REVIEW 2 cited by
Explaining Patterns in Data with Language Models via Interpretable Autoprompting
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Explaining Patterns in Data with Language Models via Interpretable Autoprompting
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have displayed an impressive ability to harness natural language to perform complex tasks. In this work, we explore whether we can leverage this learned ability to find and explain patterns in data. Specifically, given a pre-trained LLM and data examples, we introduce interpretable autoprompting (iPrompt), an algorithm that generates a natural-language string explaining the data. iPrompt iteratively alternates between generating explanations with an LLM and reranking them based on their performance when used as a prompt. Experiments on a wide range of datasets, from synthetic mathematics to natural-language understanding, show that iPrompt can yield meaningful insights by accurately finding groundtruth dataset descriptions. Moreover, the prompts produced by iPrompt are simultaneously human-interpretable and highly effective for generalization: on real-world sentiment classification datasets, iPrompt produces prompts that match or even improve upon human-written prompts for GPT-3. Finally, experiments with an fMRI dataset show the potential for iPrompt to aid in scientific discovery. All code for using the methods and data here is made available on Github.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Human-AI Co-design for Clinical Prediction Models
HACHI, an iterative human-AI loop that turns clinical notes into small interpretable yes/no-concept risk scores, outperforms standard instruments in two retrospective UCSF case studies.
-
RLIE: Rule Generation with Logistic Regression, Iterative Refinement, and Evaluation for Large Language Models
Logistic regression over LLM-generated natural-language rules outperformed letting the LLM reason with those rules on six binary text tasks.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.