Pith. sign in

REVIEW 20 cited by

ToolSandbox: A Stateful, Conversational, Interactive Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Tool Use Capabilities

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.04682 v2 pith:ZFO7MPWZ submitted 2024-08-08 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords evaluationtoolsandboxcapabilitiesllmstoolconversationalmodelsstate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent large language models (LLMs) advancements sparked a growing research interest in tool assisted LLMs solving real-world challenges, which calls for comprehensive evaluation of tool-use capabilities. While previous works focused on either evaluating over stateless web services (RESTful API), based on a single turn user prompt, or an off-policy dialog trajectory, ToolSandbox includes stateful tool execution, implicit state dependencies between tools, a built-in user simulator supporting on-policy conversational evaluation and a dynamic evaluation strategy for intermediate and final milestones over an arbitrary trajectory. We show that open source and proprietary models have a significant performance gap, and complex tasks like State Dependency, Canonicalization and Insufficient Information defined in ToolSandbox are challenging even the most capable SOTA LLMs, providing brand-new insights into tool-use LLM capabilities. ToolSandbox evaluation framework is released at https://github.com/apple/ToolSandbox

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 20 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Diagnosing Tool-Selection Reasoning in LLM Agents with Canary Tools

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Canary tools turn a binary wrong-tool error into a typed diagnosis of the reasoning weakness, and a six-type taxonomy separates models by capability.

  2. Graph-of-Skills: Dependency-Aware Structural Retrieval for Massive Agent Skills

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Graph of Skills retrieves dependency-aware skill bundles from large libraries via offline graph construction and hybrid inference-time search, improving agent rewards by 43.6% while cutting tokens by 37.8% on benchmarks.

  3. Mind the Sim2Real Gap in User Simulation for Agentic Tasks

    cs.AI 2026-03 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    On τ-bench, LLM user simulators are more cooperative, more verbose, and more lenient than real human users, so agent benchmarks that rely on them overstate real-world performance.

  4. AppWorld-UL: Benchmarking Diverse Agent-User Interactions for Tool-Use

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AppWorld-UL perturbs AppWorld's autonomous tasks into 516 user-interaction-requiring tasks; SOTA agents succeed on only 48.6% of them.

  5. The A-R Behavioral Space: Execution-Level Profiling of Tool-Using Language Model Agents in Organizational Deployment

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Execution and refusal in tool-using LLMs are separable dimensions whose joint distribution shifts systematically across risk regimes and autonomy scaffolds, made visible in A-R space.

  6. Gecko: A Simulation Environment with Stateful Feedback for Refining Agent Tool Calls

    cs.SE 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A simulated tool environment with argument validation, response synthesis, and task-state feedback improves LLM tool-call accuracy at test time.

  7. One Tool Is Enough: Reinforcement Learning for Repository-Level LLM Agents

    cs.SE 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Repository-level issue localization can be done by a single jump-to-definition tool trained with reinforcement learning, achieving strong results on SWE-bench despite using only open-weights models.

  8. Experience-Evolving Multi-Turn Tool-Use Agent with Hybrid Episodic-Procedural Memory

    cs.LG 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An LLM agent that builds a tool-transition graph with state summaries from past experience improves tool selection and RL exploration by large margins on multi-turn benchmarks.

  9. UserBench: An Interactive Gym Environment for User-Centric Agents

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new multi-turn agent benchmark shows that current LLMs elicit fewer than 30% of user preferences and reach full intent alignment only about 20% of the time.

  10. ASPERA: A Simulated Environment to Evaluate Planning for Complex Action Execution

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ASPERA generates a benchmark of 250 executable assistant tasks and finds that LLMs, even with full API documentation, solve only 10 to 80 percent of them.

  11. Butterfly Effects in Toolchains: A Comprehensive Analysis of Failed Parameter Filling in LLM Tool-Agent Systems

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM tool agents fail at parameter filling in five recurring ways; perturbing tool documents and user queries drives most failures, and invented parameter names are tied to the model rather than the input.

  12. Quo Vadis, World Modeling?

    cs.CV 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An agent-centric reframing of world modeling, replacing physical state prediction with 'information transitions' organized into six proxy functions and three empowerment levels.

  13. How Can Input Reformulation Improve Tool Usage Accuracy in a Complex Dynamic Environment? A Study on $\tau$-bench

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    IRMA reformulates tool-agent inputs with memory, domain constraints, and tool suggestions, and reports improved tau-bench pass^5 reliability over ReAct, function calling, and self-reflection.

  14. Agent Identity Evals: Measuring Agentic Identity

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Introduces Agent Identity Evals (AIE), five similarity-based metrics for LMA identity stability, with pilot experiments showing identifiability always at zero and no statistical support.

  15. Apple Intelligence Foundation Language Models: Tech Report 2025

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Apple's 3B on-device and larger server language models match or beat several similarly sized open models on MMLU, MMMLU, and MGSM, using new efficiency techniques like KV-cache sharing and 2-bit quantization.

  16. Teaching a Language Model to Speak the Language of Tools

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LoRA fine-tuning of BgGPT models on a bilingual Bulgarian function-calling dataset yields large gains on a self-built 120-case benchmark while keeping knowledge benchmarks stable.

  17. Graphs Meet AI Agents: Taxonomy, Progress, and Future Opportunities

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A survey that groups graph-empowered AI agent research into planning, execution, memory, and multi-agent coordination, plus agents-for-graphs and applications.

  18. CONFETTI: Conversational Function-Calling Evaluation Through Turn-Level Interactions

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new 109-conversation, 86-API benchmark for LLM function-calling in multi-turn dialogue shows top models at about 40% accuracy and near-zero performance on chains of 4+ calls.

  19. PyTOD: Programmable Task-Oriented Dialogue with Execution Feedback

    cs.CL 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    A solvable one-state model of a dynamic molecular switch is claimed to combine synapse-like switching with proven convergence and fading memory for stable neuromorphic computation.

  20. Evolutionary Perspectives on the Evaluation of LLM-Based AI Agents: A Comprehensive Survey

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that classifies AI agent evaluation benchmarks along environment and capability axes, and proposes five traits that distinguish agents from chatbots.

Pith tools