REVIEW 17 cited by
Wave Effects in Gravitational Lensing of Gravitational Waves from Chirping Binaries
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Wave Effects in Gravitational Lensing of Gravitational Waves from Chirping Binaries
read the original abstract
In the gravitational lensing of gravitational waves, the wave optics should be used instead of the geometrical optics when the wavelength $\lambda$ of the gravitational waves is longer than the Schwarzschild radius of the lens mass $M_L$. For the gravitational lensing of the chirp signals from the coalescence of the super massive black holes at the redshift $z_S\sim 1$ relevant to LISA, the wave effects become important for the lens mass smaller than $\sim 10^8 M_{\odot}$. For such cases, we compute how accurately we can extract the mass of the lens and the source position from the lensed signal. We consider two simple lens models: the point mass lens and the SIS (Singular Isothermal Sphere). We find that the lens mass and the source position can be determined within $\sim 0.1% [(S/N)/10^3]^{-1}$ for the lens mass larger than $10^8 M_{\odot}$ and $\gsim 10% [(S/N)/10^3]^{-1}$ for the lens mass smaller than $10^7 M_{\odot}$ due to the diffraction effect, where $(S/N)$ is the signal to noise ratio of the unlensed chirp signals. For the SIS model, if the source position is outside the Einstein radius, only a single image exists in the geometrical optics approximation so that the lens parameters can not be determined. While in the wave optics cases we find that the lens mass can be determined even for $M_L < 10^8 M_{\odot}$. For the point mass lens, one can extract the lens parameters even if the source position is far outside the Einstein radius. As a result, the lensing cross section is an order of magnitude larger than that for the usual strong lensing of light.
Forward citations
Cited by 17 Pith papers
-
Wave-optics gravitational wave lensing in modified gravity
In a curvature-coupled propagation framework for modified gravity, gravitational-wave lensing in wave optics shows persistent infrared interactions that prevent the amplification factor from approaching unity at zero ...
-
Effective description of lensed gravitational waves diffracted by stellar fields
Authors synthesize SVD-based reduced-order models from wave-optics simulations to provide an effective stochastic description of stellar microlensing distortions on lensed gravitational waves.
-
Probing Dark Matter Substructure with Wave-Optics Distortions of Strongly Lensed LISA Gravitational Waves
Simulated four-year-LISA lensed waveforms show fuzzy-dark-matter substructure leaves a frequency-dependent phase residual that distinguishes it from NFW or self-interacting halos with ~60–110 resolved images.
-
The diffraction-lensing interpretation of GW231123 with astrophysical priors
GW231123 is better fit by a lower-mass merger diffracted by an isolated ~1000 M_sun lens, but astrophysical priors and a frequentist rate estimate make this lensing interpretation unlikely.
-
Identifying lensed gravitational waves with physics-informed posterior learning
Fusing a simulation-trained common-source mass posterior with waveform features raises lensed-event detection efficiency from 20.8% to 35.2% at 1% false-positive rate and lowers the SNR for 50% efficiency from 45.3 to 33.5.
-
Identification of Lensed Gravitational-Wave Beat Patterns by LISA
Strong lensing of MBHBs produces identifiable beat patterns in about 7% of detectable two-image LISA events, with Bayesian inference recovering time delay and magnification parameters.
-
GW231123: False Massive Graviton Signatures from Unmodeled Point-Mass Lensing
Unmodeled point-mass lensing produces a spurious nonzero graviton mass posterior in GW231123 that vanishes when lensing is included in the analysis.
-
Improved Identification of Strongly Lensed Gravitational Waves with Host Galaxy Locations
A two-step Bayesian reweighting scheme using Euclid galaxy locations boosts the Bayes factor for true lensed GW pairs by a factor of about 10 while lowering it for unlensed coincidences.
-
Parameter inference of millilensed gravitational waves using neural spline flows
Neural spline flows perform fast posterior inference on 11-dimensional millilensed GW parameters with accuracy comparable to dynesty for most quantities and a 3-day to 0.8-second speedup.
-
Detection of cosmic strings by gravitational wave lensing. Predictions for Einstein Telescope
Simulated cosmic-string lensing of binary black holes predicts Einstein Telescope would detect the events and infer Gµ ≈ 1e-10, though the source geometry is assumed ad hoc.
-
Prospect for Detection of Strongly Lensed Multi-messenger Signals of Binary Neutron Star Mergers
Future CE+ET detectors may detect lensed BNS kilonovae at ~0.5/yr via pointed follow-up of known galaxy lenses, while lensed sGRBs and afterglows remain rare or undetectable with current-generation facilities.
-
Finite-Core Signatures in LISA-Band Wave-Optics Lensing by Low-Mass Dark Matter Halos
Finite cores in low-mass dark matter halos produce distinct complex residuals in LISA-band wave-optics amplification that cannot be fully mimicked by lower-concentration NFW profiles and peak at rc/rs ≃ 0.25-0.3.
-
GW231123: Overlapping Gravitational Wave Signals?
GW231123 data favors an overlapping two-signal model over a single merger with Bayes factors of 100-10000, mitigating waveform-dependent discrepancies and suggesting possible gravitational lensing.
-
Retrieving the True Masses of Gravitational-wave Sources
Hydrodynamic drag makes BBH waveforms resemble higher-mass vacuum sources, biasing matched-filter chirp-mass estimates upward for LISA sources.
-
Measuring the Hubble constant with strongly lensed gravitational waves from space-based detector networks
Simulations indicate joint Taiji+LISA analysis of five SLGW events yields H0 95% credible interval uncertainties of 0.11 (source redshift unknown) or 0.042 (source redshift known).
-
Effects of formation channels and gravitational lensing on stochastic gravitational wave background
Using HBI on GWTC-4 data the authors compute lensed SGWBs for ABHs and PBHs and conclude that LIGO and ET can distinguish the two formation channels in specific frequency ranges, with ET offering broader coverage.
-
The Science of the Einstein Telescope
The paper provides state-of-the-art predictions for the Einstein Telescope's impact on fundamental physics, cosmology, compact-object astrophysics, and multi-messenger astronomy across its proposed configurations.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.