Pith. sign in

REVIEW 13 cited by

Observational Scaling Laws and the Predictability of Language Model Performance

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.10938 v3 pith:YTTGGQ5D submitted 2024-05-17 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CLstat.ML

Observational Scaling Laws and the Predictability of Language Model Performance

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.CLstat.ML
keywords modelscalinglanguagemodelsperformancetrainingapproachcapabilities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Understanding how language model performance varies with scale is critical to benchmark and algorithm development. Scaling laws are one approach to building this understanding, but the requirement of training models across many different scales has limited their use. We propose an alternative, observational approach that bypasses model training and instead builds scaling laws from ~100 publically available models. Building a single scaling law from multiple model families is challenging due to large variations in their training compute efficiencies and capabilities. However, we show that these variations are consistent with a simple, generalized scaling law where language model performance is a function of a low-dimensional capability space, and model families only vary in their efficiency in converting training compute to capabilities. Using this approach, we show the surprising predictability of complex scaling phenomena: we show that several emergent phenomena follow a smooth, sigmoidal behavior and are predictable from small models; we show that the agent performance of models such as GPT-4 can be precisely predicted from simpler non-agentic benchmarks; and we show how to predict the impact of post-training interventions like Chain-of-Thought and Self-Consistency as language model capabilities continue to improve.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 13 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. EdgeBench: Unveiling Scaling Laws of Learning from Real-World Environments

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.5

    Across ~38,000 hours on 134 ultra-long real-world tasks, aggregate agent performance follows a log-sigmoid of interaction time, and measured learning speed doubles about every three months.

  2. Item Response Scaling Laws: A Measurement Theory Approach for Efficient and Generalizable Neural Scaling Estimation

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    IRSL applies IRT to reduce scaling law estimation from O(M×N) to O(M+N) parameters, enabling reliable estimates with only 50 questions per benchmark after calibration and generalizable ability scores across related be...

  3. The Art of Scaling Reinforcement Learning Compute for LLMs

    cs.LG 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A 400k+ GPU-hour study shows RL scaling in LLMs follows predictable sigmoidal trajectories, with most design choices affecting efficiency rather than the performance asymptote, enabling accurate large-scale prediction...

  4. Query-efficient model evaluation using cached responses

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DKPS-based methods predict new model benchmark scores using cached responses, matching baseline mean absolute error with substantially fewer queries and an offline query selection approach.

  5. Query-efficient model evaluation using cached responses

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DKPS-based methods leverage cached model responses to achieve equivalent benchmark prediction accuracy with substantially fewer queries than standard evaluation.

  6. Comprehensive AI governance requires addressing non-model gains

    cs.CY 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Non-model gains via inference, systems, and assets can drive AI capabilities independently of base models, requiring governance beyond model-level evaluation and mitigation.

  7. Scaling Laws Meet Model Architecture: Toward Inference-Efficient LLMs

    cs.LG 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A conditional scaling law fitted on over 200 models from 80M to 3B parameters identifies architectures that deliver up to 2.1% higher accuracy and 42% higher inference throughput than LLaMA-3.2 under the same training budget.

  8. Benchmarking Misuse Mitigation Against Covert Adversaries

    cs.CR 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Develops the BSD data generation pipeline and two new datasets to evaluate decomposition attacks as effective misuse enablers and stateful defenses as a countermeasure in language model safety.

  9. Predicting Inference-Time Scaling Gains from Labeled Validation-Set Output Statistics

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A ridge predictor using prompt-level agreement spread, label-assisted first-correct position, completion-length variance, and entropy reaches Spearman ρ=0.90 with observed best-of-N gains across three model families a...

  10. When Mean CE Fails: Median CE Can Better Track Language Model Quality

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Median cross-entropy tracks language model task performance more reliably than mean cross-entropy during synthetic fact-learning SFT and top-K distillation.

  11. Rethinking Expert Trajectory Utilization in LLM Post-training for Mathematical Reasoning

    cs.LG 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Sequential SFT followed by RL, guided by the Plasticity-Ceiling Framework, achieves higher performance ceilings in LLM mathematical reasoning than synchronized methods by optimizing data scale and transition timing.

  12. Ling and Ring 2.6 Technical Report: Efficient and Instant Agentic Intelligence at Trillion-Parameter Scale

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Technical report announcing Ling-2.6 and Ring-2.6 models with hybrid linear attention, evolutionary CoT, and KPop RL for efficient agentic intelligence at scale.

  13. Position: Stop Evaluating AI with Human Tests, Develop Principled, AI-specific Tests instead

    cs.LG 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Human tests should not be applied to AI to measure traits like intelligence due to calibration, validity, contamination, and prompt sensitivity issues; develop AI-specific evaluation frameworks instead.