Heavy Quark Energy Loss in Nuclear Medium

Ben-Wei Zhang; Enke Wang; Xin-Nian Wang

REVIEW

Heavy Quark Energy Loss in Nuclear Medium

Ben-Wei Zhang, Enke Wang, Xin-Nian Wang

Nuclear Theory · Submitted 16 Sep 2003 · 19 references

Pith's verdict: The linear-to-quadratic crossover argument is sound and worth citing; the quantitative curves lean on an assumed ansatz and an unpublished companion, which is where a referee should push.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (selfhosted/deepseek-v4.1-flash) read the paper on October 29, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 2 major objections · 7 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv IDnucl-th/0309040 (version 2)

Pith IDKQEZ7ANB, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationBen-Wei Zhang, Enke Wang, Xin-Nian Wang. "Heavy Quark Energy Loss in Nuclear Medium." arXiv:nucl-th/0309040 (2003). https://pith.science/paper/KQEZ7ANB

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

Quick read on the Zhang–Wang–Wang heavy-quark energy loss letter. The thing worth your time is the analytic argument that the mass-dependent gluon formation time turns the medium-size dependence of radiative energy loss from linear in R_A to quadratic as Q^2 and the quark energy grow relative to M. That falls straight out of Eq. (14) — a 1/x_A prefactor sitting against the LPM factor (1 - exp(-x_L^2/x_A^2)) — and it survives any sensible choice of suppression kernel, since all you need is something that vanishes at small x_L and saturates at large x_L. It is a clean extension of their light-quark twist-4 program, and the dead-cone suppression they fold in is standard physics, correctly motivated by Dokshitzer–Kharzeev. They are also upfront that Djordjevic–Gyulassy got similar results concurrently, and that the coefficient ~C should in principle carry Q^2 dependence. Both are the right things to flag, and they flag them in the text rather than burying them in a footnote. The modified splitting functions in Eqs. (10)-(11) are a usable deliverable on their own. Where it is soft, in order of how much it matters: the quantitative crossover in Fig. 1 rests on the factorized ansatz Eq. (13), introduced with 'one can assume' and backed only by citation to Osborne–Wang. The x_L kernel and the argument of the LPM exponential are assumed, not derived, and they fix where the crossover sits. The two limits do not care; the curves do. Second, the c_i coefficients and the 23-cut-diagram sum live in Ref. [17], listed as 'in preparation', so the technical core is not checkable from this letter. That is a real gap for a Letter making quantitative claims, though the qualitative claim stands without it. Third, minor but worth reconciling: the dead-cone denominator is (1-z)^2 M^2 in Eq. (3) and z^2 M^2 in Eq. (17), so f_{Q/q} is not literally the ratio of Eq. (3) to its massless limit. Probably a convention slip, but a referee should ask. I do not buy the circularity worry — the normalization is divided out of Fig. 1, so what is being claimed is the shape, and the shape follows from the LPM structure. Who should read it: anyone working on heavy-flavor quenching or on the PHENIX single-electron puzzle. It deserves a serious referee report, mainly to press on Eq. (13) and to get Ref. [17] on the record.

Referee report

Significance

If correct, the result is a physically transparent and useful statement: heavy-quark energy loss is not a rescaling of the light-quark result, and the R_A scaling law itself changes with the ratio of the hard scale to the quark mass. Two features deserve explicit credit. First, the analytic limits in Eqs. (15) and (16) are clean and can be checked directly from the structure of Eq. (14), and the M → 0 limit is stated to recover the authors' earlier light-quark result (Ref. [18]), which is a nontrivial consistency check rather than a trivial one. Second, the suppression claim of the abstract is carried by the ratio plots in Figs. 2 and 3, and that ratio is independent of the overall normalization ~C C_A α_s²/N_c, so the suppression statement is parameter-free in that specific sense. The paper also properly discloses the concurrent work of Ref. [15].

Major objections (2)

[Eq. (13) and Fig. 1] The crossover from linear to quadratic R_A dependence is analytically robust, but the location of the crossover and the shape of the curves in Fig. 1 are set by the factorized ansatz for the twist-four quark-gluon matrix element in Eq. (13), which the authors introduce with 'one can assume a factorized form' and support by citation to Ref. [19]. The specific x̃_L dependence — the (x̃_L − x̃_M)²/x̃_L⁴ kernel and the argument x̃_L²/x_A² of the LPM factor — is assumed rather than derived, and it fixes the crossover condition x_B M²/(x_A Q²) ~ 1. The authors acknowledge the assumption, but Fig. 1 is presented as a result without any estimate of how much the crossover position moves under a different but equally plausible kernel. Please state explicitly in the text that the two limits are the robust content and that the crossover location in Fig. 1 is illustrative of the ansatz, or supply a sensitivity band.
[Eqs. (3), (6)–(8), and Ref. [17]] The technical core of the Letter — the evaluation of the 23 cut diagrams and the mass-dependent coefficients c1, c2, c3 in Eqs. (6)–(8) — is deferred to Ref. [17], which is listed as 'in preparation' and is therefore not available to a reader. The qualitative claims do not depend on the detailed form of these coefficients, but the modified splitting functions in Eqs. (10)–(11) and every numerical curve do. At minimum, please sketch in this Letter how the mass-dependent terms in c1–c3 arise (which cut diagrams and which propagator denominators produce the M²/ℓ_T² and M⁴/ℓ_T⁴ structures), and ensure that Ref. [17] is available to referees and readers at the time of publication.

Minor objections (7)

[Eq. (17) versus Eq. (3)] The symbol z carries two different meanings in the two equations: in Eq. (3) the denominator is ℓ_T² + (1−z)²M² with z the fraction retained by the fragmenting quark, whereas Eq. (17) uses ℓ_T² + z²M² with z the gluon momentum fraction (consistent with the q → gq term of Eq. (9)). As written, the claimed ratio f_{Q/q} = [ℓ_T²/(ℓ_T² + z²M²)]⁴ is not literally the ratio of Eq. (3) to its massless limit. Please state the substitution explicitly so the reader can verify the power of four.
[Eq. (7)] The polynomial in the first bracket of c2 reads '2z³ − 5z + 8z − 1', which contains two linear terms in z and is presumably a typographical error. Please check this expression against the source calculation.
[Figs. 1–3] None of the three figures identifies which curve corresponds to which (Q², x_B) pair, and the axes carry no labels or units. The captions should specify the parameter values for each curve and the quantity plotted on each axis, including the normalization by which Fig. 1 is rescaled.
[Introduction and Summary] The connection to the PHENIX single-electron measurement (Ref. [14]) and to heavy-ion collisions is motivational only; the calculation is performed for DIS and the extension to a hot medium is asserted ('can be easily extended') rather than shown. Please mark this explicitly as motivation rather than as a result of the present Letter.
[Comparison with Ref. [15]] Ref. [15] is the closest concurrent work and is properly disclosed, but no quantitative comparison of the two results is presented. A brief comparison of the energy-loss magnitude or of the R_A scaling in the overlapping regime would help the reader judge whether the two approaches agree.
[Eq. (14) and Fig. 1] Figure 1 is rescaled by ~C C_A α_s²/N_c, and the text notes that ~C 'should in principle depend on Q²'. Consequently no absolute magnitude of ⟨Δz_Q^g⟩ is quoted anywhere in the Letter. One benchmark number at a stated (x_B, Q², R_A) would make the result usable by readers who wish to compare with other energy-loss calculations.
[Sec. 2 (double scattering)] The truncation to double parton scattering assumes the small expansion parameter α_s A^{1/3}/Q². For the large nuclei and moderate Q² relevant to the figures, the numerical size of this parameter and hence the reliability of the truncation should be stated.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

Heavy quark mass shortens the gluon formation time, so the medium-size dependence of radiative energy loss crosses over from linear to quadratic as energy and momentum scale grow relative to the quark mass.

The reading

When a fast quark travels through a nucleus, it scatters off the nuclear medium and radiates gluons, losing energy. For a massless quark, the standard picture is that this energy loss grows quadratically with the size of the nucleus, because quantum interference (the Landau-Pomeranchuk-Migdal effect) suppresses radiation whose formation time exceeds the nuclear size. This paper asks what changes when the quark is heavy, for example a charm quark with mass around 1.5 GeV. Two mass effects appear. First, the formation time of a radiated gluon is shortened by the quark mass, so the interference effect is weakened. Second, the mass suppresses radiation at small angles, the so-called dead-cone effect. Working within a twist-expansion framework the authors previously developed for light quarks, they derive a modified fragmentation function and an energy-loss formula for the heavy quark. The analytic structure of the energy-loss integral shows two regimes. When the quark energy and momentum transfer are comparable to the quark mass, the formation time is short compared with the nucleus, interference is absent, and the energy loss grows linearly with nuclear size. When energy and momentum transfer are much larger than the mass, the mass becomes negligible, interference returns, and the energy loss grows quadratically, matching the light-quark result. Numerical curves for charm show the crossover. The absolute normalization of the energy loss is not computed; it is factored out of the plots.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that because the gluon formation time depends on the quark mass, the medium-size dependence of heavy quark radiative energy loss changes from linear to quadratic when the initial energy and momentum scale are increased relative to the quark mass. This is stated in abstract:s1 and derived analytically from Eq. (14): the prefactor carries 1/x_A (linear in R_A) while the LPM factor (1 - exp(-x_L^2/x_A^2)) either vanishes (leaving an R_A-independent integral, hence linear total) or scales as 1/x_A^2 (giving quadratic total). If correct, heavy quark energy loss is not simply a rescaling of the light-quark result.

Load-bearing premise

The numerical R_A curves in Fig. 1 rest on the factorized ansatz for the twist-four quark-gluon matrix element in Eq. (13), T^{A,C}_{qg} ≈ ~C x_A f_q^A(x) {(1 - e^{-x_L^2/x_A^2})[c1 - c2] + c3/2}, with ~C ≡ 2C x_T f_g^N(x_T) and the note that ~C 'should in principle depend on Q^2'. The x_L dependence assumed here, not derived, sets where the linear-to-quadratic crossover occurs. If the true twist-four matrix has different x_L dependence, the crossover point and the shape of the curves shift, though the two limiting behaviors survive.

Original abstract

Multiple scattering, modified fragmentation functions and radiative energy loss of a heavy quark propagating in a nuclear medium are investigated in perturbative QCD. Because of the quark mass dependence of the gluon formation time, the medium size dependence of heavy quark energy loss is found to change from a linear to a quadratic form when the initial energy and momentum scale are increased relative to the quark mass. The radiative energy loss is also significantly suppressed relative to a light quark due to the suppression of collinear gluon emission by a heavy quark.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,996 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.12 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.56 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.07 · compares with prior results 0.71 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

Multiple scattering, modified fragmentation functions and radiative energy loss of a heavy quark propagating in a nuclear medium are investigated in perturbative QCD. Because of the quark mass dependence of the gluon formation time, the medium size dependence of heavy quark energy loss is found to change from a linear to a quadratic form when the initial energy and momentum scale are increased relative to the quark mass. The radiative energy loss is also significantly suppressed relative to a light quark due to the suppression of collinear gluon emission by a heavy quark.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	Multiple scattering, modified fragmentation functions and radiative energy loss of a heavy quark propagating in a nuclear medium are investigated in perturbative QCD.	contribution 0.99	0.85	0.08	asserted 0.95
s1	Because of the quark mass dependence of the gluon formation time, the medium size dependence of heavy quark energy loss is found to change from a linear to a quadratic form when the initial energy and momentum scale are increased relative to the quark mass.	result 0.99	0.91	0.56	asserted 1.00
s2	The radiative energy loss is also significantly suppressed relative to a light quark due to the suppression of collinear gluon emission by a heavy quark.	result 0.98	0.75	0.20	asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.92.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v2

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

Figures

Showing 1 of the paper's 3 figures. See all figures in the PDF ↗ Figures reproduced from arXiv:nucl-th/0309040 by the authors.

References

Works cited (19)

[17]

B. Zhang, E. Wang and X. N. Wang, in preparation

View on Pith
[18]

B. W. Zhang and X. N. Wang, Nucl. Phys. A 720, 429 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ph/0301195]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003
[15]

M. Djordjevic and M. Gyulassy, Phys. Lett. B 560, 37 (2003) [arXiv:nucl-th/0302069]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003
[19]

J. Osborne and X.-N. Wang, Nucl. Phys. A 710, 281 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ph/0204046]. 4

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002
[1]

M. Gyulassy and X.-N. Wang, Nucl. Phys. B420, 583 (1994) [arXiv:nucl-th/9306003]; X.-N. Wang, M. Gyu- lassy and M. Pl¨ umer, Phys. Rev. D 51, 3436 (1995) [arXiv:hep-ph/9408344]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1994
[2]

R. Baier et al. , Nucl. Phys. B483, 291 (1997) [arXiv:hep- ph/9607355]; Nucl. Phys. B484, 265 (1997) [arXiv:hep- ph/9608322]

View on Pith 1997
[3]

B. G. Zhakharov, JETP letters 63, 952 (1996) [arXiv:hep-ph/9607440]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996
[4]

M. Gyulassy, P. L´ evai and I. Vitev, Nucl. Phys. B594, 371 (2001) [arXiv:nucl-th/0006010]; Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5535 (2000) [arXiv:nucl-th/0005032]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[5]

U. Wiedemann, Nucl. Phys. B588, 303 (2000) [arXiv:hep-ph/0005129]; Nucl. Phys. A 690, 731 (2001) [arXiv:hep-ph/0008241]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[6]

X. F. Guo and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3591 (2000) [arXiv:hep-ph/0005044]; X.-N. Wang and X. F. Guo, Nucl. Phys. A 696, 788 (2001) [arXiv:hep- ph/0102230]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[7]

M. Gyulassy, I. Vitev and X. N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2537 (2001) [arXiv:nucl-th/0012092]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[8]

E. Wang and X. N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 162301 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ph/0202105]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002
[9]

C. A. Salgado and U. A. Wiedemann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 092303 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ph/0204221]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002
[10]

K. Adcox et al. [PHENIX Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 022301 (2002) [arXiv:nucl-ex/0109003]; S. S. Adler et al. [PHENIX Collaboration], arXiv:nucl- ex/0304022

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002
[11]

C. Adler et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 202301 (2002) [arXiv:nucl-ex/0206011]; J. Adams et al. [STAR Collab- oration], arXiv:nucl-ex/0305015

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002
[12]

X. N. Wang, arXiv:nucl-th/0305010

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[13]

Y. L. Dokshitzer and D. E. Kharzeev, Phys. Lett. B 519, 199 (2001) [arXiv:hep-ph/0106202]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[14]

K. Adcox et al. [PHENIX Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 192303 (2002) [arXiv:nucl-ex/0202002]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002
[16]

M. Luo, J. Qiu and G. Sterman, Phys. Lett. B279, 377 (1992); M. Luo, J. Qiu and G. Sterman, Phys. Rev. D 50, 1951 (1994); M. Luo, J. Qiu and G. Sterman, Phys. Rev. D49, 4493 (1994)

View on Pith 1992

Forward citations

Cited by 36 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Bayesian Inference of Heavy-Quark Dissipation and Jet Transport Parameters from D-Meson observables in heavy-ion collisions at the LHC energies
nucl-th 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

First simultaneous Bayesian extraction of 2πT D_s and q-hat/T^3 from D-meson R_AA and v2 at 5.02 TeV, yielding a non-monotonic temperature dependence in their ratio that deviates from the expected value of 2.
Ab Initio Coupling of Jets to Collective Flow in the Opacity Expansion Approach
hep-ph 2021-04 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

Sub-eikonal velocity and gradient corrections to jet broadening and medium-induced radiation are derived at first order in opacity, showing jets are deflected along the medium flow and radiate preferentially in that d...
Charmed baryon-to-meson ratios inside jets as a discriminator of hadronization mechanisms: from color reconnection in p+p to coalescence in Pb+Pb
hep-ph 2026-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The in-jet Λc+/D0 ratio is predicted to be enhanced by color reconnection in p+p and suppressed by thermal coalescence in Pb+Pb, providing a jet-based discriminator of hadronization mechanisms.
$D^0$-$D_s^+$ Elliptic-Flow Splitting under Event-Shape Engineering: A Probe of Sequential Charm Hadronization
hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

Event-shape engineering via q2 selection in 0-10% and 30-50% Pb-Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV is shown to separate geometry-driven flow from hadronization-time effects, producing a positive growing Δv2(D0-Ds+) and species...
Study of jet-induced hydro response in high-energy heavy-ion collisions with a flow-matching generative model
nucl-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

A flow-matching generative model trained on CoLBT-hydro data conditionally generates marginal final-state hadron spectra from jet-induced hydro responses in 0-10% Pb+Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV, matching training data s...

Show 31 more citing papers

An improved linear Boltzmann transport model for hadron and jet suppression in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions
nucl-th 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

An improved LBT model with an earlier medium-scale insertion and color-flow tracking reproduces hadron and jet nuclear modification factors together in 5.02 TeV Pb+Pb collisions.
Heavy Quark Pair Energy Correlators: From Profiling Partonic Splittings to Probing Heavy-Flavor Fragmentation
hep-ph 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Heavy-flavor energy-energy correlators isolate the gluon to heavy quark-antiquark splitting and are predicted to be sensitive to medium modifications and anisotropic quark-gluon plasma structure.
Medium-induced modification of azimuthal correlations of electrons from heavy-flavor hadron decays with charged particles in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm{NN}} = 5.02}$ TeV
nucl-ex 2025-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

First Pb-Pb measurement of heavy-flavor electron-charged particle azimuthal correlations shows a near-side low-pT enhancement hint (1.27 sigma) and an away-side high-pT suppression (2.5 sigma) in central collisions.
Prompt D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, and D$^{*+}$ production in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV
nucl-ex 2021-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Prompt D0, D+ and D*+ mesons in central Pb-Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV are suppressed by a factor of about 5.5 at 6-8 GeV/c, and comparison with transport models narrows the charm spatial diffusion coefficient to 1.5 < ...
Determining the jet transport coefficient $\hat{q}$ from inclusive hadron suppression measurements using Bayesian parameter estimation
nucl-th 2021-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Bayesian fitting of the MATTER and LBT jet-quenching models to RHIC and LHC hadron suppression data gives q-hat/T^3 = 2 to 4 (90% CR) for jets above 40 GeV/c, and a MATTER-to-LBT switching virtuality Q0 of 2.0 to 2.7 GeV.
Inverting the mass hierarchy of jet quenching effects with prompt $b$-jet substructure
hep-ph 2017-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Heavy-quark mass makes the momentum-sharing distribution of bottom-tagged jets more strongly modified by the quark-gluon plasma than that of light jets, inverting the usual dead-cone hierarchy.
A data-driven analysis for the temperature and momentum dependence of the heavy quark diffusion coefficient in relativistic heavy-ion collisions
nucl-th 2017-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A Bayesian fit of a three-parameter heavy-quark diffusion model to D-meson RAA and v2 data from three collision systems yields a spatial diffusion coefficient consistent with lattice QCD and predicts D-meson v3 in agr...
Measurement of the B+/- meson nuclear modification factor in PbPb collisions at sqrt(s[NN]) = 5.02 TeV
hep-ex 2017-05 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

Exclusive B+/- mesons are suppressed in PbPb collisions by about a factor of two (R_AA between 0.3 and 0.6 for 7 < pT < 50 GeV/c), consistent with beauty-quark energy loss models.
Multistage Monte-Carlo simulation of jet modification in a static medium
nucl-th 2017-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Coupling a virtuality-ordered parton shower (MATTER) to time-ordered transport models (MARTINI, LBT) at a separation scale Q0 produces jet energy distributions that differ qualitatively from any single generator, incl...
Suppression and azimuthal anisotropy of prompt and nonprompt J/psi production in PbPb collisions at sqrt(s[NN]) = 2.76 TeV
nucl-ex 2016-10 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

Prompt J/psi mesons in PbPb collisions at 2.76 TeV show a nonzero elliptic anisotropy (v2 = 0.066, 3.3 sigma) with little dependence on centrality, rapidity or pT, while nonprompt J/psi from b-hadron decays are consis...
Linearized Boltzmann transport model for jet propagation in the quark-gluon plasma: Heavy quark evolution
nucl-th 2016-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A linearized Boltzmann transport model for heavy quarks in a hydrodynamic plasma reproduces measured D meson suppression and elliptic flow once the quark transport coefficient is enhanced at low momentum and near the ...
Inclusive, prompt and non-prompt J/$\psi$ production at mid-rapidity in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV
nucl-ex 2015-04 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

In Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV, inclusive J/psi production is less suppressed at low transverse momentum than at high, and non-prompt J/psi from beauty decays is suppressed more strongly than most models predict.
Elastic, Inelastic, and Path Length Fluctuations in Jet Tomography
nucl-th 2005-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Adding collisional energy loss and geometric path-length fluctuations to radiative jet quenching lowers the predicted non-photonic electron suppression toward RHIC data while keeping pion suppression and the multiplic...
Medium-Induced Gluon Radiation off Massive Quarks Fills the Dead Cone
hep-ph 2003-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Medium-induced gluon radiation from a heavy quark fills the dead cone at small angles but is suppressed at large gluon energies relative to a massless quark, so heavy-quark energy loss survives but is reduced.
Heavy Quark Radiative Energy Loss in QCD Matter
nucl-th 2003-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The GLV opacity series for radiative energy loss generalizes to massive quarks by a single universal frequency shift, (m_g^2 + x^2 M^2)/(2xE), and heavy quark energy loss stays near the incoherent Bethe-Heitler-like limit.
Photon bremsstrahlung from heavy quarks in a dense nuclear matter
hep-ph 2026-08 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

The single-scattering-induced photon spectrum from a hard quark is expressed in terms of the full exchanged-gluon momentum distribution, with explicit heavy-quark mass dependence, beyond the collinear expansion.
System-size dependence of the $D^0$--$D_s^+$ flow splitting from early $D_s^+$ formation at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.36$~TeV
hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

Sequential hadronization predicts v2(D0) > v2(Ds+) from extra partonic flow accumulated by D0 parents between 1.2 Tc and Tc, with universal linear scaling of the hadronic splitting across O-O and Pb-Pb systems.
Geometric Bias and Centrality Dependence of Jet Quenching in High-Energy Nuclear Collisions
nucl-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

Suppression of high-pT hadrons in peripheral Pb+Pb collisions is predominantly driven by initial-state geometric bias rather than final-state jet quenching.
Nuclear modification of $B_c$ mesons in relativistic heavy-ion collisions based on a linear Boltzmann transport model
hep-ph 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

A linear Boltzmann transport model with Yukawa and string interactions reproduces the measured B_c nuclear modification in Pb+Pb collisions and predicts larger low-pT B_c R_AA in Au+Au at RHIC than at the LHC.
Radial profile of heavy quarks in jets in high-energy nuclear collisions
nucl-th 2020-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

A Monte Carlo jet-quenching model predicts mass-dependent radial redistribution of heavy quarks in jets: charm diffuses outward, bottom shifts inward.
The JETSCAPE framework
nucl-th 2019-03 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

JETSCAPE v1.3 is released as a modular, task-based C++ event-generator framework that composes existing heavy-ion physics codes (TRENTO, VISHNew/MUSIC, MATTER, LBT, MARTINI, AdS/CFT, PYTHIA) into one runnable event an...
Towards the determination of heavy-quark transport coefficients in quark-gluon plasma
nucl-th 2018-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Tuning six heavy-quark transport models to a common static-medium benchmark reduces the spread in their extracted drag coefficients from a factor of five to a factor of two.
Multiple jets and $\gamma$-jet correlation in high-energy heavy-ion collisions
hep-ph 2018-03 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Sub-leading jets produced alongside a direct photon are suppressed in Pb+Pb collisions, which narrows the photon-jet azimuthal correlation instead of broadening it.
Transverse momentum dependence of D-meson production in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76$ TeV
nucl-ex 2015-09 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

Prompt D-meson yields in central Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV are suppressed by up to a factor of 5-6 relative to binary-scaled pp yields at pT about 10 GeV/c, with a factor of 2-3 suppression persisting out to 36 GeV/c.
Jets as differential probes of hot QCD matter
hep-ph 2026-10 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

A comprehensive theoretical framework for extracting directional and multi-scale properties of the quark-gluon plasma from differential jet substructure observables.
Charmonia Production in Hot QCD Matter and Electromagnetic Fields
nucl-th 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

The paper explains the measured rise of charmonium nuclear modification factor above unity at pT<0.1 GeV/c in peripheral Pb-Pb collisions as coherent photoproduction from strong electromagnetic fields.
Heavy and light flavor jet quenching at RHIC and LHC energies
nucl-th 2017-03 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

A single transport model with two tuned couplings reproduces light- and heavy-flavor hadron suppression at RHIC and the LHC, and yields a jet-quenching parameter that falls with temperature and is largest for gluons.
Energy loss, hadronization and hadronic interactions of heavy flavors in relativistic heavy-ion collisions
nucl-th 2015-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

A single tuned heavy-quark transport coefficient, combined with radiative energy loss, hybrid fragmentation-coalescence hadronization, and UrQMD hadronic rescattering, reproduces D meson suppression at RHIC and LHC bu...
Elliptic flow and energy loss of heavy quarks in ultra-relativistic heavy ion collisions
hep-ph 2011-04 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

Elastic heavy-quark scattering in a partonic transport model, even with running coupling and improved Debye screening, falls short of measured elliptic flow and nuclear suppression by a factor of four, which the autho...
QGP@50: More than Four Decades of Jet Quenching
hep-ph 2025-08 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

A historical and technical review of jet quenching in heavy-ion collisions, covering four decades of theory, the RHIC discovery, and modern Bayesian extractions of the jet transport parameter qhat.
Jet quenching and medium response in high-energy heavy-ion collisions: a review
hep-ph 2020-02 accept novelty 2.0 of 10

Jet-induced medium response, the recoil partons and hydrodynamic wake left behind a quenching jet, is required to describe soft hadrons, jet shapes, jet masses and cone-size dependence of jet suppression in heavy-ion ...

How later papers used it

121 later papers cite it

Evidence: thin. 80 of the citing papers share no author with it, and 30 of those carry a confident label from Pith's citation classifier.

Pith read 2 of the 146 citing sentences, choosing only those whose citation markers point at this paper alone, and wrote the paraphrases from them. The summary, the counts, the evidence level, the links and the quotes come from code; the summary counts the papers listed below. A later paper is listed under a label when Pith's citation classifier gives one of its sentences that label at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), Pith's reading finds that the citing paper itself did it, and a second check confirms the paraphrase against the sentence. This section lists uses only. It does not list criticism or disagreement, so their absence here says nothing about how the paper has been received. Papers that share an author with this one are listed apart, under "By the same authors". A quote is the citing authors' own sentence, shown when their paper's licence is CC BY, CC BY-SA or CC0. JSON

2 later papers by other authors are listed below: 2 used its method or tool.

Uses its method or tool 2 of 59 papers with this label

Simulated the probability of gluon radiation and the radiated gluon momentum with a Monte-Carlo method using an equation taken from this paper's Higher-Twist energy loss formalism.

Dynamical Evolution, Hadronization and Angular De-correlation of Heavy Flavor in a Hot and Dense QCD Medium (2014) · 1.00 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting
Quantified the momentum of the radiated gluon in its modified Langevin transport equation with this paper's pQCD Higher-Twist calculation.

Charm-strange meson production in ultra-relativistic heavy-ion collisions at the CERN-LHC energies (2018) · 0.98 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting

How the literature uses it

110 arXiv papers cite this in 136 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 59 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 2 papers

Then it has been further improved by going beyond the helicity amplitude approximation [ref] and extended to evaluate heavy quark energy loss in SIDIS by considering charged-current interaction [ref] .

Heavy quark radiative energy loss in nuclei within the improved high-twist approach · Introduction · 0.88
Thus it can be viewed as a generalization of the higher twist formalism [ref] for both heavy and light flavor medium-induced radiative process.

Gluon emission from heavy quarks in dense nuclear matter · Introduction · 0.98

Uses its method or tool 50 papers

The probability of gluon radiation during each time interval $Δt$ and the momentum of radiated gluon ($Δp⃗_⃗g⃗$) are simulated using the Monte-Carlo method according to the following equation, taken from the Higher-Twist energy loss formalism [ref] : [equation] where $q̂$ is the gluon transport coefficient, $k_⊥$ is the gluon transverse momentum, $x$ is the fractional energy carried by radiated gluon, $τ_f$ is the gluon formation time, and $P(x)$ is the splitting function.

Dynamical Evolution, Hadronization and Angular De-correlation of Heavy Flavor in a Hot and Dense QCD Medium · In-medium Evolution and Hadronization of Heavy Quarks · 1.00
If the number of elastic scatterings in a given time step $Δt$ follows the Poisson distribution, then the probability for having elastic scatterings in $Δt$ is given by: [equation] For inelastic radiative process, we use the higher-twist formalism for the medium-induced gluon radiation spectrum [ref] , [equation] where $x$ and $k_⊥$ are the fraction energy and transverse momentum of the emitted gluon, $M$ is the mass of the parent parton (here we use $M_c = 1.27$ GeV/c and $M_b = 4.19$ GeV/c), $α_s$ is the strong coupling for the splitting vertex, $P(x)$ is the vacuum splitting function, $τ_f=2Ex (1-x)/(k_⊥^2+x^2 M^2)$ is the formation time for gluon radiation, $(t-t_i)$ denotes accumulative time for a gluon radiation event, i.e., $t_i$ is reset to zero after each radiation, $q̂(E_1,T_m)$ is the jet transport parameter characterizing the transverse momentum broadening rate from elastic c

Heavy and light flavor jet quenching in different collision systems at the LHC energies · Linear Boltzmann transport model · 1.00
All $2→2$ channels are included for the elastic scattering processes, and the medium-induced gluon radiation is introduced for the inelastic process based on the higher-twist energy loss formalism [ref] .

Linearized Boltzmann transport model for jet propagation in the quark-gluon plasma: Heavy quark evolution · Introduction · 0.96

Cites it as background 22 papers

This result was surprising since it was thought that the radiative part of the energy loss of heavy quarks is suppressed due to the “dead cone effect” [ref] .

Elliptic flow and energy loss of heavy quarks in ultra-relativistic heavy ion collisions · Introduction · 0.89
In heavy-ion collisions (HICs) at the RHIC and the LHC, a new form of nuclear matter, the quark-gluon plasma (QGP) [ref] composed of de-confined quarks and gluons, may be created, and the jet quenching (or parton energy loss effect) has long been proposed as an excellent hard probe to unravel the fascinating properties of the QCD medium at extreme high density and temperature [ref] .

Multijet topology in high-energy nuclear collisions: jet broadening · Introduction · 0.99
The former induces a dependence on the impact parameter $|𝐛_⊥|$ in the cross section, while the latter accounts for the alteration of phase space that comes from radiative [ref] and collisional [ref] energy loss.

The dijet mass distribution in heavy ion collisions · Dijet production in heavy ion collisions · 0.87

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [17]

B. Zhang, E. Wang and X. N. Wang, in preparation

View on Pith

[2] [18]

B. W. Zhang and X. N. Wang, Nucl. Phys. A 720, 429 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ph/0301195]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003

[3] [15]

M. Djordjevic and M. Gyulassy, Phys. Lett. B 560, 37 (2003) [arXiv:nucl-th/0302069]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003

[4] [19]

J. Osborne and X.-N. Wang, Nucl. Phys. A 710, 281 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ph/0204046]. 4

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002

[5] [1]

M. Gyulassy and X.-N. Wang, Nucl. Phys. B420, 583 (1994) [arXiv:nucl-th/9306003]; X.-N. Wang, M. Gyu- lassy and M. Pl¨ umer, Phys. Rev. D 51, 3436 (1995) [arXiv:hep-ph/9408344]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1994

[6] [2]

R. Baier et al. , Nucl. Phys. B483, 291 (1997) [arXiv:hep- ph/9607355]; Nucl. Phys. B484, 265 (1997) [arXiv:hep- ph/9608322]

View on Pith 1997

[7] [3]

B. G. Zhakharov, JETP letters 63, 952 (1996) [arXiv:hep-ph/9607440]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996

[8] [4]

M. Gyulassy, P. L´ evai and I. Vitev, Nucl. Phys. B594, 371 (2001) [arXiv:nucl-th/0006010]; Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5535 (2000) [arXiv:nucl-th/0005032]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[9] [5]

U. Wiedemann, Nucl. Phys. B588, 303 (2000) [arXiv:hep-ph/0005129]; Nucl. Phys. A 690, 731 (2001) [arXiv:hep-ph/0008241]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[10] [6]

X. F. Guo and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3591 (2000) [arXiv:hep-ph/0005044]; X.-N. Wang and X. F. Guo, Nucl. Phys. A 696, 788 (2001) [arXiv:hep- ph/0102230]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[11] [7]

M. Gyulassy, I. Vitev and X. N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2537 (2001) [arXiv:nucl-th/0012092]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[12] [8]

E. Wang and X. N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 162301 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ph/0202105]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002

[13] [9]

C. A. Salgado and U. A. Wiedemann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 092303 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ph/0204221]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002

[14] [10]

K. Adcox et al. [PHENIX Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 022301 (2002) [arXiv:nucl-ex/0109003]; S. S. Adler et al. [PHENIX Collaboration], arXiv:nucl- ex/0304022

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002

[15] [11]

C. Adler et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 202301 (2002) [arXiv:nucl-ex/0206011]; J. Adams et al. [STAR Collab- oration], arXiv:nucl-ex/0305015

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002

[16] [12]

X. N. Wang, arXiv:nucl-th/0305010

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[17] [13]

Y. L. Dokshitzer and D. E. Kharzeev, Phys. Lett. B 519, 199 (2001) [arXiv:hep-ph/0106202]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[18] [14]

K. Adcox et al. [PHENIX Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 192303 (2002) [arXiv:nucl-ex/0202002]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002

[19] [16]

M. Luo, J. Qiu and G. Sterman, Phys. Lett. B279, 377 (1992); M. Luo, J. Qiu and G. Sterman, Phys. Rev. D 50, 1951 (1994); M. Luo, J. Qiu and G. Sterman, Phys. Rev. D49, 4493 (1994)

View on Pith 1992