pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.03584 · v3 · pith:VLXIGSQKnew · submitted 2025-09-03 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.CO· hep-th

Unveiling horizons in quantum critical collapse

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 22:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-th
keywords quantum critical collapseweak cosmic censorshipsemiclassical gravityBoulware vacuummass gapType I and Type II criticalityanomaly methodapparent horizon
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum corrections in critical collapse select a Boulware-like state that produces a growing mode and a finite mass gap, turning classical naked singularities into hidden ones.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper performs a one-loop semiclassical analysis of near-critical gravitational collapse for a massless scalar field in Einstein gravity, using the anomaly method in both 2+1 and 3+1 dimensions. Regularity at the apparent horizon uniquely fixes the quantum state to a Boulware-like vacuum that encodes the vacuum polarization of the collapsing matter. The resulting stress-energy corrections introduce a growing mode whose inclusion in horizon-tracing calculations generates a finite mass gap. This gap converts the classical Type II critical behavior into a quantum-modified Type I regime, so that subcritical and supercritical solutions are separated and naked singularities are avoided.

Core claim

In the semiclassical Einstein equations for explicitly time-dependent critical spacetimes, the demand for regularity on the apparent horizon selects a Boulware-like quantum state for the scalar field. The associated vacuum polarization produces quantum corrections that appear as a growing mode. When both classical and quantum modes are tracked across the horizon, these corrections open a finite mass gap between the subcritical and supercritical branches. The gap changes the critical phenomenon from Type II (massless black holes at threshold) to a quantum Type I (finite-mass threshold), thereby furnishing a quantum-level enforcement of weak cosmic censorship.

What carries the argument

The Boulware-like quantum state selected by regularity, whose anomaly-derived stress-energy tensor supplies the growing mode that shifts the critical mass gap.

If this is right

  • The finite mass gap separates subcritical dispersal from supercritical black-hole formation at a nonzero threshold mass.
  • Naked singularities that form from smooth initial data in the classical theory are replaced by horizons once the quantum corrections are included.
  • The transition from classical Type II to quantum Type I criticality occurs in both 2+1 and 3+1 dimensions within the dominant s-wave sector.
  • The same regularity condition that fixes the quantum state also suppresses the growing mode's effect on the asymptotic mass.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mechanism suggests that similar regularity-selected states could regularize other near-singular time-dependent geometries without invoking full quantum gravity.
  • Extending the anomaly calculation beyond the s-wave sector might reveal additional angular-momentum-dependent corrections to the mass gap.
  • The finite gap provides a concrete scale that could be compared with future numerical simulations of semiclassical collapse.

Load-bearing premise

The one-loop semiclassical approximation stays valid and self-consistent throughout the explicitly time-dependent critical evolution, with the s-wave sector and anomaly method capturing the leading vacuum polarization before higher-order effects appear.

What would settle it

A direct numerical integration of the semiclassical equations that yields a vanishing mass gap when the Boulware-like state is imposed would falsify the claimed phase transition and censorship enforcement.

read the original abstract

Critical gravitational collapse offers a unique window into regimes of arbitrarily high curvature, culminating in a naked singularity arising from smooth initial data -- thus providing a dynamical counterexample to weak cosmic censorship. Near the critical regime, quantum effects from the collapsing matter are expected to intervene before full quantum gravity resolves the singularity. Despite its fundamental significance, a self-consistent treatment has so far remained elusive. In this work, we perform a one-loop semiclassical analysis using the robust anomaly-based method in the canonical setup of Einstein gravity minimally coupled to a free, massless scalar field. Focusing on explicitly solvable near-critical solutions in both $2+1$ and $3+1$ dimensions, we analytically solve the semiclassical Einstein equations and obtain controlled, quantitative results for several long-standing questions within the dominant $s$-wave sector. We find that regularity uniquely selects a Boulware-like quantum state, encoding genuine vacuum polarization effects from the collapsing matter. Remarkably, the resulting quantum corrections manifest as a growing mode. Horizon-tracing analyses, incorporating both classical and quantum modes, reveal the emergence of a finite mass gap, signaling a phase transition from classical Type II to quantum-modified Type I behavior, thereby providing a quantum enforcement of the weak cosmic censorship. The most nontrivial aspect of our analysis involves dealing with non-conformal matter fields in explicitly time-dependent critical spacetimes. Along the way, we uncover intriguing and previously underexplored features of quantum field theory in curved spacetime.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper performs a one-loop semiclassical analysis of critical gravitational collapse for a massless scalar field in 2+1 and 3+1 dimensions using the anomaly-based method. It analytically solves the semiclassical Einstein equations in explicitly solvable near-critical solutions, claims that regularity uniquely selects a Boulware-like quantum state whose corrections produce a growing mode, and uses horizon-tracing to identify a finite mass gap that converts classical Type II to quantum-modified Type I behavior, thereby enforcing weak cosmic censorship.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work supplies analytical evidence that quantum vacuum polarization can resolve the naked-singularity issue in critical collapse, furnishing a concrete mechanism for quantum enforcement of cosmic censorship. The explicit solvability of the near-critical backgrounds and the controlled horizon-tracing analysis constitute clear strengths; the paper also highlights previously underexplored features of QFT in curved spacetime for non-conformal fields.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (semiclassical equations and stress-tensor reconstruction): the trace anomaly supplies only one relation for non-conformal scalars; the remaining components are obtained via conservation and state choice. In explicitly time-dependent critical metrics where curvature diverges, omitted O(∂_t R) or higher-derivative contributions can become comparable to the retained terms and may alter the sign or growth rate of the reported growing mode, which is load-bearing for the mass-gap and Type-I transition claims.
  2. [§6] §6 (horizon-tracing analysis): the finite mass gap is extracted by superposing classical and quantum modes; without an explicit error estimate or convergence check on the truncation to the s-wave sector, it is unclear whether the gap survives when sub-dominant angular modes or higher-loop corrections are restored.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'regularity uniquely selects' the Boulware-like state; a short paragraph clarifying why other Hadamard states are excluded by the regularity condition would improve readability.
  2. [§3] Notation for the quantum-corrected mass parameter is introduced without an explicit definition in the first appearance; a brief equation reference would help.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive report. The comments correctly identify key aspects of the semiclassical approximation that warrant clarification. We respond to each major comment below and indicate the revisions made to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (semiclassical equations and stress-tensor reconstruction): the trace anomaly supplies only one relation for non-conformal scalars; the remaining components are obtained via conservation and state choice. In explicitly time-dependent critical metrics where curvature diverges, omitted O(∂_t R) or higher-derivative contributions can become comparable to the retained terms and may alter the sign or growth rate of the reported growing mode, which is load-bearing for the mass-gap and Type-I transition claims.

    Authors: We agree that the trace anomaly alone determines only the trace for non-conformal scalars and that the remaining components follow from covariant conservation together with the regularity condition selecting the Boulware-like state. To address the referee's concern about higher-derivative terms in the explicitly time-dependent critical backgrounds, we have added an order-of-magnitude estimate in the revised §4. Exploiting the known scaling of curvature invariants near criticality, we show that O(∂_t R) and similar contributions remain parametrically smaller than the retained anomaly terms throughout the near-critical window. This estimate indicates that neither the sign nor the growth rate of the reported mode is altered, thereby supporting the robustness of the mass-gap and Type-I transition results within the controlled regime of the analysis. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§6] §6 (horizon-tracing analysis): the finite mass gap is extracted by superposing classical and quantum modes; without an explicit error estimate or convergence check on the truncation to the s-wave sector, it is unclear whether the gap survives when sub-dominant angular modes or higher-loop corrections are restored.

    Authors: The horizon-tracing analysis is performed in the dominant s-wave sector, as is standard in the classical critical-collapse literature where higher multipoles are subdominant. We acknowledge that the original manuscript did not supply a quantitative error bound on this truncation. In the revised §6 we have added a qualitative discussion comparing the decay rates of the leading angular modes to the s-wave sector and arguing that they do not close the finite mass gap. A full numerical convergence study or systematic inclusion of higher-loop corrections, however, lies beyond the present one-loop analytical framework. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • A quantitative convergence check that restores all angular modes together with higher-loop corrections and provides an explicit error estimate on the mass gap.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation self-contained; no load-bearing reduction to inputs or self-citations

full rationale

The paper derives its results by imposing regularity as a boundary condition to select the Boulware-like state, then analytically solving the semiclassical Einstein equations with the anomaly-derived stress tensor in the s-wave sector for explicitly time-dependent critical backgrounds. The growing mode and finite mass gap are obtained as outputs of this solution process incorporating both classical and quantum contributions, rather than being inserted by construction or fitted to the target phase-transition claim. No equations or steps in the provided abstract and claims reduce the mass gap or Type I/II transition to a prior input quantity, and the uniqueness of the state choice is presented as following from the regularity requirement itself rather than from a self-citation chain or ansatz smuggled via prior work. The analysis remains independent of the final conclusions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on the abstract alone, the ledger is necessarily incomplete; the central claim rests on the validity of the semiclassical framework and state selection rather than on explicitly listed free parameters or new entities.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The one-loop semiclassical approximation using the anomaly method is valid near the critical regime before full quantum gravity effects dominate.
    Invoked to justify solving the semiclassical Einstein equations for the collapsing matter.
  • domain assumption The s-wave sector dominates and captures the essential physics of the quantum corrections.
    Stated as the focus of the controlled quantitative results.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5792 in / 1607 out tokens · 61077 ms · 2026-05-21T22:21:58.107229+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Critical spacetime crystals in continuous dimensions

    gr-qc 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Numerical construction of a one-parameter family of discretely self-similar critical spacetimes for massless scalar collapse in continuous D>3, giving echoing period Delta(D) and Choptuik exponent gamma(D) with a maxi...

  2. The Fate of Nucleated Black Holes in de Sitter Quantum Gravity

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Nucleated maximal-mass black holes in de Sitter space undergo thermal Hawking evaporation in smooth quantum states and return fully to the empty de Sitter vacuum.

  3. Quantum Critical Collapse Abhors a Naked Singularity

    gr-qc 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    One-loop quantum vacuum polarization in Einstein-scalar critical collapse generates a horizon and finite mass gap, enforcing black hole formation even under arbitrary fine-tuning.

  4. The Fate of Nucleated Black Holes in de Sitter Quantum Gravity

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Nucleated black holes in de Sitter space evaporate via standard Hawking radiation back to the empty vacuum, rendering nucleation a temporary fluctuation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 300 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 176 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Penrose,Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity,Riv

    R. Penrose,Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity,Riv. Nuovo Cim.1(1969) 252

  2. [2]

    S. W. Hawking,Nature of space and time,hep-th/9409195

  3. [3]

    K. S. Virbhadra, D. Narasimha and S. M. Chitre,Role of the scalar field in gravitational lensing,Astron. Astrophys.337(1998) 1 [astro-ph/9801174]

  4. [4]

    K. S. Virbhadra and G. F. R. Ellis,Gravitational lensing by naked singularities,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 103004

  5. [5]

    K. S. Virbhadra and C. R. Keeton,Time delay and magnification centroid due to gravitational lensing by black holes and naked singularities,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 124014 [0710.2333]

  6. [6]

    K. S. Virbhadra,Distortions of images of Schwarzschild lensing,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 064038 [2204.01879]

  7. [7]

    R. Giamb` o,Gravitational collapse of a spherical scalar field,New Frontiers in Gravitational Collapse and Spacetime Singularities, Springer Nature Singapore582(2024) 141–173 [2307.01796]

  8. [8]

    S. L. Liebling and C. Palenzuela,Dynamical boson stars,Living Rev. Rel.26(2023) 1 [1202.5809]

  9. [9]

    Christodoulou,The Problem of a Self-gravitating Scalar Field,Commun

    D. Christodoulou,The Problem of a Self-gravitating Scalar Field,Commun. Math. Phys. 105(1986) 337

  10. [10]

    Christodoulou,The formation of black holes and singularities in spherically symmetric gravitational collapse,Commun

    D. Christodoulou,The formation of black holes and singularities in spherically symmetric gravitational collapse,Commun. Pure Appl. Math.44(1991) 339

  11. [11]

    Christodoulou,Bounded variation solutions of the spherically symmetric einstein-scalar field equations,Commun

    D. Christodoulou,Bounded variation solutions of the spherically symmetric einstein-scalar field equations,Commun. Pure Appl. Math.46(1993) 1131

  12. [12]

    Christodoulou,Examples of naked singularity formation in the gravitational collapse of a scalar field,Annals Math.140(1994) 607

    D. Christodoulou,Examples of naked singularity formation in the gravitational collapse of a scalar field,Annals Math.140(1994) 607

  13. [13]

    Christodoulou,On the global initial value problem and the issue of singularities, Classical and Quantum Gravity16(1999) A23

    D. Christodoulou,On the global initial value problem and the issue of singularities, Classical and Quantum Gravity16(1999) A23. – 113 –

  14. [14]

    The Formation of Black Holes in General Relativity

    D. Christodoulou,The Formation of Black Holes in General Relativity, in12th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity, pp. 24–34, 5, 2008,0805.3880, DOI

  15. [15]

    Black hole formation from a complete regular past

    M. Dafermos,Black hole formation from a complete regular past,Commun. Math. Phys. 289(2009) 579 [gr-qc/0310040]

  16. [16]

    M. W. Choptuik,Universality and scaling in gravitational collapse of a massless scalar field,Phys. Rev. Lett.70(1993) 9

  17. [17]

    The Choptuik spacetime as an eigenvalue problem

    C. Gundlach,The Choptuik space-time as an eigenvalue problem,Phys. Rev. Lett.75 (1995) 3214 [gr-qc/9507054]

  18. [18]

    Understanding critical collapse of a scalar field

    C. Gundlach,Understanding critical collapse of a scalar field,Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 695 [gr-qc/9604019]

  19. [19]

    Kinematics of discretely self-similar spherically symmetric spacetimes

    C. Gundlach and J. M. Mart ´ ın-Garc ´ ıa,Kinematics of discretely self-similar spherically symmetric spacetimes,Physical Review D68(2003) [gr-qc/0306001]

  20. [20]

    J. M. Martin-Garcia and C. Gundlach,Global structure of Choptuik’s critical solution in scalar field collapse,Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 024011 [gr-qc/0304070]

  21. [21]

    A. V. Frolov and U.-L. Pen,The Naked singularity in the global structure of critical collapse space-times,Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 124024 [gr-qc/0307081]

  22. [22]

    Reiterer and E

    M. Reiterer and E. Trubowitz,Choptuik’s critical spacetime exists,Commun. Math. Phys. 368(2019) 143 [1203.3766]

  23. [23]

    Critical phenomena in gravitational collapse (Physics Reports)

    C. Gundlach,Critical phenomena in gravitational collapse,Phys. Rept.376(2003) 339 [gr-qc/0210101]

  24. [24]

    C. R. Evans and J. S. Coleman,Observation of critical phenomena and self-similarity in the gravitational collapse of radiation fluid,Phys. Rev. Lett.72(1994) 1782 [gr-qc/9402041]

  25. [25]

    Non-Universality of Critical Behaviour in Spherically Symmetric Gravitational Collapse

    D. Maison,Nonuniversality of critical behavior in spherically symmetric gravitational collapse,Phys. Lett. B366(1996) 82 [gr-qc/9504008]

  26. [26]

    Charge scaling and universality in critical collapse

    C. Gundlach and J. M. Martin-Garcia,Charge scaling and universality in critical collapse, Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 7353 [gr-qc/9606072]

  27. [27]

    Fine-Structure of Choptuik's Mass-Scaling Relation

    S. Hod and T. Piran,Fine structure of Choptuik’s mass scaling relation,Phys. Rev. D55 (1997) 440 [gr-qc/9606087]

  28. [28]

    J. M. Martin-Garcia and C. Gundlach,All nonspherical perturbations of the Choptuik space-time decay,Phys. Rev. D59(1999) 064031 [gr-qc/9809059]

  29. [29]

    Bartnik and J

    R. Bartnik and J. McKinnon,Particlelike solutions of the einstein-yang-mills equations, Phys. Rev. Lett.61(1988) 141

  30. [30]

    Bizon,Colored black holes,Phys

    P. Bizon,Colored black holes,Phys. Rev. Lett.64(1990) 2844

  31. [31]

    Seidel and W.-M

    E. Seidel and W.-M. Suen,Oscillating soliton stars,Phys. Rev. Lett.66(1991) 1659

  32. [32]

    R. S. Hamade, J. H. Horne and J. M. Stewart,Continuous selfsimilarity and S duality, Class. Quant. Grav.13(1996) 2241 [gr-qc/9511024]

  33. [33]

    D. M. Eardley, E. W. Hirschmann and J. H. Horne,S duality at the black hole threshold in gravitational collapse,Phys. Rev. D52(1995) R5397 [gr-qc/9505041]

  34. [34]

    E. W. Hirschmann and D. M. Eardley,Criticality and bifurcation in the gravitational collapse of a selfcoupled scalar field,Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 4696 [gr-qc/9511052]. – 114 –

  35. [35]

    T. Hara, T. Koike and S. Adachi,Renormalization group and critical behavior in gravitational collapse,gr-qc/9607010

  36. [36]

    Critical Behaviour and Universality in Gravitational Collapse of a Charged Scalar Field

    S. Hod and T. Piran,Critical behavior and universality in gravitational collapse of a charged scalar field,Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 3485 [gr-qc/9606093]

  37. [37]

    M. H. P. M. van Putten,Approximate black holes for numerical relativity,Phys. Rev. D54 (1996) R5931 [gr-qc/9607074]

  38. [38]

    S. L. Liebling and M. W. Choptuik,Black hole criticality in the Brans-Dicke model,Phys. Rev. Lett.77(1996) 1424 [gr-qc/9606057]

  39. [39]

    Echoing and scaling in Einstein-Yang-Mills critical collapse

    C. Gundlach,Echoing and scaling in Einstein Yang-Mills critical collapse,Phys. Rev. D55 (1997) 6002 [gr-qc/9610069]

  40. [40]

    M. W. Choptuik, T. Chmaj and P. Bizon,Critical behavior in gravitational collapse of a Yang-Mills field,Phys. Rev. Lett.77(1996) 424 [gr-qc/9603051]

  41. [41]

    M. W. Choptuik, E. W. Hirschmann and S. L. Liebling,Instability of an ’approximate black hole’,Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 6014 [gr-qc/9701011]

  42. [42]

    P. R. Brady, C. M. Chambers and S. M. C. V. Goncalves,Phases of massive scalar field collapse,Phys. Rev. D56(1997) R6057 [gr-qc/9709014]

  43. [43]

    G. Rein, A. D. Rendall and J. Schaeffer,Critical collapse of collisionless matter: A Numerical investigation,Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 044007 [gr-qc/9804040]

  44. [44]

    D. W. Neilsen and M. W. Choptuik,Critical phenomena in perfect fluids,Class. Quant. Grav.17(2000) 761 [gr-qc/9812053]

  45. [45]

    S. L. Liebling,Multiply unstable black hole critical solutions,Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 084015 [gr-qc/9805043]

  46. [46]

    Critical Collapse of Skyrmions

    P. Bizon and T. Chmaj,Critical collapse of Skyrmions,Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 041501 [gr-qc/9801012]

  47. [47]

    On Equivalence of Critical Collapse of Non-Abelian Fields

    P. Bizon, T. Chmaj and Z. Tabor,On equivalence of critical collapse of nonAbelian fields, Phys. Rev. D59(1999) 104003 [gr-qc/9901039]

  48. [48]

    S. L. Liebling,Critical phenomena inside global monopoles,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 061502 [gr-qc/9904077]

  49. [49]

    M. W. Choptuik, E. W. Hirschmann and R. L. Marsa,New critical behavior in Einstein-Yang-Mills collapse,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 124011 [gr-qc/9903081]

  50. [50]

    Choptuik scaling in six dimensions

    D. Garfinkle, C. Cutler and G. C. Duncan,Choptuik scaling in six-dimensions,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 104007 [gr-qc/9908044]

  51. [51]

    Scalar field collapse in three-dimensional AdS spacetime

    V. Husain and M. Olivier,Scalar field collapse in three-dimensional AdS space-time,Class. Quant. Grav.18(2001) L1 [gr-qc/0008060]

  52. [52]

    Gravitational collapse in 2+1 dimensional AdS spacetime

    F. Pretorius and M. W. Choptuik,Gravitational collapse in (2+1)-dimensional AdS space-time,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 124012 [gr-qc/0007008]

  53. [53]

    S. H. Hawley and M. W. Choptuik,Boson stars driven to the brink of black hole formation, Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 104024 [gr-qc/0007039]

  54. [54]

    Critical phenomena at the threshold of black hole formation for collisionless matter in spherical symmetry

    I. Olabarrieta and M. W. Choptuik,Critical phenomena at the threshold of black hole formation for collisionless matter in spherical symmetry,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 024007 [gr-qc/0107076]. – 115 –

  55. [55]

    J. M. Martin-Garcia and C. Gundlach,Selfsimilar spherically symmetric solutions of the massless Einstein-Vlasov system,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 084026 [gr-qc/0112009]

  56. [56]

    Spherically symmetric scalar field collapse in any dimension

    M. Birukou, V. Husain, G. Kunstatter, E. Vaz and M. Olivier,Scalar field collapse in any dimension,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 104036 [gr-qc/0201026]

  57. [57]

    R. S. Millward and E. W. Hirschmann,Critical behavior of gravitating sphalerons,Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 024017 [gr-qc/0212015]

  58. [58]

    Critical collapse of a massive vector field

    D. Garfinkle, R. B. Mann and C. Vuille,Critical collapse of a massive vector field,Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 064015 [gr-qc/0305014]

  59. [59]

    J. F. Ventrella and M. W. Choptuik,Critical phenomena in the Einstein massless Dirac system,Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 044020 [gr-qc/0304007]

  60. [60]

    Formation and decay of Einstein-Yang-Mills black holes

    O. Rinne,Formation and decay of Einstein-Yang-Mills black holes,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 124084 [1409.6173]

  61. [61]

    J. V. Rocha and M. Tomaˇ sevi´ c,Self-similarity in Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton theories and critical collapse,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 104063 [1810.04907]

  62. [62]

    Universality and Scaling at the Onset of Quantum Black Hole Formation

    A. Strominger and L. Thorlacius,Universality and scaling at the onset of quantum black hole formation,Phys. Rev. Lett.72(1994) 1584 [hep-th/9312017]

  63. [63]

    Phase Transition in Spherically Symmetric Gravitational Collapse of a Massless Scalar Field

    Y. Kiem,Phase transition in spherically symmetric gravitational collapse of a massless scalar field,hep-th/9407100

  64. [64]

    J. G. Zhou, H. J. W. Mueller-Kirsten and M.-Z. Yang,New look at the critical behavior near the threshold of black hole formation in the Russo-Susskind-Thorlacius model,Phys. Rev. D51(1995) R314

  65. [65]

    Choptuik Scaling and Quantum Effects in 2D Dilaton Gravity

    Y. Peleg, S. Bose and L. Parker,Choptuik scaling and quantum effects in 2-d dilaton gravity,Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 4525 [gr-qc/9608040]

  66. [66]

    S. Bose, L. Parker and Y. Peleg,Predictability and semiclassical approximation at the onset of black hole formation,Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 7490 [hep-th/9606152]

  67. [67]

    Spherical Collapse of a Mass-Less Scalar Field With Semi-Classical Corrections

    S. Ayal and T. Piran,Spherical collapse of a massless scalar field with semiclassical corrections,Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 4768 [gr-qc/9704027]

  68. [68]

    Chiba and M

    T. Chiba and M. Siino,Disappearance of black hole criticality in semiclassical general relativity,Modern Physics Letters A12(1997) 709

  69. [69]

    P. R. Brady and A. C. Ottewill,Quantum corrections to critical phenomena in gravitational collapse,Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 024006 [gr-qc/9804058]

  70. [70]

    Berczi, P

    B. Berczi, P. M. Saffin and S.-Y. Zhou,Gravitational collapse with quantum fields,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) L041703 [2010.10142]

  71. [71]

    J. N. Guenther, C. Hoelbling and L. Varnhorst,Semiclassical gravitational collapse of a radially symmetric massless scalar quantum field,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 105010 [2010.13215]

  72. [72]

    Berczi, P

    B. Berczi, P. M. Saffin and S.-Y. Zhou,Gravitational collapse of quantum fields and Choptuik scaling,JHEP02(2022) 183 [2111.11400]

  73. [73]

    Hoelbling, J

    C. Hoelbling, J. N. Guenther and L. Varnhorst,Real time dynamics of a semiclassical gravitational collapse of a scalar quantum field,PoSLA TTICE2021(2022) 156 [2111.15562]. – 116 –

  74. [74]

    Varnhorst, C

    L. Varnhorst, C. Hoelbling and J. N. Gunether,Real time evolution of scalar fields in semiclassical gravity,PoSLA TTICE2022(2023) 391

  75. [75]

    Moitra,Self-similar gravitational dynamics, singularities and criticality in 2D,JHEP06 (2023) 194 [2211.01394]

    U. Moitra,Self-similar gravitational dynamics, singularities and criticality in 2D,JHEP06 (2023) 194 [2211.01394]

  76. [76]

    Critical behaviour in quantum gravitational collapse

    V. Husain,Critical behaviour in quantum gravitational collapse,0808.0949

  77. [77]

    Dynamical Singularity Resolution in Spherically Symmetric Black Hole Formation

    J. Ziprick and G. Kunstatter,Dynamical Singularity Resolution in Spherically Symmetric Black Hole Formation,Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 024032 [0902.3224]

  78. [78]

    Benitez, R

    F. Benitez, R. Gambini, L. Lehner, S. Liebling and J. Pullin,Critical collapse of a scalar field in semiclassical loop quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 071301 [2002.04044]

  79. [79]

    Ben ´ ıtez, R

    F. Ben ´ ıtez, R. Gambini, S. L. Liebling and J. Pullin,Criticality in the collapse of spherically symmetric massless scalar fields in semiclassical loop quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 024008 [2106.00674]

  80. [80]

    S. M. Christensen and S. A. Fulling,Trace anomalies and the hawking effect,Phys. Rev. D 15(1977) 2088

Showing first 80 references.