pith. sign in

arxiv: 2504.11205 · v3 · pith:Z3CFUK44new · submitted 2025-04-15 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Probing Black Hole Phase Transitions through Quasi-Periodic Oscillations

Bidyut Hazarika , Prabwal Phukon This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 08:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords black hole thermodynamicsquasi-periodic oscillationsphase transitionsRN AdS black holeKerr black holeHawking temperaturestability
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quasi-periodic oscillation frequencies in black holes change their trend with temperature exactly when the hole crosses a thermodynamic phase boundary.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether QPO frequencies can detect the thermodynamic phases of black holes by computing upper and lower QPO frequencies in RN AdS and Kerr metrics and plotting them against Hawking temperature. The frequencies follow one pattern in one phase and a different pattern in another, with the switch occurring at the known transition points; the same plots also separate stable from unstable branches. A sympathetic reader would care because this would turn an already observed timing signal into a potential thermometer for black hole thermodynamics. The work remains mathematical and notes the absence of direct observational tests for the temperature itself.

Core claim

Using both RN AdS and Kerr black hole backgrounds across different QPO models, the analysis shows that QPO frequencies trace out distinct thermodynamic phases and also reflect their stability properties. As the black hole transitions between different thermodynamic phases, the trend of QPO frequencies with respect to temperature also shifts.

What carries the argument

Quasi-periodic oscillation frequencies obtained by substituting the RN AdS or Kerr metric directly into standard orbital QPO expressions and then comparing the results to Hawking temperature.

If this is right

  • QPO timing data could indicate when an accreting black hole is crossing from one thermodynamic phase to another.
  • The stability of each thermodynamic branch can be read from the same frequency-temperature curve.
  • The signature appears across multiple standard QPO models and both charged AdS and rotating black holes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the frequency shift survives in more realistic accretion-disk models, X-ray timing archives could be re-examined for phase-transition candidates.
  • The method could be applied to other black-hole solutions whose phase diagrams are already known from thermodynamic calculations.
  • It leaves open whether the physical mechanism producing the QPOs itself changes when the background crosses a phase boundary.

Load-bearing premise

The usual QPO frequency formulas stay valid and meaningful when the background geometry itself is undergoing a thermodynamic phase transition.

What would settle it

An observation of QPO frequencies versus temperature in an accreting black hole that shows no change in slope or pattern at the temperature where a phase transition is independently expected would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.11205 by Bidyut Hazarika, Prabwal Phukon.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Radial and vertical oscillatory response of the particle in a unstable circular null geodesics with different values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Behavior of the quasi-periodic oscillation (QPO) frequencies of both upper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Radial and vertical oscillatory response of the particle in a unstable circular timelike geodesics with different values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Behavior of the quasi-periodic oscillation (QPO) frequencies of both upper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Behavior of the quasi-periodic oscillation (QPO) frequencies of both upper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Temperature of the Kerr black hole with respect to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Behavior of the quasi-periodic oscillation (QPO) frequencies of both upper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this work, we probe the well known thermodynamic phase structure of black hole through the lens of its quasi-periodic oscillations (QPOs). Can QPOs be influenced by black hole phase transitions? Do they carry any signature of such transitions in their observational patterns? These were the central questions guiding our study. Using both RN AdS and Kerr black hole backgrounds across different QPO models, we analyzed the behavior of upper and lower QPO frequencies as functions of the Hawking temperature. Our results shows that QPO frequencies trace out distinct thermodynamic phases and also reflect their stability properties. As the black hole transitions between different thermodynamic phases, the trend of QPO frequencies with respect to temperature also shifts. Due to lack of of observational data, the present work is primarily more on the mathematical side, as the underlying mechanism responsible for the Hawking temperature has not yet been fully understood or experimentally verified. Moreover, given the speculative nature of black hole phase transitions, it would be unfair to claim that our results establish a definitive connection between an observable quantity such as the QPO frequency and the thermodynamic phase behavior of black holes. Nevertheless, our analysis suggests a possibility that changes in black hole geometry could be one of the contributing factors influencing QPO behavior.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that quasi-periodic oscillation (QPO) frequencies computed from standard models in RN-AdS and Kerr backgrounds trace distinct thermodynamic phases of black holes and reflect their stability properties. As the Hawking temperature varies, the trends in upper and lower QPO frequencies shift when the black hole crosses phase transition points in the extended phase space, suggesting that changes in geometry during transitions may influence QPO behavior. The work is explicitly framed as a mathematical exploration rather than an observational claim, citing the lack of data and the speculative status of black hole phase transitions.

Significance. If the reported correlation between QPO frequency trends and thermodynamic phase structure holds under scrutiny, it would provide a novel mathematical link between black hole thermodynamics in the extended phase space and astrophysical observables, potentially allowing QPO data to indicate phase stability. The manuscript receives credit for using standard metrics and QPO expressions without introducing new free parameters or ad-hoc adjustments to force the reported behavior.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methodology and results sections on RN-AdS QPO computation] The central claim that QPO frequencies reflect thermodynamic phases and stability relies on direct substitution of the RN-AdS metric into standard QPO expressions (geodesic/epicyclic frequencies) without re-derivation or bounds on the effects of the negative cosmological constant in the regime of multiple horizons at fixed T and P; this assumption is load-bearing for interpreting trend shifts as genuine signatures rather than potential artifacts of the unadjusted formulas.
  2. [Results and discussion] No error analysis, robustness checks, or comparisons against alternative QPO prescriptions are supplied, which directly affects the reliability of the reported phase-tracing behavior (as the paper itself qualifies the results as only a mathematical possibility).
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract contains typos: 'Our results shows' should be 'Our results show'; 'lack of of observational data' should be 'lack of observational data'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and valuable comments. Our manuscript is explicitly framed as a mathematical exploration of possible connections between QPO frequencies and black hole thermodynamics in the extended phase space, without claiming observational implications. Below we address the major comments point by point.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methodology and results sections on RN-AdS QPO computation] The central claim that QPO frequencies reflect thermodynamic phases and stability relies on direct substitution of the RN-AdS metric into standard QPO expressions (geodesic/epicyclic frequencies) without re-derivation or bounds on the effects of the negative cosmological constant in the regime of multiple horizons at fixed T and P; this assumption is load-bearing for interpreting trend shifts as genuine signatures rather than potential artifacts of the unadjusted formulas.

    Authors: The QPO frequency expressions employed are the standard geodesic and epicyclic frequency formulas derived from the general stationary metric, which have been applied in the literature to a range of spacetimes including those with a cosmological constant. The RN-AdS metric components already incorporate the negative cosmological constant, and the calculations are performed at fixed pressure and temperature in the extended phase space. We did not perform a full re-derivation because the expressions depend only on the metric functions and their derivatives, which remain well-defined. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that explicit bounds on the influence of multiple horizons would strengthen the interpretation. We will add a dedicated paragraph in the methodology section discussing the regime of validity and any potential artifacts. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results and discussion] No error analysis, robustness checks, or comparisons against alternative QPO prescriptions are supplied, which directly affects the reliability of the reported phase-tracing behavior (as the paper itself qualifies the results as only a mathematical possibility).

    Authors: We agree that the absence of quantitative error estimates and comparisons with other QPO models limits the robustness assessment. The manuscript already qualifies the findings as a mathematical possibility rather than a definitive link. To address this, we will include a short subsection in the discussion that (i) notes the qualitative nature of the observed trend shifts, (ii) references the range of QPO models used, and (iii) explicitly states that alternative prescriptions could alter the precise locations of slope changes while preserving the overall phase-tracing pattern in our calculations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper applies standard QPO frequency expressions (geodesic/epicyclic frequencies) directly to the RN-AdS and Kerr metrics and plots the resulting upper/lower frequencies against Hawking temperature. Thermodynamic phases and stability are determined independently from the usual extended phase-space quantities (e.g., heat capacity, Gibbs free energy). No parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then relabeled as a prediction, no self-citation is invoked as a uniqueness theorem, and no ansatz is smuggled in. The observed trend shifts are therefore outputs of the explicit substitution rather than tautological redefinitions of the inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on the standard RN AdS and Kerr metrics, the usual thermodynamic identification of Hawking temperature, and the conventional expressions for QPO frequencies; no new entities are postulated and the only free parameters are those already present in the chosen QPO models.

free parameters (1)
  • orbital radius or frequency parameters inside each QPO model
    Standard QPO prescriptions contain one or more adjustable radii or frequencies that are evaluated at each temperature point.
axioms (2)
  • standard math The RN AdS and Kerr metrics correctly describe the spacetime geometry for the thermodynamic analysis.
    Invoked when substituting the metrics into the QPO frequency formulas.
  • domain assumption Hawking temperature is the appropriate control parameter for locating thermodynamic phase transitions.
    Used to plot frequency versus temperature and identify transition points.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5748 in / 1359 out tokens · 42735 ms · 2026-05-25T08:41:56.590230+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · 12 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration),Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016) [arXiv:1602.03837]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al.,First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett.871, L1 (2019)

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al.,First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. II. Array and In- strumentation, Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L2 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al.,First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. III. Data Process- ing and Calibration, Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L3 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al.,First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV. Imaging the Central Supermassive Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett. 875, L4 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al.,First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Physical Ori- gin of the Asymmetric Ring, Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L5 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al.,First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett. 875, L6 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Shipley and S

    J. Shipley and S. R. Dolan, Class. Quant. Grav. 33 (2016) no.17, 175001

    work page 2016

  9. [9]

    Bambi and K

    C. Bambi and K. Freese, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009), 043002

    work page 2009

  10. [10]

    Atamurotov, A

    F. Atamurotov, A. Abdujabbarov and B. Ahmedov, As- trophys. Space Sci. 348 (2013), 179-188

    work page 2013

  11. [11]

    Vagnozzi et al., Horizon-scale tests of gravity theories and fundamental physics from the Event Horizon Tele- scope image of Sagittarius A*, Class

    S. Vagnozzi et al., Horizon-scale tests of gravity theories and fundamental physics from the Event Horizon Tele- scope image of Sagittarius A*, Class. Quantum Grav. 40, 165007 (2023)

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    J. D. Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy, Phys. Rev. D 7, 2333-2346 (1973) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.7.2333

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.7.2333 1973

  13. [13]

    S. W. Hawking, Black hole explosions, Nature248, 30-31 (1974) doi:10.1038/248030a0

    work page doi:10.1038/248030a0 1974

  14. [14]

    S. W. Hawking, Particle Creation by Black Holes, Commun. Math. Phys.43, 199-220 (1975) [er- ratum: Commun. Math. Phys.46, 206 (1976)] doi:10.1007/BF02345020

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02345020 1975

  15. [15]

    J. M. Bardeen, B. Carter and S. W. Hawking, The Four laws of black hole mechanics, Commun. Math. Phys.31, 161-170 (1973) doi:10.1007/BF01645742

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01645742 1973

  16. [16]

    R. M. Wald, Entropy and black-hole thermo- dynamics, Phys. Rev. D20, 1271-1282 (1979) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.20.1271

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.20.1271 1979

  17. [17]

    Black-hole thermodynamics, Physics Today, 33(1):24–31, 1980

    Jacob D Bekenstein. Black-hole thermodynamics, Physics Today, 33(1):24–31, 1980

    work page 1980

  18. [18]

    R. M. Wald, The thermodynamics of black holes, Living Rev. Rel.4, 6 (2001) doi:10.12942/lrr-2001-6 [arXiv:gr- qc/9912119 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.12942/lrr-2001-6 2001

  19. [19]

    S.Carlip, Black Hole Thermodynamics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D23, 1430023 (2014) 11 doi:10.1142/S0218271814300237 [arXiv:1410.1486 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0218271814300237 2014

  20. [20]

    A.C.Wall, A Survey of Black Hole Thermodynamics, [arXiv:1804.10610 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    P.Candelas and D.W.Sciama, Irreversible Thermody- namics of Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.38, 1372-1375 (1977) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.38.1372

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.38.1372 1977

  22. [22]

    On Black Hole Entropy Corrections in the Grand Canonical Ensemble

    S. Mahapatra, P. Phukon and T. Sarkar, Phys. Rev. D84, 044041 (2011) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.044041 [arXiv:1103.5885 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.044041 2011

  23. [23]

    P. C. W. Davies, Thermodynamic Phase Transitions of Kerr-Newman Black Holes in De Sitter Space, Class. Quant. Grav.6, 1909 (1989) doi:10.1088/0264- 9381/6/12/018

    work page doi:10.1088/0264- 1909

  24. [24]

    S. W. Hawking and D. N. Page, Thermodynamics of Black Holes in anti-De Sitter Space, Commun. Math. Phys.87, 577 (1983) doi:10.1007/BF01208266

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01208266 1983

  25. [25]

    Curir, Rotating black holes as dissipative spin- thermodynamical systems, General Relativity and Grav- itation,13, 417, (1981) doi:10.1007/BF00756588

    A. Curir, Rotating black holes as dissipative spin- thermodynamical systems, General Relativity and Grav- itation,13, 417, (1981) doi:10.1007/BF00756588

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00756588 1981

  26. [26]

    Anna Curir, Black hole emissions and phase transitions, General Relativity and Gravitation,13, 1177, (1981) doi:10.1007/BF00759866

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00759866 1981

  27. [27]

    Pavon and J

    D. Pavon and J. M. Rubi, Nonequilibrium Thermody- namic Fluctuations of Black Holes, Phys. Rev. D37, 2052-2058 (1988) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.37.2052

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.37.2052 2052

  28. [28]

    Pavon, Phase transition in Reissner-Nordstrom black holes, Phys

    D. Pavon, Phase transition in Reissner-Nordstrom black holes, Phys. Rev. D43, 2495-2497 (1991) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.43.2495

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.43.2495 1991

  29. [29]

    Kaburaki, Critical behavior of extremal Kerr-Newman black holes, Gen

    O. Kaburaki, Critical behavior of extremal Kerr-Newman black holes, Gen. Rel. Grav.28, 843 (1996)

    work page 1996

  30. [30]

    R. G. Cai, Z. J. Lu and Y. Z. Zhang, Critical behav- ior in (2+1)-dimensional black holes, Phys. Rev. D55, 853-860 (1997) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.55.853 [arXiv:gr- qc/9702032 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.55.853 1997

  31. [31]

    R. G. Cai and J. H. Cho, Thermodynamic curvature of the BTZ black hole, Phys. Rev. D60, 067502 (1999) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.067502 [arXiv:hep-th/9803261 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.60.067502 1999

  32. [32]

    Y. H. Wei, Thermodynamic critical and geometrical properties of charged BTZ black hole, Phys. Rev. D80, 024029 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.024029

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.024029 2009

  33. [33]

    A general framework to study the extremal phase transition of black holes

    K. Bhattacharya, S. Dey, B. R. Majhi and S. Samanta, General framework to study the extremal phase transi- tion of black holes, Phys. Rev. D99, no.12, 124047 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.124047 [arXiv:1903.03434 [gr- qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.124047 2019

  34. [34]

    Enthalpy and the Mechanics of AdS Black Holes

    D. Kastor, S. Ray and J. Traschen, Enthalpy and the Mechanics of AdS Black Holes, Class. Quant. Grav. 26, 195011 (2009) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/19/195011 [arXiv:0904.2765 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/19/195011 2009

  35. [35]

    B. P. Dolan, The cosmological constant and the black hole equation of state, Class. Quant. Grav. 28, 125020 (2011) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/28/12/125020 [arXiv:1008.5023 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0264-9381/28/12/125020 2011

  36. [36]

    B. P. Dolan, Pressure and volume in the first law of black hole thermodynamics, Class. Quant. Grav. 28, 235017 (2011) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/28/23/235017 [arXiv:1106.6260 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0264-9381/28/23/235017 2011

  37. [37]

    B. P. Dolan, Compressibility of rotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D84, 127503 (2011) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.127503 [arXiv:1109.0198 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.127503 2011

  38. [38]

    B. P. Dolan, Where Is the PdV in the First Law of Black Hole Thermodynamics?, doi:10.5772/52455 [arXiv:1209.1272 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.5772/52455

  39. [39]

    P-V criticality of charged AdS black holes

    D. Kubiznak and R. B. Mann, P-V criticality of charged AdS black holes, JHEP07, 033 (2012) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2012)033 [arXiv:1205.0559 [hep- th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2012)033 2012

  40. [40]

    Black hole chemistry: thermodynamics with Lambda

    D. Kubiznak, R. B. Mann and M. Teo, Black hole chemistry: thermodynamics with Lambda, Class. Quant. Grav.34, no.6, 063001 (2017) doi:10.1088/1361- 6382/aa5c69 [arXiv:1608.06147 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1361- 2017

  41. [41]

    Angelini, L

    L. Angelini, L. Stella, A.N. Parmar, Astrophys. J. 346, 906 (1989)

    work page 1989

  42. [42]

    S. Kato, J. Fukue, Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 32, 377 (1980)

    work page 1980

  43. [43]

    Abramowicz, W

    M.A. Abramowicz, W. Klu´zniak, Astron. Astrophys. 374, L19 (2001)

    work page 2001

  44. [44]

    Wagoner, A.S

    R.V. Wagoner, A.S. Silbergleit, M. Ortega-Rodriguez, Astrophys. J. 559, L25 (2001)

    work page 2001

  45. [45]

    Silbergleit, R.V

    A.S. Silbergleit, R.V. Wagoner, M. Ortega-Rodr´ ıguez, Astrophys. J. 548, 335 (2001)

    work page 2001

  46. [46]

    D.H. Wang, L. Chen, C.M. Zhang, Y.J. Lei, J.L. Qu, L.M. Song, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 454, 1231 (2015)

    work page 2015

  47. [47]

    Rezzolla, S.I

    L. Rezzolla, S.I. Yoshida, T.J. Maccarone, O. Zanotti, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 344, L37 (2003)

    work page 2003

  48. [48]

    T¨ or¨ ok, Z

    G. T¨ or¨ ok, Z. Stuchl´ ık, Astron. Astrophys. 437, 775 (2005)

    work page 2005

  49. [49]

    Ingram, C

    A. Ingram, C. Done, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 405, 2447 (2010)

    work page 2010

  50. [50]

    Fragile, O

    P.C. Fragile, O. Straub, O. Blaes, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 461, 1356 (2016)

    work page 2016

  51. [51]

    Stuchl´ ık, A

    Z. Stuchl´ ık, A. Kotrlov´ a, G. T¨ or¨ ok, Astron. Astrophys. 552, A10 (2013)

    work page 2013

  52. [52]

    Stuchl´ ık, A

    Z. Stuchl´ ık, A. Kotrlov´ a, G. T¨ or¨ ok, Acta Astron. 62, 389 (2012)

    work page 2012

  53. [53]

    Ortega-Rodr´ ıguez, H

    M. Ortega-Rodr´ ıguez, H. Sol´ ıs-S´ anchez, L. ´Alvarez- Garc´ ıa, E. Dodero-Rojas, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 492, 1755 (2020)

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    Stuchl´ ık, M

    Z. Stuchl´ ık, M. Koloˇ s, J. Kov´ aˇr, P. Slan´ y, A. Tursunov, Universe 6, 26 (2020)

    work page 2020

  55. [55]

    Maselli, G

    A. Maselli, G. Pappas, P. Pani, L. Gualtieri, S. Motta, V. Ferrari, L. Stella, Astrophys. J. 899, 139 (2020)

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    Rayimbaev, K.F

    J. Rayimbaev, K.F. Dialektopoulos, F. Sarikulov, A. Ab- dujabbarov, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 572 (2023)

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    D¨ onmez, Appl

    O. D¨ onmez, Appl. Math. Comput. 181, 256 (2006). https://doi. org/10.1016/j.amc.2006.01.031

    work page doi:10.1016/j.amc.2006.01.031 2006

  58. [58]

    Donmez, Res

    O. Donmez, Res. Astron. Astrophys. 24, 085001 (2024). https:// doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/ad5b9e. arXiv:2310.13847 [astroph.HE]

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/ad5b9e 2024

  59. [59]

    Donmez, Eur

    O. Donmez, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 524 (2024). https://doi.org/ 10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12876-6. arXiv:2311.08388 [astroph.HE]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12876-6 2024

  60. [60]

    Donmez, Mod

    O. Donmez, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 39, 2450076–665 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732324500767. arXiv:2405.15467 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217732324500767 2024

  61. [61]

    Koyuncu, O

    F. Koyuncu, O. D¨ onmez, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 29, 1450115 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732314501156

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217732314501156 2014

  62. [62]

    Koussour, S

    M. Koussour, S. Bekov, A. Syzdykova, S. Mumi- nov, I. Ibragimov, J. Rayimbaev, arXiv e-prints (2024). https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.2412.20073. arXiv:2412.20073 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  63. [63]

    Donmez, Phys

    O. Donmez, Phys. Lett. B 827, 136997 (2022). https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.physletb.2022.136997. arXiv:2103.03160 [astro-ph.HE] 12

    work page arXiv 2022

  64. [64]

    Donmez, F

    O. Donmez, F. Dogan, T. Sahin, Universe 8, 458 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8090458. arXiv:2205.14382 O. Donmez, F. Dogan, Universe 10, 152 (2024). https://doi.org/ 10.3390/universe10040152

    work page doi:10.3390/universe8090458 2022

  65. [65]

    D¨ onmez, 2024, 006 (2024)

    O. D¨ onmez, 2024, 006 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1475-7516/2024/09/006. arXiv:2402.16707 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  66. [66]

    Donmez, J

    O. Donmez, J. High Energy Astrophys. 45, 1 (2025). https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jheap.2024.11.002. arXiv:2408.10102 [astroph.HE]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2024.11.002 2025

  67. [67]

    Donmez, F

    O. Donmez, F. Dogan, Phys. Dark Universe 46, 101718 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2024.101718. arXiv:2407.01478 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2024.101718 2024

  68. [68]

    Dasgupta, N

    A. Dasgupta, N. Tiwari and I. Banerjee, Signa- tures of Einstein-Maxwell dilaton-axion gravity from the observed quasi-periodic oscillations in black holes, [arXiv:2503.02708 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv

  69. [69]

    I. Banerjee, Testing black holes in non-linear elec- trodynamics from the observed quasi-periodic oscilla- tions, JCAP08, no.08, 034 (2022) doi:10.1088/1475- 7516/2022/08/034 [arXiv:2203.10890 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475- 2022

  70. [70]

    Banerjee, S

    I. Banerjee, S. Chakraborty and S. SenGupta, Looking for extra dimensions in the observed quasi-periodic oscillations of black holes,JCAP09, 037 (2021) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/09/037 [arXiv:2105.06636 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/09/037 2021

  71. [71]

    Jumaniyozov, M

    S. Jumaniyozov, M. Zahid, M. Alloqulov, I. Ibragimov, J. Rayimbaev and S. Murodov, Radiative properties and QPOs around charged black hole in Kalb–Ramond gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C85, no.2, 126 (2025) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13863-1

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13863-1 2025

  72. [72]

    Rayimbaev, S

    J. Rayimbaev, S. Murodov, A. Shermatov and A. Yusupov, QPOs from charged particles around mag- netized black holes in braneworlds, Eur. Phys. J. C84, no.10, 1114 (2024) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13463-5

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13463-5 2024

  73. [73]

    Ghorani, S

    E. Ghorani, S. Mitra, J. Rayimbaev, B. Puli¸ ce, F. Ata- murotov, A. Abdujabbarov and D. Demir, Constraints on metric-Palatini gravity from QPO data, Eur. Phys. J. C84, no.10, 1022 (2024) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024- 13373-6 [arXiv:2410.04993 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024- 2024

  74. [74]

    Jumaniyozov, S

    S. Jumaniyozov, S. U. Khan, J. Rayimbaev, A. Abdujab- barov, S. Urinbaev and S. Murodov, Circular motion and QPOs near black holes in Kalb–Ramond gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C84, no.9, 964 (2024) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 024-13351-y

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 2024

  75. [75]

    Tursunali Xamidov , Uktamjon Uktamov, Sanjar Shay- matov, Bobomurat Ahmedov ,Quasiperiodic oscillations around a Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by a Dehnen type dark matter halo,Physics of the Dark Uni- verse 47, February 2025, 101805

    work page 2025

  76. [76]

    Bambi, Black Holes: A Laboratory for Testing Strong Gravity (2017)

    C. Bambi, Black Holes: A Laboratory for Testing Strong Gravity (2017)

    work page 2017

  77. [77]

    Shahzadi, M

    M. Shahzadi, M. Koloˇ s, Z. Stuchl´ ık, Y. Habib, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 1067 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09868-1. arXiv:2104.09640 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09868-1 2021