Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

What You See is What You Classify: Black Box Attributions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.11266 v2 pith:CVKLF243 submitted 2022-05-23 cs.CV cs.AIcs.LG

What You See is What You Classify: Black Box Attributions

classification cs.CV cs.AIcs.LG
keywords attributionsimagemasksapproachesblack-boxdeepexistingmethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

An important step towards explaining deep image classifiers lies in the identification of image regions that contribute to individual class scores in the model's output. However, doing this accurately is a difficult task due to the black-box nature of such networks. Most existing approaches find such attributions either using activations and gradients or by repeatedly perturbing the input. We instead address this challenge by training a second deep network, the Explainer, to predict attributions for a pre-trained black-box classifier, the Explanandum. These attributions are provided in the form of masks that only show the classifier-relevant parts of an image, masking out the rest. Our approach produces sharper and more boundary-precise masks when compared to the saliency maps generated by other methods. Moreover, unlike most existing approaches, ours is capable of directly generating very distinct class-specific masks in a single forward pass. This makes the proposed method very efficient during inference. We show that our attributions are superior to established methods both visually and quantitatively with respect to the PASCAL VOC-2007 and Microsoft COCO-2014 datasets.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When, How Long and How Much? Interpretable Neural Networks for Time Series Regression by Learning to Mask and Aggregate

    cs.LG 2025-12 conditional novelty 7.0

    MAGNETS learns unsupervised, mask-based concepts to make time-series regression predictions additively interpretable, recovering ground-truth temporal rules on synthetic tasks and beating interpretable baselines on mo...