Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

ROME: Evaluating Pre-trained Vision-Language Models on Reasoning beyond Visual Common Sense

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.19301 v1 pith:3OFEEWFU submitted 2023-10-30 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CV

ROME: Evaluating Pre-trained Vision-Language Models on Reasoning beyond Visual Common Sense

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.CV
keywords reasoningvision-languagebeyondmodelsromecommoncommonsenseknowledge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Humans possess a strong capability for reasoning beyond common sense. For example, given an unconventional image of a goldfish laying on the table next to an empty fishbowl, a human would effortlessly determine that the fish is not inside the fishbowl. The case, however, may be different for a vision-language model, whose reasoning could gravitate towards the common scenario that the fish is inside the bowl, despite the visual input. In this paper, we introduce a novel probing dataset named ROME (reasoning beyond commonsense knowledge) to evaluate whether the state-of-the-art pre-trained vision-language models have the reasoning capability to correctly interpret counter-intuitive content. ROME contains images that defy commonsense knowledge with regards to color, shape, material, size and positional relation. Experiments on the state-of-the-art pre-trained vision-language models reveal that most of these models are still largely incapable of interpreting counter-intuitive scenarios. We hope that ROME will spur further investigations on reasoning beyond commonsense knowledge in vision-language research.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Judging Against the Reference: Uncovering Knowledge-Driven Failures in LLM-Judges on QA Evaluation

    cs.CL 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0

    LLM judges frequently mark candidates wrong when the gold reference contradicts the model's own knowledge, even if the candidate exactly matches the provided reference.