pith. sign in

arxiv: 2404.07980 · v2 · submitted 2024-04-11 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

ISCOs and the weak gravity conjecture bound in higher derivative theories of gravity

Adrinil Paul , Chandrasekhar Bhamidipati This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 01:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords weak gravity conjecturehigher derivative gravityISCOAdS black holesGauss-Bonnet gravityanomalous dimensionsCFT operatorscharged probes
0
0 comments X

The pith

Demanding positive anomalous dimensions for dual CFT operators yields the weak gravity conjecture bound on charged probes around higher-derivative AdS black holes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines circular orbits and innermost stable circular orbits of charged particles in spherically symmetric AdS black holes modified by higher derivative terms. It interprets the binding energy of these probes at large orbits as the anomalous dimensions of heavy-light double-twist operators in the dual large-spin CFT. Requiring these dimensions to be positive produces an exact bound on the charge-to-mass ratio of the probes that coincides with the weak gravity conjecture bound. This bound grows as the higher derivative couplings increase, as verified explicitly in Gauss-Bonnet gravity.

Core claim

In higher derivative theories of gravity, the positivity of anomalous dimensions of heavy-light double-twist CFT operators, obtained from the binding energy of charged probes in the large orbit limit around AdS black holes, enforces an exact bound on the charge to mass ratio that matches the weak gravity conjecture, with the bound increasing for larger higher derivative couplings.

What carries the argument

The binding energy of charged probes in the large orbit limit, which supplies the anomalous dimensions of heavy-light double-twist operators whose positivity is required.

Load-bearing premise

The binding energy of charged probes in the bulk at large orbits directly determines the anomalous dimensions of the corresponding heavy-light double-twist CFT operators.

What would settle it

A direct computation of the anomalous dimensions in the dual CFT that shows they remain positive even when the charge-to-mass ratio exceeds the derived bound, or becomes negative below it.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2404.07980 by Adrinil Paul, Chandrasekhar Bhamidipati.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: V ′′(r) and angular momentum plotted w.r.t r for various values of the charge to mass ratio ˆq. V ′′(r) is evaluated together with V (r) = V ′ (r) = 0, such that the zeros show the risco (the radius of ISCO). For all the plots, αe = 0.01, L = 10, d = 4 (AdS5) (a) The charge to mass ratio ˆq is below the WGC bound (eqn. (2.25)), resulting in one ISCO, for which angular momentum is positive. (b) The charge t… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Plot of V ′′(r) vs r (evaluated together with V (r) = V ′ (r) = 0), the zeros of which show the risco (the radius of isco) for various values of the Gauss-Bonnet coupling parameter αe. For all the plots, L = 10, d = 4 (AdS5) and ˆq is taken to be below the WGC bound in eqn. (2.25). the Weak Gravity Conjecture (WGC) bound. Using the methods developed in [50, 57, 59], we studied a specific large radius limit… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study circular orbits of charged particles in spherically symmetric AdS black holes in higher derivative theories of gravity, and their limiting ISCOs (innermost stable circular orbits). The dual interpretation is in terms of heavy-light double twist conformal field theory (CFT) operators in the large spin limit, whose anomalous dimensions can be extracted from the binding energy of charged probes in the bulk, in a certain large orbit limit. Demanding the positivity of the anomalous dimensions, leads to an exact bound for the charge to mass ratio $\hat q$ of probe particles in the black hole backgrounds, which matches with the WGC bound. We find that $\hat q$ increases with the higher derivative coupling parameters, which is explicitly checked in the Gauss-Bonnet gravity. For existing computations with probe particles in AdS backgrounds, the anomalous dimension and the WGC bound we find, particularly in Gauss-Bonnet theories, are in agreement in appropriate limits with the recent computations for Schwarzschild AdS arXiv:2009.04500, charged AdS arXiv:2305.08907 and neutral Gauss-Bonnet black holes in AdS arXiv:2204.09749. Finally, we show that the ISCOs exist until the limit set by the WGC bound, with their radius decreasing with coupling parameters, which we check explicitly for the case of Gauss-Bonnet black holes in AdS.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines circular orbits and limiting ISCOs of charged probes around spherically symmetric AdS black holes in higher-derivative gravity. It interprets the binding energy of these probes (in a large-orbit limit) as the anomalous dimensions of heavy-light double-twist CFT operators in the large-spin limit. Positivity of these dimensions is imposed to derive an exact lower bound on the charge-to-mass ratio q̂ that reproduces the WGC bound; the bound is shown to increase with the higher-derivative couplings, with explicit verification in Gauss-Bonnet gravity. ISCOs are shown to exist up to this bound, with radius decreasing as couplings increase. Agreements with prior Einstein-gravity and neutral Gauss-Bonnet results are noted in appropriate limits.

Significance. If the bulk-to-boundary mapping holds without higher-derivative corrections, the result supplies a CFT-positivity derivation of the WGC bound that extends previous AdS/CFT analyses to higher-derivative theories and provides a concrete check in Gauss-Bonnet. The explicit increase of q̂ with couplings and the persistence of ISCOs up to the bound are falsifiable predictions that could be tested in other higher-derivative models.

major comments (2)
  1. [dual interpretation and large spin limit] Dual-interpretation / large-spin-limit section: the identification of the probe binding energy E_bind (extracted in the stated large-orbit limit) with the anomalous dimension γ of heavy-light double-twist operators is taken directly from the Einstein-gravity dictionary of prior works (arXiv:2009.04500, arXiv:2305.08907). No derivation or explicit check is supplied showing that this relation E_bind ↦ γ remains unmodified once the background metric and effective potential receive O(α) higher-derivative corrections; this step is load-bearing for the claim of an exact WGC match.
  2. [Gauss-Bonnet gravity] Abstract and § on Gauss-Bonnet check: the statement that positivity of γ produces an 'exact bound' matching WGC is asserted after the mapping is invoked, but the explicit extraction of E_bind from the effective potential (including the large-orbit expansion) is not displayed; without those intermediate equations it is impossible to verify that no post-hoc adjustment was made to recover the WGC form.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the charge-to-mass ratio is introduced as hat q in the abstract but the precise normalization (including any factors of the AdS radius) should be stated once in the main text before the bound is derived.
  2. The comparison sentences with arXiv:2204.09749 and arXiv:2305.08907 would be clearer if the precise limits (e.g., vanishing charge or vanishing GB coupling) were written explicitly rather than described as 'appropriate limits'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the two major comments point by point below, providing clarification on the dual mapping while agreeing that additional explicit derivations and intermediate steps will strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [dual interpretation and large spin limit] Dual-interpretation / large-spin-limit section: the identification of the probe binding energy E_bind (extracted in the stated large-orbit limit) with the anomalous dimension γ of heavy-light double-twist operators is taken directly from the Einstein-gravity dictionary of prior works (arXiv:2009.04500, arXiv:2305.08907). No derivation or explicit check is supplied showing that this relation E_bind ↦ γ remains unmodified once the background metric and effective potential receive O(α) higher-derivative corrections; this step is load-bearing for the claim of an exact WGC match.

    Authors: The mapping follows from the standard large-spin, large-orbit limit in the AdS/CFT dictionary for heavy-light double-twist operators, which relies on the leading asymptotic AdS fall-off of the metric and the resulting effective potential at large r; higher-derivative corrections modify the geometry at finite r but preserve the asymptotic structure, so the leading relation between E_bind and γ is unchanged. We nevertheless acknowledge that an explicit check for the corrected background would be useful, and we will add a brief derivation of the mapping (including the large-r expansion) in a revised subsection or appendix. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Gauss-Bonnet gravity] Abstract and § on Gauss-Bonnet check: the statement that positivity of γ produces an 'exact bound' matching WGC is asserted after the mapping is invoked, but the explicit extraction of E_bind from the effective potential (including the large-orbit expansion) is not displayed; without those intermediate equations it is impossible to verify that no post-hoc adjustment was made to recover the WGC form.

    Authors: We agree that displaying the intermediate large-orbit expansion and E_bind extraction for the Gauss-Bonnet case will allow direct verification. In the revised manuscript we will include these explicit steps in the Gauss-Bonnet section, showing the expansion of the effective potential, the resulting E_bind, and the positivity condition that yields the WGC bound without any adjustment. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: positivity of anomalous dimensions is an independent CFT input applied to bulk binding energies computed in higher-derivative backgrounds

full rationale

The derivation computes probe binding energies and ISCOs directly from the higher-derivative metric (Gauss-Bonnet case checked explicitly), then applies the standard large-spin AdS/CFT dictionary (cited from external literature: arXiv:2009.04500 etc.) to obtain anomalous dimensions. Positivity of those dimensions is imposed as an external CFT requirement, producing a bound on hat q that is shown to match the WGC and to vary with the higher-derivative couplings. This match is a derived outcome, not an input; the dictionary relation is taken as unmodified but is not redefined or fitted inside the paper. No self-citations, no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, and no reduction of the central claim to its own assumptions by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the AdS/CFT dictionary and the requirement that anomalous dimensions be positive; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT duality maps bulk probe binding energies in the large-orbit limit to anomalous dimensions of heavy-light double-twist operators
    Invoked to extract the bound from positivity of anomalous dimensions.
  • domain assumption Anomalous dimensions of the dual operators must be positive
    This positivity condition is used to obtain the exact WGC-matching bound.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5791 in / 1593 out tokens · 33305 ms · 2026-05-24T01:46:43.571310+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Criticality of ISCOs and AdS/CFT

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ISCOs mark coalescence points of center and saddle fixed points in black hole effective potentials, exhibiting van der Waals-like mean-field scaling, with corresponding negative and positive anomalous dimensions for c...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 87 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 48 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The String Landscape, Black Holes and Gravity as the Weakest Force

    N. Arkani-Hamed, L. Motl, A. Nicolis and C. Vafa, The String landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force , JHEP 06 (2007) 060 [ hep-th/0601001]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  2. [2]

    The String Landscape and the Swampland

    C. Vafa, The String landscape and the swampland , hep-th/0509212. 9

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    T. D. Brennan, F. Carta and C. Vafa, The String Landscape, the Swampland, and the Missing Corner, PoS T ASI2017(2017) 015 [ 1711.00864]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    The Swampland: Introduction and Review

    E. Palti, The Swampland: Introduction and Review , Fortsch. Phys. 67 (2019), no. 6, 1900037 [1903.06239]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  5. [5]

    van Beest, J

    M. van Beest, J. Calder´ on-Infante, D. Mirfendereski and I. Valenzuela, Lectures on the Swampland Program in String Compactifications, 2102.01111

    work page arXiv

  6. [7]

    Higher Order Correction to the GHS String Black Hole

    M. Natsuume, Higher order correction to the GHS string black hole , Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 3949–3953 [hep-th/9406079]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  7. [8]

    Y. Kats, L. Motl and M. Padi, Higher-order corrections to mass-charge relation of extremal black holes, JHEP 12 (2007) 068 [ hep-th/0606100]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  8. [9]

    P. A. Cano, T. Ort´ ın and P. F. Ramirez,On the extremality bound of stringy black holes , JHEP 02 (2020) 175 [ 1909.08530]

    work page arXiv 2020

  9. [10]

    P. A. Cano, S. Chimento, R. Linares, T. Ort´ ın and P. F. Ram´ ırez,α′ corrections of Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black holes, JHEP 02 (2020) 031 [ 1910.14324]

    work page arXiv 2020

  10. [11]

    P. A. Cano, T. Ort´ ın, A. Ruip´ erez and M. Zatti,Non-supersymmetric black holes with α’ corrections, JHEP 03 (2022) 103 [ 2111.15579]

    work page arXiv 2022

  11. [12]

    L. Ma, Y. Pang and H. L¨ u, α’-corrections to near extremal dyonic strings and weak gravity conjecture, JHEP 01 (2022) 157 [ 2110.03129]

    work page arXiv 2022

  12. [13]

    Proof of the Weak Gravity Conjecture from Black Hole Entropy

    C. Cheung, J. Liu and G. N. Remmen, Proof of the Weak Gravity Conjecture from Black Hole Entropy, JHEP 10 (2018) 004 [ 1801.08546]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  13. [14]

    Hamada, T

    Y. Hamada, T. Noumi and G. Shiu, Weak Gravity Conjecture from Unitarity and Causality , Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019), no. 5, 051601 [ 1810.03637]

    work page arXiv 2019

  14. [15]

    Bellazzini, M

    B. Bellazzini, M. Lewandowski and J. Serra, Positivity of Amplitudes, Weak Gravity Conjecture, and Modified Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019), no. 25, 251103 [ 1902.03250]

    work page arXiv 2019

  15. [16]

    A. M. Charles, The Weak Gravity Conjecture, RG Flows, and Supersymmetry , 1906.07734

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1906

  16. [17]

    C. R. T. Jones and B. McPeak, The Black Hole Weak Gravity Conjecture with Multiple Charges , JHEP 06 (2020) 140 [ 1908.10452]

    work page arXiv 2020

  17. [18]

    G. J. Loges, T. Noumi and G. Shiu, Thermodynamics of 4D Dilatonic Black Holes and the Weak Gravity Conjecture, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020), no. 4, 046010 [ 1909.01352]

    work page arXiv 2020

  18. [19]

    Goon and R

    G. Goon and R. Penco, Universal Relation between Corrections to Entropy and Extremality , Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020), no. 10, 101103 [ 1909.05254]

    work page arXiv 2020

  19. [20]

    Cremonini, C

    S. Cremonini, C. R. T. Jones, J. T. Liu and B. McPeak, Higher-Derivative Corrections to Entropy and the Weak Gravity Conjecture in Anti-de Sitter Space , JHEP 09 (2020) 003 [ 1912.11161]

    work page arXiv 2020

  20. [21]

    Q. Chen, W. Hong and J. Tao, Universal thermodynamic extremality relations for charged AdS black hole surrounded by quintessence , 2005.00747

    work page arXiv 2005

  21. [22]

    G. J. Loges, T. Noumi and G. Shiu, Duality and Supersymmetry Constraints on the Weak Gravity Conjecture, JHEP 11 (2020) 008 [ 2006.06696]

    work page arXiv 2020

  22. [23]

    Bobev, A

    N. Bobev, A. M. Charles, K. Hristov and V. Reys, Higher-derivative supergravity, AdS4 holography, and black holes , JHEP 08 (2021) 173 [ 2106.04581]. 10

    work page arXiv 2021

  23. [24]

    Causality, unitarity, and the weak gravity conjecture,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Y.-t. Huang, J.-Y. Liu and G. N. Remmen, Causality, Unitarity, and the Weak Gravity Conjecture, 2109.13937

    work page arXiv

  24. [25]

    Cremonini, C

    S. Cremonini, C. R. T. Jones, J. T. Liu, B. McPeak and Y. Tang, Repulsive Black Holes and Higher-Derivatives, 2110.10178

    work page arXiv

  25. [26]

    Aalsma, Corrections to Extremal Black Holes from Iyer-Wald , 2111.04201

    L. Aalsma, Corrections to Extremal Black Holes from Iyer-Wald , 2111.04201

    work page arXiv

  26. [27]

    A. J. Amsel and D. Gorbonos, JHEP 11 (2010), 033 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2010)033 [arXiv:1005.4718 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep11(2010)033 2010

  27. [28]

    M. J. Bowick, L. Smolin and L. C. R. Wijewardhana, Role of String Excitations in the Last Stages of Black Hole Evaporation , Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 (1986) 424

    work page 1986

  28. [29]

    Some Speculations about Black Hole Entropy in String Theory

    L. Susskind, Some speculations about black hole entropy in string theory , hep-th/9309145

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [30]

    G. T. Horowitz and J. Polchinski, A Correspondence principle for black holes and strings , Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 6189–6197 [ hep-th/9612146]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  30. [31]

    Evidence for a Lattice Weak Gravity Conjecture

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius, Evidence for a sublattice weak gravity conjecture , JHEP 08 (2017) 025 [ 1606.08437]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  31. [32]

    The Weak Gravity Conjecture in three dimensions

    M. Montero, G. Shiu and P. Soler, The Weak Gravity Conjecture in three dimensions , JHEP 10 (2016) 159 [ 1606.08438]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  32. [33]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand, Tensionless Strings and the Weak Gravity Conjecture , JHEP 10 (2018) 164 [ 1808.05958]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [34]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand, Modular Fluxes, Elliptic Genera, and Weak Gravity Conjectures in Four Dimensions , JHEP 08 (2019) 104 [ 1901.08065]

    work page arXiv 2019

  34. [35]

    Aalsma, A

    L. Aalsma, A. Cole and G. Shiu, Weak Gravity Conjecture, Black Hole Entropy, and Modular Invariance, JHEP 08 (2019) 022 [ 1905.06956]

    work page arXiv 2019

  35. [36]

    Klaewer, S.-J

    D. Klaewer, S.-J. Lee, T. Weigand and M. Wiesner, Quantum corrections in 4d N = 1 infinite distance limits and the weak gravity conjecture , JHEP 03 (2021) 252 [ 2011.00024]

    work page arXiv 2021

  36. [37]

    Infrared Consistency and the Weak Gravity Conjecture

    C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen, Infrared Consistency and the Weak Gravity Conjecture , JHEP 12 (2014) 087 [ 1407.7865]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  37. [38]

    A Tower Weak Gravity Conjecture from Infrared Consistency

    S. Andriolo, D. Junghans, T. Noumi and G. Shiu, A Tower Weak Gravity Conjecture from Infrared Consistency, Fortsch. Phys. 66 (2018), no. 5, 1800020 [ 1802.04287]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  38. [39]

    Chen, Y.-T

    W.-M. Chen, Y.-T. Huang, T. Noumi and C. Wen, Unitarity bounds on charged/neutral state mass ratios, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019), no. 2, 025016 [ 1901.11480]

    work page arXiv 2019

  39. [40]

    Alberte, C

    L. Alberte, C. de Rham, S. Jaitly and A. J. Tolley, QED positivity bounds, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021), no. 12, 125020 [ 2012.05798]

    work page arXiv 2021

  40. [41]

    K. Aoki, T. Q. Loc, T. Noumi and J. Tokuda, Is the Standard Model in the Swampland? Consistency Requirements from Gravitational Scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021), no. 9, 091602 [2104.09682]

    work page arXiv 2021

  41. [42]

    Noumi and J

    T. Noumi and J. Tokuda, Gravitational positivity bounds on scalar potentials , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 6, 066022 [ 2105.01436]

    work page arXiv 2021

  42. [43]

    Noumi, S

    T. Noumi, S. Sato and J. Tokuda, Phenomenological Motivation for Gravitational Positivity Bounds: A Case Study of Dark Sector Physics , 2205.12835

    work page arXiv

  43. [44]

    Sharpening the Weak Gravity Conjecture with Dimensional Reduction

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius, Sharpening the Weak Gravity Conjecture with Dimensional Reduction, JHEP 02 (2016) 140 [ 1509.06374]. 11

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  44. [45]

    Harlow, B

    D. Harlow, B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius, “Weak gravity conjecture,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 95 (2023) no.3, 3 [arXiv:2201.08380 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  45. [46]

    The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998), 231-252 [arXiv:hep-th/9711200 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  46. [47]

    Gauge Theory Correlators from Non-Critical String Theory

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,” Phys. Lett. B 428 (1998), 105-114 [arXiv:hep-th/9802109 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  47. [48]

    Anti De Sitter Space And Holography

    E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space and holography,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998), 253-291 doi:10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a2 [arXiv:hep-th/9802150 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.4310/atmp.1998.v2.n2.a2 1998

  48. [49]

    Geodesic Structure of the 2 + 1 Black Hole

    N. Cruz, C. Martinez and L. Pena, “Geodesic structure of the (2+1) black hole,” Class. Quant. Grav. 11, 2731 (1994) [gr-qc/9401025]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  49. [50]

    ISCOs in AdS/CFT,

    D. Berenstein, Z. Li and J. Simon, “ISCOs in AdS/CFT,” Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (2021) no.4, 045009 [arXiv:2009.04500 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2021

  50. [51]

    Fast Scramblers

    Y. Sekino and L. Susskind, “Fast Scramblers,” JHEP 10 (2008), 065 [arXiv:0808.2096 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  51. [52]

    Holographic Evolution of Entanglement Entropy

    J. Abajo-Arrastia, J. Aparicio and E. Lopez, “Holographic Evolution of Entanglement Entropy,” JHEP 11 (2010), 149 [arXiv:1006.4090 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  52. [53]

    Holographic Thermalization

    V. Balasubramanian, A. Bernamonti, J. de Boer, N. Copland, B. Craps, E. Keski-Vakkuri, B. Muller, A. Schafer, M. Shigemori and W. Staessens, “Holographic Thermalization,” Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011), 026010 [arXiv:1103.2683 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  53. [54]

    Holographic Local Quenches and Entanglement Density

    M. Nozaki, T. Numasawa and T. Takayanagi, “Holographic Local Quenches and Entanglement Density,” JHEP 05 (2013), 080 [arXiv:1302.5703 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  54. [55]

    Black holes and the butterfly effect

    S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, “Black holes and the butterfly effect,” JHEP 03 (2014), 067 [arXiv:1306.0622 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  55. [57]

    Gravitational orbits, double-twist mirage, and many-body scars,

    M. Dodelson and A. Zhiboedov, “Gravitational orbits, double-twist mirage, and many-body scars,” JHEP 12 (2022), 163 doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2022)163 [arXiv:2204.09749 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2022)163 2022

  56. [59]

    Newton vs Coulomb in AdS/CFT and the weak gravity conjecture,

    U. Moitra, “Newton vs Coulomb in AdS/CFT and the weak gravity conjecture,” Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) no.4, L041903 [arXiv:2305.08907 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  57. [60]

    On the CFT Operator Spectrum at Large Global Charge,

    S. Hellerman, D. Orlando, S. Reffert and M. Watanabe, “On the CFT Operator Spectrum at Large Global Charge,” JHEP 12 (2015), 071 [arXiv:1505.01537 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2015

  58. [61]

    Compensating strong coupling with large charge

    L. Alvarez-Gaume, O. Loukas, D. Orlando and S. Reffert, “Compensating strong coupling with large charge,” JHEP 04 (2017), 059 [arXiv:1610.04495 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  59. [62]

    A safe CFT at large charge,

    D. Orlando, S. Reffert and F. Sannino, “A safe CFT at large charge,” JHEP 08 (2019), 164 [arXiv:1905.00026 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2019

  60. [63]

    L. ´A. Gaum´ e, D. Orlando and S. Reffert, Phys. Rept.933 (2021), 1-66 [arXiv:2008.03308 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2021

  61. [64]

    Weak Gravity Conjecture in AdS/CFT

    Y. Nakayama and Y. Nomura, “Weak gravity conjecture in the AdS/CFT correspondence,” Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) no.12, 126006 [arXiv:1509.01647 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  62. [65]

    Convexity of charged operators in CFTs and the weak gravity conjecture,

    O. Aharony and E. Palti, “Convexity of charged operators in CFTs and the weak gravity conjecture,” Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) no.12, 126005 [arXiv:2108.04594 [hep-th]]. 12

    work page arXiv 2021

  63. [66]

    Universal Bounds on Charged States in 2d CFT and 3d Gravity

    N. Benjamin, E. Dyer, A. L. Fitzpatrick and S. Kachru, “Universal Bounds on Charged States in 2d CFT and 3d Gravity,” JHEP 08 (2016), 041 [arXiv:1603.09745 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  64. [67]

    Testing the Weak Gravity -- Cosmic Censorship Connection

    T. Crisford, G. T. Horowitz and J. E. Santos, “Testing the Weak Gravity - Cosmic Censorship Connection,” Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) no.6, 066005 [arXiv:1709.07880 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  65. [68]

    A Holographic Derivation of the Weak Gravity Conjecture

    M. Montero, “A Holographic Derivation of the Weak Gravity Conjecture,” JHEP 03 (2019), 157 [arXiv:1812.03978 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  66. [69]

    Transport Coefficients from Extremal Gauss-Bonnet Black Holes

    R. G. Cai, Y. Liu and Y. W. Sun, “Transport Coefficients from Extremal Gauss-Bonnet Black Holes,” JHEP 04 (2010), 090 [arXiv:0910.4705 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  67. [70]

    Holographic Phase Transitions of P-wave Superconductors in Gauss-Bonnet Gravity with Back-reaction

    R. G. Cai, Z. Y. Nie and H. Q. Zhang, “Holographic Phase Transitions of P-wave Superconductors in Gauss-Bonnet Gravity with Back-reaction,” Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011), 066013 [arXiv:1012.5559 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  68. [71]

    Comments on operators with large spin

    L. F. Alday and J. M. Maldacena, “Comments on operators with large spin,” JHEP 11 (2007), 019 [arXiv:0708.0672 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  69. [74]

    Black Holes, Heavy States, Phase Shift and Anomalous Dimensions

    M. Kulaxizi, G. S. Ng and A. Parnachev, “Black Holes, Heavy States, Phase Shift and Anomalous Dimensions,” SciPost Phys. 6 (2019) no.6, 065 [arXiv:1812.03120 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  70. [75]

    Black Holes and Conformal Regge Bootstrap,

    R. Karlsson, M. Kulaxizi, A. Parnachev and P. Tadi?, “Black Holes and Conformal Regge Bootstrap,” JHEP 10 (2019), 046 [arXiv:1904.00060 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2019

  71. [76]

    Heavy-light Bootstrap from Lorentzian Inversion Formula,

    Y. Z. Li, “Heavy-light Bootstrap from Lorentzian Inversion Formula,” JHEP 07 (2020), 046 [arXiv:1910.06357 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  72. [77]

    More on Heavy-Light Bootstrap up to Double-Stress-Tensor,

    Y. Z. Li and H. Y. Zhang, “More on Heavy-Light Bootstrap up to Double-Stress-Tensor,” [arXiv:2004.04758 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2004

  73. [78]

    R. G. Cai, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002), 084014 [arXiv:hep-th/0109133 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  74. [79]

    P-V criticality in the extended phase space of Gauss-Bonnet black holes in AdS space

    R. G. Cai, L. M. Cao, L. Li and R. Q. Yang, “P-V criticality in the extended phase space of Gauss-Bonnet black holes in AdS space,” JHEP 09 (2013), 005 [arXiv:1306.6233 [gr-qc]]. [80]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  75. [80]

    Circular motion of neutral test particles in Reissner-Nordstr\"om spacetime

    D. Pugliese, H. Quevedo and R. Ruffini, “Circular motion of neutral test particles in Reissner-Nordstr¨ om spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D83 (2011), 024021 [arXiv:1012.5411 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  76. [81]

    Motion of charged test particles in Reissner--Nordstr\"om spacetime

    D. Pugliese, H. Quevedo and R. Ruffini, “Motion of charged test particles in Reissner-Nordstr¨ om spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011), 104052 [arXiv:1103.1807 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  77. [82]

    General classification of charged test particle circular orbits in Reissner--Nordstr\"om spacetime

    D. Pugliese, H. Quevedo and R. Ruffini, “General classification of charged test particle circular orbits in Reissner–Nordstr¨ om spacetime,” Eur. Phys. J. C77 (2017) no.4, 206 [arXiv:1304.2940 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  78. [83]

    A Note on Circular Geodesics and Phase Transitions of Black Holes

    B. Chandrasekhar and S. Mohapatra, “A Note on Circular Geodesics and Phase Transitions of Black Holes,” Phys. Lett. B 791 (2019), 367-374 [arXiv:1805.05088 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  79. [84]

    Innermost stable circular orbit and shadow of the 4 D Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet black hole,

    M. Guo and P. C. Li, “Innermost stable circular orbit and shadow of the 4 D Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet black hole,” Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) no.6, 588 [arXiv:2003.02523 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  80. [85]

    Conformal Bootstrap At Large Charge

    D. Jafferis, B. Mukhametzhanov and A. Zhiboedov, “Conformal Bootstrap At Large Charge,” JHEP 05 (2018), 043 [arXiv:1710.11161 [hep-th]]. 13

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

Showing first 80 references.