pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17438 · v1 · pith:WAIUEOWVnew · submitted 2026-05-17 · ✦ hep-th · hep-ph

Holographic entanglement entropy in the QCD phase diagram under external magnetic field

Man-Man Sun , Man-Li Tian , Zhou-Run Zhu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 22:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th hep-ph
keywords holographic entanglement entropyQCD phase diagramexternal magnetic fieldEinstein-Maxwell-dilaton modelswallow-tail structurephase transitionconfinement-deconfinement
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:WAIUEOWV Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number? 
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{WAIUEOWV}

Prints a linked pith:WAIUEOWV badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

The pith

Entanglement entropy develops a swallow-tail structure under perpendicular magnetic fields, marking the QCD phase transition in a holographic model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses an Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton holographic model to compute entanglement entropy for a strip subsystem in QCD matter placed in an external magnetic field. In the perpendicular orientation the entanglement entropy versus strip length develops three branches and a swallow-tail shape that signals a switch between connected and disconnected minimal surfaces. This structure is absent for parallel fields, and the entropy difference stays single-valued at small chemical potential but turns multivalued at large chemical potential unless the magnetic field is increased. The patterns line up with the model's black-hole thermodynamics and reproduce the expected QCD phase diagram. The central finding is that entanglement entropy thereby functions as a direct probe of the confinement-deconfinement transition and its magnetic-field dependence.

Core claim

In the Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton background that models QCD, the holographic entanglement entropy for perpendicular magnetic field exhibits a swallow-tail discontinuity with three distinct branches in the strip length, corresponding to a transition between connected and disconnected Ryu-Takayanagi surfaces in both the specious-confinement and deconfined phases; for parallel orientation the entropy is monotonic with no such transition; the entropy difference remains smooth at small chemical potential, becomes multivalued at large chemical potential, and recovers single-valued behavior when the magnetic field strength is raised, all in quantitative agreement with the model's black-hole phase-di

What carries the argument

The Ryu-Takayanagi minimal-surface prescription for holographic entanglement entropy evaluated on connected versus disconnected surfaces in the Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton geometry with external magnetic field.

If this is right

  • The same entanglement-entropy diagnostic can be applied to other regions of the QCD phase diagram, including finite-density and finite-temperature lines.
  • Parallel versus perpendicular magnetic-field dependence supplies a directional signature that distinguishes confinement-related transitions from purely thermal ones.
  • Multivalued behavior at large chemical potential offers a holographic counterpart to the critical endpoint expected in real QCD.
  • The restoration of single-valued entropy by increasing magnetic field predicts that strong fields can suppress the first-order character of the transition.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the swallow-tail survives in more realistic holographic models that include running coupling or back-reaction, it could serve as a practical observable in heavy-ion collision data.
  • The directional anisotropy suggests that entanglement entropy might be used to infer the orientation of magnetic fields in the early universe or in neutron-star mergers.
  • Testing whether the same multivalued structure appears in mutual information or other entanglement measures would tighten the link between information-theoretic quantities and thermodynamic phase boundaries.

Load-bearing premise

The Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton model with the chosen parameters faithfully reproduces the QCD phase diagram and its response to external magnetic fields.

What would settle it

A calculation in a different holographic model or a lattice QCD simulation that shows no swallow-tail structure in entanglement entropy for perpendicular magnetic fields at the expected transition temperature would falsify the claim that the feature probes the QCD phase transition.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.17438 by Man-Li Tian, Man-Man Sun, Zhou-Run Zhu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (b) presents the difference in entanglement entropy between connected and dis￾connected surfaces within the specious-confinement phase. In the perpendicular case, a swallow-tail structure ○2 appears. This branch consistently yields higher entanglement en￾tropy than branches ○1 and ○3 , suggesting that it corresponds to a saddle point of the minimal area functional. As the strip length x increases, the syst… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Strip length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Strip length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: shows the difference in entanglement entropy under varying magnetic field. When the field is small, a swallow-tail structure labeled ○2 appears in the perpendicular case, signaling a transition from a connected surface to a disconnected one. As the magnetic field strengthens, branch ○2 disappears, and the entanglement entropy difference becomes a monotonic function of x at large B. It is worth noting that … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Strip length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Strip length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) Strip length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this work, we explore holographic entanglement entropy in the QCD phase diagram under an external magnetic field using an Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton model. We consider both the specious-confinement and deconfined phases. In the perpendicular magnetic field orientation, the strip length shows three distinct branches, and the entanglement entropy develops a swallow-tail structure, indicating a transition between connected and disconnected entanglement surfaces. For the parallel orientation, the behavior is monotonic and no transition occurs. In addition, the difference in entanglement entropy changes smoothly with temperature at small chemical potential, but becomes multivalued at large chemical potential. Increasing the magnetic field restores single-valued behavior. These results are consistent with the black hole thermodynamics and the QCD phase diagram. Our findings show that entanglement entropy can serve as an effective probe of the QCD phase transition.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses an Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton holographic model tuned to QCD-like thermodynamics to compute entanglement entropy across the phase diagram in the presence of an external magnetic field. For perpendicular orientation it reports three branches in strip length and a swallow-tail in EE signaling a connected-to-disconnected transition; for parallel orientation the behavior is monotonic. The EE difference is single-valued at small chemical potential but becomes multivalued at large mu, with increasing B restoring single-valuedness. The authors conclude that these structures are consistent with black-hole thermodynamics and that EE can serve as an effective probe of the QCD phase transition.

Significance. If the EMD background were shown to reproduce quantitative lattice features of the QCD magnetic phase diagram (critical endpoint location, inverse magnetic catalysis strength), the reported EE structures would provide a concrete holographic diagnostic for the confinement-deconfinement transition. The work would then add a useful observable to the existing holographic toolkit for strongly coupled QCD.

major comments (2)
  1. [Model setup and numerical results sections] The central claim that EE serves as an effective probe of the QCD phase transition rests on the assumption that the chosen EMD parameters faithfully reproduce the QCD magnetic phase structure. No quantitative comparison is given between the model's critical temperature, chemical potential, or B-dependence of the transition line and existing lattice QCD results; without such benchmarks the swallow-tail and multivalued EE features remain generic signatures of any first-order holographic transition rather than a specific test of QCD.
  2. [Discussion of swallow-tail structures and EE difference] The statement that the EE results are 'consistent with the black hole thermodynamics and the QCD phase diagram' is largely tautological: the swallow-tail and branch structure follow by construction from the first-order transition engineered into the background. An independent test would require showing that the locations of the EE jumps coincide with independently determined thermodynamic critical points, which is not demonstrated.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and introduction] Clarify the meaning of 'specious-confinement' phase; if this is a non-standard term, replace with the conventional 'confined' or 'hadronic' phase.
  2. [Figures] Ensure that all plots of EE versus strip length or temperature explicitly label the magnetic-field values and indicate which branches correspond to connected versus disconnected surfaces.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Model setup and numerical results sections] The central claim that EE serves as an effective probe of the QCD phase transition rests on the assumption that the chosen EMD parameters faithfully reproduce the QCD magnetic phase structure. No quantitative comparison is given between the model's critical temperature, chemical potential, or B-dependence of the transition line and existing lattice QCD results; without such benchmarks the swallow-tail and multivalued EE features remain generic signatures of any first-order holographic transition rather than a specific test of QCD.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting this point. The EMD model parameters were selected based on earlier works to reproduce key qualitative features of the QCD phase diagram, including inverse magnetic catalysis and the existence of a critical endpoint. While the current manuscript does not include a new side-by-side quantitative table against lattice data, we will add a short paragraph in the model section summarizing the model's thermodynamic benchmarks with references to lattice results and prior holographic calibrations. This addition will help clarify that the reported EE structures are linked to the model's QCD-like thermodynamics. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Discussion of swallow-tail structures and EE difference] The statement that the EE results are 'consistent with the black hole thermodynamics and the QCD phase diagram' is largely tautological: the swallow-tail and branch structure follow by construction from the first-order transition engineered into the background. An independent test would require showing that the locations of the EE jumps coincide with independently determined thermodynamic critical points, which is not demonstrated.

    Authors: We agree that the swallow-tail in EE is expected once a first-order transition is present in the background. In our calculations the critical values of T and mu at which the EE branches meet are the same as those obtained from the free-energy comparison. To make this explicit and address the request for an independent check, we will include in the revised manuscript a direct overlay or table comparing the critical lines extracted from the thermodynamic potential with those read off from the EE swallow-tail. This will demonstrate the coincidence of the transition points. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

EMD parameters tuned to QCD thermodynamics make EE swallow-tail and multivalued structures generic by construction

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "These results are consistent with the black hole thermodynamics and the QCD phase diagram. Our findings show that entanglement entropy can serve as an effective probe of the QCD phase transition."

    The model is constructed with parameters chosen to reproduce the QCD phase diagram (including first-order transitions and B-dependence). The swallow-tail and multivalued EE difference are then presented as a 'finding' that EE probes the transition; these features are generic consequences of any holographic first-order transition and therefore follow by construction from the fitted thermodynamics.

full rationale

The paper selects an Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton background whose parameters are adjusted to produce a first-order transition line and the desired magnetic response. It then computes entanglement entropy in that background and reports swallow-tail behavior plus multivalued differences as evidence that EE probes the QCD phase transition. Because swallow-tail structures are known to appear generically in any holographic model with a first-order transition, the reported EE features reduce directly to the input thermodynamics rather than constituting an independent test. No quantitative lattice comparison is supplied to break the loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton holographic model for QCD; no explicit free parameters, additional axioms, or invented entities are listed in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton model accurately captures the QCD phase diagram under external magnetic fields.
    The entire exploration of entanglement entropy branches and phase transitions is performed inside this model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5666 in / 1257 out tokens · 38283 ms · 2026-05-19T22:34:23.586568+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · 45 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A background magnetic field B is introduced through the second gauge field via F(2)M N = Bdx2 ∧ dx3, which breaks the SO(3) rotational symmetry as B is aligned along the x1-direction

    + dz2 g(z) ], (2) where S(z), g(z), and L represent the scale factor, blackening function, and AdS length scale, respectively. A background magnetic field B is introduced through the second gauge field via F(2)M N = Bdx2 ∧ dx3, which breaks the SO(3) rotational symmetry as B is aligned along the x1-direction. In this metric, B is a five-dimensional field with...

    work page

  2. [2]

    In the presence of a background magnetic field, the entangling sur face can align parallel and perpendicular to the magnetic field

    + gzzdz2, (12) where gtt = − L2e2P (z) z2 g(z), gxx1 = L2e2P (z) z2 , gxx2 = L2e2P (z) z2 eB2z2 and gzz = L2e2P (z) z2 1 g(z) . In the presence of a background magnetic field, the entangling sur face can align parallel and perpendicular to the magnetic field. To be specific, one can cons ider the boundary subsystem with the domain − x∥/ 2 ≤ x1 ≤ x∥/ 2 for pa...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Entanglement in Many-Body Systems

    L. Amico, R. Fazio, A. Osterloh and V. Vedral, Rev. Mod. Ph ys. 80, 517-576 (2008) doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.80.517 [arXiv:quant-ph/0703044 [quant-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.517 2008

  4. [4]

    Area laws for the entanglement entropy - a review

    J. Eisert, M. Cramer and M. B. Plenio, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 277-306 (2010) doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.82.277 [arXiv:0808.3773 [quant -ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.277 2010

  5. [5]

    P. V. Buividovich and M. I. Polikarpov, Nucl. Phys. B 802, 458-474 (2008) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.04.024 [arXiv:0802.4247 [hep-lat]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.04.024 2008

  6. [6]

    AdS Bubbles, Entropy and Closed String Tachyons

    T. Nishioka and T. Takayanagi, JHEP 01, 090 (2007) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/01/090 [arXiv:hep-th/0611035 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/01/090 2007

  7. [7]

    Detecting topological order in a ground state wave function

    M. Levin and X. G. Wen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 110405 (2006) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.110405 [arXiv:cond-mat/0510613 [cond-mat.str-el]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.110405 2006

  8. [8]

    Topological entanglement entropy

    A. Kitaev and J. Preskill, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 110404 (2006) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.110404 [arXiv:hep-th/0510092 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.110404 2006

  9. [9]

    J. M. Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231-252 (1998) doi:10.1023/A:1026654312961 [arXiv:hep-th/9711200 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1023/a:1026654312961 1998

  10. [10]

    Anti De Sitter Space And Holography

    E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 253-291 (1998) doi:10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a2 [arXiv:hep-th/9802150 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.4310/atmp.1998.v2.n2.a2 1998

  11. [11]

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, Phys. Lett . B 428, 105-114 (1998) doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00377-3 [arXiv:hep-th/9802 109 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(98)00377-3 1998

  12. [12]

    Holographic Derivation of Entanglement Entropy from AdS/CFT

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 181602 (2006) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.181602 [arXiv:hep-th/0603001 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.181602 2006

  13. [13]

    Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, JHEP 08, 045 (2006) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/08/045 [arXiv:hep-th/0605073 [hep-th]]. 15

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/08/045 2006

  14. [14]

    I. R. Klebanov, D. Kutasov and A. Murugan, Nucl. Phys. B 796, 274-293 (2008) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2007.12.017 [arXiv:0709.2140 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2007.12.017 2008

  15. [15]

    Confining gauge theories and holographic entanglement entropy with a magnetic field

    D. Dudal and S. Mahapatra, JHEP 04, 031 (2017) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2017)031 [arXiv:1612.06248 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep04(2017)031 2017

  16. [17]

    U. Kol, C. Nunez, D. Schofield, J. Sonnenschein and M. War schawski, JHEP 06, 005 (2014) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2014)005 [arXiv:1403.2721 [hep-th] ]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2014)005 2014

  17. [18]

    Lewkowycz, JHEP 05, 032 (2012) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2012)032 [arXiv:1204.05 88 [hep- th]]

    A. Lewkowycz, JHEP 05, 032 (2012) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2012)032 [arXiv:1204.05 88 [hep- th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2012)032 2012

  18. [19]

    R. G. Cai, S. He and D. Li, JHEP 03, 033 (2012) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2012)033 [arXiv:1201.0820 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep03(2012)033 2012

  19. [20]

    N. R. F. Braga and R. da Rocha, Phys. Lett. B 776, 78-83 (2018) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.11.034 [arXiv:1710.07383 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.11.034 2018

  20. [21]

    Holographic Studies of Entanglement Entropy in Superconductors

    T. Albash and C. V. Johnson, JHEP 05, 079 (2012) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2012)079 [arXiv:1202.2605 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep05(2012)079 2012

  21. [22]

    Schwinger Effect and Entanglement Entropy in Confining Geometries

    M. Ghodrati, Phys. Rev. D 92, no.6, 065015 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.065015 [arXiv:1506.08557 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.065015 2015

  22. [23]

    Holographic Entanglement Entropy in the QCD Phase Diagram with a Critical Point

    J. Knaute and B. K¨ ampfer, Phys. Rev. D 96, no.10, 106003 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.106003 [arXiv:1706.02647 [hep -ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.106003 2017

  23. [24]

    P. V. Buividovich and M. I. Polikarpov, Phys. Lett. B 670, 141-145 (2008) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.10.032 [arXiv:0806.3376 [ hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.10.032 2008

  24. [25]

    E. Itou, K. Nagata, Y. Nakagawa, A. Nakamura and V. I. Zak harov, PTEP 2016, no.6, 061B01 (2016) doi:10.1093/ptep/ptw050 [arXiv:1512.0133 4 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1093/ptep/ptw050 2016

  25. [26]

    S. Katz, F. Niedermayer, D. Nogradi and C. Torok, Phys. R ev. D 95, no.5, 054506 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.054506 [arXiv:1611.03987 [hep -lat]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.054506 2017

  26. [27]

    Effects of a strong magnetic field on the QCD flux tube

    C. Bonati, S. Cal ` ı, M. D’Elia, M. Mesiti, F. Negro, A. Ru cci and F. Sanfilippo, Phys. Rev. D 98, no.5, 054501 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.054501 [ar Xiv:1807.01673 [hep-lat]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.054501 2018

  27. [28]

    V. E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, JHEP 07, 062 (2007) doi:10.1088/1126- 6708/2007/07/062 [arXiv:0705.0016 [hep-th]]. 16

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126- 2007

  28. [29]

    R. G. Cai, S. He, L. Li and Y. L. Zhang, JHEP 07, 088 (2012) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2012)088 [arXiv:1203.6620 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2012)088 2012

  29. [30]

    Z. Yang, F. J. Cheng, C. Niu, C. Y. Zhang and P. Liu, JHEP 04, 110 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2023)110 [arXiv:2301.13574 [hep-th ]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2023)110 2023

  30. [31]

    Entanglement Tsunami: Universal Scaling in Holographic Thermalization

    H. Liu and S. J. Suh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 011601 (2014) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.011601 [arXiv:1305.7244 [ hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.011601 2014

  31. [32]

    A. R. Brown, D. A. Roberts, L. Susskind, B. Swingle and Y. Zhao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, no.19, 191301 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.19130 1 [arXiv:1509.07876 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.19130 2016

  32. [33]

    Complexity and Shock Wave Geometries

    D. Stanford and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D 90, no.12, 126007 (2014) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.126007 [arXiv:1406.2678 [hep- th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.126007 2014

  33. [34]

    Asadi, B

    M. Asadi, B. Amrahi and H. Eshaghi-Kenari, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, no.1, 69 (2023) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11214-6 [arXiv:2209.0158 6 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11214-6 2023

  34. [35]

    S. J. Zhang, Nucl. Phys. B 916, 304-319 (2017) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2017.01.010 [arXiv:1608.03072 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2017.01.010 2017

  35. [36]

    AdS/QCD, Entanglement Entropy and Critical Temperature

    M. Ali-Akbari and M. Lezgi, Phys. Rev. D 96, no.8, 086014 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.086014 [arXiv:1706.04335 [hep -th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.086014 2017

  36. [37]

    Z. Li, K. Xu and M. Huang, Chin. Phys. C 45, no.1, 013116 (2021) doi:10.1088/1674- 1137/abc539 [arXiv:2002.08650 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1674- 2021

  37. [38]

    Interplay between the holographic QCD phase diagram and entanglement entropy

    D. Dudal and S. Mahapatra, JHEP 07, 120 (2018) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2018)120 [arXiv:1805.02938 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2018)120 2018

  38. [39]

    Estimate of the magnetic field strength in heavy-ion collisions

    V. Skokov, A. Y. Illarionov and V. Toneev, Int. J. Mod. Ph ys. A 24, 5925-5932 (2009) doi:10.1142/S0217751X09047570 [arXiv:0907.1396 [nucl- th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0217751x09047570 2009

  39. [40]

    Particle production in strong electromagnetic fields in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

    K. Tuchin, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2013, 490495 (2013) doi:10.1155/2013/490495 [arXiv:1301.0099 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1155/2013/490495 2013

  40. [41]

    R. C. Duncan and C. Thompson, Astrophys. J. Lett. 392, L9 (1992) doi:10.1086/186413

    work page doi:10.1086/186413 1992

  41. [42]

    Magnetic Fields in the Early Universe

    D. Grasso and H. R. Rubinstein, Phys. Rept. 348, 163-266 (2001) doi:10.1016/S0370- 1573(00)00110-1 [arXiv:astro-ph/0009061 [astro-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370- 2001

  42. [43]

    G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz , S. Krieg, A. Schafer and K. K. Sz- abo, JHEP 02, 044 (2012) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2012)044 [arXiv:1111.49 56 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2012)044 2012

  43. [44]

    Inverse magnetic catalysis and the Polyakov loop

    F. Bruckmann, G. Endrodi and T. G. Kovacs, JHEP 04, 112 (2013) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2013)112 [arXiv:1303.3972 [hep-lat ]]. 17

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep04(2013)112 2013

  44. [45]

    Bohra, D

    H. Bohra, D. Dudal, A. Hajilou and S. Mahapatra, Phys. Le tt. B 801, 135184 (2020) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.135184 [arXiv:1907.01852 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.135184 2020

  45. [46]

    Inverse magnetic catalysis for the chiral transition induced by thermo-magnetic effects on the coupling constant

    A. Ayala, M. Loewe, A. J. Mizher and R. Zamora, Phys. Rev. D 90, no.3, 036001 (2014) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.036001 [arXiv:1406.3885 [hep- ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.036001 2014

  46. [47]

    Z. R. Zhu and D. Hou, Phys. Rev. D 110, no.6, 066010 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.066010 [arXiv:2305.12375 [he p-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.066010 2024

  47. [48]

    Anisotropy of the quark-antiquark potential in a magnetic field

    C. Bonati, M. D’Elia, M. Mariti, M. Mesiti, F. Negro and F . Sanfilippo, Phys. Rev. D 89, no.11, 114502 (2014) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.114502 [ar Xiv:1403.6094 [hep-lat]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.114502 2014

  48. [49]

    Magnetic field effects on the static quark potential at zero and finite temperature

    C. Bonati, M. D’Elia, M. Mariti, M. Mesiti, F. Negro, A. R ucci and F. Sanfilippo, Phys. Rev. D 94, no.9, 094007 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.094007 [ar Xiv:1607.08160 [hep-lat]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.094007 2016

  49. [50]

    Holographic QCD in the Veneziano limit at finite Magnetic Field and Chemical Potential

    U. Gursoy, M. Jarvinen and G. Nijs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, no.24, 242002 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.242002 [arXiv:1707.00872 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.242002 2018

  50. [51]

    The melting of charmonium in a magnetic field from an effective AdS/QCD model

    D. Dudal and T. G. Mertens, Phys. Rev. D 91, 086002 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.086002 [arXiv:1410.3297 [hep- th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.086002 2015

  51. [52]

    Magnetic catalysis in flavored ABJM

    N. Jokela, A. V. Ramallo and D. Zoakos, JHEP 02, 021 (2014) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2014)021 [arXiv:1311.6265 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep02(2014)021 2014

  52. [53]

    Critelli, R

    R. Critelli, R. Rougemont, S. I. Finazzo and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. D 94, no.12, 125019 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.125019 [arXiv:1606.094 84 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.125019 2016

  53. [54]

    D. Li, M. Huang, Y. Yang and P. H. Yuan, JHEP 02, 030 (2017) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2017)030 [arXiv:1610.04618 [hep-th ]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep02(2017)030 2017

  54. [55]

    P. Jain, S. S. Jena and S. Mahapatra, Phys. Rev. D 107, no.8, 086016 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.086016 [arXiv:2209.15355 [he p-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.086016 2023

  55. [56]

    I. Y. Aref’eva, A. Patrushev and P. Slepov, JHEP 07, 043 (2020) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2020)043 [arXiv:2003.05847 [hep-th ]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2020)043 2020

  56. [57]

    Thermal entropy of a quark-antiquark pair above and below deconfinement from a dynamical holographic QCD model

    D. Dudal and S. Mahapatra, Phys. Rev. D 96, no.12, 126010 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.126010 [arXiv:1708.06995 [hep -th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.126010 2017

  57. [58]

    Charged Magnetic Brane Solutions in AdS_5 and the fate of the third law of thermodynamics

    E. D’Hoker and P. Kraus, JHEP 03, 095 (2010) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2010)095 [arXiv:0911.4518 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep03(2010)095 2010

  58. [59]

    No inverse magnetic catalysis in the QCD hard and soft wall models

    D. Dudal, D. R. Granado and T. G. Mertens, Phys. Rev. D 93, no.12, 125004 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.125004 [arXiv:1511.04042 [hep -th]]. 18

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.125004 2016

  59. [60]

    M. W. Li, Y. Yang and P. H. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D 96, no.6, 066013 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.066013 [arXiv:1703.09184 [hep -th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.066013 2017

  60. [61]

    A Refined Holographic QCD Model and QCD Phase Structure

    Y. Yang and P. H. Yuan, JHEP 11 (2014), 149 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2014)149 [arXiv:1406.1865 [hep-th]]. 19

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep11(2014)149 2014