REVIEW 2 cited by
MindCraft: Theory of Mind Modeling for Situated Dialogue in Collaborative Tasks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
An ideal integration of autonomous agents in a human world implies that they are able to collaborate on human terms. In particular, theory of mind plays an important role in maintaining common ground during human collaboration and communication. To enable theory of mind modeling in situated interactions, we introduce a fine-grained dataset of collaborative tasks performed by pairs of human subjects in the 3D virtual blocks world of Minecraft. It provides information that captures partners' beliefs of the world and of each other as an interaction unfolds, bringing abundant opportunities to study human collaborative behaviors in situated language communication. As a first step towards our goal of developing embodied AI agents able to infer belief states of collaborative partners in situ, we build and present results on computational models for several theory of mind tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Morae: Proactively Pausing UI Agents for User Choices
Morae, a UI agent that proactively pauses at ambiguous decision points, helps blind and low-vision users complete more tasks and express preferences better than fully autonomous agents.
-
Referential ambiguity and clarification requests: comparing human and LLM behaviour
Humans seldom ask clarification questions for referential ambiguity, while LLMs ask them more often, and reasoning prompts increase LLM question frequency and relevance.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.