C., Feng, Y ., Liu, Q., Zhu, Y ., and Stone, P. Libero: Benchmarking knowledge transfer for lif...

  18. [18]

    RDT-1B: a Diffusion Foundation Model for Bimanual Manipulation

    10 RoboFlow4D: A Lightweight Flow World Model Toward Real-Time Flow-Guided Robotic Manipulation Liu, S., Wu, L., Li, B., Tan, H., Chen, H., Wang, Z., Xu, K., Su, H., and Zhu, J. Rdt-1b: a diffusion founda- tion model for bimanual manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.07864, 2024a. Liu, S., Zeng, Z., Ren, T., Li, F., Zhang, H., Yang, J., Jiang, Q., Li, C....

  19. [19]

    Embodied arena: A comprehensive, unified, and evolving evaluation platform for embodied ai.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.15273,

    Ni, F., Zhang, M., Li, P., Yuan, Y ., Zhang, L., Liu, Y ., Han, P., Kou, L., Ma, S., Qiao, J., et al. Embodied arena: A comprehensive, unified, and evolving evaluation platform for embodied ai.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.15273,

  20. [20]

    DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision

    Oquab, M., Darcet, T., Moutakanni, T., V o, H., Szafraniec, M., Khalidov, V ., Fernandez, P., Haziza, D., Massa, F., El- Nouby, A., et al. Dinov2: Learning robust visual features without supervision.arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07193,

  21. [21]

    FAST: Efficient Action Tokenization for Vision-Language-Action Models

    Pertsch, K., Stachowicz, K., Ichter, B., Driess, D., Nair, S., Vuong, Q., Mees, O., Finn, C., and Levine, S. Fast: Efficient action tokenization for vision-language-action models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09747,

  22. [22]

    SpatialVLA: Exploring Spatial Representations for Visual-Language-Action Model

    Qu, D., Song, H., Chen, Q., Yao, Y ., Ye, X., Ding, Y ., Wang, Z., Gu, J., Zhao, B., Wang, D., et al. Spatialvla: Exploring spatial representations for visual-language-action model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.15830,

  23. [23]

    Progressive Distillation for Fast Sampling of Diffusion Models

    Salimans, T. and Ho, J. Progressive distillation for fast sampling of diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.00512,

  24. [24]

    Hi Robot: Open-Ended Instruction Following with Hierarchical Vision-Language-Action Models

    Shi, L. X., Ichter, B., Equi, M., Ke, L., Pertsch, K., Vuong, Q., Tanner, J., Walling, A., Wang, H., Fusai, N., et al. Hi robot: Open-ended instruction following with hier- archical vision-language-action models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.19417,

  25. [25]

    ManiSkill3: GPU parallelized robotics simula- tion and rendering for generalizable embodied AI,

    Tao, S., Xiang, F., Shukla, A., Qin, Y ., Hinrichsen, X., Yuan, X., Bao, C., Lin, X., Liu, Y ., Chan, T.-k., et al. Maniskill3: Gpu parallelized robotics simulation and rendering for generalizable embodied ai.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.00425,

  26. [26]

    Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policy

    Team, O. M., Ghosh, D., Walke, H., Pertsch, K., Black, K., Mees, O., Dasari, S., Hejna, J., Kreiman, T., Xu, C., et al. Octo: An open-source generalist robot policy.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.12213,

  27. [27]

    Wan: Open and Advanced Large-Scale Video Generative Models

    Wan, T., Wang, A., Ai, B., Wen, B., Mao, C., Xie, C.-W., Chen, D., Yu, F., Zhao, H., Yang, J., Zeng, J., Wang, J., Zhang, J., Zhou, J., Wang, J., Chen, J., Zhu, K., Zhao, K., Yan, K., Huang, L., Feng, M., Zhang, N., Li, P., Wu, P., Chu, R., Feng, R., Zhang, S., Sun, S., Fang, T., Wang, T., Gui, T., Weng, T., Shen, T., Lin, W., Wang, W., Wang, W., Zhou, W....

  28. [28]

    Any-point Trajectory Modeling for Policy Learning

    Wen, C., Lin, X., So, J., Chen, K., Dou, Q., Gao, Y ., and Abbeel, P. Any-point trajectory modeling for policy learn- ing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.00025,

  29. [29]

    Video models are zero-shot learners and reasoners

    Wiedemer, T., Li, Y ., Vicol, P., Gu, S. S., Matarese, N., Swer- sky, K., Kim, B., Jaini, P., and Geirhos, R. Video mod- els are zero-shot learners and reasoners.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.20328,

  30. [30]

    Flow as the cross-domain manipulation interface

    11 RoboFlow4D: A Lightweight Flow World Model Toward Real-Time Flow-Guided Robotic Manipulation Xu, M., Xu, Z., Xu, Y ., Chi, C., Wetzstein, G., Veloso, M., and Song, S. Flow as the cross-domain manipulation interface. In Agrawal, P., Kroemer, O., and Burgard, W. (eds.),Conference on Robot Learning, 6-9 November 2024, Munich, Germany, volume 270, pp. 2475...

  31. [31]

    Fp3: A 3d foundation policy for robotic manipulation

    Yang, R., Chen, G., Wen, C., and Gao, Y . Fp3: A 3d foun- dation policy for robotic manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.08950, 2025b. Ye, K., Zhou, J., Qiu, Y ., Liu, J., Zhou, S., Lin, K.-Y ., and Liang, J. From watch to imagine: Steering long-horizon manipulation via human demonstration and future envi- sionment.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.22205,

  32. [32]

    3D Diffusion Policy: Generalizable Visuomotor Policy Learning via Simple 3D Representations

    Ze, Y ., Zhang, G., Zhang, K., Hu, C., Wang, M., and Xu, H. 3d diffusion policy: Generalizable visuomotor policy learning via simple 3d representations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.03954,

  33. [33]

    4d-vla: Spatiotemporal vision-language-action pretraining with cross-scene calibration.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.22242, 2025a

    Zhang, J., Chen, Y ., Xu, Y ., Huang, Z., Zhou, Y ., Yuan, Y .-J., Cai, X., Huang, G., Quan, X., Xu, H., et al. 4d-vla: Spatiotemporal vision-language-action pretraining with cross-scene calibration.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.22242,

  34. [34]

    Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation with Low-Cost Hardware

    Zhao, T. Z., Kumar, V ., Levine, S., and Finn, C. Learn- ing fine-grained bimanual manipulation with low-cost hardware.arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.13705,

  35. [35]

    TraceVLA: Visual Trace Prompting Enhances Spatial-Temporal Awareness for Generalist Robotic Policies

    Zheng, R., Liang, Y ., Huang, S., Gao, J., Daum ´e III, H., Kolobov, A., Huang, F., and Yang, J. Tracevla: Vi- sual trace prompting enhances spatial-temporal aware- ness for generalist robotic policies.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.10345,

  36. [36]

    3DFlowAction: Learning cross- embodiment manipulation from 3d flow world model,

    Zhi, H., Chen, P., Zhou, S., Dong, Y ., Wu, Q., Han, L., and Tan, M. 3dflowaction: Learning cross-embodiment manipulation from 3d flow world model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.06199,

  37. [37]

    and NovaFlow (Li et al., 2025a) derive 3D object/actionable flow by first generating task-conditioned videos and then applying a multi-stage lifting pipeline (e.g., depth estimation, segmentation, point tracking, and 3D reconstruction). Due to the heavy reliance on video generation, both methods incurminute-levelend-to-end latency: Dream2Flow reports3–11 ...

  38. [38]

    to track 3D point flows on the gripper throughout each episode. Since raw point trajectories can contain redundant or noisy signals, we apply a three-stage filtering pipeline: (i) remove near-static tracks, (ii) reject outlier points, and (iii) discard tracks with implausibly large inter-frame displacements. For datasets without a visible gripper, we inst...