Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 90 references

A free electric BMS3 scalar with the right central charge reproduces the monodromy classification of 3D Einstein gravity, while AdS3 and dS3 flat limits give complementary flat holography.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-10 20:30 UTC pith:Y3KGKSVM

load-bearing objection Solid classical BMS3 construction paper: free electric scalar with both central charges, monodromy match to 3D gravity, and AdS/dS sign complementarity are real additions. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.06826 v1 pith:Y3KGKSVM submitted 2026-07-07 hep-th

BMS₃ invariant field theories

classification hep-th
keywords BMS3 symmetryflat-space holographyCarrollian field theoryelectric and magnetic scalarscentral chargesmonodromy classificationLiouville theoryboundary counterterms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper builds and organizes two-dimensional scalar field theories that carry the infinite-dimensional BMS3 symmetry of asymptotically flat three-dimensional gravity. It constructs free and interacting electric, magnetic, and canonical models, including electric–magnetic couplings, and works out the boundary counterterms at null-infinity corners so that the action is BMS3-invariant with a consistent variational principle. Sources produce flux-balance laws for the supertranslation and superrotation charges. The central claim for holography is that a free electric BMS3 scalar with the matching central charge reproduces the monodromy classification of three-dimensional Einstein gravity—elliptic, parabolic, and hyperbolic branches corresponding to conical defects, null orbifolds, and flat cosmologies. Separately, the flat-space limits of AdS3 and dS3, obtained as Carrollian limits of Liouville and Euclidean Liouville theory, yield BMS3 theories with isomorphic spectra but opposite signs for the supertranslation charges and the central charge c_M. The paper therefore presents these limits as complementary realizations of flat-space holography, and supplies a classical toolkit of boundary models for that program.

Core claim

A free electric BMS3 scalar, once equipped with the appropriate central charge, reproduces the monodromy classification of three-dimensional Einstein gravity: constant-energy solutions of its Riccati equation, linearized via a non-local primary, fall into elliptic, parabolic, and hyperbolic branches that match conical defects, null orbifolds, and flat cosmologies under the bulk dictionary relating the improvement parameter to Newton’s constant. In parallel, the flat-space limits of AdS3 and dS3 produce BMS3 theories whose spectra are isomorphic but whose supertranslation charges and c_M flip sign, so the two limits furnish complementary realizations of flat-space holography.

What carries the argument

The improved free electric scalar (Lagrangian ½ψ̇² with transformation δψ = fψ̇ + bψ′ + (2/γ)f′), whose on-shell energy density satisfies a Riccati equation linearized by the non-local primary Y = exp(−(γ/4)∫ψ̇); the monodromy of Y classifies solutions and, with γ = √(32πG), matches the 3D gravity spectrum. The same improvement structure, with opposite-sign Hamiltonians, appears in the magnetic flat limits of Liouville and Euclidean Liouville.

Load-bearing premise

That classical agreement of monodromy classes and stress-tensor orbits, together with the bulk dictionary for the central charge, already constitutes a boundary description of three-dimensional Einstein gravity, even though a quantum Hilbert-space match and a unique bulk dual for the electric and canonical models remain open.

What would settle it

Compute whether the electric model’s constant-H solutions, after BMS orbiting and the dictionary γ = √(32πG), produce exactly the same set of conical-defect angles, parabolic monodromies, and positive-energy flat cosmologies as the bulk Einstein solutions under Barnich–Compère boundary conditions; any mismatch in the allowed energy windows or monodromy conjugacy classes would refute the claimed reproduction.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs and reviews two-dimensional BMS3-invariant scalar field theories (electric, magnetic, and canonical), with and without central extensions and Liouville-type interactions, including electric–magnetic couplings and multifield extensions (sigma models, Toda, deformed symplectic structures). It carefully treats boundary terms at u o±∞, supplies counterterms and fall-off conditions that restore BMS3 invariance and a well-posed variational principle, and derives flux-balance laws in the presence of sources. A free electric model with improved transformations is shown to realize both c_M and c_L; with the bulk dictionary γ=√(32πG) its constant-H solutions, linearized via a non-local primary Y, reproduce the elliptic/parabolic/hyperbolic monodromy classification of 3D Einstein gravity (conical defects, null orbifolds, flat cosmologies). Flat-space limits of AdS3 and dS3 (Carrollian Liouville and Euclidean Liouville) yield BMS3 theories with isomorphic spectra but opposite signs of supertranslation charges and c_M, presented as complementary realizations of flat-space holography.

Significance. The work supplies a systematic classical toolkit for BMS3 field theories that is useful for flat-space holography. Strengths include explicit Noether charges and Poisson-bracket central extensions, concrete boundary counterterms that cancel divergent superrotation pieces while preserving the variational principle, flux-balance laws, and a clean monodromy match between the free electric model and 3D Einstein gravity under a standard dictionary. The AdS3/dS3 sign-flip observation and the canonical first-order model (with twisted Sugawara and enlarged algebra) are new organizing structures. Results are classical and the bulk duals of the electric/canonical models are left open, but the constructions themselves are carefully derived and of clear interest to the Carrollian/flat-holography community.

major comments (2)
  1. The monodromy claim in §2.5 is load-bearing for the holographic interpretation. The Riccati equation for constant H0, linearization via Y (2.71) to Y''−κY=0, and the elliptic/parabolic/hyperbolic conjugacy classes are derived carefully and match the known bulk spectrum under γ=√(32πG). The paper should state more explicitly that this is a classical coadjoint-orbit match (stress-tensor sector), not a completed quantum dual or a uniqueness statement for the electric model; the discussion in §7 already flags the open quantum and dual questions, but a short clarifying sentence in §2.5 would prevent over-reading.
  2. In §3.4 the claim that flat limits of AdS3 and dS3 provide complementary realizations of flat-space holography rests on isomorphic spectra with opposite signs of H and c_M. The classical spectrum match is solid, but the manuscript should note that induced representations for c_M>0 (energies bounded below) and c_M<0 (energies bounded above) are isomorphic only at the level of the classical phase space / induced modules already discussed; no new representation-theoretic computation is supplied. A brief caveat would keep the claim proportionate.
minor comments (4)
  1. Notation for the improvement parameters γ and λ is reused across electric, magnetic and canonical models; a short table or sentence in the introduction listing which central charges each model realizes would help the reader.
  2. In §2.1–2.2 the counterterm S_ct = −Λ∫(L(Λ)+L(−Λ)) is introduced by hand; a one-line comparison with the holographic renormalization literature (e.g. Papadimitriou) already cited would clarify the origin of the form.
  3. Typographical consistency: the arXiv identifier in the header is 2607.06826 while the abstract banner shows the same; ensure journal submission metadata match. Occasional missing spaces after commas in equations (e.g. around (2.83)) should be cleaned.
  4. Section 6.3 on the extended symplectic structure is interesting but ends abruptly; a sentence on whether a Sugawara construction is expected or left for future work would improve closure.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: monodromy classes and AdS3/dS3 sign flips are obtained by independent solution of the field equations and analytic continuation, then matched to bulk via a free parameter dictionary.

full rationale

The paper constructs BMS3-invariant Lagrangians (electric free scalar (2.1)/(2.64), magnetic (3.1), canonical (4.1), Liouville deformations, couplings) from first-order or second-order actions, imposes improved transformation laws that close into the BMS3 algebra off-shell or on-shell, computes Noether charges H and P, and evaluates their Poisson brackets to extract central charges c_M and c_L (e.g. (2.75), (2.83), (3.33), (3.84), (4.54)). Boundary counterterms (2.9), (3.7) and flux-balance laws with sources are derived directly from the variational principle and equations of motion. For the monodromy claim, constant-H0 solutions of the free electric model reduce to a Riccati equation that is linearized via the non-local primary Y (2.71) to the free oscillator Y''-κY=0; the three conjugacy classes (elliptic/parabolic/hyperbolic) and the deficit-angle window are read off from the solutions and then identified with 3D Einstein gravity by the free choice γ=√(32πG) that sets c_M=3/G. The AdS3/dS3 flat limits follow from Carroll contractions of (Euclidean) Liouville plus analytic continuation that flips the sign of H and c_M; the resulting spectra are isomorphic by construction of the contraction but the sign difference is a genuine output. None of these steps reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input, a self-definition, or a load-bearing self-citation uniqueness theorem. Parameter identification with bulk quantities is ordinary holographic dictionary matching, not circular derivation. The paper is therefore self-contained against its own classical benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 6 axioms · 3 invented entities

The work sits inside the standard BMS3/Carroll asymptotic-symmetry program. Load-bearing inputs are the BMS3 algebra and primary transformation laws, Carroll limits of relativistic scalars/Liouville, and the bulk dictionary relating γ,λ to G,μ. Free parameters are model couplings and improvement coefficients fixed by matching known central charges. Invented entities are the new Lagrangian realizations and the coupled/multifield extensions; they are defined by symmetry, not postulated particles.

free parameters (4)
  • γ (background charge / improvement coefficient)
    Sets c_M via c_M = 96π/γ² (or 8π/γ² depending on normalization); fixed by bulk dictionary γ=√(32πG) when matching 3D gravity.
  • λ (superrotation improvement)
    Controls c_L = λ 96π/γ; identified with 1/μ in TMG / flat chiral gravity.
  • β, g (Liouville exponent and coupling)
    Interaction parameters in electric/magnetic Liouville and coupled models; free at the classical level.
  • h (BMS weight of primary scalars)
    Chosen (often 0 or 1) so kinetic terms transform as weight-2 densities; discrete modeling choice.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption BMS3 algebra (1.1) with generators L_n, M_n and central charges c_L, c_M is the asymptotic symmetry of 3D flat gravity / conformal Carroll symmetry on null infinity.
    Taken from Barnich–Compère and related literature; used throughout as the target symmetry.
  • domain assumption Primary (and quasi-primary) transformation laws for scalars and stress-tensor multiplets under BMS3, including boost charge ξ.
    Section 1 and subsequent constructions; standard in Carrollian CFT literature.
  • domain assumption Electric and magnetic Carroll limits of relativistic Klein–Gordon / Liouville yield the free electric and magnetic BMS3 models.
    Cited from Henneaux–Salgado-Rebolledo, de Boer et al.; starting point for Sections 2–3.
  • domain assumption Bulk dictionary c_M = 3/G (and c_L = 3/(μG) for TMG) and identification of boundary stress-tensor components with metric functions H,P.
    Used to match monodromy windows and central charges to 3D Einstein / TMG.
  • standard math Classical Noether procedure plus equal-time Poisson brackets correctly generate the symmetry algebra including central extensions.
    Standard classical field theory; applied repeatedly to compute Q and [Q1,Q2].
  • ad hoc to paper Boundary counterterms of the form ±Λ ∫ (L or H) at u=±Λ cancel divergent superrotation boundary pieces while preserving the variational principle under stated fall-offs.
    Constructed in Sections 2–3 and 5; motivated by invariance and finiteness, not uniquely derived from a bulk renormalization scheme.
invented entities (3)
  • Canonical BMS3 first-order model L=χ φ̇ with twisted Sugawara composite currents and enlarged Witt–Heisenberg–BMS algebra no independent evidence
    purpose: Provide a purely symplectic realization dual to free electric theory and a free-field avatar of flat chiral gravity (c_L only).
    Defined by Lagrangian and composite currents in Section 4; independent evidence is algebraic closure and duality map (2.78), not a bulk dual.
  • Electric–magnetic coupled BMS3 models with potential V = g e^{βψ/2} e^{γφ/2} h(βψ−γφ) no independent evidence
    purpose: Realize interacting theories constrained by off-shell BMS3 with both central charges.
    Section 5; potential form fixed by requiring weight-2 primary interaction density.
  • Multifield extensions: Carrollian sigma models with covariantly constant T,R; magnetic Toda; two-field extended symplectic structure with q1,q2 no independent evidence
    purpose: Show the same BMS3 mechanisms with target-space geometry, Cartan data, or deformed symplectic forms.
    Section 6; illustrative constructions without claimed bulk duals.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 48879 in / 3632 out tokens · 54900 ms · 2026-07-10T20:30:35.989862+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We review existing and construct new two-dimensional field theories that exhibit BMS$_3$ symmetry, with and without central extensions. These include interacting electric, magnetic and canonical BMS$_3$ scalar theories, as well as couplings between the electric and magnetic sectors. We provide a careful analysis of boundary contributions at the corner points $u\rightarrow\pm\infty$, determine the counterterms and boundary conditions required by BMS$_3$ invariance, and study the corresponding variational principles. Furthermore, we introduce external sources and derive the associated flux-balance laws. Within the framework of flat-space holography, we show that a simple free electric BMS$_3$ model with the appropriate central charge reproduces the monodromy classification of three-dimensional Einstein gravity. Finally, we investigate the flat-space limits of both AdS$_3$ and dS$_3$, whose boundary dynamics are described by Carrollian limits of Liouville and Euclidean Liouville theory, respectively. Although the resulting BMS$_3$ theories possess isomorphic spectra, they differ in the signs of the supertranslation charges and the central charge. This suggests that the flat-space limits of AdS$_3$ and dS$_3$ provide complementary realizations of flat-space holography.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 90 canonical work pages · 76 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity

    J.M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

  2. [2]

    Bondi, M.G.J

    H. Bondi, M.G.J. van der Burg and A.W.K. Metzner,Gravitational waves in general relativity

  3. [3]

    Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems,Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A269(1962) 21

  4. [4]

    Sachs,Asymptotic symmetries in gravitational theory,Phys

    R. Sachs,Asymptotic symmetries in gravitational theory,Phys. Rev.128(1962) 2851

  5. [5]

    Classical central extension for asymptotic symmetries at null infinity in three spacetime dimensions

    G. Barnich and G. Compere,Classical central extension for asymptotic symmetries at null infinity in three spacetime dimensions,Class. Quant. Grav.24(2007) F15 [gr-qc/0610130]

  6. [6]

    Asymptotic Structure of Symmetry Reduced General Relativity

    A. Ashtekar, J. Bicak and B.G. Schmidt,Asymptotic structure of symmetry reduced general relativity,Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 669 [gr-qc/9608042]

  7. [7]

    Deser, R

    S. Deser, R. Jackiw and S. Templeton,Topologically massive gauge theories,Annals of Physics 281(2000) 409

  8. [8]

    Deser, R

    S. Deser, R. Jackiw and S. Templeton,Three-dimensional massive gauge theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.48(1982) 975

  9. [9]

    Flat-Space Chiral Gravity

    A. Bagchi, S. Detournay and D. Grumiller,Flat-Space Chiral Gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.109 (2012) 151301 [1208.1658]

  10. [10]

    Classical and Quantized Tensionless Strings

    J. Isberg, U. Lindstrom, B. Sundborg and G. Theodoridis,Classical and quantized tensionless strings,Nucl. Phys. B411(1994) 122 [hep-th/9307108]

  11. [11]

    Tensionless Strings and Galilean Conformal Algebra

    A. Bagchi,Tensionless Strings and Galilean Conformal Algebra,JHEP05(2013) 141 [1303.0291]

  12. [12]

    Bagchi, A

    A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, R. Chatterjee and P. Pandit,The Tensionless Lives of Null Strings, 2601.20959

  13. [13]

    Super-GCA from $\mathcal{N} = (2,2)$ Super-Virasoro

    I. Mandal and A. Rayyan,Super-GCA fromN=(2,2) super-Virasoro,Phys. Lett. B754 (2016) 195 [1601.04723]

  14. [14]

    On the null origin of the ambitwistor string

    E. Casali and P. Tourkine,On the null origin of the ambitwistor string,JHEP11(2016) 036 [1606.05636]

  15. [15]

    Tensionless Superstrings: View from the Worldsheet

    A. Bagchi, S. Chakrabortty and P. Parekh,Tensionless Superstrings: View from the Worldsheet,JHEP10(2016) 113 [1606.09628]

  16. [16]

    Addendum to "Super-GCA from $\mathcal{N}=(2,2)$ super-Virasoro": Super-GCA connection with tensionless strings

    I. Mandal,Addendum to ”Super-GCA fromN= (2,2)super-Virasoro”: Super-GCA connection with tensionless strings,1607.02439

  17. [17]

    The complex null string, Galilean conformal algebra and scattering equations

    E. Casali, Y. Herfray and P. Tourkine,The complex null string, Galilean conformal algebra and scattering equations,JHEP10(2017) 164 [1707.09900]

  18. [18]

    Inhomogeneous Tensionless Superstrings

    A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, S. Chakrabortty and P. Parekh,Inhomogeneous Tensionless Superstrings,JHEP02(2018) 065 [1710.03482]

  19. [19]

    Higher spin theory in 3-dimensional flat space

    H. Afshar, A. Bagchi, R. Fareghbal, D. Grumiller and J. Rosseel,Spin-3 gravity in three-dimensional flat space,Physical Review Letters111(2013) 121603 [1307.4768]

  20. [20]

    Asymptotically flat spacetimes in three-dimensional higher spin gravity

    H.A. Gonzalez, J. Matulich, M. Pino and R. Troncoso,Asymptotically flat spacetimes in three-dimensional higher spin gravity,Journal of High Energy Physics09(2013) 016 [1307.5651]

  21. [21]

    M. Gary, D. Grumiller, M. Riegler and J. Rosseel,Flat space (higher spin) gravity with chemical potentials,Journal of High Energy Physics01(2015) 152 [1411.3728]. – 56 –

  22. [22]

    Higher spin extension of cosmological spacetimes in 3D: asymptotically flat behaviour with chemical potentials and thermodynamics

    J. Matulich, A. Perez, D. Tempo and R. Troncoso,Higher spin extension of cosmological spacetimes in 3d: asymptotically flat behaviour with chemical potentials and thermodynamics, Journal of High Energy Physics05(2015) 025 [1412.1464]

  23. [23]

    Extension of the Poincar\'e group with half-integer spin generators: hypergravity and beyond

    O. Fuentealba, J. Matulich and R. Troncoso,Extension of the Poincaré group with half-integer spin generators: hypergravity and beyond,JHEP09(2015) 003 [1505.06173]

  24. [24]

    Soft gravitons in three dimensions

    J. Cotler, K. Jensen, S. Prohazka, M. Riegler and J. Salzer,Soft gravitons in three dimensions, 2411.13633

  25. [25]

    Brown and M

    J.D. Brown and M. Henneaux,Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,Commun.Math.Phys.104(1986) 207

  26. [26]

    The BMS/GCA correspondence

    A. Bagchi,Correspondence between asymptotically flat spacetimes and nonrelativistic conformal field theories,Physical Review Letters105(2010) 171601 [1006.3354]

  27. [28]

    Holography of 3d Flat Cosmological Horizons

    A. Bagchi, S. Detournay, R. Fareghbal and J. Simón,Holography of 3D flat cosmological horizons,Physical Review Letters110(2013) 141302 [1208.4372]

  28. [29]

    The flat limit of three dimensional asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes

    G. Barnich, A. Gomberoff and H.A. Gonzalez,The Flat limit of three dimensional asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 024020 [1204.3288]

  29. [30]

    Entropy of three-dimensional asymptotically flat cosmological solutions

    G. Barnich,Entropy of three-dimensional asymptotically flat cosmological solutions,JHEP10 (2012) 095 [1208.4371]

  30. [31]

    Entanglement entropy in Galilean conformal field theories and flat holography

    A. Bagchi, R. Basu, D. Grumiller and M. Riegler,Entanglement entropy in Galilean conformal field theories and flat holography,Physical Review Letters114(2015) 111602 [1410.4089]

  31. [32]

    Wilson Lines and Holographic Entanglement Entropy in Galilean Conformal Field Theories

    R. Basu and M. Riegler,Wilson lines and holographic entanglement entropy in Galilean conformal field theories,Physical Review D93(2016) 045003 [1511.08662]

  32. [33]

    Stress tensor correlators in three-dimensional gravity

    A. Bagchi, D. Grumiller and W. Merbis,Stress tensor correlators in three-dimensional gravity, Physical Review D93(2016) 061502 [1507.05620]

  33. [34]

    Flat Holography: Aspects of the dual field theory

    A. Bagchi, R. Basu, A. Kakkar and A. Mehra,Flat Holography: Aspects of the dual field theory,JHEP12(2016) 147 [1609.06203]

  34. [35]

    Entanglement Entropy in Flat Holography

    H. Jiang, W. Song and Q. Wen,Entanglement entropy in flat holography,Journal of High Energy Physics07(2017) 142 [1706.07552]

  35. [36]

    Holographic Entanglement and Poincare blocks in three dimensional flat space

    E. Hijano and C. Rabideau,Holographic entanglement and Poincaré blocks in three-dimensional flat space,Journal of High Energy Physics05(2018) 068 [1712.07131]

  36. [37]

    Local quantum energy conditions in non-Lorentz-invariant quantum field theories

    D. Grumiller, P. Parekh and M. Riegler,Local quantum energy conditions in non-Lorentz-invariant quantum field theories,Physical Review Letters123(2019) 121602 [1907.06650]

  37. [38]

    Geometric actions and flat space holography

    W. Merbis and M. Riegler,Geometric actions and flat space holography,Journal of High Energy Physics02(2020) 125 [1912.08207]

  38. [39]

    Non-Lorentzian Chaos and Cosmological Holography

    A. Bagchi, S. Chakrabortty, D. Grumiller, B. Radhakrishnan, M. Riegler and A. Sinha, Non-Lorentzian chaos and cosmological holography,arXiv preprint(2021) [2106.07649]

  39. [40]

    Three-dimensional Bondi-Metzner-Sachs invariant two-dimensional field theories as the flat limit of Liouville theory

    G. Barnich, A. Gomberoff and H.A. González,Three-dimensional Bondi-Metzner-Sachs invariant two-dimensional field theories as the flat limit of Liouville theory,Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 124032 [1210.0731]. – 57 –

  40. [41]

    Dual dynamics of three dimensional asymptotically flat Einstein gravity at null infinity

    G. Barnich and H.A. Gonzalez,Dual dynamics of three dimensional asymptotically flat Einstein gravity at null infinity,JHEP05(2013) 016 [1303.1075]

  41. [42]

    Carroll contractions of Lorentz-invariant theories

    M. Henneaux and P. Salgado-Rebolledo,Carroll contractions of Lorentz-invariant theories, 2109.06708

  42. [43]

    Carroll symmetry, dark energy and inflation

    J. de Boer, J. Hartong, N.A. Obers, W. Sybesma and S. Vandoren,Carroll Symmetry, Dark Energy and Inflation,Front. in Phys.10(2022) 810405 [2110.02319]

  43. [44]

    Carroll stories

    J. de Boer, J. Hartong, N.A. Obers, W. Sybesma and S. Vandoren,Carroll stories,JHEP09 (2023) 148 [2307.06827]

  44. [45]

    Le Bellac and J.M

    M. Le Bellac and J.M. Lévy-Leblond,Galilean electromagnetism,Nuovo Cim. B14(1973) 217

  45. [46]

    Quantizing Carrollian field theories

    J. Cotler, K. Jensen, S. Prohazka, A. Raz, M. Riegler and J. Salzer,Quantizing Carrollian field theories,JHEP10(2024) 049 [2407.11971]

  46. [47]

    Cotler, P

    J. Cotler, P. Dhivakar and K. Jensen,Carrollian holographic duals are non-local,2512.05072

  47. [48]

    Carrollian quantum states and flat space holography

    S. Fredenhagen, S. Prohazka and R. Tiefenbacher,Carrollian quantum states and flat space holography,2604.22745

  48. [49]

    P.-x. Hao, W. Song, X. Xie and Y. Zhong,BMS-invariant free scalar model,Physical Review D 105(2022) 125005 [2111.04701]

  49. [50]

    Intrinsic Approach to $1+1$D Carrollian Conformal Field Theory

    A. Saha,Intrinsic approach to 1 + 1D Carrollian conformal field theory,Journal of High Energy Physics12(2022) 133 [2207.11684]

  50. [51]

    One-Loop Quantum Effects in Carroll Scalars

    K. Banerjee, R. Basu, B. Krishnan, S. Maulik, A. Mehra and A. Ray,One-loop quantum effects in Carroll scalars,arXiv preprint(2023) [2307.03901]

  51. [52]

    The Shadow Formalism of Galilean CFT$_2$

    B. Chen and R. Liu,The shadow formalism of Galilean CFT2,Journal of High Energy Physics 05(2023) 224 [2203.10490]

  52. [53]

    Carroll covariant scalar fields in two dimensions

    A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, S. Dutta, K.S. Kolekar and P. Sharma,Carroll covariant scalar fields in two dimensions,Journal of High Energy Physics01(2023) 072 [2203.13197]

  53. [54]

    From CFTs to theories with Bondi-Metzner-Sachs symmetries: Complexity and out-of-time-ordered correlators

    A. Banerjee, A. Bhattacharyya, P. Drashni and S. Pawar,From CFTs to theories with Bondi-Metzner-Sachs symmetries: Complexity and out-of-time-ordered correlators,Physical Review D106(2022) 126022 [2205.15338]

  54. [55]

    B. Chen, H. Sun and Y.-f. Zheng,Quantization of Carrollian conformal scalar theories,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 125010 [2406.17451]

  55. [56]

    Aspects of the BMS/CFT correspondence

    G. Barnich and C. Troessaert,Aspects of the BMS/CFT correspondence,JHEP05(2010) 062 [1001.1541]

  56. [57]

    Bridging Carrollian and Celestial Holography

    L. Donnay, A. Fiorucci, Y. Herfray and R. Ruzziconi,Bridging Carrollian and Celestial Holography,2212.12553

  57. [58]

    Carrollian conformal fields and flat holography

    K. Nguyen and P. West,Carrollian Conformal Fields and Flat Holography,Universe9(2023) 385 [2305.02884]

  58. [59]

    Carrollian conformal correlators and massless scattering amplitudes

    K. Nguyen,Carrollian conformal correlators and massless scattering amplitudes,2311.09869

  59. [60]

    Carrollian conformal scalar as flat-space singleton

    X. Bekaert, A. Campoleoni and S. Pekar,Carrollian conformal scalar as flat-space singleton, Phys. Lett. B838(2023) 137734 [2211.16498]

  60. [61]

    Holographic Carrollian Conformal Scalars

    X. Bekaert, A. Campoleoni and S. Pekar,Holographic Carrollian conformal scalars,JHEP05 (2024) 242 [2404.02533]. – 58 –

  61. [62]

    Holographic renormalization as a canonical transformation

    I. Papadimitriou,Holographic renormalization as a canonical transformation,JHEP11(2010) 014 [1007.4592]

  62. [63]

    Perfect Fluids

    J. de Boer, J. Hartong, N.A. Obers, W. Sybesma and S. Vandoren,Perfect Fluids,SciPost Phys.5(2018) 003 [1710.04708]

  63. [64]

    The Asymptotic Dynamics of de Sitter Gravity in three Dimensions

    S. Cacciatori and D. Klemm,The Asymptotic dynamics of de Sitter gravity in three-dimensions,Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 579 [hep-th/0110031]

  64. [65]

    Timelike T-Duality, de Sitter Space, Large $N$ Gauge Theories and Topological Field Theory

    C.M. Hull,Timelike T duality, de Sitter space, large N gauge theories and topological field theory,JHEP07(1998) 021 [hep-th/9806146]

  65. [66]

    Analytic Continuation of Liouville Theory

    D. Harlow, J. Maltz and E. Witten,Analytic Continuation of Liouville Theory,JHEP12 (2011) 071 [1108.4417]

  66. [67]

    Deser, R

    S. Deser, R. Jackiw and G. ’t Hooft,Three-Dimensional Einstein Gravity: Dynamics of Flat Space,Annals Phys.152(1984) 220

  67. [68]

    ’t Hooft,Nonperturbative Two Particle Scattering Amplitudes in (2+1)-Dimensional Quantum Gravity,Commun

    G. ’t Hooft,Nonperturbative Two Particle Scattering Amplitudes in (2+1)-Dimensional Quantum Gravity,Commun. Math. Phys.117(1988) 685

  68. [69]

    Witten,(2+1)-Dimensional Gravity as an Exactly Soluble System,Nucl

    E. Witten,(2+1)-Dimensional Gravity as an Exactly Soluble System,Nucl. Phys. B311 (1988) 46

  69. [70]

    Non-Lorentzian theories with and without constraints

    E.A. Bergshoeff, J. Gomis and A. Kleinschmidt,Non-Lorentzian theories with and without constraints,JHEP01(2023) 167 [2210.14848]

  70. [71]

    On Carroll partition functions and flat space holography

    G. Poulias and S. Vandoren,On Carroll partition functions and flat space holography,JHEP 06(2025) 232 [2503.20615]

  71. [72]

    Cosmic evolution from phase transition of 3-dimensional flat space

    A. Bagchi, S. Detournay, D. Grumiller and J. Simon,Cosmic Evolution from Phase Transition of Three-Dimensional Flat Space,Phys. Rev. Lett.111(2013) 181301 [1305.2919]

  72. [73]

    Fiorucci, S

    A. Fiorucci, S. Pekar, P. Marios Petropoulos and M. Vilatte,Carrollian-Holographic Derivation of Gravitational Flux-Balance Laws,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 261602 [2505.00077]

  73. [74]

    Boundary Energy-Momentum Tensors for Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes

    J. Hartong, E. Have, V. Nenmeli and G. Oling,Boundary Energy-Momentum Tensors for Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes,2505.05432

  74. [75]

    Supertranslations call for superrotations

    G. Barnich and C. Troessaert,Supertranslations call for superrotations,PoSCNCFG2010 (2010) 010 [1102.4632]

  75. [76]

    Notes on the BMS group in three dimensions: I. Induced representations

    G. Barnich and B. Oblak,Notes on the BMS group in three dimensions: I. Induced representations,JHEP06(2014) 129 [1403.5803]

  76. [77]

    BMS Particles in Three Dimensions

    B. Oblak,BMS Particles in Three Dimensions, Ph.D. thesis, U. Brussels, Brussels U., 2016. 1610.08526. 10.1007/978-3-319-61878-4

  77. [78]

    Ruzziconi and P

    R. Ruzziconi and P. West,Extended BMS representations and strings,JHEP05(2026) 167 [2601.00662]

  78. [79]

    Super-BMS$_{3}$ invariant boundary theory from three-dimensional flat supergravity

    G. Barnich, L. Donnay, J. Matulich and R. Troncoso,Super-BMS3 invariant boundary theory from three-dimensional flat supergravity,JHEP01(2017) 029 [1510.08824]

  79. [80]

    Hall effects in Carroll dynamics

    L. Marsot, P.M. Zhang, M. Chernodub and P.A. Horvathy,Hall effects in Carroll dynamics, Phys. Rept.1028(2023) 1 [2212.02360]

  80. [81]

    New Boundary Conditions for AdS3

    G. Compère, W. Song and A. Strominger,New Boundary Conditions for AdS3,JHEP05 (2013) 152 [1303.2662]. – 59 –

Showing first 80 references.