pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.16377 · v3 · pith:W5V2FCRWnew · submitted 2025-09-19 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.mes-hall· cond-mat.stat-mech· physics.chem-ph

Subtleties in the pseudomodes formalism

Wynter Alford , Laetitia P. Bettmann , Gabriel T. Landi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 08:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.stat-mechphysics.chem-ph
keywords pseudomodesopen quantum systemsspectral densitynon-Hermitian Hamiltonianmesoscopic leadseffective dynamicsenvironment engineering
0
0 comments X

The pith

Non-diagonalizable effective Hamiltonians from coupled pseudomodes produce spectral density terms unavailable to diagonalizable cases.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines subtleties in constructing sets of pseudomodes to approximate a structured environment's spectral density for open quantum systems. It focuses on the case where pseudomodes are allowed to couple to one another, which makes the effective spectral density more than a simple sum of Lorentzians. Non-diagonalizability of the resulting single-particle non-Hermitian Hamiltonian is shown to enable new functional forms in that density. A construction is given for choosing pseudomode parameters that exactly reproduce any chosen spectral-density fit, exposing large freedom in the design. The conventional limit of infinitely many uncoupled, evenly spaced pseudomodes is also shown not to guarantee convergence of the effective density.

Core claim

Non-diagonalizability of the pseudomodes' effective single-particle non-Hermitian Hamiltonian can lead to terms in the effective spectral density which cannot be obtained by diagonalizable non-Hermitian Hamiltonians. The effective spectral density does not necessarily converge in the limit of an infinite number of pseudomodes distributed evenly in energy. Exact matching of a spectral-density fit is possible, and the notion of effective spectral densities also appears in scattering theory for non-interacting systems.

What carries the argument

The effective single-particle non-Hermitian Hamiltonian of the coupled pseudomodes (with local damping), whose resolvent determines the effective spectral density seen by the system.

If this is right

  • Effective spectral densities are no longer restricted to sums of Lorentzians once inter-pseudomode couplings are permitted.
  • Exact reproduction of a given spectral-density fit is always possible by suitable choice of pseudomode parameters and couplings.
  • An infinite collection of uncoupled pseudomodes spaced evenly in energy need not recover the target spectral density.
  • The same effective-density construction arises naturally in scattering theory for non-interacting particles.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Design freedom in the pseudomode parameters could be used to enforce additional dynamical constraints beyond spectral-density matching.
  • Non-diagonalizable cases may be required when modeling environments whose response cannot be captured by purely diagonal effective models.

Load-bearing premise

That inter-pseudomode couplings can be added while the resulting non-Hermitian dynamics still reproduces the target environment spectral density to the desired accuracy.

What would settle it

A concrete spectral-density function containing a term generated only by a non-diagonalizable Hamiltonian, together with an exhaustive search showing whether any diagonalizable Hamiltonian of comparable dimension can reproduce that exact function.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.16377 by Gabriel T. Landi, Laetitia P. Bettmann, Wynter Alford.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Standard setup of a quantum system coupled to two reservoirs. (b) The pseudomodes model with uncoupled pseudomodes (the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Comparison of fits to an e [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The simplest non-diagonalizable pseudomode configuration, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. E [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. E [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The pseudomode method for open quantum systems, also known as the mesoscopic leads approach, consists in replacing a structured environment by a set of auxiliary "pseudomodes" subject to local damping that approximate the environment's spectral density. Determining what parameters and geometry to use for the auxiliary modes, however, is non-trivial and involves many subtleties. In this paper we revisit this problem of pseudomode design and investigate some of these subtleties. In particular, we examine the scenario in which pseudomodes couple to each other, resulting in an effective spectral density that is no longer a sum of Lorentzians. We show that non-diagonalizability of the pseudomodes' effective single-particle non-Hermitian Hamiltonian can lead to terms in the effective spectral density which cannot be obtained by diagonalizable non-Hermitian Hamiltonians. We also present a method for constructing the pseudomode parameters to exactly match a fit to a spectral density, and in doing so illuminate the enormous freedom in this process. The case of many uncoupled pseudomodes evenly distributed in energy is explored, and we show how, contrary to conventional assumption, the effective spectral density does not necessarily converge in the limit of an infinite number of pseudomodes distributed this way. Finally, we discuss how the notion of effective spectral densities can also emerge in the context of scattering theory for non-interacting systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines subtleties in the pseudomode (mesoscopic leads) formalism for approximating structured environments in open quantum systems. Key claims include: (i) inter-pseudomode couplings yield effective spectral densities beyond sums of Lorentzians; (ii) non-diagonalizability of the effective single-particle non-Hermitian Hamiltonian produces additional terms (e.g., from Jordan blocks) unobtainable with diagonalizable Hamiltonians; (iii) a constructive method exists for exact matching of a target spectral density, exposing large parameter freedom; (iv) the effective spectral density need not converge for infinitely many evenly distributed uncoupled pseudomodes; and (v) effective spectral densities arise naturally in scattering theory for non-interacting systems.

Significance. If the explicit constructions hold, the work supplies concrete mathematical clarifications on pseudomode design that are directly useful to practitioners in quantum optics and open-system simulation. The demonstration of non-Lorentzian terms from non-diagonalizable Hamiltonians and the counterexample to convergence in the uniform infinite-pseudomode limit are falsifiable observations that can prevent misapplication of the formalism. The parameter-freedom result and scattering-theory link broaden the method's scope without introducing new physical assumptions.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract states that non-diagonalizable Hamiltonians 'can lead to terms... which cannot be obtained by diagonalizable non-Hermitian Hamiltonians,' but the main text should include an explicit low-dimensional example (e.g., a 2x2 Jordan block) with the resulting spectral-density expression to make the distinction immediate.
  2. In the section discussing the infinite-pseudomode limit, the precise sense in which the effective spectral density 'does not necessarily converge' (pointwise, in L1, distributionally) should be stated explicitly, together with the counterexample parameters.
  3. Notation for the effective non-Hermitian Hamiltonian and the mapping from its resolvent to the spectral density should be introduced once, early, with a clear equation reference, to avoid repeated re-definition in later sections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, accurate summary of its contributions, and recommendation for minor revision. We are pleased that the work's clarifications on pseudomode design are viewed as useful to practitioners.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivations are explicit mathematical constructions

full rationale

The paper performs direct analysis of the pseudomodes formalism via explicit constructions on the effective non-Hermitian Hamiltonian (including Jordan-block effects from non-diagonalizability) and limits of uniform pseudomode distributions. These steps rely on algebraic properties of the spectral density expressions rather than any fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-citation chains, or ansatzes smuggled from prior work. The method for exact matching of spectral densities is presented as illuminating parameter freedom, not as a self-referential fit. No load-bearing step reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Since only the abstract is available, no specific free parameters, axioms or invented entities can be identified from the text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5800 in / 1014 out tokens · 45343 ms · 2026-05-25T08:07:49.826205+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. One-to-one correspondence between Hierarchical Equations of Motion and Pseudomodes for Open Quantum System Dynamics

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    There is a one-to-one correspondence between HEOM and pseudomodes for exponential bath correlation functions, realized by N interacting Lindblad-damped pseudomodes and a non-unitary linear mirror transformation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 93 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [2]

    Choose a number of pseudomodesnsuch that γ= ωM −ω m d−1 (57) is an acceptably small coupling to the residual baths

    work page

  2. [3]

    Letε j =ω m +(j−1)γ, such that theε j form an evenly spaced array withε 1 =ω m andε d =ω M

    work page

  3. [4]

    ConstructΛ,ΓbyΛ i j =δ i jε j andΓ i j =δ i jγ

    work page

  4. [5]

    Since the matricesΛ,Γare diagonal, the effective spectral density matrix is given by (18)

    Choose the elements ofζso that ζi,kζ j,k =J i j(εk)γ/2π. Since the matricesΛ,Γare diagonal, the effective spectral density matrix is given by (18). Furthermore, since all theζ ik are real, the resulting elements of the spectral density matrix Ji j will be sums of Lorentzians centered at the elementsε k with widthγ/2: Jeff i j (ω)= nX k=1 Ji j(εk) 2π γ2 (ω...

    work page

  5. [6]

    Define a relevant frequency range [ωm, ωM] over which to approximate the spectral density

    work page

  6. [7]

    Choose an even number of pseudomodesnsuch that γ=4 ωM −ωm d/2−1 is an acceptably small coupling to the residual baths

    work page

  7. [8]

    Letδ=γ/4 andε q = ωm +δ(q−1) forq=1, ...,n/2, such that theε q form an evenly spaced array with ε1 =ω m andε d/2 =ω M

    work page

  8. [9]

    ConstructΛandΓas block-diagonal, withn/2 2x2 blocksΛ q andΓ q of the form: Λq = εq δ δ ε q  ,Γ q = 0 0 0 4δ  .(66)

    work page

  9. [10]

    Choose the elements ofζso that ζi,kζ j,k =J i j(ε(k+1)/2)γ/2πifkis odd and 0 ifkis even. Under this method, we obtain an effective spectral density that is a sum ofn/2 squared Lorentzians: Jeff i j (ω)= n/2X k=1 4Ji j(εk) 2π δ4 (ω−ε k)2 +δ 2 2 .(67) There is still error in the largenlimit for this method, but it is smaller than that for the one-layer vers...

    work page

  10. [11]

    Choose a time interval∆tand cutofftimet c =2N∆tto sample the correlation function, whereN≥2L+1

    work page

  11. [12]

    ,2Nand construct the (N+1)×(N+1) matrixH i j =ϕ i+j+1

    Letϕ j =C(j∆t) forj=0, . . . ,2Nand construct the (N+1)×(N+1) matrixH i j =ϕ i+j+1

    work page

  12. [13]

    This is analogous to find- ing the eigendecomposition of a Hermitian matrix as H|m⟩=σ m|m⟩, but for a complex-symmetric matrix

    Compute the Takagi decomposition [78]: find vectors um such thatHu m =σ mu∗ m. This is analogous to find- ing the eigendecomposition of a Hermitian matrix as H|m⟩=σ m|m⟩, but for a complex-symmetric matrix. The matrixUwhose columns areu m is unitary so we could alternately writeH=UσU T where we take the transpose ofUrather than the adjoint. We order theσ ...

    work page

  13. [14]

    w N ordered by increasing modulus

    Define the polynomialf(z)= PN n=0 (uL)n zn and obtain its rootsw 0,w 1, . . .w N ordered by increasing modulus

    work page

  14. [15]

    Write these roots asr keiθk with−π < θ≤πand choose the exponents to beλ k =− 2N tc log(rk)+iθ k

    Of these roots, the firstLwill have|w k|<1. Write these roots asr keiθk with−π < θ≤πand choose the exponents to beλ k =− 2N tc log(rk)+iθ k

    work page

  15. [16]

    Obtainκ k by least-squares fitting the equationsϕ j =PL k=1 κkw j k forj=0,1, . . .2N. Fitting with Prony’s method can be quite sensitive to the choice made in step 1. Thus, it is generally most practical to sample a large number of interval choices and then select the choice that gives the effective spectral density that best fits the true spectral densi...

    work page

  16. [17]

    Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems,

    Vittorio Gorini, Andrzej Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudar- shan, “Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems,” Journal of Mathematical Physics17, 821–825 (1976)

    work page 1976

  17. [18]

    On the generators of quantum dynamical semi- groups,

    G. Lindblad, “On the generators of quantum dynamical semi- groups,” Communications in Mathematical Physics48, 119– 130 (1976)

    work page 1976

  18. [19]

    Strongly Coupled Quantum Heat Machines,

    David Gelbwaser-Klimovsky and Al ´an Aspuru-Guzik, “Strongly Coupled Quantum Heat Machines,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters6, 3477–3482 (2015)

    work page 2015

  19. [20]

    Thermodynamics of non-Markovian reser- voirs and heat engines,

    George Thomas, Nana Siddharth, Subhashish Banerjee, and Sibasish Ghosh, “Thermodynamics of non-Markovian reser- voirs and heat engines,” Physical Review E97, 062108 (2018)

    work page 2018

  20. [21]

    Employing non-Markovian effects to improve the per- formance of a quantum Otto refrigerator,

    Patrice A. Camati, Jonas F. G. Santos, and Roberto M. Serra, “Employing non-Markovian effects to improve the per- formance of a quantum Otto refrigerator,” Physical Review A 102, 012217 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [22]

    Non-Markovian thermal operations boosting the performance of quantum heat engines,

    Krzysztof Ptaszy ´nski, “Non-Markovian thermal operations boosting the performance of quantum heat engines,” Physical Review E106, 014114 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [23]

    Cyclic Quantum Engines Enhanced by Strong Bath Coupling,

    Camille L. Latune, Graeme Pleasance, and Francesco Petruc- cione, “Cyclic Quantum Engines Enhanced by Strong Bath Coupling,” Physical Review Applied20, 024038 (2023)

    work page 2023

  23. [24]

    The Kondo Effect in the Unitary Limit,

    W. G. van der Wiel, S. De Franceschi, T. Fujisawa, J. M. Elzer- man, S. Tarucha, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, “The Kondo Effect in the Unitary Limit,” Science289, 2105–2108 (2000)

    work page 2000

  24. [25]

    Kondo screening in unconven- tional superconductors: The role of anomalous propagators,

    Lars Fritz and Matthias V ojta, “Kondo screening in unconven- tional superconductors: The role of anomalous propagators,” Physical Review B72, 212510 (2005)

    work page 2005

  25. [26]

    Analog Quantum Simulation of the Dynamics 17 of Open Quantum Systems with Quantum Dots and Microelec- tronic Circuits,

    Chang Woo Kim, John M. Nichol, Andrew N. Jordan, and Ig- nacio Franco, “Analog Quantum Simulation of the Dynamics 17 of Open Quantum Systems with Quantum Dots and Microelec- tronic Circuits,” PRX Quantum3, 040308 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [27]

    Characteriza- tion of individual charge fluctuators in Si/SiGe quantum dots,

    Feiyang Ye, Ammar Ellaboudy, Dylan Albrecht, Rohith Vu- datha, N. Tobias Jacobson, and John M. Nichol, “Characteriza- tion of individual charge fluctuators in Si/SiGe quantum dots,” Physical Review B110, 235305 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [28]

    Signatures of the ultrastrong light-matter coupling regime,

    Aji A. Anappara, Simone De Liberato, Alessandro Tredicucci, Cristiano Ciuti, Giorgio Biasiol, Lucia Sorba, and Fabio Beltram, “Signatures of the ultrastrong light-matter coupling regime,” Physical Review B79, 201303 (2009)

    work page 2009

  28. [29]

    Circuit quantum electrodynamics in the ultrastrong-coupling regime,

    T. Niemczyk, F. Deppe, H. Huebl, E. P. Menzel, F. Hocke, M. J. Schwarz, J. J. Garcia-Ripoll, D. Zueco, T. H¨ummer, E. Solano, A. Marx, and R. Gross, “Circuit quantum electrodynamics in the ultrastrong-coupling regime,” Nature Physics6, 772–776 (2010)

    work page 2010

  29. [30]

    Dissipa- tion of the Rabi model beyond the Jaynes–Cummings approx- imation: Quasi-degenerate qubit and ultra-strong coupling,

    S Agarwal, S M Hashemi Rafsanjani, and J H Eberly, “Dissipa- tion of the Rabi model beyond the Jaynes–Cummings approx- imation: Quasi-degenerate qubit and ultra-strong coupling,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 46, 224017 (2013)

    work page 2013

  30. [31]

    Ul- trastrong coupling regimes of light-matter interaction,

    P. Forn-D´ıaz, L. Lamata, E. Rico, J. Kono, and E. Solano, “Ul- trastrong coupling regimes of light-matter interaction,” Reviews of Modern Physics91, 025005 (2019)

    work page 2019

  31. [32]

    Quantum amplification and simulation of strong and ultrastrong coupling of light and mat- ter,

    Wei Qin, Anton Frisk Kockum, Carlos S ´anchez Mu˜noz, Adam Miranowicz, and Franco Nori, “Quantum amplification and simulation of strong and ultrastrong coupling of light and mat- ter,” Physics Reports Quantum Amplification and Simulation of Strong and Ultrastrong Coupling of Light and Matter,1078, 1–59 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [33]

    Non-Markovian spontaneous emission in a tunable cavity formed by atomic mir- rors,

    Annyun Das, Pablo Solano, and Kanu Sinha, “Non-Markovian spontaneous emission in a tunable cavity formed by atomic mir- rors,” (2025), arXiv:2504.09281

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [34]

    Quantum Coherence in Photosynthetic Light Harvesting,

    Akihito Ishizaki and Graham R. Fleming, “Quantum Coherence in Photosynthetic Light Harvesting,” Annual Review of Con- densed Matter Physics3, 333–361 (2012)

    work page 2012

  34. [35]

    Quantum coherence in photosynthesis for efficient solar-energy conversion,

    Elisabet Romero, Ramunas Augulis, Vladimir I. Novoderezhkin, Marco Ferretti, Jos Thieme, Donatas Zig- mantas, and Rienk van Grondelle, “Quantum coherence in photosynthesis for efficient solar-energy conversion,” Nature Physics10, 676–682 (2014)

    work page 2014

  35. [36]

    Using non-Markovian measures to evaluate quantum master equations for photosynthesis,

    Hong-Bin Chen, Neill Lambert, Yuan-Chung Cheng, Yueh-Nan Chen, and Franco Nori, “Using non-Markovian measures to evaluate quantum master equations for photosynthesis,” Scien- tific Reports5, 12753 (2015)

    work page 2015

  36. [37]

    Us- ing coherence to enhance function in chemical and biophysical systems,

    Gregory D. Scholes, Graham R. Fleming, Lin X. Chen, Al ´an Aspuru-Guzik, Andreas Buchleitner, David F. Coker, Gre- gory S. Engel, Rienk van Grondelle, Akihito Ishizaki, David M. Jonas, JeffS. Lundeen, James K. McCusker, Shaul Mukamel, Jennifer P. Ogilvie, Alexandra Olaya-Castro, Mark A. Ratner, Frank C. Spano, K. Birgitta Whaley, and Xiaoyang Zhu, “Us- in...

    work page 2017

  37. [38]

    Fundamental limitations in Lindblad de- scriptions of systems weakly coupled to baths,

    Devashish Tupkary, Abhishek Dhar, Manas Kulkarni, and Ar- chak Purkayastha, “Fundamental limitations in Lindblad de- scriptions of systems weakly coupled to baths,” Physical Re- view A105, 032208 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [39]

    The- ory of pseudomodes in quantum optical processes,

    B. J. Dalton, Stephen M. Barnett, and B. M. Garraway, “The- ory of pseudomodes in quantum optical processes,” Physical Review A64, 053813 (2001)

    work page 2001

  39. [40]

    Pseudomodes as an effective description of mem- ory: Non-Markovian dynamics of two-state systems in struc- tured reservoirs,

    L. Mazzola, S. Maniscalco, J. Piilo, K.-A. Suominen, and B. M. Garraway, “Pseudomodes as an effective description of mem- ory: Non-Markovian dynamics of two-state systems in struc- tured reservoirs,” Physical Review A80, 012104 (2009)

    work page 2009

  40. [41]

    Nonequilibrium steady state transport via the reduced density matrix operator,

    Joseph E. Subotnik, Thorsten Hansen, Mark A. Ratner, and Abraham Nitzan, “Nonequilibrium steady state transport via the reduced density matrix operator,” The Journal of Chemical Physics130, 144105 (2009)

    work page 2009

  41. [42]

    Nonperturbative Treatment of non-Markovian Dynamics of Open Quantum Systems,

    D. Tamascelli, A. Smirne, S. F. Huelga, and Martin B. Plenio, “Nonperturbative Treatment of non-Markovian Dynamics of Open Quantum Systems,” Physical Review Letters120, 030402 (2018)

    work page 2018

  42. [43]

    Marko- vian treatment of non-Markovian dynamics of open Fermionic systems,

    Feng Chen, Enrico Arrigoni, and Michael Galperin, “Marko- vian treatment of non-Markovian dynamics of open Fermionic systems,” New Journal of Physics21, 123035 (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [44]

    Optimized auxiliary oscillators for the simulation of gen- eral open quantum systems,

    F. Mascherpa, A. Smirne, A. D. Somoza, P. Fern´andez-Acebal, S. Donadi, D. Tamascelli, S. F. Huelga, and Martin B. Ple- nio, “Optimized auxiliary oscillators for the simulation of gen- eral open quantum systems,” Physical Review A101, 052108 (2020)

    work page 2020

  44. [45]

    Tensor-Network Method to Simulate Strongly Interacting Quantum Thermal Machines,

    Marlon Brenes, Juan Jos ´e Mendoza-Arenas, Archak Purkayastha, Mark T. Mitchison, Stephen R. Clark, and John Goold, “Tensor-Network Method to Simulate Strongly Interacting Quantum Thermal Machines,” Physical Review X 10, 031040 (2020)

    work page 2020

  45. [46]

    Stochastic wave-function approach to non- Markovian systems,

    A. Imamo ¯glu, “Stochastic wave-function approach to non- Markovian systems,” Physical Review A50, 3650–3653 (1994)

    work page 1994

  46. [47]

    Stochastic wavefunction methods beyond the Born - Markov and rotating-wave approximations,

    P Stenius and A Imamo ¯glu, “Stochastic wavefunction methods beyond the Born - Markov and rotating-wave approximations,” Quantum and Semiclassical Optics: Journal of the European Optical Society Part B8, 283–295 (1996)

    work page 1996

  47. [48]

    Decay of an atom coupled strongly to a reser- voir,

    B. M. Garraway, “Decay of an atom coupled strongly to a reser- voir,” Physical Review A55, 4636–4639 (1997)

    work page 1997

  48. [49]

    Nonperturbative decay of an atomic system in a cavity,

    B. M. Garraway, “Nonperturbative decay of an atomic system in a cavity,” Physical Review A55, 2290–2303 (1997)

    work page 1997

  49. [50]

    The Reaction Coordinate Mapping in Quantum Thermodynamics,

    Ahsan Nazir and Gernot Schaller, “The Reaction Coordinate Mapping in Quantum Thermodynamics,” inThermodynamics in the Quantum Regime: Fundamental Aspects and New Di- rections, edited by Felix Binder, Luis A. Correa, Christian Gogolin, Janet Anders, and Gerardo Adesso (Springer Inter- national Publishing, Cham, 2018) pp. 551–577

    work page 2018

  50. [51]

    Effective-mode representation of non-Markovian dynamics: A hierarchical approximation of the spectral density. I. Appli- cation to single surface dynamics,

    Keith H. Hughes, Clara D. Christ, and Irene Burghardt, “Effective-mode representation of non-Markovian dynamics: A hierarchical approximation of the spectral density. I. Appli- cation to single surface dynamics,” The Journal of Chemical Physics131, 024109 (2009)

    work page 2009

  51. [52]

    Environ- mental dynamics, correlations, and the emergence of noncanon- ical equilibrium states in open quantum systems,

    Jake Iles-Smith, Neill Lambert, and Ahsan Nazir, “Environ- mental dynamics, correlations, and the emergence of noncanon- ical equilibrium states in open quantum systems,” Physical Re- view A90, 032114 (2014)

    work page 2014

  52. [53]

    Nonequilibrium thermodynamics in the strong cou- pling and non-Markovian regime based on a reaction coordinate mapping,

    Philipp Strasberg, Gernot Schaller, Neill Lambert, and Tobias Brandes, “Nonequilibrium thermodynamics in the strong cou- pling and non-Markovian regime based on a reaction coordinate mapping,” New Journal of Physics18, 073007 (2016)

    work page 2016

  53. [54]

    Perfor- mance of a quantum heat engine at strong reservoir coupling,

    David Newman, Florian Mintert, and Ahsan Nazir, “Perfor- mance of a quantum heat engine at strong reservoir coupling,” Physical Review E95, 032139 (2017)

    work page 2017

  54. [55]

    Fermionic reaction coordinates and their application to an autonomous Maxwell demon in the strong coupling regime,

    Philipp Strasberg, Gernot Schaller, Thomas L. Schmidt, and Massimiliano Esposito, “Fermionic reaction coordinates and their application to an autonomous Maxwell demon in the strong coupling regime,” Physical Review B97, 205405 (2018)

    work page 2018

  55. [56]

    Pushing the limits of the reaction-coordinate map- ping,

    Luis A. Correa, Buqing Xu, Benjamin Morris, and Gerardo Adesso, “Pushing the limits of the reaction-coordinate map- ping,” The Journal of Chemical Physics151, 094107 (2019)

    work page 2019

  56. [57]

    Strong coupling ef- fects in quantum thermal transport with the reaction coordinate method,

    Nicholas Anto-Sztrikacs and Dvira Segal, “Strong coupling ef- fects in quantum thermal transport with the reaction coordinate method,” New Journal of Physics23, 063036 (2021)

    work page 2021

  57. [58]

    Non- 18 Markovian quantum heat statistics with the reaction coordi- nate mapping,

    Mike Shubrook, Jake Iles-Smith, and Ahsan Nazir, “Non- 18 Markovian quantum heat statistics with the reaction coordi- nate mapping,” Quantum Science and Technology10, 025063 (2025)

    work page 2025

  58. [59]

    Mappings of open quantum systems onto chain repre- sentations and Markovian embeddings,

    M. P. Woods, R. Groux, A. W. Chin, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, “Mappings of open quantum systems onto chain repre- sentations and Markovian embeddings,” Journal of Mathemati- cal Physics55, 032101 (2014)

    work page 2014

  59. [60]

    Sim- ple and Accurate Method for Time-Dependent Transport along Nanoscale Junctions,

    Liping Chen, Thorsten Hansen, and Ignacio Franco, “Sim- ple and Accurate Method for Time-Dependent Transport along Nanoscale Junctions,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 118, 20009–20017 (2014)

    work page 2014

  60. [61]

    Breaking the Entangle- ment Barrier: Tensor Network Simulation of Quantum Trans- port,

    Marek M. Rams and Michael Zwolak, “Breaking the Entangle- ment Barrier: Tensor Network Simulation of Quantum Trans- port,” Physical Review Letters124, 137701 (2020)

    work page 2020

  61. [62]

    Dual current anomalies and quantum trans- port within extended reservoir simulations,

    Gabriela W ´ojtowicz, Justin E. Elenewski, Marek M. Rams, and Michael Zwolak, “Dual current anomalies and quantum trans- port within extended reservoir simulations,” Physical Review B 104, 165131 (2021)

    work page 2021

  62. [63]

    Performance of reservoir discretizations in quantum transport simulations,

    Justin E. Elenewski, Gabriela W ´ojtowicz, Marek M. Rams, and Michael Zwolak, “Performance of reservoir discretizations in quantum transport simulations,” The Journal of Chemical Physics155, 124117 (2021)

    work page 2021

  63. [64]

    Particle current statis- tics in driven mesoscale conductors,

    Marlon Brenes, Giacomo Guarnieri, Archak Purkayastha, Jens Eisert, Dvira Segal, and Gabriel Landi, “Particle current statis- tics in driven mesoscale conductors,” Physical Review B108, L081119 (2023)

    work page 2023

  64. [65]

    Pseudofermion method for the exact description of fermionic environments: From single-molecule electronics to the Kondo resonance,

    Mauro Cirio, Neill Lambert, Pengfei Liang, Po-Chen Kuo, Yueh-Nan Chen, Paul Menczel, Ken Funo, and Franco Nori, “Pseudofermion method for the exact description of fermionic environments: From single-molecule electronics to the Kondo resonance,” Physical Review Research5, 033011 (2023)

    work page 2023

  65. [66]

    Quantum thermodynamics with fast driving and strong coupling via the mesoscopic leads approach,

    Artur M. Lacerda, Archak Purkayastha, Michael Kewming, Gabriel T. Landi, and John Goold, “Quantum thermodynamics with fast driving and strong coupling via the mesoscopic leads approach,” Physical Review B107, 195117 (2023)

    work page 2023

  66. [67]

    Entropy production in the mesoscopic-leads formu- lation of quantum thermodynamics,

    Artur M. Lacerda, Michael J. Kewming, Marlon Brenes, Conor Jackson, Stephen R. Clark, Mark T. Mitchison, and John Goold, “Entropy production in the mesoscopic-leads formu- lation of quantum thermodynamics,” Physical Review E110, 014125 (2024)

    work page 2024

  67. [68]

    Quantum stochastic thermodynamics in the mesoscopic-leads formulation,

    Laetitia P. Bettmann, Michael J. Kewming, Gabriel T. Landi, John Goold, and Mark T. Mitchison, “Quantum stochastic thermodynamics in the mesoscopic-leads formulation,” Phys- ical Review E112, 014105 (2025)

    work page 2025

  68. [69]

    Non-Hermitian pseudomodes for strongly cou- pled open quantum systems: Unravelings, correlations, and thermodynamics,

    Paul Menczel, Ken Funo, Mauro Cirio, Neill Lambert, and Franco Nori, “Non-Hermitian pseudomodes for strongly cou- pled open quantum systems: Unravelings, correlations, and thermodynamics,” Physical Review Research6, 033237 (2024)

    work page 2024

  69. [70]

    Pseudomode treatment of strong-coupling quantum thermody- namics,

    Francesco Albarelli, Bassano Vacchini, and Andrea Smirne, “Pseudomode treatment of strong-coupling quantum thermody- namics,” Quantum Science and Technology10, 015041 (2024)

    work page 2024

  70. [71]

    Macroscopic QED for quantum nanophotonics: Emitter-centered modes as a minimal basis for multiemitter problems,

    Johannes Feist, Antonio I. Fern ´andez-Dom´ınguez, and Francisco J. Garc ´ıa-Vidal, “Macroscopic QED for quantum nanophotonics: Emitter-centered modes as a minimal basis for multiemitter problems,” Nanophotonics10, 477–489 (2020)

    work page 2020

  71. [72]

    Few-Mode Field Quantiza- tion of Arbitrary Electromagnetic Spectral Densities,

    Ivan Medina, Francisco J. Garc ´ıa-Vidal, Antonio I. Fern´andez- Dom´ınguez, and Johannes Feist, “Few-Mode Field Quantiza- tion of Arbitrary Electromagnetic Spectral Densities,” Physical Review Letters126, 093601 (2021)

    work page 2021

  72. [73]

    Few-mode field quantization for multiple emitters,

    M ´onica S ´anchez-Barquilla, Francisco J. Garc ´ıa-Vidal, Anto- nio I. Fern´andez-Dom´ınguez, and Johannes Feist, “Few-mode field quantization for multiple emitters,” Nanophotonics11, 4363–4374 (2022)

    work page 2022

  73. [74]

    Lindblad Master Equation Capable of Describing Hy- brid Quantum Systems in the Ultrastrong Coupling Regime,

    Maksim Lednev, Francisco J. Garc ´ıa-Vidal, and Johannes Feist, “Lindblad Master Equation Capable of Describing Hy- brid Quantum Systems in the Ultrastrong Coupling Regime,” Physical Review Letters132, 106902 (2024)

    work page 2024

  74. [75]

    A purified input-output pseudomode model for structured open quantum systems,

    Pengfei Liang, Neill Lambert, Si Luo, Lingzhen Guo, and Mauro Cirio, “A purified input-output pseudomode model for structured open quantum systems,” (2024), arXiv:2412.04264

    work page arXiv 2024

  75. [76]

    Fingerprint and Universal Markovian Closure of Structured Bosonic Environ- ments,

    Alexander N ¨ußeler, Dario Tamascelli, Andrea Smirne, James Lim, Susana F. Huelga, and Martin B. Plenio, “Fingerprint and Universal Markovian Closure of Structured Bosonic Environ- ments,” Physical Review Letters129, 140604 (2022)

    work page 2022

  76. [77]

    Spectral density modulation and universal Markovian closure of fermionic environments,

    Davide Ferracin, Andrea Smirne, Susana F. Huelga, Martin B. Plenio, and Dario Tamascelli, “Spectral density modulation and universal Markovian closure of fermionic environments,” The Journal of Chemical Physics161, 174114 (2024)

    work page 2024

  77. [78]

    Modelling the ultra-strongly coupled spin-boson model with unphysical modes,

    Neill Lambert, Shahnawaz Ahmed, Mauro Cirio, and Franco Nori, “Modelling the ultra-strongly coupled spin-boson model with unphysical modes,” Nature Communications10, 3721 (2019)

    work page 2019

  78. [79]

    Quantum-Classical Decomposition of Gaussian Quantum En- vironments: A Stochastic Pseudomode Model,

    Si Luo, Neill Lambert, Pengfei Liang, and Mauro Cirio, “Quantum-Classical Decomposition of Gaussian Quantum En- vironments: A Stochastic Pseudomode Model,” PRX Quantum 4, 030316 (2023)

    work page 2023

  79. [80]

    Shot noise in mesoscopic con- ductors,

    Ya. M. Blanter and M. B¨uttiker, “Shot noise in mesoscopic con- ductors,” Physics Reports336, 1–166 (2000)

    work page 2000

  80. [81]

    Scattering theory of current and intensity noise correlations in conductors and wave guides,

    M. B ¨uttiker, “Scattering theory of current and intensity noise correlations in conductors and wave guides,” Physical Review B46, 12485–12507 (1992)

    work page 1992

Showing first 80 references.