Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Survey of Needs, Techniques, Applications, and Future Direction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.00265 v2 pith:QKZFUPS4 submitted 2024-08-30 cs.AI cs.CLcs.CYcs.LG

Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Survey of Needs, Techniques, Applications, and Future Direction

classification cs.AI cs.CLcs.CYcs.LG
keywords modelsartificialintelligenceaccountabilityapplicationbeneficiarieschallengescomprehensive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Artificial intelligence models encounter significant challenges due to their black-box nature, particularly in safety-critical domains such as healthcare, finance, and autonomous vehicles. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) addresses these challenges by providing explanations for how these models make decisions and predictions, ensuring transparency, accountability, and fairness. Existing studies have examined the fundamental concepts of XAI, its general principles, and the scope of XAI techniques. However, there remains a gap in the literature as there are no comprehensive reviews that delve into the detailed mathematical representations, design methodologies of XAI models, and other associated aspects. This paper provides a comprehensive literature review encompassing common terminologies and definitions, the need for XAI, beneficiaries of XAI, a taxonomy of XAI methods, and the application of XAI methods in different application areas. The survey is aimed at XAI researchers, XAI practitioners, AI model developers, and XAI beneficiaries who are interested in enhancing the trustworthiness, transparency, accountability, and fairness of their AI models.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Explainable Reinforcement Learning via Physics-Aware Policy Distillation

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 3.0

    Distilling TD3 into a depth-7 decision tree with a Pole-Urgency feature and noisy oracle data matches inverted-pendulum success while inducing Bang-Bang limit-cycle control that remains empirically bounded.