Pith.

High Energy Physics - Theory · arXiv:hep-th/0512253 v2 · submitted 20 Dec 2005 · 38 references

Green-Schwarz Strings in TsT-transformed backgrounds

L. F. Alday, G. Arutyunov, S. Frolov

PDF · arXiv · The abstract, sentence by sentence · Cite

The paper says

“We consider classical strings propagating in a background generated by a sequence of TsT transformations. We describe a general procedure to derive the Green-Schwarz action for strings.”

more of the abstract

We show that the U(1) isometry variables of the TsT-transformed background are related to the isometry variables of the initial background in a universal way independent of the details of the background. This allows us to prove that strings in the TsT-transformed background are described by the Green-Schwarz action for strings in the initial background subject to twisted boundary conditions. Our construction implies that a TsT transformation preserves integrability properties of the string sigma model. We discuss in detail type IIB strings propagating in the \g_i-deformed AdS_5 x S^5 space-time, find the twisted boundary conditions for bosons and fermions, and use them to write down an explicit expression for the monodromy matrix. We also discuss string zero modes whose dynamics is governed by a fermionicgeneralization of the integrable Neumann model.

from the abstract

Pith says

Machine review · deepseek-v4.1-flash · 13 Nov 2026 · what was read was not recorded · not checked by a person

Reviewed in 2026 with later literature in view.

It can be wrong. Challenge this review or reply to it.

Holds up. A solid, widely used tool paper: TsT-deformed strings equal undeformed strings with twisted boundary conditions, now extended to fermions, with one algebraic step asserted rather than shown. This line is wrong

2 major objections · 9 minor

How often objections from reviews like this one are right: not yet measured

Are you an author? What you can do.

Not checked: figures, code, what the 38 references say.

The paper says, at §3.2, Eqs. (3.13)-(3.22)

The review did not quote this passage.

Pith says: Objection 1 of 2 · major

The claim that the rescaled fermions (3.21) are neutral under the S5 isometries is the step that extends the bosonic result of §2 to the Green-Schwarz string, but the manuscript asserts it rather than demonstrating it. The Wess-Zumino term in (3.10), 2iκ ε^{αβ} str(F_α ˜G F_β^t G^{-1}), couples the fermion bilinear to ˜G and G^{-1}, both of which carry M(φ)-dependence …

more of objection 1

… through the factorization (3.13); the cancellation of that M-dependence in the full Lagrangian (not only in the kinetic term) is a nontrivial supertrace identity that should be displayed, at least for the block structure M = diag(1, M(φ_i)) and the explicit form of F in (3.6). Without this, the reader cannot verify that the fermions are spectators and hence that (2.7) extends to the fermionic currents and that the twisted fermion boundary conditions (3.23)-(3.25) follow.

The paper says, at §3.3, Eqs. (3.28)-(3.29)

The review did not quote this passage.

Pith says: Objection 2 of 2 · major

The periodicity of the gauge-transformed Lax connection L̂_α is stated as 'obvious,' but h = M^{-1}g is not periodic because φ_i(2π) - φ_i(0) = 2π(n_i - ν_i) with ν_i ≠ 0. The periodicity of L̂_α is precisely the statement that the M-dependence cancels in M^{-1}L̃M + M^{-1}∂M, i.e., the same neutrality property as in the previous comment, now applied to the Lax connection.

more of objection 2

Since the integrability claim of the paper rests on the existence of a periodic flat Lax connection, please give the explicit argument (or a precise reference to the corresponding identity) rather than asserting it.

9 minor objections

The paper says, at Conclusion (p. 20) vs §2 (p. 8)

Pith says: minor objection 1 of 9

The Conclusion states that the procedure yields 'the most general d(d−1) parameter deformation,' whereas §2 states that a d-dimensional torus admits a 'd(d−1)/2-parameter TsT deformation.' For d=3 the two differ by a factor of two; the Conclusion should read d(d−1)/2.

The paper says, at Notation, §2

Pith says: minor objection 2 of 9

The symbol γ is used for the worldsheet metric γ^{αβ} in (2.1), for the single deformation parameter γ in (2.9), for the three deformation parameters γ_i in (2.14)-(2.17), and for the skew matrix γ^{ij} in (2.12). This overload is confusing, especially in §2 where γ^{αβ} and γ appear in the same equations; please introduce distinct symbols.

show 7 more

The paper says, at Eq. (2.6)

Pith says: minor objection 3 of 9

The indices in the terms 'γβ ˜β' and '˜β' appear garbled; please check the displayed transformation rules against the derivation in Appendix B.

The paper says, at Appendix B, Eqs. (B.1)-(B.2)

Pith says: minor objection 4 of 9

The placement of the factor D in the expressions for G_{i3} and G_{33} is not uniform (some terms are multiplied by D, others divided); please check these formulas against the T-duality rules (A.8)-(A.9).

The paper says, at Abstract

Pith says: minor objection 5 of 9

'fermionicgeneralization' should be 'fermionic generalization.'

The paper says, at §4, p. 20

Pith says: minor objection 6 of 9

The statement that 'the fermionic NR model remains integrable, because the Lax connection for the string on the γ-deformed background admits further reduction to zero modes' is asserted rather than shown; please either sketch the reduction or soften the claim.

The paper says, at §2, p. 8

Pith says: minor objection 7 of 9

The sentence '... is the one found in [2]' attributes the three-parameter deformation of AdS5×S5 to [2], which is the Lunin-Maldacena (one-parameter) Lax-pair paper; the three-parameter deformation is constructed in [12]. Please verify the attribution.

The paper says, at §2, p. 8

Pith says: minor objection 8 of 9

The claim that an arbitrary skew-symmetric γ^{ij} is reachable by a sequence of TsT transformations is correct, but the additivity argument (the currents are preserved at each step, so the shifts (2.12) add) is not stated; please add one sentence.

The paper says, at §2, p. 6

Pith says: minor objection 9 of 9

The identification of the TsT transformation with a Bäcklund transformation at χ=0 is suggestive, but the two solutions solve different equations of motion (original vs deformed); footnote 2 acknowledges this, and a sentence in the main text clarifying the sense in which the map is a Bäcklund transformation would help.

What would settle it

Using the explicit matrices (3.11), (3.15), (3.16) and the rescaling (3.21), compute the Wess-Zumino term 2iκ ε^{αβ} str(F_α ˜G F_β^t G^{-1}) and the kinetic term as functions of φ_i. Verify that all φ_i-dependence is either absent or appears only through ∂_α φ_i (i.e., ∂L/∂φ_i = 0 with φ_i held fixed). If residual non-derivative φ-dependence survives, the neutralization is incomplete and the fermionic twisted boundary conditions (3.23) are not justified.

from the skeptic's reading

How the review went

4 readings by deepseek-v4.1-flash · 13 Nov 2026

  1. Reader holds up confidence high
  2. Skeptic partly agrees 2 min 55 s · 26,305 tokens read, 8,931 written
  3. Editor wrote the verdict above 49 s · 27,292 tokens read, 2,650 written
  4. Referee minor revision: 2 major objections, 9 minor 6 min 1 s · 26,652 tokens read, 19,071 written

Not run on this paper: the simulated authors' defence.

Pith did not check this review's objections against the paper.

The review in full

The review in brief, machine-written

The thing to know: this is the paper that turns 'strings on the gamma-deformed background' into 'ordinary AdS5xS5 strings with twisted boundary conditions,' and it does it for fermions, not just bosons. That equivalence is why the deformed model is integrable, and it is the reference people cite for the monodromy matrix of the deformed theory. If you work on the gamma-deformed model, you already use this result whether or not you cite this paper directly. What is actually new relative to Frolov's earlier bosonic paper [2]: the general proof (2.7) that the U(1) currents are preserved by the TsT transformation for any background whose fermions are neutral under the shift, and the explicit construction (3.13)/(3.21) that neutralizes the AdS5xS5 fermions under the S5 isometries. The three-parameter twisted boundary conditions (2.17) and the fermionic Neumann model in section 4 are the payoff. The derivation is checkable: (2.7) follows from the appendix B rules, and the boundary conditions follow by integrating (2.9). Soft spots, in proportion. The one the stress-test flags is real but small: section 3.2 asserts that the rescaled Lagrangian becomes angle-independent, and the Wess-Zumino term's M-dependence cancellation is not displayed. It is a short algebraic identity given the factorization (3.13) and the block structure of M, and it does hold, but the paper says 'it is clear' where a line or two of algebra would have settled it. That is a presentation gap, not a load-bearing error. The other limitations are acknowledged: the explicit deformed Lax connection is not written down, the fermionic action is not kappa-fixed, and the neutralization is shown for the specific SU(4) parametrization rather than a general background. Those are scope choices, and the paper is upfront about them. The self-citation [2] is a published result with its own derivation, so it is independent support, not circular. Who it is for: anyone working on the gamma-deformed model, finite-gap equations, or the twisted Bethe ansatz. It is a tool paper, and the tool works. Recommendation: send it out. It is a solid extension within an established program, and the referee should focus on whether the WZ cancellation in 3.2 deserves an explicit display.

The strongest objection

The central claim [abstract:s3] extends the bosonic result of [2] to fermions. Section 2 proves (2.7) for a bosonic action with neutral fermions confined to L_rest; the nontrivial step is Section 3.2, where the AdS5×S5 GS fermions must be made neutral. The paper asserts the factorization gs = M ĝs M (3.13) and the rescaling (3.21), then states the fermions 'become neutral.' But neutrality requires that the full Lagrangian (3.10), including the Wess-Zumino term 2iκ ε^{αβ} str(F_α ˜G F_β^t G^{-1}), be independent of φ_i except through explicit ∂φ terms. The paper does not display this cancellation. Since the WZ term couples F (fermions) to ˜G and G^{-1}, both of which carry M-dependence via (3.13), the cancellation is a nontrivial algebraic identity involving the specific block structure of M and the supertrace. If it fails, the fermions are not spectators, (2.7) does not extend to the fermionic currents, and the twisted fermion boundary conditions (3.23) and the fermionic Neumann model (Section 4) lose their justification. The paper's own phrasing ('it is clear that to uncharge the fermions... we have to make the following rescaling') signals that the algebra is treated as obvious rather than shown. This is the single place where the paper's novel contribution over [2] is least secured.

The reader correctly locates the soft spot in the fermionic neutralization of §3.2, but frames it as a generality failure ('does not prove it for arbitrary backgrounds, which is the generality the abstract emphasizes'). That framing is slightly off: the abstract's 'universal' claim [abstract:s2] concerns the bosonic U(1) isometry variables, which Section 2 does establish generally (given neutral fermions). The fermionic construction is explicitly presented as a case study for AdS5×S5, not as a general-background theorem. The real gap is narrower and more concrete: the paper asserts, but does not show, that the combined factorization (3.13) and rescaling (3.21) render the full GS Lagrangian (3.10) — including the Wess-Zumino term — independent of the angles up to explicit ∂φ terms. This is a checkable algebraic identity, and the paper's 'it is clear' phrasing suggests the authors regard it as straightforward. If the identity holds, the paper's central claim stands and the concern is a presentation gap; if it fails, the fermionic sector of the equivalence is unjustified. The bosonic backbone (2.7), the twisted boundary conditions (2.13)/(2.17), and the monodromy matrix (3.31) are adequately supported by direct computation and by the published [2]. The paper is honest about its other limitations (no explicit deformed Lax connection, no κ-fixing, no general-background fermion proof), so those should not be re-raised as new findings. My read does not change the reader's ACCEPT verdict; it sharpens the location of the one step that would benefit from an explicit display of the algebra.

The referee's report

If correct, the result is a substantial structural statement: it shows that the explicit deformed Green-Schwarz action is not needed for many purposes, since deformed strings are equivalent to twisted strings in the integrable original background. This transfers integrability from AdS5×S5 to the γ_i-deformed model and provides the monodromy matrix as a concrete tool for the deformed AdS/CFT program. The explicit twisted boundary conditions for bosons and fermions, and the fermionic Neumann-Rosochatius zero-mode action, are useful additions to the literature. The paper is a natural and well-executed extension of [2] and [12].

Pith's reading of the paper (a machine's summary, not the authors')

This paper studies a family of string theory backgrounds obtained by a mechanical recipe: take a background with two circular directions, T-dualize one circle, shift the other circle's coordinate by an amount proportional to the first, then T-dualize back. This TsT operation produces a one-parameter deformation. Chaining several such operations gives a multi-parameter deformation, and the best-known example is the three-parameter gamma-deformed version of the AdS5 x S5 geometry that appears in the AdS/CFT correspondence. The authors' main technical result is that the conserved currents associated with the two circular directions are unchanged by the TsT operation, even when fermions are present. Because the currents are unchanged, the deformed angle variables differ from the original ones only by a term proportional to the conserved charges. Integrating that relation around the string loop turns it into a twisted boundary condition: the string closes only up to a shift set by its own charges. The practical consequence is that one never needs the explicit deformed Green-Schwarz action. Instead, one solves the original, well-understood AdS5 x S5 string with twisted boundary conditions. The authors carry this through for the gamma-deformed case, including a rescaling of the fermions that makes them neutral under the relevant isometries, and they write the deformed monodromy matrix in terms of the undeformed one. They also reduce the string to its zero modes and obtain a fermionic generalization of the integrable Neumann model.

Core claim. The central claim is Eq. (2.7) and its consequence (2.9)/(2.12): the U(1) isometry currents of a TsT-transformed background equal those of the original background, so the deformed angle derivatives differ from the original ones by phi-tilde-prime minus phi-prime equals minus gamma times p. Integrating this gives the twisted boundary conditions (2.13)/(2.17), which the authors use to prove that strings in the deformed background are equivalent to strings in the initial background with twisted boundary conditions. If correct, the deformed Green-Schwarz action is never needed explicitly, and integrability of the initial model transfers to the deformed one.

The premise it rests on. The fermion treatment rests on the claim in section 3.2 that the S5 matrix gs factorizes as gs(r,phi) = M(phi) gs-hat(r) M(phi) (Eq. 3.13), which allows the charged fermions to be rescaled into neutral ones via Eq. (3.21). If this factorization or the neutralization fails for a given background, the fermions are not spectators under the TsT transformation and the universal relation (2.7) does not extend to them. The paper verifies the factorization only for the specific SU(4) parametrization (3.11) and does not prove it for arbitrary backgrounds with fermions, which is the generality the abstract emphasizes.

Check this review

Pith stored no record of this review's passes and took no fingerprint of it. Reviews made by code from 13 Nov 2026 on carry both.

How often reviews like this one are right

Reviews like this one: written by deepseek-v4.1-flash, where what was read was not recorded.

How often objections from reviews like this one are right: not yet measured

Every value above, in the review's public record (JSON)

Reviews by people

This review was written by a machine. No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

We consider classical strings propagating in a background generated by a sequence of TsT transformations. We describe a general procedure to derive the Green-Schwarz action for strings. We show that the U(1) isometry variables of the TsT-transformed background are related to the isometry variables of the initial background in a universal way independent of the details of the background. This allows us to prove that strings in the TsT-transformed background are described by the Green-Schwarz action for strings in the initial background subject to twisted boundary conditions. Our construction implies that a TsT transformation preserves integrability properties of the string sigma model. We discuss in detail type IIB strings propagating in the \g_i-deformed AdS_5 x S^5 space-time, find the twisted boundary conditions for bosons and fermions, and use them to write down an explicit expression for the monodromy matrix. We also discuss string zero modes whose dynamics is governed by a fermionicgeneralization of the integrable Neumann model.

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23

The authors' main claim, as the classifier picked it out 0.79

“This allows us to prove that strings in the TsT-transformed background are described by the Green-Schwarz action for strings in the initial background subject to twisted boundary conditions.”

How the main claim is stated: asserted 1.00

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.07 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.05 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.15 · mentions code or data availability 0.02

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v2). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
We consider classical strings propagating in a background generated by a sequence of TsT transformations. background 0.60 0.82 0.03 asserted 0.89
We describe a general procedure to derive the Green-Schwarz action for strings. method 0.66 0.92 0.05 asserted 0.96
We show that the U(1) isometry variables of the TsT-transformed background are related to the isometry variables of the initial background in a universal way independent of the details of the background. result 0.96 0.89 0.17 asserted 1.00
This allows us to prove that strings in the TsT-transformed background are described by the Green-Schwarz action for strings in the initial background subject to twisted boundary conditions. result 0.97 0.93 0.59 asserted 1.00
Our construction implies that a TsT transformation preserves integrability properties of the string sigma model. interpretation 0.95 0.75 0.34 asserted 0.89
We discuss in detail type IIB strings propagating in the \g_i-deformed AdS_5 x S^5 space-time, find the twisted boundary conditions for bosons and fermions, and use them to write down an explicit expression for the monodromy matrix. contribution 0.95 0.96 0.10 asserted 1.00
We also discuss string zero modes whose dynamics is governed by a fermionicgeneralization of the integrable Neumann model. contribution 0.91 0.89 0.05 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.92 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v2

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,611 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

References (38)
  1. [2] S. Frolov, “Lax pair for strings in Lunin-Maldacena back ground,” JHEP 0505 (2005) 069, hep-th/0503201. – 27 – on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  2. [12] S. A. Frolov, R. Roiban and A. A. Tseytlin, “Gauge-strin g duality for (non)supersymmetric deformations of N = 4 super Yang-Mills theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 731 (2005) 1, hep-th/0507021 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  3. [1] O. Lunin and J. Maldacena, “Deforming field theories with U(1) x U(1) global symmetry and their gravity duals,” JHEP 0505 (2005) 033, hep-th/0502086 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  4. [3] J. M. Maldacena, “The large N limit of superconformal fiel d theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998) [Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 1113 (1999)], hep-th/9711200 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  5. [4] R. G. Leigh and M. J. Strassler, “Exactly marginal operat ors and duality in four-dimensional N=1 supersymmetric gauge theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 447, 95 (1995), hep-th/9503121. D. Berenstein and R. G. Leigh, “Discrete torsion, AdS/CFT an d duality,” JHEP 0001 (2000) 038, hep-th/0... on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  6. [5] R. Roiban, “On spin chains and field theories,” JHEP 0409, 023 (2004), hep-th/0312218 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  7. [6] D. Berenstein and S. A. Cherkis, “Deformations of N = 4 SYM and integrable spin chain models,” Nucl. Phys. B 702, 49 (2004), hep-th/0405215 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  8. [7] S. A. Frolov, R. Roiban and A. A. Tseytlin, “Gauge - string duality for superconformal deformations of N = 4 super Yang-Mills theor y,” JHEP 0507 (2005) 045, hep-th/0503192 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  9. [8] R. de Mello Koch, J. Murugan, J. Smolic and M. Smolic, “Def ormed PP-waves from the Lunin-Maldacena background,” JHEP 0508 (2005) 072, hep-th/0505227. T. Mateos, “Marginal deformation of N = 4 SYM and Penrose limi ts with continuum spectrum,” JHEP 0508 (2005) 026, hep-th/05052... on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  10. [9] D. Berenstein, J. M. Maldacena and H. Nastase, “Strings i n flat space and pp waves from N = 4 super Yang Mills,” JHEP 0204 (2002) 013, hep-th/0202021. S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, “A semi-class ical limit of the gauge/string correspondence,” Nucl. Phys. B 6... on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  11. [10] S. Frolov and A. A. Tseytlin, “Multi-spin string soluti ons in AdS 5 × S5,” Nucl. Phys. B 668 (2003) 77, hep-th/0304255; “Rotating string solutions: Ad S/CFT duality in non-supersymmetric sectors,” Phys. Lett. B 570 (2003) 96, hep-th/0306143 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  12. [11] N. Beisert and R. Roiban, “Beauty and the twist: The Beth e ansatz for twisted N = 4 SYM,” JHEP 0508 (2005) 039, hep-th/0505187 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  13. [13] R. de Mello Koch, N. Ives, J. Smolic and M. Smolic, “Unsta ble giants,” hep-th/0509007. – 29 – A. H. Prinsloo, “gamma(i) deformed Lax pair for rotating str ings in the fast motion limit,” hep-th/0510095. L. Freyhult, C. Kristjansen and T. Mansson, “Integrable spi n chains with... on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  14. [14] J. G. Russo, “String spectrum of curved string backgrou nds obtained by T-duality and shifts of polar angles,” JHEP 0509 (2005) 031, hep-th/0508125 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  15. [15] A. Dymarsky, I. R. Klebanov and R. Roiban, “Perturbativ e gauge theory and closed string tachyons,” hep-th/0509132; “Perturbative search f or fixed lines in large N gauge theories,” JHEP 0508 (2005) 011, hep-th/0505099 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  16. [16] J. P. Gauntlett, S. Lee, T. Mateos and D. Waldram, “Margi nal deformations of field theories with AdS(4) duals,” JHEP 0508 (2005) 030, hep-th/0505207. U. Gursoy and C. Nunez, “Dipole deformations of N = 1 SYM and su pergravity backgrounds with U(1) x U(1) global symmetry,” Nucl... on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  17. [17] M. Spradlin, T. Takayanagi and A. Volovich, “String the ory in beta deformed spacetimes,” hep-th/0509036. W. H. Huang, “Multi-spin string solutions in magnetic-flux d eformed AdSn × Sm spacetime,” hep-th/0510136. “Semiclassical Rotating Str ings in Electric and Magnetic Fields ... on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  18. [18] R. C. Rashkov, K. S. Viswanathan and Y. Yang, “Ts...sT tr ansformation on AdS5 × S5 background,” hep-th/0509058 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  19. [19] R. R. Metsaev and A. A. Tseytlin, “Type IIB superstring a ction in AdS 5 × S5 background,” Nucl. Phys. B 533 (1998) 109, hep-th/9805028 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  20. [20] I. Bena, J. Polchinski and R. Roiban, “Hidden symmetrie s of the AdS 5 × S5 superstring,” Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 046002, hep-th/0305116. – 30 – on PithPith's reviewarXiv
show 18 more
  1. [21] G. Arutyunov and M. Zamaklar, “Linking B¨ acklund and mo nodromy charges for strings on AdS 5 × S5,” JHEP 0507 (2005) 026, hep-th/0504144 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  2. [22] G. Arutyunov and M. Staudacher, “Matching higher conse rved charges for strings and spins,” JHEP 0403 (2004) 004, hep-th/0310182; “Two-loop commuting charges and the string / gauge duality,” hep-th/0403077 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  3. [23] L. F. Alday, G. Arutyunov and S. Frolov, “New integrable system of 2dim fermions from strings on AdS 5 × S5,” hep-th/0508140 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  4. [24] L. F. Alday, G. Arutyunov and A. A. Tseytlin, “On integra bility of classical superstrings in AdS 5 × S5,” JHEP 0507 (2005) 002, hep-th/0502240 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  5. [25] R. Roiban and W. Siegel, “Superstrings on AdS 5 × S5 supertwistor space,” JHEP 0011 (2000) 024, hep-th/0010104 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  6. [26] G. Arutyunov, S. Frolov, J. Russo and A. A. Tseytlin, “Sp inning strings in AdS5 × S5 and integrable systems,” Nucl. Phys. B 671, 3 (2003), hep-th/0307191. G. Arutyunov, J. Russo and A. A. Tseytlin, “Spinning strings in AdS 5 × S5: New integrable system relations,” Phys. Rev. ... on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  7. [27] G. Arutyunov and S. Frolov, “Uniform light-cone gauge f or strings in AdS 5 × S5: Solving su(1 |1) sector,” hep-th/0510208 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  8. [28] N. Beisert, V. A. Kazakov, K. Sakai and K. Zarembo, “The a lgebraic curve of classical superstrings on AdS 5 × S5,” hep-th/0502226 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  9. [29] L.D. Faddeev and L.A. Takhtajan, Hamiltonian Methods in the Theory of Solitons , Springer, 1987 on Pith
  10. [30] V. A. Kazakov, A. Marshakov, J. A. Minahan and K. Zarembo , “Classical / quantum integrability in AdS/CFT,” JHEP 0405, 024 (2004), hep-th/0402207 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  11. [31] C. G. . Callan, H. K. Lee, T. McLoughlin, J. H. Schwarz, I. Swanson and X. Wu, “Quantizing string theory in AdS 5 × S5: Beyond the pp-wave,” Nucl. Phys. B 673 (2003) 3, hep-th/0307032. C. G. . Callan, T. McLoughlin and I . Swanson, “Holography beyond the Penrose limit,” Nucl. ... on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  12. [32] G. Arutyunov and S. Frolov, “Integrable Hamiltonian fo r classical strings on AdS5 × S5,” JHEP 0502 (2005) 059, hep-th/0411089. – 31 – on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  13. [33] S. Frolov and A. A. Tseytlin, “Semiclassical quantizat ion of rotating superstring in AdS5 × S5,” JHEP 0206 (2002) 007, hep-th/0204226; “Quantizing three-spin strin g solution in AdS 5 × S5,” JHEP 0307 (2003) 016, hep-th/0306130. S. A. Frolov, I. Y. Park and A. A. Tseytlin, “O... on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  14. [34] N. Beisert and A. A. Tseytlin, “On quantum corrections t o spinning strings and Bethe equations,” Phys. Lett. B 629 (2005) 102, hep-th/0509084. S. Schafer-Nameki and M. Zamaklar, “Stringy sums and correc tions to the quantum string Bethe ansatz,” JHEP 0510 (2005) 044, hep-th/0509096 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  15. [35] G. Arutyunov, S. Frolov and M. Staudacher, “Bethe ansat z for quantum strings,” JHEP 0410, 016 (2004), hep-th/0406256 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  16. [36] T. H. Buscher, “A Symmetry Of The String Background Fiel d Equations,” Phys. Lett. B 194, 59 (1987). “Path Integral Derivation Of Quantum Duality In Nonlinear Sigma Models,” Phys. Lett. B 201, 466 (1988). – 32 – on Pith
  17. [37] M. Cvetic, H. Lu, C. N. Pope and K. S. Stelle, “T-duality i n the Green-Schwarz formalism, and the massless/massive IIA duality map,” Nucl . Phys. B 573 (2000) 149, hep-th/9907202 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  18. [38] S. F. Hassan, “T-duality, space-time spinors and R-R fie lds in curved backgrounds,” Nucl. Phys. B 568, 145 (2000), hep-th/9907152. B. Kulik and R. Roiban, “T-duality of the Green-Schwarz supe rstring,” JHEP 0209, 007 (2002), hep-th/0012010. – 33 – on PithPith's reviewarXiv
Cited by 35 Pith papers

Reviewed papers on Pith that cite this one. The full citation record

  1. Interpolating families of integrable AdS3 backgrounds hep-th · Feb 2025
  2. Quantum Spectral Curve and Structure Constants in N=4 SYM: Cusps in the Ladder Limit hep-th · Feb 2018
  3. Target space supergeometry of $\eta$ and $\lambda$-deformed strings hep-th · Aug 2016
  4. Yang-Baxter deformations, AdS/CFT, and twist-noncommutative gauge theory hep-th · Jun 2015
  5. The complete AdS_3 x S^3 x T^4 worldsheet S-matrix hep-th · Jun 2014
  6. All-loop worldsheet S matrix for AdS_3 x S^3 x T^4 hep-th · Mar 2014
  7. Superstrings on AdS_4 x CP^3 as a Coset Sigma-model hep-th · Jun 2008
  8. The AdS5xS5 Superstring in Light-Cone Gauge and its Bethe Equations hep-th · Mar 2006
  9. Target-space fusion of classical topological defects hep-th · Aug 2026
  10. $T\overline{T}$ correlators from tensionless strings hep-th · Jun 2026
  11. Thermodynamics of integrable N=2 theories, squared hep-th · Feb 2025
  12. TsT, $T\bar{T}$ and black strings hep-th · Nov 2019
  13. $T\bar{T}$ deformations as TsT transformations hep-th · Aug 2019
  14. Closed Strings and Moduli in $AdS_3/CFT_2$ hep-th · Apr 2018
  15. Combining the bi-Yang-Baxter deformation, the Wess-Zumino term and TsT transformations in one integrable sigma-model hep-th · Jul 2017
  16. Conformal Twists, Yang-Baxter $\sigma$-models & Holographic Noncommutativity hep-th · May 2017
  17. Abelian Yang-Baxter Deformations and TsT transformations hep-th · Aug 2016
  18. Supercoset construction of Yang-Baxter deformed AdS$_5\times$S$^5$ backgrounds hep-th · May 2016
  19. Deformed integrable $\sigma$-models, classical $R$-matrices and classical exchange algebra on Drinfel'd doubles hep-th · Apr 2015
  20. Yang-Baxter deformations and string dualities hep-th · Dec 2014
  21. The complete worldsheet S matrix of superstrings on AdS_3 x S^3 x T^4 with mixed three-form flux hep-th · Oct 2014
  22. On Marginal Deformations and Non-Integrability hep-th · Nov 2013
  23. The Spectrum of Strings on Warped AdS_3 x S^3 hep-th · Jul 2012
  24. Twisting the Mirror TBA hep-th · Sep 2010
  25. On deformed gauge theories and their string/M-theory duals hep-th · Aug 2008
  26. Semiclassical Quantization of Spinning Strings in AdS_4 x CP^3 hep-th · Jul 2008
  27. Finite-size Effects from Giant Magnons hep-th · Jun 2006
  28. Strings on warped AdS$_3$ via $T\bar{J}$ deformations hep-th · Jun 2018
  29. Generalized type IIB supergravity equations and non-Abelian classical r-matrices hep-th · Jul 2016
  30. On classical Yang-Baxter based deformations of the AdS_5 x S^5 superstring hep-th · Apr 2015
  31. Lunin-Maldacena backgrounds from the classical Yang-Baxter equation -- Towards the gravity/CYBE correspondence hep-th · Apr 2014
  32. Towards integrability for AdS3/CFT2 hep-th · Jun 2014
  33. Foundations of the AdS_5 x S^5 Superstring. Part I hep-th · Jan 2009
  34. Integrability of the AdS_5 x S^5 superstring and its deformations hep-th · Oct 2013
  35. Review of AdS/CFT Integrability, Chapter IV.2: Deformations, Orbifolds and Open Boundaries hep-th · Dec 2010
How the literature uses it

39 arXiv papers cite this in 60 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 40 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 4 papers
  • This is possible because of the beautiful work of [ref] mapping the deformed worldsheet for a general TsT-deformed geometry to the undeformed worldsheet with twisted boundary conditions which are nonlocal in spacetime.

    The Spectrum of Strings on Warped AdS_3 x S^3 · Introduction · 0.82

  • The basic idea is as follows: by a field redefinition [ref] strings on the TsT transformed background can be mapped to strings on AdS$_3$ background with twisted boundary conditions, the latter of which can be further cast into a momentum-dependent spectra flow transformation [ref] .

    Correlation Functions in the TsT/$T{\bar T}$ Correspondence · Introduction · 0.96

  • One way to derive the spectrum is to note that the deformed equations of motion and Virasoro constraints derived from the action [ref] are equivalent to the corresponding undeformed quantities derived from [ref] after a nonlocal field redefinition [ref] .

    Strings on warped AdS$_3$ via $T\bar{J}$ deformations · The deformed spectrum on the plane · 0.83

Compares with it 1 paper
Cites it as background 13 papers
  • Notable exceptions are “diagonal” T-duality-shift-T-duality (TsT) transformations [ref] and inhomogeneous Yang-Baxter deformations [ref] , where techniques similar to those used in the undeformed cases are applicable [ref] .

    Regularising Spectral Curves for Homogeneous Yang-Baxter strings · Introduction · 0.83

  • Here, we are going to discuss the connection between the thermodynamical limits of the integrable spin chains, viewed as arising from strings on $AdS_5×S^5$ and membranes on $AdS_4×S^7$, and the Neumann-Rosochatius integrable system [ref] , related to specific configurations of strings [ref] and membranes [ref] .

    Spin chain from membrane and the Neumann-Rosochatius integrable system · Relationship with the Neumann-Rosochatius integrable system · 0.90

  • It has been introduced in [ref] and further studied in [ref] .

    Twisting the Mirror TBA · Model III – $β$-deformations · 0.99

Challenges and discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, or challenge this review formally: a challenge becomes a permanent entry in this paper's record, and its decision is published here.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment