Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Open-AoE argues that 2,000 hours of everyday smartphone video can be turned into structured robot-training data via an open pipeline that adds hand poses, camera trajectories, and action labels.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 03:20 UTC pith:XB3AJXZE

load-bearing objection A genuinely useful open dataset and toolchain for egocentric manipulation, with one central soft spot: the geometric annotations are never quantitatively validated. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.14183 v2 pith:XB3AJXZE submitted 2026-07-15 cs.RO cs.CV

Open-AoE: An Open Egocentric Manipulation Dataset and Toolchain for Embodied Learning

Zishuo Li , Bowen Yang , Changtao Miao , Kai Zhu , Hao Chen , Qingze Guan , Zhengxing Wu , Wanke Zhan
show 24 more authors
Yang Sun Zhiyi Huang Zitong Shan Zhenchao Jin Jiadong Hong Taowen Wang Yushi Feng You Liu Yibo Wang Yifan Yang Zhaowen Zhou Man Luo Hao Cheng Bo Zhang Jianshu Li Jiansheng Cai Guocai Yao Jize Zhang Chenhao Lin Renjing Xu Lequan Yu Chao Shen Chunhua Shen Zhe Li
This is my paper
classification cs.RO cs.CV
keywords egocentric videomanipulation datasetMANO hand reconstructioncamera trajectorysmartphone captureembodied learningtraining-ready toolchainatomic action annotations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Open-AoE sets out to show that consumer smartphones, not specialist head-mounted rigs, can support large-scale structured supervision for embodied learning. Its first release contributes roughly 2,000 hours of egocentric manipulation video from more than 500 contributors using more than 400 phone models, with each clip aligned to MANO hand poses, camera trajectories, English text, and temporally localized atomic actions. Around this corpus it builds a full capture-to-training pipeline that gates recording on-device, filters and labels offline with a vision-language model, reconstructs hands and camera motion jointly, and exposes training-ready representations for vision-language-action policies, world action models, and world models. If the released reconstructions are as sound as the pipeline's quality gates suggest, the community gains an open data loop that lowers the cost of contributing and reusing manipulation data.

Core claim

The central claim is that the full data-production loop for embodied learning—capture, curation, reconstruction, annotation, and model adaptation—can be run on commodity-smartphone data at scale. The paper reports that its first release contains about 2,000 hours of real egocentric manipulation video from 500+ contributors and 400+ device models, covering 8,000+ tasks and 400+ scenes; every accepted segment is aligned on one timeline with undistorted RGB, camera intrinsics and metric 6-DoF trajectories, bilateral MANO hand meshes and 21-joint keypoints, validity masks, and English atomic-action annotations. It further claims that this production is made possible by a processing pipeline that

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the 'AoE sample': one timeline on which undistorted RGB, camera intrinsics and camera trajectories, bilateral MANO hand meshes with 21-joint keypoints, validity masks, and atomic action segments are aligned. The alignment is produced by a joint reconstruction stage that combines a monocular hand-motion reconstructor with a robust SLAM backend, plus sliding-window optimization and global bundle adjustment to place hands and camera in one metric world frame. The training-ready side is a representation spectrum spanning dense MANO states (110-dimensional per-frame), wrist-fingertip targets, robot-facing joint interfaces, and compact ego-action vectors, so the same evi

Load-bearing premise

The released MANO hand reconstructions and camera trajectories are accurate enough for downstream robot learning, but no ground-truth accuracy benchmark is reported—the quality gates are qualitative thresholds, so systematic bias under motion blur or severe ego-motion would undermine the geometric supervision.

What would settle it

Run the released reconstruction pipeline on a sample of clips recorded with a motion-capture glove or optical hand tracker and a ground-truth camera pose system, then compute wrist and joint mean error in millimeters and trajectory drift. If hand-mesh errors are large relative to typical robot gripper tolerances (say 1–2 cm at the wrist) or camera drift exceeds a small fraction of path length, the toolchain's geometric supervision would be too coarse for the downstream uses claimed.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the quality gates perform, everyday smartphone users become viable data contributors, removing the need for teleoperation rigs or specialized head-mounted capture hardware.
  • A single corpus can be converted into training signals for VLA policies, world action models, and world models, so downstream teams can skip building their own post-processing stack.
  • Because hand and camera trajectories are reconstructed jointly, the toolchain can separate hand motion from camera ego-motion, which is a prerequisite for controllable world modeling.
  • The reported 97.8% history-future window yield implies most footage converts into fixed-context training samples, so annotation boundaries do not waste data.
  • Cross-embodiment retargeting from the same MANO trajectories and validity masks preserves reach-contact-release structure across multiple robot embodiments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper explicitly flags that the downstream benefit of its camera-domain diversity is a hypothesis pending controlled ablations; a concrete test is to hold out one phone model's clips and measure how much policy or world-model performance degrades when evaluating on that model.
  • All reported distribution statistics come from a single random 100-hour subset; extrapolating them to the full 2,000-hour release remains an assumption that a full-corpus audit could confirm or revise.
  • The quality gates use thresholds on valid-frame ratio, IK failure rate, and trajectory smoothness rather than measured geometric error; quantifying them against motion-capture ground truth would extend the paper's claims from qualitative to quantitative.
  • If the toolchain is as modular as described, it should accept other calibrated egocentric sources beyond Open-AoE's own smartphone captures, which would test the generality of the infrastructure.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. Open-AoE is a dataset and toolchain paper. It releases approximately 2,000 hours of egocentric manipulation video collected by 500+ contributors using 400+ smartphone models, together with text annotations, MANO hand poses, camera trajectories, and temporally localized atomic actions. The paper also describes a four-stage processing pipeline (on-device capture gating, offline QC and scene labeling, reconstruction and annotation, and quality inspection) and a downstream toolchain for visualization, 4D hand-object reconstruction, cross-embodiment retargeting, and training adapters for VLA policies, WAMs, and world models. To support the resource, the authors compare Open-AoE with OpenEgo, EgoDex, and EgoXtreme on CLIP-based visual diversity, semantic/temporal annotation coverage, image-annotation consistency, and training-window retention. The analysis is carefully scoped in places: distributional statistics are computed on the same random 100-hour subsample, and §3.6 explicitly labels downstream benefit as a training hypothesis. The central gap is that the geometric supervision (MANO hand poses and camera trajectories) is never quantitatively validated against ground truth.

Significance. If the released artifacts are as described, Open-AoE would be a substantial community resource. It is one of the largest egocentric manipulation corpora with jointly available language, hand, camera, and action supervision, and its smartphone-based device diversity is unusual. The open toolchain is a genuine contribution because it lowers the barrier from raw video to model training and makes the dataset directly consumable by several embodied-learning paradigms. The paper also does several things well: it scopes diversity claims to a 100-hour random sample, uses balanced repeated sampling for the CLIP metrics, and provides quantitative comparisons against existing datasets with a shared evaluator. The main unsecured pillar is geometric supervision: no per-frame joint error, reprojection error, or trajectory accuracy is reported, and the three quality gates in §3.5 do not establish metric correctness. Since the abstract and Table 1 promise MANO hand poses and camera trajectories as dataset supervision, this validation gap must be addressed before those modalities can be relied upon for robot learning.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.4–3.5] The central geometric supervision—MANO hand poses and camera trajectories—is never validated against ground truth. §3.4 describes HaWoR and DROID-W with re-tuned kernels, sliding-window refinement, and global bundle adjustment, but no quantitative error metrics are reported. §3.5's three quality gates (valid-frame ratio, IK failure rate, smooth/continuous trajectory) are necessary but not sufficient: a smoothly drifting or globally mis-scaled SLAM trajectory can pass the consistency gate, and a high valid-frame ratio does not bound per-joint MANO error. Because the abstract and Table 1 explicitly promise these modalities as dataset supervision for embodied learning, this is a load-bearing gap. Please add a held-out validation (e.g., HOT3D, synthetic smartphone-video renderings, or a manually annotated subset) reporting per-frame hand joint error, reprojection error, and trajectory ATE/RP
  2. [§3.4 and §5.3] Temporal action localization is another core deliverable, but boundary accuracy is never measured. Atomic-action slicing is described as model-generated with human-in-the-loop correction (§3.4), and §5.3 audits image-text consistency with Idefics2; however, consistency is not boundary correctness. With a mean segment duration of 9.64 s and 13.97 segments/min, small boundary shifts can materially change the training labels used by the window-retention analysis in §5.4. Please report boundary precision/recall and duration error against a random human-annotated subset, or explicitly state that boundary accuracy is not yet benchmarked.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§1] Grammar: 'we provide a separate downstream toolchain supports visualization' should read 'we provide a separate downstream toolchain that supports visualization'.
  2. [§2.1] The sentence 'Open-AoE [9] complements these efforts...' cites the AoE capture-framework paper rather than a description of the present dataset. Please rephrase as 'building on AoE [9]' or cite the current release appropriately.
  3. [§3.6] The sentence 'These values supersede the interval and vocabulary counts from an earlier preprocessing snapshot' is unclear and should be removed or made precise; it reads as an internal note rather than a scientific statement.
  4. [§5.1 / Figure 6] The CLIP diversity results are reported as means over 3,000 balanced trials, but no error bars or confidence intervals are shown in Figure 6. Given the authors' claim of ranking first in all six metrics, reporting variability or rank frequencies would strengthen the analysis.
  5. [§5.1] The analysis depends on several hyperparameters (K=50 codebook cells, τ=5 coverage threshold, k=20 neighbors). Please justify these choices or include a sensitivity analysis, since some conclusions may be sensitive to them.
  6. [Abstract / Table 1] The abstract and Table 1 report 2,000 hours and 400+ device types, while the distributional evidence in §3.6 is computed on a 100-hour sample. The paper should clarify whether the full-release metadata confirms these counts or whether they are inferred from the sample.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; the dataset/release claims are descriptive and externally checkable, with only non-load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

Open-AoE's central claims are a released corpus, a processing pipeline, and a training toolchain rather than a derived prediction, so there is no fitted-parameter/predicted-quantity chain that could reduce to its inputs by construction. The only self-citations, e.g. "Open-AoE builds on the AoE consumer-smartphone collection framework [9]" (Sec. 1) and the edge-side capture mechanics of Sec. 3.2, document provenance of the capture app and are not used to derive the dataset's properties. The evaluation sections are descriptive audits using external models (CLIP, Idefics2) and explicitly defined formulas (Eqs. 1-6) that compute diversity, coverage, and window yield from the released data; none of these quantities is fitted and then re-reported as a prediction. The paper even states a downstream benefit remains a training hypothesis (Sec. 3.6), and the Sec. 3.5 quality gates are selection criteria, not evidence that the geometric reconstructions are accurate. The absence of quantitative MANO/SLAM error benchmarks is a validation gap, which is a correctness risk rather than a circularity. No load-bearing argument reduces to a self-citation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new physical or formal entities are invented; the capture app, processing pipeline, and toolchain are software artifacts built from existing models and standards. The free parameters listed are analysis and curation choices that shape, but do not constitute, the scientific derivation.

free parameters (5)
  • Three-gate QC thresholds
    The completeness (valid-frame ratio), correctness (IK failure rate), and consistency (trajectory smoothness) thresholds in §3.5 determine which ~2,000 hours are released but are only described qualitatively.
  • CLIP codebook size K = 50
    Hand-chosen analysis hyperparameter in §5.1, Eq. (2).
  • kNN neighborhood size k = 20
    Hand-chosen analysis hyperparameter in §5.1, Eq. (3).
  • Meaningful-coverage threshold τ = 5
    Hand-chosen threshold for counting occupied visual cells in §5.1.
  • History/future/stride windows = h=f=Δ=2s
    Hand-chosen candidate-window extraction settings in §5.4; reported yield depends on this choice.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption MANO hand model sufficiently represents real hand articulation
    The released hand supervision is expressed as MANO pose, which is standard but is only a parametric approximation of real hands (§3.4).
  • domain assumption Smartphone egocentric video is sufficient for accurate HaWoR and DROID-W reconstruction
    The pipeline assumes that consumer-phone RGB with motion blur and ego-motion can still support metric-scale hand and camera pose reconstruction (§3.4).
  • domain assumption The 100-hour random sample represents the full 2,000-hour release
    All diversity, coverage, and utility statistics are computed on a 100-hour subset and extrapolated to the release (§3.6, §5).
  • domain assumption CLIP embeddings capture visual diversity relevant to manipulation
    The high-dimensional visual diversity comparison rests on CLIP features being a meaningful representation of manipulation-relevant differences (§5.1).
  • domain assumption Idefics2 scores are a valid proxy for annotation-vision consistency
    The cross-dataset consistency audit uses an automated VLM judge rather than human ground truth (§5.3).
  • domain assumption Anonymization and local review are sufficient to prevent re-identification
    The privacy statement asserts face-masking and metadata replacement but provides no formal re-identification risk analysis (Appendix).

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 188 in / 7704 out tokens · 120513 ms · 2026-08-02T03:20:36.771872+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Egocentric videos of human manipulation provide scalable supervision for embodied intelligence, yet existing resources rarely combine low-cost continuous capture, manipulation-level structured annotations, and reusable tools for robot learning. We present Open-AoE, an open, community-oriented egocentric manipulation dataset and toolchain spanning the full pipeline from smartphone capture to model training. Its first release contains approximately 2,000 hours of manipulation video collected in natural environments by 500+ contributors using 400+ smartphones. The dataset provides text annotations, MANO-based hand poses, camera trajectories, and temporally localized atomic actions. Open-AoE further includes a data processing pipeline that transforms raw recordings into structured samples through temporal action segmentation, semantic annotation, hand reconstruction, and camera trajectory reconstruction. Meanwhile, we provide a separate downstream toolchain supports visualization, cross-embodiment retargeting, model-specific data conversion, and training recipes for VLA policies, WAMs, and World Models. By integrating scalable capture, structured processing, and downstream adaptation, Open-AoE reduces the barriers to both data contribution and reuse, providing practical open infrastructure for embodied model training, human-to-robot transfer, and world modeling.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.14183 by Bowen Yang, Bo Zhang, Changtao Miao, Chao Shen, Chenhao Lin, Chunhua Shen, Guocai Yao, Hao Chen, Hao Cheng, Jiadong Hong, Jiansheng Cai, Jianshu Li, Jize Zhang, Kai Zhu, Lequan Yu, Man Luo, Qingze Guan, Renjing Xu, Taowen Wang, Wanke Zhan, Yang Sun, Yibo Wang, Yifan Yang, You Liu, Yushi Feng, Zhaowen Zhou, Zhe Li, Zhenchao Jin, Zhengxing Wu, Zhiyi Huang, Zishuo Li, Zitong Shan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of Open-AoE. Open-AoE provides independent modules for smartphone capture, structured data processing, and downstream robot learning, supporting 2,000 hours of data across 500+ contributors, 400+ device types, 400+ scenes, and 8,000+ tasks. 1 arXiv:2607.14183v2 [cs.RO] 18 Jul 2026 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Open-AoE data processing pipeline. Starting from edge-side on-device detection and control, raw egocentric videos pass through offline quality checking and scene labeling (image￾based detection, video slicing, and large-model detection), followed by pose reconstruction, atomic-action annotation, and three-gate quality inspection to produce an anonymized training corpus. The released subset contains approxi… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Open-AoE collection, sensor, and semantic diversity in a random 100-hour sample. The nested donut summarizes the consumer-phone brand and market-model composition, and the lower-left panel shows the horizontal-FOV distribution. The center panels report collection￾context composition and anonymous collector-ID coverage, while the word clouds summarize atomic-action verbs, manipulated objects, and task-langu… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The outputs are coupled: reconstruction supplies object and contact references, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: AoE-Reconstruct-Retarget. A smartphone-captured egocentric video is projected into 4D hand-object assets, robot-usable motion, and robotized video. The repository integrates reconstruction interfaces for EgoInfinity and Do-as-I-Do, multiple retargeting backends for G1, Galbot/Galaxea, Sharpa, and XHand, and simulation and egoview synthesis for result validation. 4D hand-object reconstruction. EgoInfinity [… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: AoE-Training-Ready. A synchronized AoE segment is projected into action repre￾sentations with different supervision densities and semantic roles. Integrated recipes connect dense MANO, robot-facing, hand-plus-camera, and latent or weak action representations to Vision-Language-Action policies, World Action Models, and World Models. For recipes that require dense hand articulation, Open-AoE concatenates two… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: High-dimensional CLIP feature analysis. Bars report the mean over 3,000 balanced [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Semantic breadth and temporal annotation characteristics across datasets. (a) Number of unique entries in the primary released action-annotation field versus temporal annotation coverage, with marker area proportional to annotation density, measured as the number of annotated segments per minute. (b) Mean segment duration and annotation density for each dataset. Because the datasets use different native an… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Sequence-level image-annotation consistency across datasets. (a) Sequence-macro means, sequence-level medians, and 95% bootstrap confidence intervals for the mean Idefics2 consistency score. (b) Fractions of sequences in the low (⩽ 2), intermediate (2 < · < 4), and high (⩾ 4) score ranges. As illustrated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Training-sample yield and multimodal supervision availability across datasets. (a) Candidate history-future windows obtained per hour using 2 s of history, 2 s of future context, and a 2 s stride, together with the retention rate relative to the no-boundary ceiling of 1,800 windows per hour. (b) Availability of native hand signals, distinguishing entries with at least one valid hand from those with valid s… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Data Pyramid for Embodied Manipulation

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 3.0

    Embodied training data form a five-layer pyramid—real-robot, UMI, ego/exo, simulation, general V–L—ordered by the trade-off between scale and robot alignment, and model capabilities track how those layers are mixed.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Ego4D: Around the world in 3,000 hours of egocentric video

    Kristen Grauman et al. Ego4D: Around the world in 3,000 hours of egocentric video. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,

  2. [2]

    Rescaling egocentric vision: Collection, pipeline and challenges for EPIC-KITCHENS-

    Dima Damen, Hazel Doughty, Giovanni Maria Farinella, Antonino Furnari, Evangelos Kazakos, Jian Ma, Davide Moltisanti, Jonathan Munro, Toby Perrett, Will Price, and Michael Wray. Rescaling egocentric vision: Collection, pipeline and challenges for EPIC-KITCHENS-

  3. [3]

    Yoon, Mouli Sivapurapu, and Jian Zhang

    Ryan Hoque, Peide Huang, David J. Yoon, Mouli Sivapurapu, and Jian Zhang. EgoDex: Learning dexterous manipulation from large-scale egocentric video. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.11709, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2505.11709

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    EgoLive: A large-scale egocentric dataset from real-world human tasks

    Yihang Li, Xuelong Wei, Jingzhou Luo, Yingjing Xiao, Yibo Bai, Guangyuan Zhou, Teng Zou, Chenguang Gui, Jiajun Wen, He Zhang, Kangliang Chen, Xing Pan, Shuaiyan Liu, Daming Wang, Tao An, Jiayi Li, Shibo Jin, Wanwan Zhang, Tianyu Wang, Boren Wei, Zhixuan Huang, Fangsheng Liu, Ruodai Li, Hui Zhang, Anson Li, Yicheng Gong, Peng Cao, Jiaming Liang, and Liang ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  5. [5]

    OpenEgo: A large-scale multimodal egocentric dataset for dexterous manipulation

    Ahad Jawaid and Yu Xiang. OpenEgo: A large-scale multimodal egocentric dataset for dexterous manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.05513, 2025. URL https://arxiv.or g/abs/2509.05513

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    EgoScale: Scaling dexterous manipulation with diverse egocentric human data

    Ruijie Zheng, Dantong Niu, Yuqi Xie, Jing Wang, Mengda Xu, Yunfan Jiang, Fernando Castañeda, Fengyuan Hu, You Liang Tan, Letian Fu, Trevor Darrell, Furong Huang, Yuke Zhu, Danfei Xu, and Linxi Fan. EgoScale: Scaling dexterous manipulation with diverse egocentric human data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.16710, 2026. URL https://arxiv.or g/abs/2602.16710

    arXiv 2026

  7. [8]

    DROID: A large-scale in-the-wild robot manipulation dataset

    Alexander Khazatsky et al. DROID: A large-scale in-the-wild robot manipulation dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.12945, 2024. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2403.12945

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  8. [9]

    AoE: Always-on egocentric human video collection for embodied AI

    Bowen Yang, Zishuo Li, Yang Sun, Changtao Miao, Yifan Yang, Man Luo, Xiaotong Yan, Feng Jiang, Jinchuan Shi, Yankai Fu, Ning Chen, Junkai Zhao, Pengwei Wang, Guocai Yao, Shanghang Zhang, Hao Chen, Zhe Li, and Kai Zhu. AoE: Always-on egocentric human video collection for embodied AI. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern ...

    2026

  9. [10]

    HOI4D: A 4d egocentric dataset for category-level human- object interaction

    Yunze Liu, Yun Liu, Che Jiang, Kangbo Lyu, Weikang Wan, Hao Shen, Boqiang Liang, Zhoujie Fu, He Wang, and Li Yi. HOI4D: A 4d egocentric dataset for category-level human- object interaction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 21013–21022, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.0 1577. 20

    2022

  10. [11]

    HOT3D: Hand and object tracking in 3d from egocentric multi-view videos

    Prithviraj Banerjee, Sindi Shkodrani, Pierre Moulon, Shreyas Hampali, Shangchen Han, Fan Zhang, Linguang Zhang, Jade Fountain, Edward Miller, Selen Basol, Richard Newcombe, Robert Wang, Jakob Julian Engel, and Tomas Hodan. HOT3D: Hand and object tracking in 3d from egocentric multi-view videos. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  11. [12]

    EgoMimic: Scaling imitation learning via egocentric video

    Simar Kareer, Dhruv Patel, Ryan Punamiya, Pranay Mathur, Shuo Cheng, Chen Wang, Judy Hoffman, and Danfei Xu. EgoMimic: Scaling imitation learning via egocentric video. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.24221, 2024. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2410.24221

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  12. [13]

    Ha- WoR: World-space hand motion reconstruction from egocentric videos

    Jinglei Zhang, Jiankang Deng, Chao Ma, and Rolandos Alexandros Potamias. Ha- WoR: World-space hand motion reconstruction from egocentric videos. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.02973, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2501.02973

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  13. [14]

    Qian, Podshara Chanrungmaneekul, and Kaiyu Hang

    Gaotian Wang, Kejia Ren, Andrew Morgan, Yiting Chen, Howard H. Qian, Podshara Chanrungmaneekul, and Kaiyu Hang. EgoInfinity: A web-scale 4d hand-object interaction data engine for any-view robot retargeting and video-to-action robot learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.17385, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2606.17385

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  14. [15]

    EgoAERO: Learning dexterous manipulation from a single egocentric video without object assets

    Yichen Niu, Haoran Lv, Xinrui Zhang, Xueyao Wan, Shiyu Gao, Ying Ai, Hui Xu, Yongqi Hu, Hengyi Zhang, Yang Xie, Zhaxizhuoma, Yue Zhao, Zhenshan Bing, Yan Ding, and Jianxing Liu. EgoAERO: Learning dexterous manipulation from a single egocentric video without object assets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.08057, 2026. URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/2606.08057

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  15. [17]

    Phantom: Training robots without robots using only human videos

    Marion Lepert, Jiaying Fang, and Jeannette Bohg. Phantom: Training robots without robots using only human videos. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.00779, 2025. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2503.00779

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  16. [18]

    Being-H0.5: Scaling human-centric robot learning for cross-embodiment generalization

    Hao Luo, Ye Wang, Wanpeng Zhang, Sipeng Zheng, Ziheng Xi, Chaoyi Xu, Haiweng Xu, Haoqi Yuan, Chi Zhang, Yiqing Wang, Yicheng Feng, and Zongqing Lu. Being-H0.5: Scaling human-centric robot learning for cross-embodiment generalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.12993, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2601.12993

    arXiv 2026

  17. [19]

    EgoMI: Learn- ing active vision and whole-body manipulation from egocentric human demonstrations

    Justin Yu, Yide Shentu, Di Wu, Pieter Abbeel, Ken Goldberg, and Philipp Wu. EgoMI: Learn- ing active vision and whole-body manipulation from egocentric human demonstrations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.00153, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2511.00153

    arXiv 2025

  18. [20]

    ZeroWBC: Learning natural whole-body humanoid interaction from human egocentric data

    Haoran Yang, Jiacheng Bao, Yucheng Xin, Haoming Song, Yuyang Tian, Bin Zhao, Dong Wang, and Xuelong Li. ZeroWBC: Learning natural whole-body humanoid interaction from human egocentric data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.09170, 2026. URL https://arxi v.org/abs/2603.09170

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  19. [21]

    EgoHumanoid: Unlocking in-the-wild loco-manipulation with robot-free egocentric demonstration

    Modi Shi, Shijia Peng, Jin Chen, Haoran Jiang, Tianyu Li, Di Huang, Ping Luo, Hongyang Li, and Li Chen. EgoHumanoid: Unlocking in-the-wild loco-manipulation with robot-free egocentric demonstration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.10106, 2026. URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2602.10106. 21

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  20. [22]

    Being-H0: Vision-language-action pretraining from large-scale human videos

    Hao Luo, Yicheng Feng, Wanpeng Zhang, Sipeng Zheng, Ye Wang, Haoqi Yuan, Jiazheng Liu, Chaoyi Xu, Qin Jin, and Zongqing Lu. Being-H0: Vision-language-action pretraining from large-scale human videos. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.15597, 2025. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2507.15597

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  21. [23]

    EgoVLA: Learning vision-language-action models from egocentric human videos

    Ruihan Yang, Qinxi Yu, Yecheng Wu, Rui Yan, Borui Li, An-Chieh Cheng, Xueyan Zou, Yunhao Fang, Xuxin Cheng, Ri-Zhao Qiu, Hongxu Yin, Sifei Liu, Song Han, Yao Lu, and Xiaolong Wang. EgoVLA: Learning vision-language-action models from egocentric human videos. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.12440, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.1 2440

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  22. [25]

    Latent action learning requires supervision in the presence of distractors

    Alexander Nikulin, Ilya Zisman, Denis Tarasov, Nikita Lyubaykin, Andrei Polubarov, Igor Kiselev, and Vladislav Kurenkov. Latent action learning requires supervision in the presence of distractors. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.00379, 2025. URL https://arxiv.or g/abs/2502.00379

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  23. [26]

    LaWAM: Latent world action models for efficient dynamics-aware robot policies

    Jialei Chen, Kai Wang, Kang Chen, Shuaihang Chen, Feng Gao, Wenhao Tang, Zhiyuan Li, Weilin Liu, Zhuyu Yao, Boxun Li, Yuanbo Xu, and Chao Yu. LaWAM: Latent world action models for efficient dynamics-aware robot policies. arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.15768, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2606.15768

    arXiv 2026

  24. [27]

    World action models are zero- shot policies

    Seonghyeon Ye, Yunhao Ge, Kaiyuan Zheng, Shenyuan Gao, Sihyun Yu, George Kurian, Suneel Indupuru, You Liang Tan, Chuning Zhu, Jiannan Xiang, Ayaan Malik, Kyungmin Lee, William Liang, Nadun Ranawaka, Jiasheng Gu, Yinzhen Xu, Guanzhi Wang, Fengyuan Hu, Avnish Narayan, Johan Björck, Jing Wang, Gwanghyun Kim, Dantong Niu, Ruijie Zheng, Yuqi Xie, Jimmy Wu, Qi ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  25. [29]

    iVideoGPT: Interactive videogpts are scalable world models

    Jialong Wu, Shaofeng Yin, Ningya Feng, Xu He, Dong Li, Jianye Hao, and Mingsheng Long. iVideoGPT: Interactive videogpts are scalable world models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.15223, 2024. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2405.15223

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  26. [31]

    DROID-SLAM in the wild

    Moyang Li, Zihan Zhu, Marc Pollefeys, and Daniel Barath. DROID-SLAM in the wild. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,

  27. [32]

    Javier Romero, Dimitrios Tzionas, and Michael J. Black. Embodied hands: Modeling and capturing hands and bodies together. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 36(6), 2017. doi: 10.1145/3130800.3130883

    arXiv 2017

  28. [33]

    Do as i do: Dexterous manipulation data from everyday human videos

    Bhawna Paliwal, Haritheja Etukuru, William Liang, Pieter Abbeel, Nur Muhammad Mahi Shafiullah, and Jitendra Malik. Do as i do: Dexterous manipulation data from everyday human videos. arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.19333, 2026. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2606.19333

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  29. [34]

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2602.06949

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [35]

    SPIDER: Scalable physics- informed dexterous retargeting

    Chaoyi Pan, Changhao Wang, Haozhi Qi, Zixi Liu, Homanga Bharadhwaj, Akash Sharma, Tingfan Wu, Guanya Shi, Jitendra Malik, and Francois Hogan. SPIDER: Scalable physics- informed dexterous retargeting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.09484, 2025. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2511.09484

    arXiv 2025

  31. [36]

    LeRobot: An open-source library for end-to-end robot learning

    Remi Cadene, Simon Aliberts, Francesco Capuano, Michel Aractingi, Adil Zouitine, Pepijn Kooijmans, Jade Choghari, Martino Russi, Caroline Pascal, Steven Palma, Mustafa Shukor, Jess Moss, Alexander Soare, Dana Aubakirova, Quentin Lhoest, Quentin Gallouedec, and Thomas Wolf. LeRobot: An open-source library for end-to-end robot learning. arXiv preprint arXiv...

    arXiv 2026

  32. [37]

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10125. 22

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [38]

    Develop humanoid robot policies end-to-end with NVIDIA Isaac GR00T

    Edith Llontop and Brandon Neel. Develop humanoid robot policies end-to-end with NVIDIA Isaac GR00T. NVIDIA Technical Blog, July 2026. URL https://developer.nv idia.com/blog/develop-humanoid-robot-policies-end-to-end-with-nvidi a-isaac-gr00t/. Official GR00T N1.7 workflow and model overview

    2026

  34. [39]

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2603.19076

    arXiv

  35. [41]

    Causal world modeling for robot control

    Lin Li, Qihang Zhang, Yiming Luo, Shuai Yang, Ruilin Wang, Fei Han, Mingrui Yu, Zelin Gao, Nan Xue, Xing Zhu, Yujun Shen, and Yinghao Xu. Causal world modeling for robot control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.21998, 2026. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.2 1998. 23

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  36. [42]

    AnyTeleop: A general vision-based dexterous robot arm-hand teleoperation system

    Yuzhe Qin, Wei Yang, Binghao Huang, Karl Van Wyk, Hao Su, Xiaolong Wang, Yu-Wei Chao, and Dieter Fox. AnyTeleop: A general vision-based dexterous robot arm-hand teleoperation system. In Robotics: Science and Systems, 2023. URL https://github.c om/dexsuite/dex-retargeting

    2023

  37. [43]

    EgoXtreme: A dataset for robust object pose estimation in egocentric views under extreme conditions

    Taegyoon Yoon, Yegyu Han, Seojin Ji, Jaewoo Park, Sojeong Kim, Taein Kwon, and Hyung- Sin Kim. EgoXtreme: A dataset for robust object pose estimation in egocentric views under extreme conditions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.25135, 2026. URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/2603.25135

    arXiv 2026

  38. [44]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, Gretchen Krueger, and Ilya Sutskever. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 139 of Proceedings o...

    2021

  39. [45]

    H-RDT: Human manipulation enhanced bimanual robotic manipulation

    Hongzhe Bi, Lingxuan Wu, Tianwei Lin, Hengkai Tan, Zhizhong Su, Hang Su, and Jun Zhu. H-RDT: Human manipulation enhanced bimanual robotic manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.23523, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23523

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  40. [47]

    SmolVLA: A vision-language- action model for affordable and efficient robotics

    Mustafa Shukor, Dana Aubakirova, Francesco Capuano, Pepijn Kooijmans, Steven Palma, Adil Zouitine, Michel Aractingi, Caroline Pascal, Martino Russi, Andres Marafioti, Simon Alibert, Matthieu Cord, Thomas Wolf, and Remi Cadene. SmolVLA: A vision-language- action model for affordable and efficient robotics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.01844, 2025. URLhttps://...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  41. [49]

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2409.06445

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [51]

    AdaWorld: Learning adaptable world models with latent actions

    Shenyuan Gao, Siyuan Zhou, Yilun Du, Jun Zhang, and Chuang Gan. AdaWorld: Learning adaptable world models with latent actions. In Proceedings of the 42nd International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 267 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 18744–18771. PMLR, 2025. URL https://proceedings.mlr. press/v267/gao25u.html

    2025

  43. [54]

    What matters when building vision-language models? In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 37, 2024

    Hugo Laurençon, Léo Tronchon, Matthieu Cord, and Victor Sanh. What matters when building vision-language models? In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 37, 2024. doi: 10.52202/079017-2789. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc /paper_files/paper/2024/hash/a03037317560b8c5f2fb4b6466d4c439-Abstr act-Conference.html. 24 Appendix Privacy an...

    work page doi:10.52202/079017-2789 2024

  44. [100]

    International Journal of Computer Vision, 130(1):33–55, 2022

    2022

  45. [2022]

    URL https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content/CVPR2022/html/Grauman_ Ego4D_Around_the_World_in_3000_Hours_of_Egocentric_Video_CVPR_2022_p aper.html

  46. [2024]

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2410.18647

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  47. [2025]

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2510.21571

    arXiv

  48. [2026]

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12604

    Pith/arXiv arXiv