arxiv: 2512.10344 · v1 · submitted 2025-12-11 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Recognition: no theorem link

Improved Identification of Strongly Lensed Gravitational Waves with Host Galaxy Locations

Tonghua Liu , Kai Liao

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 23:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO

keywords strong gravitational lensinggravitational wavesBayes factorEuclid surveypositional priorsBayesian inferencemulti-messengerfalse positive reduction

0 comments

The pith

Incorporating positions from the Euclid galaxy lens catalog increases the Bayes factor for true strongly lensed gravitational wave pairs by a factor of about 10.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors develop a Bayesian framework to better identify strongly lensed gravitational waves by adding positional information from the Euclid galaxy lens catalog. They use a two-step process: first estimate parameters with a uniform sky prior, then reweight the catalog galaxies to create an informed prior. This prior change has little effect on the waveform parameters themselves but causes the Bayes factor to rise for actual lensed pairs and fall for unrelated coincidences. A reader would care because this multi-messenger technique raises the reliability of lensing claims without altering core gravitational wave analysis. The approach cuts false positives while boosting true signals by roughly a factor of ten on average.

Core claim

The paper establishes that replacing a uniform positional prior with one derived from reweighting the Euclid galaxy catalog produces a dual improvement in lensing searches: the Bayes factor for truly lensed gravitational wave event pairs increases by an average factor of ∼10, while the Bayes factor for unlensed pairs decreases, thereby enhancing discrimination between real lenses and chance coincidences.

What carries the argument

A two-step reweighting scheme that first performs gravitational wave parameter estimation under a uniform sky prior and then uses the resulting posterior to reweight positions in the Euclid galaxy lens catalog, yielding an astrophysically informed positional prior for the lensing hypothesis test.

Load-bearing premise

The Euclid galaxy lens catalog provides accurate, complete, and unbiased positional information that translates directly into a valid astrophysical prior without selection biases or mismatches.

What would settle it

A controlled test on simulated datasets containing a known mixture of lensed and unlensed gravitational wave pairs, verifying that the Bayes factor rises exclusively for the lensed subset and falls for the unlensed subset.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.10344 by Kai Liao, Tonghua Liu.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Reweighted Euclid lens galaxy prior after incorpo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Combined corner plot comparing posterior distributions for lensed gravitational wave signal parameters under different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Comparison of the restricted Bayes factors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We present a Bayesian framework that enhances the identification of strongly lensed gravitational waves (GWs) by incorporating informative positional priors from the Euclid galaxy lens catalog. The core of our method introduces a two-step reweighting scheme: first, gravitational wave parameter estimation is performed under a uniform sky prior; the resulting posterior is then used to reweight galaxy positions within the Euclid catalog, constructing an astrophysically informed positional prior. Comparing this Euclid-informed prior against a uniform prior within our framework reveals distinct behaviors. While the posterior estimates of the intrinsic waveform parameters show little sensitivity to the prior change, the Bayes factor for lensing identification exhibits significant prior dependence. Crucially, for truly lensed event pairs, the Bayes factor systematically increases, whereas for unlensed pairs it decreases. This dual effect is vital for robust discrimination. Our analysis demonstrates that this multi-messenger approach significantly improves the confidence of lensing searches. For lensed pairs, the method boosts the Bayes factor by an average factor of $\sim 10$, while effectively suppressing false positives for unlensed coincidences. This underscores the critical importance of prior specification and showcases the substantial gains achievable by synergizing gravitational-wave data with electromagnetic survey information.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The two-step reweighting with Euclid positions gives a useful boost to lensing Bayes factors for true events while cutting false positives, but catalog selection effects need checking.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that the authors lay out a two-step Bayesian reweighting that takes a uniform-sky posterior from gravitational-wave parameter estimation and uses it to reweight positions from the Euclid galaxy catalog into an informed prior. For true lensed pairs the lensing Bayes factor goes up, while for unlensed coincidences it goes down; they quote an average factor-of-10 improvement on the lensed side. The waveform parameters themselves stay largely unchanged, which is consistent with the prior acting mostly on the sky location piece. That dual effect is the concrete advance and follows directly from standard reweighting once the catalog is in hand. The approach is new in its specific combination for this problem and could matter for tightening lensing searches once catalogs improve. The soft spot is the missing detail on catalog handling. The abstract gives no sign that magnitude limits, redshift cuts, or depth variations were corrected before reweighting, so the prior density could be artificially low in incomplete sky patches and produce an overstated drop in the unlensed Bayes factor. They also supply no numbers on event count, simulation volume, or uncertainty on the factor-of-10 figure, leaving the quantitative claim only loosely supported. The logic is standard and the thinking is clear, but the result rests on an untested assumption about catalog fidelity. This is aimed at the small group already working on strongly lensed gravitational waves and multi-messenger priors. It is worth sending to referees so they can check the catalog corrections and the simulation setup rather than desk-rejecting it outright.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a Bayesian framework for identifying strongly lensed gravitational waves by incorporating positional priors from the Euclid galaxy lens catalog. It describes a two-step reweighting procedure: gravitational-wave parameter estimation is first performed under a uniform sky prior, after which the resulting posterior is used to reweight galaxy positions in the Euclid catalog and construct an astrophysically informed prior. The central result is that this Euclid-informed prior increases the lensing Bayes factor for true lensed event pairs (by an average factor of ∼10) while decreasing it for unlensed coincidences, thereby improving discrimination.

Significance. If the central result holds after addressing catalog selection effects, the work would provide a practical multi-messenger tool that could meaningfully raise the reliability of strongly lensed GW searches. The reported dual effect on Bayes factors directly targets the false-positive problem that currently limits lensing analyses, and the approach is timely given the expected growth in GW event rates and the availability of wide-field surveys such as Euclid.

major comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: the reported average factor-of-∼10 boost in Bayes factor for true lenses and the suppression for unlensed pairs is obtained by direct reweighting of raw Euclid catalog positions. No correction for position-dependent selection effects (magnitude limits, redshift cuts, or survey-depth variations) is described; such effects would make the effective prior non-astrophysical and could produce an artificial suppression of the unlensed Bayes factor that would not survive once the catalog selection function is restored.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: quantitative details on the number of simulated lensed and unlensed event pairs, the precise simulation setup, and the statistical uncertainty on the reported average Bayes-factor ratio are not provided, making it difficult to assess the robustness of the ∼10 factor.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful review and positive assessment of the work's potential significance. We address the single major comment below and will incorporate clarifications and additional analysis in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the reported average factor-of-∼10 boost in Bayes factor for true lenses and the suppression for unlensed pairs is obtained by direct reweighting of raw Euclid catalog positions. No correction for position-dependent selection effects (magnitude limits, redshift cuts, or survey-depth variations) is described; such effects would make the effective prior non-astrophysical and could produce an artificial suppression of the unlensed Bayes factor that would not survive once the catalog selection function is restored.

Authors: We agree that the current implementation applies the Euclid catalog positions directly without an explicit position-dependent selection function. This is a genuine limitation of the presented analysis: the reported Bayes-factor ratios are conditioned on the observed catalog as provided, and restoring a full selection model could in principle alter the quantitative suppression for unlensed coincidences. In the revised manuscript we will (i) add an explicit statement in the abstract and methods clarifying that the Euclid catalog is used without selection-function weighting, (ii) include a new subsection discussing the dominant selection effects (magnitude limit, redshift range, and depth variations) and their expected impact on the positional prior, and (iii) perform a simple sensitivity test by applying a uniform magnitude cut and re-computing the Bayes-factor ratios to quantify robustness. These additions will not change the core two-step reweighting framework but will make the scope and limitations of the result transparent. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard Bayesian reweighting with external catalog

full rationale

The derivation consists of performing parameter estimation under a uniform sky prior, then reweighting positions drawn from the independent Euclid galaxy catalog to form an informed prior, followed by direct computation of the Bayes factor for lensing. This produces the reported factor-of-~10 boost for true lenses and suppression for unlensed pairs as a numerical outcome of the two-step procedure rather than by definitional identity, fitted-parameter renaming, or self-citation load-bearing. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results is invoked; the central claim remains independent of the paper's own equations and rests on external catalog data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework relies on standard Bayesian inference with an initial uniform sky prior and the assumption that the Euclid catalog can serve as a direct source of positional information. No free parameters are introduced or fitted in the described procedure.

axioms (2)

standard math Initial gravitational-wave parameter estimation uses a uniform sky prior
Standard assumption in GW parameter estimation pipelines
domain assumption Euclid galaxy catalog provides suitable positional priors for lensing galaxies
Invoked when reweighting galaxy positions to form the informed prior

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5505 in / 1321 out tokens · 26174 ms · 2026-05-16T23:48:16.335601+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Gravitational Lensing of Gravitational Waves from Astrophysical Sources: Theory, Detection, and Applications
astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

A review of gravitational lensing of astrophysical gravitational waves, outlining theory in geometric and wave optics, identification methods, predicted rates, and applications to dark matter and cosmology.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 19 internal anchors

[1]

Unlensed hypothesis( HU): The dataset {d1, d2} contains signals from two independent binary black hole merger events with physical parametersθ1 and θ2 being independent

Key Hypotheses and Bayes Factor Definition The problem of gravitational wave lens identification is fundamentally a comparison between two competing hypotheses: Lensed hypothesis( HL): The dataset{d1, d2} con- tains lensed signals from a single binary black hole merger event with physical parametersθ1 = θ2 = θ (excluding lensing-modified parameters like t...

work page
[2]

Our analysis implements two distinct computational pipelines, reflecting realistic data analysis scenarios with different prior assumptions

Inference Pipelines with Different Priors We develop a systematic framework to evaluate the impact of prior choice on strong lensing identification, denoting BL U as B for simplicity. Our analysis implements two distinct computational pipelines, reflecting realistic data analysis scenarios with different prior assumptions. Uniform Prior Pipeline: The Baye...

work page
[3]

The signals correspond to binary black hole (BBH) mergers lensed by massive early-type galaxies, modeled with a Singular Isothermal Ellipsoid (SIE) density pro- file

Simulation and Parameter Estimation Setup To simulate lensed GW events, we generate timeseries data by injecting simulated GW signals into colored Gaus- sian noise consistent with the ET-D power spectral density (PSD). The signals correspond to binary black hole (BBH) mergers lensed by massive early-type galaxies, modeled with a Singular Isothermal Ellips...

work page 2048
[4]

Y. Wang, A. Stebbins, and E. L. Turner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2875 (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9605140 [astro-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
[5]

Modulation of a Chirp Gravitational Wave from a Compact Binary due to Gravitational Lensing

K. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. D71, 101301 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0505116 [astro-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[6]

Wave Effects in Gravitational Lensing of Gravitational Waves from Chirping Binaries

R. Takahashi and T. Nakamura, Astrophys. J.595, 1039 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0305055 [astro-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[7]

On the waveforms of gravitationally lensed gravitational waves

L. Dai and T. Venumadhav, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1702.04724 (2017), arXiv:1702.04724 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[8]

J. M. Ezquiaga, D. E. Holz, W. Hu, M. Lagos, and R. M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D103, 064047 (2021), arXiv:2008.12814 [gr-qc]. 8

work page arXiv 2021
[9]

Abbott, T

R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, S. Abraham,et al., Astrophys. J.923, 14 (2021), arXiv:2105.06384 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[10]

O. A. Hannuksela, K. Haris, K. K. Y. Ng, S. Kumar, A. K. Mehta, D. Keitel, T. G. F. Li, and P. Ajith, Astrophys. J. Lett.874, L2 (2019), arXiv:1901.02674 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[11]

Abbott, T

R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, S. Abraham,et al., SoftwareX 13, 100658 (2021), arXiv:1912.11716 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[12]

Abbott, H

R. Abbott, H. Abe, F. Acernese,et al., Astrophys. J.970, 191 (2024), arXiv:2304.08393 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[13]

McIsaac, D

C. McIsaac, D. Keitel, T. Collett, I. Harry, S. Mozzon, O. Edy, and D. Bacon, Phys. Rev. D102, 084031 (2020), arXiv:1912.05389 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[14]

L. Dai, B. Zackay, T. Venumadhav, J. Roulet, and M. Zaldarriaga, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2007.12709 (2020), arXiv:2007.12709 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2007
[15]

X. Liu, I. Magaña Hernandez, and J. Creighton, Astro- phys. J.908, 97 (2021), arXiv:2009.06539 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2021
[16]

L. Yang, S. Wu, K. Liao, X. Ding, Z. You, Z. Cao, M. Biesi- ada, and Z.-H. Zhu, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.509, 3772 (2022), arXiv:2105.07011 [astro-ph.GA]

work page arXiv 2022
[17]

S.-S. Li, S. Mao, Y. Zhao, and Y. Lu, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.476, 2220 (2018), arXiv:1802.05089 [astro- ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[18]

A. Abac, R. Abramo, S. Albanesi,et al., arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2503.12263 (2025), arXiv:2503.12263 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[19]

F. Xu, J. M. Ezquiaga, and D. E. Holz, Astrophys. J. 929, 9 (2022), arXiv:2105.14390 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2022
[20]

Oguri, Reports on Progress in Physics82, 126901 (2019), arXiv:1907.06830 [astro-ph.CO]

M. Oguri, Reports on Progress in Physics82, 126901 (2019), arXiv:1907.06830 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2019
[21]

K. Liao, M. Biesiada, and Z.-H. Zhu, Chinese Physics Let- ters39, 119801 (2022), arXiv:2207.13489 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2022
[22]

O. A. Hannuksela, T. E. Collett, M. Çalışkan, and T. G. F. Li, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.498, 3395 (2020), arXiv:2004.13811 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2020
[23]

H. Yu, P. Zhang, and F.-Y. Wang, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.497, 204 (2020), arXiv:2007.00828 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2020
[24]

K.-H. Lai, O. A. Hannuksela, A. Herrera-Martín, J. M. Diego, T. Broadhurst, and T. G. F. Li, Phys. Rev. D98, 083005 (2018), arXiv:1801.07840 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[25]

J. M. Diego, O. A. Hannuksela, P. L. Kelly, G. Pagano, T. Broadhurst, K. Kim, T. G. F. Li, and G. F. Smoot, Astron. Astrophys.627, A130 (2019), arXiv:1903.04513 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[26]

J. S. C. Poon, S. Rinaldi, J. Janquart, H. Narola, and O. A. Hannuksela, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.536, 2212 (2025), arXiv:2406.06463 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2025
[27]

Cosmography with strong lensing of LISA gravitational wave sources

M. Sereno, P. Jetzer, A. Sesana, and M. Volonteri, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.415, 2773 (2011), arXiv:1104.1977 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[28]

S. Cao, J. Qi, Z. Cao, M. Biesiada, J. Li, Y. Pan, and Z.-H. Zhu, Scientific Reports9, 11608 (2019), arXiv:1910.10365 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2019
[29]

Precision cosmology from future lensed gravitational wave and electromagnetic signals

K. Liao, X.-L. Fan, X. Ding, M. Biesiada, and Z.-H. Zhu, Nature Communications8, 1148 (2017), arXiv:1703.04151 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[30]

S. Jana, S. J. Kapadia, T. Venumadhav, and P. Ajith, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 261401 (2023), arXiv:2211.12212 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2023
[31]

Hou, X.-L

S. Hou, X.-L. Fan, K. Liao, and Z.-H. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D101, 064011 (2020), arXiv:1911.02798 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[32]

Tambalo, M

G. Tambalo, M. Zumalacárregui, L. Dai, and M. H.-Y. Cheung, Phys. Rev. D108, 103529 (2023), arXiv:2212.11960 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2023
[33]

S. Jana, S. J. Kapadia, T. Venumadhav, S. More, and P. Ajith, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 111402 (2025), arXiv:2408.05290 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[34]

T. E. Collett and D. Bacon, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 091101 (2017), arXiv:1602.05882 [astro-ph.HE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[35]

Goyal, K

S. Goyal, K. Haris, A. K. Mehta, and P. Ajith, Phys. Rev. D103, 024038 (2021), arXiv:2008.07060 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[36]

X.-L. Fan, K. Liao, M. Biesiada, A. Piórkowska-Kurpas, and Z.-H. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 091102 (2017)

work page 2017
[37]

Identifying strongly lensed gravitational wave signals from binary black hole mergers

K. Haris, A. K. Mehta, S. Kumar, T. Venumadhav, and P. Ajith, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1807.07062 (2018), arXiv:1807.07062 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[38]

Thrane and C

E. Thrane and C. Talbot, Publications of the Astronomi- cal Society of Australia36, e010 (2019), arXiv:1809.02293 [astro-ph.IM]

work page arXiv 2019
[39]

R. K. L. Lo and I. Magaña Hernandez, Phys. Rev. D107, 123015 (2023), arXiv:2104.09339 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[40]

Z. Gao, K. Liao, L. Yang, and Z.-H. Zhu, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.526, 682 (2023), arXiv:2304.13967 [astro- ph.IM]

work page arXiv 2023
[41]

X. Shan, B. Hu, X. Chen, and R.-G. Cai, Nature Astron- omy9, 916 (2025), arXiv:2301.06117 [astro-ph.IM]

work page arXiv 2025
[42]

Scaramella, J

Euclid Collaboration, R. Scaramella, J. Amiaux,et al., Astron. Astrophys.662, A112 (2022), arXiv:2108.01201 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2022
[43]

Walmsley, P

Euclid Collaboration, M. Walmsley, P. Holloway, et al., arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2503.15324 (2025), arXiv:2503.15324 [astro-ph.GA]

work page arXiv 2025
[44]

Mellier, Abdurro’uf, J.A

Euclid Collaboration, Y. Mellier, Abdurro’uf,et al., As- tron. Astrophys.697, A1 (2025), arXiv:2405.13491 [astro- ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[45]

O. A. Hannuksela, K. Haris, J. Janquart, H. Narola, H. Phurailatpam, J. D. E. Creighton, and C. Van Den Broeck, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2510.15463 (2025), arXiv:2510.15463 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2025
[46]

X. Fan, C. Messenger, and I. S. Heng, Astrophys. J.795, 43 (2014), arXiv:1406.1544 [astro-ph.HE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[47]

A simple model of complete precessing black-hole-binary gravitational waveforms

M. Hannam, P. Schmidt, A. Bohé, L. Haegel, S. Husa, F. Ohme, G. Pratten, and M. Pürrer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 151101 (2014), arXiv:1308.3271 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[48]

S. Husa, S. Khan, M. Hannam, M. Pürrer, F. Ohme, X. J. Forteza, and A. Bohé, Phys. Rev. D93, 044006 (2016), arXiv:1508.07250 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[49]

Pratten, S

G. Pratten, S. Husa, C. García-Quirós, M. Colleoni, A. Ramos-Buades, H. Estellés, and R. Jaume, Phys. Rev. D102, 064001 (2020), arXiv:2001.11412 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[50]

Punturo, M

M. Punturo, M. Abernathy, F. Acernese,et al., Classical and Quantum Gravity27, 194002 (2010)

work page 2010
[51]

S. Hild, M. Abernathy, F. Acernese,et al., Classical and Quantum Gravity28, 094013 (2011), arXiv:1012.0908 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[52]

Robust parameter estimation for compact binaries with ground-based gravitational-wave observations using the LALInference software library

J. Veitch, V. Raymond, B. Farr, ,et al., Phys. Rev. D91, 042003 (2015), arXiv:1409.7215 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[53]

Bilby: A user-friendly Bayesian inference library for gravitational-wave astronomy

G. Ashton, M. Hübner, P. D. Lasky,et al., Astrophys. J., Suppl. Ser.241, 27 (2019), arXiv:1811.02042 [astro- ph.IM]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[54]

Higson, W

E. Higson, W. Handley, M. Hobson, and A. Lasenby, Statistics and Computing29, 891 (2019), arXiv:1704.03459 [stat.CO]

work page arXiv 2019
[55]

Gutiérrez and M

J. Gutiérrez and M. Lagos, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2510.02061 (2025), arXiv:2510.02061 [astro- ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025