Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Attack Atlas: A Practitioner's Perspective on Challenges and Pitfalls in Red Teaming GenAI

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.15398 v1 pith:U3JGL4NB submitted 2024-09-23 cs.CR cs.AIcs.LG

Attack Atlas: A Practitioner's Perspective on Challenges and Pitfalls in Red Teaming GenAI

classification cs.CR cs.AIcs.LG
keywords generativeadversarialattackchallengespracticalsystemsacademicatlas
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

As generative AI, particularly large language models (LLMs), become increasingly integrated into production applications, new attack surfaces and vulnerabilities emerge and put a focus on adversarial threats in natural language and multi-modal systems. Red-teaming has gained importance in proactively identifying weaknesses in these systems, while blue-teaming works to protect against such adversarial attacks. Despite growing academic interest in adversarial risks for generative AI, there is limited guidance tailored for practitioners to assess and mitigate these challenges in real-world environments. To address this, our contributions include: (1) a practical examination of red- and blue-teaming strategies for securing generative AI, (2) identification of key challenges and open questions in defense development and evaluation, and (3) the Attack Atlas, an intuitive framework that brings a practical approach to analyzing single-turn input attacks, placing it at the forefront for practitioners. This work aims to bridge the gap between academic insights and practical security measures for the protection of generative AI systems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Adaptive Instruction Composition for Automated LLM Red-Teaming

    cs.CR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Adaptive Instruction Composition uses a neural contextual bandit with RL to adaptively combine crowdsourced texts, generating more effective and diverse LLM jailbreaks than random or prior adaptive methods on Harmbench.

  2. Breaking MCP with Function Hijacking Attacks: Novel Threats for Function Calling and Agentic Models

    cs.CR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A novel function hijacking attack achieves 70-100% success rates in forcing specific function calls across five LLMs on the BFCL benchmark and is robust to context semantics.

  3. Persona-Conditioned Adversarial Prompting: Multi-Identity Red-Teaming for Adversarial Discovery and Mitigation

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    PCAP conditions adversarial searches on multiple attacker personas to discover more diverse and transferable jailbreaks, yielding richer safety fine-tuning datasets that boost model robustness on GPT-OSS 120B.