Pith.

High Energy Physics - Theory · arXiv:hep-th/0508140 v2 · submitted 19 Aug 2005

New Integrable System of 2dim Fermions from Strings on AdS_5 x S^5

L. F. Alday, G. Arutyunov, S. Frolov

The paper says

“Finally we show that the Hamiltonian is integrable by explicitly constructing the corresponding Lax representation.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

We consider classical superstrings propagating on AdS_5 x S^5 space-time. We consistently truncate the superstring equations of motion to the so-called su(1|1) sector. By fixing the uniform gauge we show that physical excitations in this sector are described by two complex fermionic degrees of freedom and we obtain the corresponding Lagrangian. Remarkably, this Lagrangian can be cast in a two-dimensional Lorentz-invariant form. The kinetic part of the Lagrangian induces a non-trivial Poisson structure while the Hamiltonian is just the one of the massive Dirac fermion. We find a change of variables which brings the Poisson structure to the canonical form but makes the Hamiltonian nontrivial. The Hamiltonian is derived as an exact function of two parameters: the total S^5 angular momentum J and string tension \lambda; it is a polynomial in 1/J and in \sqrt{\lambda'} where \lambda'=\frac{\lambda}J^2 is the effective BMN coupling. We identify the string states dual to the gauge theory operators from the closed su(1|1) sector of N=4 SYM and show that the corresponding near-plane wave energy shift computed from our Hamiltonian perfectly agrees with that recently found in the literature. Finally we show that the Hamiltonian is integrable by explicitly constructing the corresponding Lax representation.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 1.00

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.13 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.20 · compares with prior results 0.95 · mentions code or data availability 0.02

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v2). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
We consider classical superstrings propagating on AdS_5 x S^5 space-time. background 0.82 0.66 0.02 asserted 0.82
We consistently truncate the superstring equations of motion to the so-called su(1|1) sector. method 0.92 0.95 0.03 asserted 1.00
By fixing the uniform gauge we show that physical excitations in this sector are described by two complex fermionic degrees of freedom and we obtain the corresponding Lagrangian. result 0.46 0.96 0.09 asserted 1.00
Remarkably, this Lagrangian can be cast in a two-dimensional Lorentz-invariant form. result 0.94 0.86 0.13 asserted 0.99
The kinetic part of the Lagrangian induces a non-trivial Poisson structure while the Hamiltonian is just the one of the massive Dirac fermion. result 0.99 0.89 0.07 asserted 1.00
We find a change of variables which brings the Poisson structure to the canonical form but makes the Hamiltonian nontrivial. method 0.41 0.96 0.06 asserted 1.00
The Hamiltonian is derived as an exact function of two parameters: the total S^5 angular momentum J and string tension \lambda; it is a polynomial in 1/J and in \sqrt{\lambda'} where \lambda'=\frac{\lambda}{J^2} is the effective BMN coupling. result 0.98 0.96 0.15 asserted 1.00
We identify the string states dual to the gauge theory operators from the closed su(1|1) sector of N=4 SYM and show that the corresponding near-plane wave energy shift computed from our Hamiltonian perfectly agrees with that recently found in the literature. result 0.95 0.90 0.21 asserted 1.00
Finally we show that the Hamiltonian is integrable by explicitly constructing the corresponding Lax representation. result 0.87 0.97 0.50 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v2

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,024 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 22 Pith papers

Reviewed papers on Pith that cite this one. The full citation record

  1. Bethe Ansatz in Stringy Sigma Models hep-th · Mar 2006
  2. The AdS_5xS^5 superstring worldsheet S-matrix and crossing symmetry hep-th · Mar 2006
  3. Superstrings on AdS_4 x CP^3 as a Coset Sigma-model hep-th · Jun 2008
  4. On String S-matrix, Bound States and TBA hep-th · Oct 2007
  5. The AdS5xS5 Superstring in Light-Cone Gauge and its Bethe Equations hep-th · Mar 2006
  6. TTbar deformation and the light-cone gauge hep-th · May 2019
  7. Integrable S matrix, mirror TBA and spectrum for the stringy $\text{AdS}_{3}\times\text{S}^3\times\text{S}^3\times\text{S}^1$ WZW model hep-th · Dec 2018
  8. Twisting the Mirror TBA hep-th · Sep 2010
  9. Semiclassical Quantization of Spinning Strings in AdS_4 x CP^3 hep-th · Jul 2008
  10. The S-matrix of String Bound States hep-th · Mar 2008
  11. The Zamolodchikov-Faddeev Algebra for AdS_5 x S^5 Superstring hep-th · Dec 2006
  12. The Off-shell Symmetry Algebra of the Light-cone AdS_5 x S^5 Superstring hep-th · Sep 2006
  13. Finite-size Effects from Giant Magnons hep-th · Jun 2006
  14. On AdS_5 x S^5 String S-matrix hep-th · Apr 2006
  15. Green-Schwarz Strings in TsT-transformed backgrounds hep-th · Dec 2005
  16. Uniform Light-Cone Gauge for Strings in AdS_5 x S^5: Solving su(1|1) Sector hep-th · Oct 2005
  17. Wrapping interactions and a new source of corrections to the spin-chain/string duality hep-th · Oct 2005
  18. $T{\overline T}$, $\widetilde JJ$, $JT$ and $\widetilde JT$ deformations hep-th · Jul 2019
  19. The SU(1|2) and SU(2|2) Sectors from Superstrings in AdS5 x S5 hep-th · Apr 2006
  20. On highest-energy state in the su(1|1) sector of N=4 super Yang-Mills theory hep-th · Mar 2006
  21. Foundations of the AdS_5 x S^5 Superstring. Part I hep-th · Jan 2009
  22. Integrability of the AdS_5 x S^5 superstring and its deformations hep-th · Oct 2013
How the literature uses it

16 arXiv papers cite this in 56 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 31 sentences without a confident label

Contests it 1 paper
  • It is not difficult to see that this remarkable scheme of cancellations would have been completely ruined had we not corrected the factor of $1/2$ missed by [ref] and the overall sign difference in comparison with by [ref] , as they were paramount for the intricate fine-tuning between the interaction terms required for $S$-matrix factorization.

    Quantum integrability of the Alday-Arutyunov-Frolov model · S-matrix factorization · contest 0.95

Compares with it 3 papers
Cites it as background 7 papers

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment