RECORD
Pseudo-Dirac Neutrinos, a Challenge for Neutrino Telescopes
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 10 Jul 2003
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim However, it may be possible to distinguish pseudo-Dirac from Dirac neutrinos using high-energy astrophysical neutrinos.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
Neutrinos may be pseudo-Dirac states, such that each generation is actually composed of two maximally-mixed Majorana neutrinos separated by a tiny mass difference. The usual active neutrino oscillation phenomenology would be unaltered if the pseudo-Dirac splittings are $\delta m^2 \alt 10^{-12}$ eV$^2$; in addition, neutrinoless double beta decay would be highly suppressed. However, it may be possible to distinguish pseudo-Dirac from Dirac neutrinos using high-energy astrophysical neutrinos. By measuring flavor ratios as a function of $L/E$, mass-squared differences down to $\delta m^2 \sim 10^{-18}$ eV$^2$ can be reached. We comment on the possibility of probing cosmological parameters with neutrinos.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | Neutrinos may be pseudo-Dirac states, such that each generation is actually composed of two maximally-mixed Majorana neutrinos separated by a tiny mass difference. | background 0.99 | 0.07 | 0.07 | hedged possibility 1.00 |
| s1 | The usual active neutrino oscillation phenomenology would be unaltered if the pseudo-Dirac splittings are $\delta m^2 \alt 10^{-12}$ eV$^2$; in addition, neutrinoless double beta decay would be highly suppressed. | background 0.81 | 0.15 | 0.08 | asserted 0.75 |
| s2 | However, it may be possible to distinguish pseudo-Dirac from Dirac neutrinos using high-energy astrophysical neutrinos. | contribution 0.59 | 0.10 | 0.40 | hedged possibility 1.00 |
| s3 | By measuring flavor ratios as a function of $L/E$, mass-squared differences down to $\delta m^2 \sim 10^{-18}$ eV$^2$ can be reached. | result 0.83 | 0.44 | 0.57 | asserted 0.77 |
| s4 | We comment on the possibility of probing cosmological parameters with neutrinos. | future work 0.86 | 0.26 | 0.05 | hedged possibility 0.55 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v2
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
Neutrinos may be pseudo-Dirac states, such that each generation is actually composed of two maximally-mixed Majorana neutrinos separated by a tiny mass difference. The usual active neutrino oscillation phenomenology would be unaltered if the pseudo-Dirac splittings are $\delta m^2 \alt 10^{-12}$ eV$^2$; in addition, neutrinoless double beta decay would be highly suppressed. However, it may be possible to distinguish pseudo-Dirac from Dirac neutrinos using high-energy astrophysical neutrinos. By measuring flavor ratios as a function of $L/E$, mass-squared differences down to $\delta m^2 \sim 10^{-18}$ eV$^2$ can be reached. We comment on the possibility of probing cosmological parameters with neutrinos.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
62 arXiv papers cite this in 88 sentences
Papers citing it · 61 sentences without a confident label
Contests it 1 paper
-
This assertion was taken to be true by others [ref] , yet we want to stress that this claim is not correct, as can be seen from the eqs.
Quasi Dirac neutrino oscillations · Introduction · contest 0.79
Uses its data or values 1 paper
-
The disappearance bounds of muons come from long-baseline experiments [ref] and atmospheric experiments [ref] , $Δm^2 ≲10^-4 eV^2$ and $sin^22θ≥10^-2$.
Boomerang mechanism explaining the excess radio background · Appendix: Boomerang mechanism versus neutrino oscillation constraints · 0.92
Compares with it 1 paper
-
This technique has the advantage over prior proposals, see, e.g., Refs. [ref] , in that it is within experimental capabilities and mitigates the astrophysical source modeling uncertainties by correlating neutrino observations from different sources at the same $L/E$.
From the Dawn of Neutrino Astronomy to A New View of the Extreme Universe · What will astrophysical neutrinos tell us about the nature of neutrino mass? · 0.80
Cites it as support 1 paper
-
This is why pseudo-Dirac splittings far below any laboratory sensitivity remain accessible over astrophysical baselines [ref] .
Internal pseudospin, lepton-number superselection, and neutrino--antineutrino coherence in massive neutral-fermion one-particle states · Helicity selection within the $ΔL=2$ sector · 0.98
Cites it as background 23 papers
-
Typical new physics includes the energy-dependent leptonic mixing matrix [ref] , neutrino-decay [ref] , non-unitary mixing [ref] , pseudo-Dirac neutrinos [ref] , neutrino secret interactions [ref] , etc [ref] .
The Nonsymmetric Flavor Transition Matrix and the Apparent P violation · Introduction · 0.93
-
Recent observed astrophysical neutrino events in the TeV-PeV energy range [ref] provide a probe to explore new physics such as Lorentz invariance violation [ref] , neutrino decay [ref] , pseudo-Dirac neutrinos [ref] , non-unitary leptonic mixing matrix [ref] , non-standard interaction (NSI) [ref] .
Influences of non-standard interactions on PeV neutrino events with and without a $L_{\alpha}-L_{\beta}$ symmetry · Introduction · 0.85
-
The flavor composition of the high energy cosmic neutrino flux has been extensively studied by many people [ref] , since the possibility of flavor tagging of high energy neutrinos was advanced in Ref. [ref] .
Signatures of sterile neutrino mixing in high-energy cosmic neutrino flux · Introduction · 0.97
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.