Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 8 cited by

This paper derives the active thermodynamics of an ideal chiral active gas, yielding a chirality-dependent ideal gas law, odd diffusion, and exact edge currents, verified in vibrobot experiments.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

For inertial chiral active gases, pressure and edge currents are determined by a chirality-dependent effective temperature and odd diffusion coefficient.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection The edge-current relation is interesting, but the equation of state and diffusion coefficient look off by a factor of two in the overdamped limit; the paper needs a major correction before I trust the central results. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2509.05053 v1 pith:YPMSFMAW submitted 2025-09-05 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.stat-mech

Active thermodynamics of inertial chiral active gases: equation of state and edge currents

Lorenzo Caprini , Umberto Marini Bettolo Marconi , Benno Liebchen , Hartmut L\"owen This is my paper
classification cond-mat.soft cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords chiral active matteractive thermodynamicsodd diffusionedge currentsequation of stateeffective temperatureinertial active particlesgranular vibrobots
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that an ideal gas of chiral active particles—particles that self-propel along circular paths—has a well-defined macroscopic thermodynamics despite being far from equilibrium. It derives an equation of state connecting wall pressure to bulk density through an effective temperature that decreases as chirality increases, a generalized Fick's law containing odd diffusion, and a formula for persistent edge currents at container walls. It verifies these predictions with experiments on 3D-printed chiral vibrobots. If correct, the results mean that chirality introduces genuinely new thermodynamic features—orthogonal fluxes and boundary currents—even in the ideal, non-interacting gas limit.

Core claim

For inertial chiral active Brownian particles in two dimensions, the pressure at a circular wall is Pm = (γDt + γ v0^2 τ/(1 + Ω^2 τ^2))ρ0, so a pressure law exists with an effective temperature Teff = γDt + γ v0^2 τ/(1 + Ω^2 τ^2). The long-time diffusion obeys Fick's law with a diffusion matrix whose diagonal entries are equal, D, and whose off-diagonal entries are antisymmetric, giving odd diffusion with a closed analytical expression, Dodd = (v0^2 τ Ωτ/(1 + Ω^2 τ^2)) (1 + 2m/(γτ))/( (1 + m/(γτ))^2 + m^2 Ω^2/γ^2 ), which is non-monotonic in chirality because of inertia. In a confined circular container, a steady tangential edge current γρut = (Dodd/D) ρ ∂rV flows along the wall, with sign s

What carries the argument

The central object is the work tensor W = m v0 ⟨n ⊗ v⟩, the momentum-space correlation between self-propulsion direction and velocity. The argument closes the hydrodynamic hierarchy by approximating W as ρ M^{-1} γ v0^2, where the matrix M^{-1} contains the chirality Ω and inertia m/γ and produces the antisymmetric, odd part of the diffusion matrix, and by approximating the pressure tensor as P ≈ γDtρ + Trace[W]ρ/2. These closures turn the coupled equations for density, velocity, and polarization into a linear Fick's law with an antisymmetric diffusion matrix; integrating the momentum balance in polar coordinates then yields the equation of state and the edge-current formula.

Load-bearing premise

The work tensor and pressure tensor are replaced, even across the steep boundary layer, by bulk closures that drop all spatial gradients and higher moments; if those closures break near the wall, both the equation of state and the edge-current prediction collapse.

What would settle it

Run particle-resolved Brownian-dynamics simulations of Eqs. (1) for a single inertial chiral active particle confined by a circular wall with controllable steepness, and measure the wall pressure and tangential velocity as functions of Ω, m/γ, and wall slope. If they do not match Eqs. (5) and (6) within statistical error—especially as the wall becomes steep—the bulk gradient-free closures are falsified.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The ideal chiral active gas has a legitimate equation of state, so pressure and density remain related by a single effective temperature even though the system is out of equilibrium.
  • Chirality reduces the effective temperature and the swim pressure because circular motion shortens the particle's exploration of space.
  • Odd diffusion emerges in an ideal, non-interacting gas purely from chirality and inertia, not from interparticle forces.
  • Edge currents are predicted exactly and their magnitude is set by Dodd/D, allowing tunable boundary flows whose direction reverses with chirality.
  • A gas of chiral active particles can exert a pressure and drive steady tangential flows at walls, a feature relevant for cleaning boundaries or powering active-particle motors.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the gradient-free closures survive near steep walls, the equation of state and edge-current formula may extend to non-circular containers, since the derivation uses only the generic momentum balance in tangential and normal coordinates.
  • A testable extension is to measure Dodd and D directly inside the boundary layer; the paper uses their bulk values in Eq. (6), and any wall-induced change would modify the predicted edge current.
  • The theory is restricted to polar, non-interacting chiral active particles; applying it to interacting or non-polar spinners would likely require additional terms for angular-momentum transfer, a limitation the authors note.
  • Comparing wall pressure measurements across different confining potentials could reveal how sensitive the effective-temperature relation is to wall steepness, testing the approximation that closures hold inside the boundary layer.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a coarse-grained hydrodynamic theory for an ideal inertial chiral active gas, starting from the Fokker-Planck equation for a chiral active Brownian particle. It derives an equation of state for the mechanical pressure at a circular wall (Eq. 5), a generalized Fick law with chiral odd diffusivity (Eqs. 3-4), and a relation for steady edge currents at the wall (Eq. 6). The theoretical predictions are compared with experiments on chiral vibrobots, and the authors claim that the equation of state and edge currents are exact predictions that are experimentally verified.

Significance. If correct, the manuscript would constitute a significant advance: it would give a compact 'active thermodynamics' for chiral gases, with edge currents and odd diffusivity as genuine thermodynamic ingredients, and would include analytic results beyond the common overdamped limit. The explicit inclusion of inertia and the original granular vibrobot experiments are valuable aspects. However, the derivation rests on uncontrolled closures, the experimental verification of the equation of state is indirect and partially self-referential, and there is a concrete factor-of-2 discrepancy in the overdamped limit of the central formulas. The qualitative framework is appealing, but the quantitative predictions need substantial correction before the results can be trusted.

major comments (3)
  1. [End Matter, Eqs. (8), (13), (3), (5)] Eq. (8) together with M^{-1} in Eq. (9) gives, in the overdamped limit m/γ→0 and Ω=0, W ≈ m v0² ρ I. However, from the definition W = m v0 ⟨n⊗v⟩ and v → v0 n, the isotropic steady-state average in two dimensions is ⟨n⊗n⟩ = I/2, so W ≈ (m v0²/2) ρ I. Substituting the correct W into Eq. (13) in the overdamped limit gives D = Dt + v0²τ/2, not D = Dt + v0²τ as stated in Eq. (3). The exact Green-Kubo calculation for the model (1) confirms D = Dt + v0²τ/2 for all m/γ. Consequently, the equation of state (5), which is proportional to D, overestimates the active pressure by a factor of 2, and Eq. (4) contains the same missing 1/2 in Dodd. This is a load-bearing quantitative error in the central results.
  2. [End Matter, parameter extraction; Fig. 4(a)] The claimed experimental verification of the equation of state is not independent. The effective temperature Teff = γDt + γv0²τ/(1+Ω²τ²) is computed from parameters (v0, τ, Ω, γ, Dt) that are fitted to the same experimental data using simulations of Eq. (1). Figure 4(a) compares only the scaling shape with 1/(1+τ²Ω²), which is insensitive to an overall multiplicative prefactor. Thus the experiments cannot detect the factor-of-2 error in Eq. (5), and the statement that the equation of state is 'experimentally verified' is too strong.
  3. [End Matter, Eqs. (8)-(10), (15)-(19)] The derivation of Eq. (6) uses the bulk coefficients D and Dodd inside the boundary layer, where the wall force is steep. The closures (8) and (10) neglect spatial gradients of W and P, and no systematic gradient expansion or error estimate is provided. The authors acknowledge that D and Dodd are bulk values, but this does not quantify the resulting error in the edge-current prediction. The text calls the edge-current result 'exact'; given the uncontrolled closure, that wording is unjustified. This is a separate load-bearing caveat for the central claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [End Matter, Eq. (4)] Eq. (4) is written in an ambiguous way in the main text; please add explicit parentheses so that the numerator and denominator in the inertial correction factor are unambiguous.
  2. [Fig. 4(d) caption] The parameter k in the scaling function ut ∼ Ωτ/(1+k τ²Ω²) is defined only in the SM. Please define it in the main text or in the caption.
  3. [Main text, Knudsen number sentence] Typo: 'the ration between' should read 'the ratio between'.
  4. [Main text and End Matter] The derivations of the closure approximations (8) and (10) are relegated to the Supplementary Material, which is not included in the arXiv version. Given that the main results hinge on these closures, the authors should either include the derivation or ensure referees have access to the SM.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

The hydrodynamic derivation is self-contained, but the experimental verification of the effective temperature / equation of state is self-referential: Teff is evaluated from parameters fitted to the same data. Edge-current and odd-diffusivity tests are independent.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Equation of state section, Fig. 4(a) caption; End Matter 'Parameter extraction']
    "Effective temperature Tef f = γDt + v0² τ γ/(1+Ω2τ 2) as a function of the rescaled chirality τ Ω - generated by different twisting angles β and tilting angles α. ... black lines in (a) and (d) represent the scaling functions ∼ 1/(1 + τ 2Ω2) and ∼ Ωτ /(1 + k τ 2Ω2)"

    The Teff 'data' in Fig. 4(a) are not a measured wall pressure or independently measured temperature; they are the algebraic combination Teff = γDt + γv0²τ/(1+Ω²τ²) evaluated using the parameters v0, τ, Ω, γ, Dt that were obtained by fitting simulations of Eq. (1) to the same experimental trajectories (the cost function includes the velocity distributions, MSD, and angular MSD). The plotted black curve is the same formula. Hence the agreement is by construction: any parameter set reproducing the fitted observables automatically satisfies the Teff curve, so the figure cannot independently verify Eq. (5). The wall pressure itself is never measured.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Figure 3(d)-(f) caption and End Matter 'Parameter extraction']
    "In (d)-(f), points are obtained by experiments and solid colored lines by theoretical predictions, i.e. interpolating the values obtained by calculating Eqs. (3) (4) with the experimental parameters (see End Matter and SM)."

    The parameters used to evaluate Eqs. (3)-(4) are fitted to the experimental data using a cost function that explicitly includes the mean-square displacement, which is the same observable from which the experimental D points are extracted as long-time slopes. The D comparison is therefore in-sample rather than a blind prediction. The Dodd comparison is more informative because the odd MSD cross-correlation is not listed among the fitted observables.

full rationale

The theoretical derivation is not circular: the chain FPE -> moment hierarchy -> closures (8) and (10) -> Eqs. (12)-(19) is an explicit calculation with stated approximations, and no fitted parameter enters the algebra. The closure assumptions (neglect of spatial gradients in W and the factor 1/2 relating P to Trace[W]) are inputs to the theory; if they are wrong, that is a correctness problem, not a circularity. The edge-current relation Eq. (6) is tested through a wall-bounded tangential velocity that was not part of the parameter-extraction cost function, and Dodd is extracted from the odd MSD not listed among the fitted observables, so those parts have independent predictive content. No load-bearing self-citation chain is used: the model and fitting-method citations [61,67] are ordinary methodological references, not uniqueness theorems. The circularity is confined to the experimental 'verification' of the effective temperature/EoS: Teff is a defined combination of parameters fitted to the same data, so Fig. 4(a) is a tautology rather than a measurement of pressure. The paper's own caveat that D and Dodd in Eqs. (5)-(6) are bulk values while their boundary values could be affected by ut is a limitation on the 'exact' claim and on the EoS/edge-current comparison, but it is not circular. The possible factor-of-two discrepancy with the overdamped ABP limit raised by the skeptic is a correctness risk inside the closure, not a circular step.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on fitted single-particle parameters (v0, tau, Omega, gamma, Dt) and on hydrodynamic closure assumptions that are not fully shown in the visible text. No new particles, forces, or fields are invented; the 'effective temperature' and 'odd diffusivity' are derived coefficients, not new entities.

free parameters (5)
  • v0 (self-propulsion speed) = not reported numerically in the text; extracted via Nelder-Mead fit
    Fitted to experimental velocity distributions and MSD; enters D, Dodd, Teff, and edge currents.
  • tau = 1/Dr (persistence time) = not reported numerically; from fit
    Rotational relaxation time, fitted; central to all predictions via tau*Omega.
  • Omega (chirality) = not reported numerically; from fit and varied via twisting angle beta
    Mean angular velocity, fitted; signals the chirality controlling all predicted quantities.
  • gamma (friction coefficient) = not reported numerically; extracted via fit
    Fitted; appears in Teff and edge current prefactors.
  • Dt (translational diffusion coefficient) = not reported numerically; extracted via fit
    Fitted; enters the thermal contribution to Teff and D.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The dynamics of a vibrobot is described by the inertial chiral active Brownian particle equations (Eq. 1): m dv/dt = -γv + γv0 n + γ√(2Dt) ξ + F_w, dθ/dt = Omega + √(2Dr) chi.
    The entire theory and the parameter extraction assume this Langevin model; if the vibrobot motion has other noise or memory, all predictions fail.
  • ad hoc to paper Hydrodynamic closure approximations (Eq. 8 and Eq. 10): W ≈ ρ M^{-1} γ v0^2 and P ≈ γ Dt ρ + Trace[W]ρ/2, obtained by neglecting spatial gradients and higher-order moments.
    These closures are stated to be derived in the SM but are not proven in the visible text; the EOS and edge current formulas depend on them.
  • ad hoc to paper Nonlinear terms and time derivatives are neglected in the momentum and polarization equations to reach the linear Fick form (Eq. 12).
    The authors state these contributions generate higher-order gradients that do not affect the ideal gas result; this is an assumption without a quantitative error bound.
  • domain assumption The wall potential is a sharp radial step V(r)=h(r)Θ(r-R) and the local wall force balances the diffusive flux, so ur=0 in steady state.
    Used to derive Eq. (18) and the edge current relation; real walls have finite width and the bulk D may not hold in the boundary layer, a caveat the authors acknowledge.
  • domain assumption Small Knudsen number Kτ = v0τ/(2R) ≪ 1 ensures the hydrodynamic description holds.
    Measured for the experiments; if violated, the ideal gas hydrodynamic theory would need higher-order gradients.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Active thermodynamics of inertial chiral active gases: equation of state and edge currents." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YPMSFMAW

@misc{pith2026250905053,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Active thermodynamics of inertial chiral active gases: equation of state and edge currents},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YPMSFMAW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.05053}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

One of the most fundamental quests in the physics of active matter concerns the existence of a comprehensive theory for its macroscopic properties, i.e. an ``active thermodynamics''. Here, we derive and experimentally verify key elements of the active thermodynamics of ideal chiral active gases, unveiling edge currents and odd diffusivity as their peculiar features. Our main results are the derivation of an equation of state relating density and pressure via a chirality-dependent effective temperature, the derivation of Fick's law including the full diffusion matrix predicting odd diffusion, and the exact prediction of edge currents at container walls that nonmonotonically depend on chirality.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Robust Topologically Protected Edge Transport in Doubly Chiral Active Particles

    cond-mat.soft 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Doubly chiral active Brownian particles with competing intrinsic rotation and translation-rotation coupling exhibit topologically protected boundary transport without backscattering, as shown by theory, simulation, an...

  2. Geometry-Induced Transport of Self-Aligning Chiral Bristlebots

    cond-mat.soft 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    An experimental platform of self-aligning chiral bristlebots demonstrates geometric rectification of transport and spontaneous switching between translational and rotational states in linked assemblies.

  3. Curvature-driven wall accumulation in chiral active particles

    cond-mat.soft 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Boundary curvature induces wall accumulation in non-motile chiral active particles confined in circular geometries via tangential wall forces, as shown by simulations and hydrodynamics.

  4. Designing topological edge currents in chiral active matter

    cond-mat.soft 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A chirality-switching model of 2D active particles produces robust topological edge currents in confinement and at phase-separation interfaces, distinct from standard motility-induced phase separation.

  5. Odd transport in a two-temperature Brownian dimer

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Odd mobility in a two-temperature Brownian dimer produces handed correlations between particles and increases thermal conductance without altering net heat flow or dissipation under handedness reversal.

  6. Sparkling bubbles in chiral active fluids

    cond-mat.soft 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Chiral active fluids form rotating bubbles that dynamically break up and reform in a sparkling instability at optimal packing fractions, as predicted by coarse-grained hydrodynamics.

  7. Equation of state for the edge flow of chiral colloidal fluids

    cond-mat.soft 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Edge fluxes in chiral fluids equal the average odd stress in confined geometries or the jump in odd stress across interfaces in phase-separated systems.

  8. Geometry-Induced Transport of Self-Aligning Chiral Bristlebots

    cond-mat.soft 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0

    Augmented bristlebots with self-aligning torque and chiral drift exhibit geometry-controlled edge currents and rectified transport via a nautilus-shaped ratchet.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · cited by 7 Pith papers · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    M. C. Marchetti, J.-F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1143 (2013)

    2013

  2. [2]

    Elgeti, R

    J. Elgeti, R. G. Winkler, and G. Gompper, Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 056601 (2015)

    2015

  3. [3]

    and the long-time slope extracted from the mean- square displacement (Fig. 3 (a)). The term Dodd, the so-called odd diffusion coefficient, is experimentally extracted by analyzing the long-time behavior of the cross-correlation MSD xy odd(t) = t⟨(x(t) − x(0))vy(0)⟩ [48]. This quantity is accompanied by 4 time oscillations and exhibits a transition from a sho...

  4. [4]

    3 (d)-(e)-(f))

    is investigated for different values of the tilting angle α (Fig. 3 (d)-(e)-(f)). Experimentally, the case β = 0 has a residual chirality which results in an odd diffusion Dodd almost two orders of magnitude smaller than Dodd corresponding to the first non-vanishing β value experimentally accessible. From further β values, Dodd starts decreasing in agreement...

    2024

  5. [5]

    Bechinger, R

    C. Bechinger, R. Di Leonardo, H. L¨ owen, C. Reichhardt, G. Volpe, and G. Volpe, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 045006 (2016)

    2016

  6. [6]

    Palacci, C

    J. Palacci, C. Cottin-Bizonne, C. Ybert, and L. Bocquet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 088304 (2010)

    2010

  7. [7]

    Szamel, Phys

    G. Szamel, Phys. Rev. E 90, 012111 (2014)

    2014

  8. [8]

    Petrelli, L

    I. Petrelli, L. F. Cugliandolo, G. Gonnella, and A. Suma, Phys. Rev. E 102, 012609 (2020)

    2020

  9. [9]

    Hecht, L

    L. Hecht, L. Caprini, H. L¨ owen, and B. Liebchen, J. Chem. Phys. 161 (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    Nikola, A

    N. Nikola, A. P. Solon, Y. Kafri, M. Kardar, J. Tailleur, and R. Voituriez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 098001 (2016)

    2016

  11. [11]

    Cameron, M

    S. Cameron, M. Mosayebi, R. Bennett, and T. B. Liver- pool, Phys. Rev. E 108, 014608 (2023)

    2023

  12. [12]

    Levis, J

    D. Levis, J. Codina, and I. Pagonabarraga, Soft Matter 13, 8113 (2017)

    2017

  13. [13]

    A. P. Solon, Y. Fily, A. Baskaran, M. E. Cates, Y. Kafri, M. Kardar, and J. Tailleur, Nat. Phys. 11, 673 (2015)

    2015

  14. [14]

    L¨ owen, Eur

    H. L¨ owen, Eur. Phys. J. 225, 2319 (2016)

    2016

  15. [15]

    Liebchen and D

    B. Liebchen and D. Levis, Europhys. Lett. 139, 67001 (2022)

    2022

  16. [16]

    Woolley, Reproduction 126, 259 (2003)

    D. Woolley, Reproduction 126, 259 (2003)

    2003

  17. [17]

    H. Shi, D. A. Quint, G. M. Grason, A. Gopinathan, and K. C. Huang, Nat. Commun. 11, 1408 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    Massana-Cid, D

    H. Massana-Cid, D. Levis, R. J. H. Hern´ andez, I. Pag- onabarraga, and P. Tierno, Phys. Rev. Research 3, L042021 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Lenz, J.-F

    P. Lenz, J.-F. Joanny, F. J¨ ulicher, and J. Prost, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 108104 (2003)

    work page 2003

  20. [20]

    K¨ ummel, B

    F. K¨ ummel, B. Ten Hagen, R. Wittkowski, I. Buttinoni, R. Eichhorn, G. Volpe, H. L¨ owen, and C. Bechinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 198302 (2013)

    work page 2013

  21. [21]

    L. N. Carenza, G. Gonnella, D. Marenduzzo, and G. Ne- gro, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 22065 (2019)

    work page 2019

  22. [22]

    Seˇ c, T

    D. Seˇ c, T. Porenta, M. Ravnik, and S. ˇZumer, Soft Mat- ter 8, 11982 (2012)

    work page 2012

  23. [23]

    Caprini and U

    L. Caprini and U. M. B. Marconi, Soft matter 15, 2627 (2019)

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    D. M. Van Roon, G. Volpe, M. M. T. Da Gama, and N. A. Ara´ ujo, Phys. Rev. E 111, 045405 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Van Teeffelen and H

    S. Van Teeffelen and H. L¨ owen, Phys. Rev. E 78, 020101 (2008)

    work page 2008

  26. [26]

    F. J. Sevilla, Phys. Rev. E 94, 062120 (2016)

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    Y. Li, L. Li, F. Marchesoni, D. Debnath, and P. K. Ghosh, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 013250 (2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Khatri and P

    N. Khatri and P. Burada, Phys. Rev. E 105, 024604 (2022). 6

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    D. M. Van Roon, G. Volpe, M. M. T. da Gama, and N. A. Ara´ ujo, Soft Matter18, 6899 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Liao and S

    G.-J. Liao and S. H. Klapp, Soft matter 14, 7873 (2018)

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    Levis and B

    D. Levis and B. Liebchen, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 30, 084001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    Levis and B

    D. Levis and B. Liebchen, Phys. Rev. E 100, 012406 (2019)

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    Reichhardt and C

    C. Reichhardt and C. Reichhardt, J. Chem. Phys. 150 (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    T. Lei, C. Zhao, R. Yan, and N. Zhao, Soft Matter 19, 1312 (2023)

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Huang, A

    Z.-F. Huang, A. M. Menzel, and H. L¨ owen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 218002 (2020)

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    Kuroda and K

    Y. Kuroda and K. Miyazaki, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2023 (10), 103203

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    A. Negi, K. Beppu, and Y. T. Maeda, Phys. Rev. Re- search 5, 023196 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    V. E. Debets, H. L¨ owen, and L. M. Janssen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 058201 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Ma and R

    Z. Ma and R. Ni, J. Chem. Phys. 156 (2022)

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    K. L. Kreienkamp and S. H. Klapp, New J. Phys. 24, 123009 (2022)

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Semwal, J

    V. Semwal, J. Joshi, S. Dikshit, and S. Mishra, Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 634, 129435 (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    A. Shee, S. Henkes, and C. Huepe, Soft Matter 20, 7865 (2024)

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    U. M. B. Marconi and L. Caprini, Soft Matter (2025)

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    F¨ urthauer, M

    S. F¨ urthauer, M. Strempel, S. W. Grill, and F. J¨ ulicher, Eur. Phys. J. E 35, 1 (2012)

    work page 2012

  45. [45]

    Caprini, B

    L. Caprini, B. Liebchen, and H. L¨ owen, Commun. Phys. 7, 153 (2024)

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    M. A. L´ opez-Casta˜ no, A. M. Seco, A. M. Seco, ´A. Rodr ´ ıguez-Rivas, and F. V. Reyes, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 033230 (2022)

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    A. R. Poggioli and D. T. Limmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 158201 (2023)

    2023

  48. [48]

    Hargus, F

    C. Hargus, F. Ghimenti, J. Tailleur, and F. van Wijland, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.00811 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    E. Kalz, S. Ravichandir, J. Birkenmeier, R. Metzler, and A. Sharma, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.04544 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Hargus, J

    C. Hargus, J. M. Epstein, and K. K. Mandadapu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 178001 (2021)

    2021

  51. [51]

    Vega Reyes, M

    F. Vega Reyes, M. A. L´ opez-Casta˜ no, and´A. Rodr ´ ıguez- Rivas, Commun. Phys. 5, 256 (2022)

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    E. Kalz, H. D. Vuijk, I. Abdoli, J.-U. Sommer, H. L¨ owen, and A. Sharma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 090601 (2022)

    2022

  53. [53]

    Yasuda, K

    K. Yasuda, K. Ishimoto, A. Kobayashi, L.-S. Lin, I. Sou, Y. Hosaka, and S. Komura, J. Chem. Phys. 157 (2022)

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    E. Kalz, H. D. Vuijk, J.-U. Sommer, R. Metzler, and A. Sharma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 057102 (2024)

    work page 2024

  55. [55]

    Hargus, A

    C. Hargus, A. Deshpande, A. K. Omar, and K. K. Man- dadapu, Physical Review Letters 134, 097105 (2025)

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    B. C. Van Zuiden, J. Paulose, W. T. Irvine, D. Bartolo, and V. Vitelli, Proceedings of the national academy of sciences 113, 12919 (2016)

    work page 2016

  57. [57]

    T. H. Tan, A. Mietke, J. Li, Y. Chen, H. Higinbotham, P. J. Foster, S. Gokhale, J. Dunkel, and N. Fakhri, Nature 607, 287 (2022)

    2022

  58. [58]

    Kumar, H

    N. Kumar, H. Soni, S. Ramaswamy, and A. Sood, Nat. Commun. 5, 4688 (2014)

    work page 2014

  59. [59]

    Baconnier, D

    P. Baconnier, D. Shohat, C. H. L´ opez, C. Coulais, V. D´ emery, G. D¨ uring, and O. Dauchot, Nat. Phys. 18, 1234 (2022)

    work page 2022

  60. [60]

    Deseigne, O

    J. Deseigne, O. Dauchot, and H. Chat´ e, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 098001 (2010)

    work page 2010

  61. [61]

    Kudrolli, Phys

    A. Kudrolli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 088001 (2010)

    work page 2010

  62. [62]

    Koumakis, A

    N. Koumakis, A. Gnoli, C. Maggi, A. Puglisi, and R. Di Leonardo, New J. Phys. 18, 113046 (2016)

    work page 2016

  63. [63]

    Scholz, S

    C. Scholz, S. Jahanshahi, A. Ldov, and H. L¨ owen, Nat. Commun. 9, 5156 (2018)

    work page 2018

  64. [64]

    A. P. Antonov, L. Caprini, A. Ldov, C. Scholz, and H. L¨ owen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 198301 (2024)

    work page 2024

  65. [65]

    Caprini, A

    L. Caprini, A. Ldov, R. K. Gupta, H. Ellenberg, R. Wittmann, H. L¨ owen, and C. Scholz, Commun. Phys. 7, 52 (2024)

    work page 2024

  66. [66]

    Scholz, M

    C. Scholz, M. Engel, and T. P¨ oschel, Nat. Commun. 9, 931 (2018)

    work page 2018

  67. [67]

    Farhadi, S

    S. Farhadi, S. Machaca, J. Aird, B. O. T. Maldonado, S. Davis, P. E. Arratia, and D. J. Durian, Soft matter 14, 5588 (2018)

    work page 2018

  68. [68]

    Siebers, A

    F. Siebers, A. Jayaram, P. Bl¨ umler, and T. Speck, Sci. Adv. 9, eadf5443 (2023)

    work page 2023

  69. [69]

    Caprini, D

    L. Caprini, D. Breoni, A. Ldov, C. Scholz, and H. L¨ owen, Commun. Phys. 7, 343 (2024)

    work page 2024

  70. [70]

    Reichhardt and C

    C. Reichhardt and C. O. Reichhardt, Phys. Rev. E 100, 012604 (2019)

    work page 2019

  71. [71]

    S. C. Takatori, W. Yan, and J. F. Brady, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 028103 (2014)

    work page 2014

  72. [72]

    S. C. Takatori and J. F. Brady, Phys. Rev. E 91, 032117 (2015)

    work page 2015

  73. [73]

    S. C. Takatori and J. F. Brady, Curr. Opin. Colloid In- terface Sci. 21, 24 (2016)

    work page 2016

  74. [74]

    Chapman and T

    S. Chapman and T. G. Cowling, (Camb. Univ., 1990)

    work page 1990

  75. [75]

    M. Han, M. Fruchart, C. Scheibner, S. Vaikuntanathan, J. J. De Pablo, and V. Vitelli, Nature Physics 17, 1260 (2021)

    work page 2021

  76. [76]

    C. B. Caporusso, G. Gonnella, and D. Levis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 168201 (2024)

    work page 2024

  77. [77]

    Caprini and U

    L. Caprini and U. Marini Bettolo Marconi, The Journal of Chemical Physics 162 (2025)

    work page 2025

  78. [78]

    Digregorio, I

    P. Digregorio, I. Pagonabarraga, and F. V. Reyes, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.08533 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    Di Leonardo, L

    R. Di Leonardo, L. Angelani, D. Dell’Arciprete, G. Ruocco, V. Iebba, S. Schippa, M. P. Conte, F. Mecarini, F. De Angelis, and E. Di Fabrizio, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 9541 (2010)

    work page 2010

  80. [80]

    Hiratsuka, M

    Y. Hiratsuka, M. Miyata, T. Tada, and T. Q. Uyeda, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 13618 (2006)

    work page 2006

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.